Author: Aleksandar

2005.05.21

Let’s prevent corruption

When I start a discussion about my system with people most often I receive complains that Paradise on Earth is not possible because individuals are weak and like to corrupt or to be corrupted. Corruption makes immoral, destructive relations in society which prevents society from being good. Corruption is a poison of every society.


But when is a man weak? He is weak when he cannot satisfy his needs. He cannot meet his needs in a closed and alienated society where privileges rule such as the one we live in today. Privileges give a man power over people, and that corrupts. Privileges are the nests for corruption. In the world of privileges, one cannot get what he needs unless he is servile to privileged people or corrupts them. That is wrong.


In the system I have proposed power over people will not exist, there will be not privileged people either so that corruption will disappear as well. Everyone who does not satisfy one’s needs at his workplace will get negative evaluations from a not satisfied person. These evaluations will be as influent as it would be necessary for the system to work fine. Therefore, everyone will try hard to please other people as much as they can without corruption.


Furthermore, the new system offers open work competition for every work post in public companies. No one’s public work post will be privileged anymore. If a person at his workplace does not satisfy somebody’s needs, he or she may be replaced with a not satisfied person who offers better productivity. No one would be able to get benefits from a privileged status in society. No one will have control over other people, neither over assets that belong to the society. Why would corruption exist when no one could achieve a privileged status and power in society? Besides that, in such a community no one will be weak, and corruption will not have any reason to exist.


The work competition is probably the most challenging part of the system I have proposed, but it is far from impossible to accomplish. It will bring better productivity than capitalism can so that it will send capitalism down in history. It will make work become a value in itself, and people will enjoy working. The work market will make all jobs equally demanded. Life in such a system will bring disalienation; it will show where real values are. Such a system will undoubtedly stop corruption. The benefits of the new system will bring to society are practically unlimited. You may find more about it in my book The Humanism. The system is entirely new so that it might not be easy to implement, but there is no other good way. We have to go this way if we want to build a beautiful future of humankind.


Jacob Rothschild Guilty

Jacob Rothschild is Guilty for the Conspiracy Against Humankind

It is well documented that the Rothschild family was by far the wealthiest and most powerful family in the world 200 years ago. They realized that power over people is not popular, and decided to rule the world secretly. It is documented that they hide their wealth and power, which indicates that they are most likely still the wealthiest and most powerful family in the world. People should have equal rights but do not because the Rothschilds built their power by taking rights that belong to other people. Thus, the Rothschild family has become the evil that oppresses the world and a significant obstacle to the progress of society.


***


My interest in conspiracies arose when I found out that they exist in the case of the destruction of my homeland Yugoslavia. World media presented the dissolution of Yugoslavia as an internal conflict amongst the Yugoslav people; this depiction was just a facade. The essence of the breakup of Yugoslavia was rooted in the colonization of the country. In 1990, the western republics, Slovenia and Croatia, elected parties that supported capitalism. Previously ruling communists won the Serbian election. As a result, Serbia impeded on the pro-Western reforms in Yugoslavia. I realized that the Western politicians and media supported the pro-Western republics and accused the Serbs of all of the problems Yugoslavia entered. This bias was the result of a conspiracy that aimed to alienate people and weaken them politically and economically, which is precisely what happened. The conspirators got power over the whole territory of former Yugoslavia and cheaply took resources that were built by all the people of Yugoslavia.  

People realize that injustice happens around the world. Many media accuse the corporations that rule the world and produce wrong, but they do not blame the people who govern these corporations. In that way, the media accept that nothing can be done against these rulers. Conspirators like such media because they spread general apathy in society. I have recognized that the allegations against corporations are useless and that it is necessary to find people who benefit from the ruling of the corporations to be able to stop them.

Around the year 2000, I wondered, who might have such high power that they could destroy Yugoslavia? Through investigation, I came to the conclusion that all roads lead to the Rothschild family, although they are very unexposed. The Rothschild family secretly governs the Western world, and so no one could hold them responsible for it. No one could remove them from power. Is that not the goal of conspiracy? At that time, I noticed that many religious people believed that doomsday is approaching and speculated on the identity of the Antichrist. They suspected George Soros, Prince Charles, and even the Pope. I tried to take advantage of the interest of Christians and suggested in the article Has the Antichrist Come?, written in 2003, that Jacob Rothschild could be the Antichrist.

By the nineteenth century, the Rothschild family had already become the wealthiest family in the world. Lord Byron presented the family in his poem “Don Juan,” canto 12/5, written in the year 1823.

 

 

Who hold the balance of the World? Who reign
O’er congress, whether royalist or liberal?
Who rouse the shirtless patriots of Spain?
(That make old Europe’s journals “squeak and gibber” all)
Who keep the World, both old and new, in pain
Or pleasure? Who make politics run glibber all?
The shade of Buonaparte’s noble daring?–
Jew Rothschild, and his fellow-Christian, Baring.

 

 

Then began the Industrial Revolution and the blossoming of colonialism where the Rothschilds certainly became even richer; but then withdrew from the public. Why did they do this? After conquering the Western world, as expected, they wanted to capture the whole world. Taking into account that rulers were often unpopular, and for this they could have even paid with their heads, the Rothschilds have decided to conquer the world secretly. And they have succeeded. Today, they are not placed on the list of the wealthiest people in the world. One could get the impression that they lost wealth in the last two hundred years, but there is no supporting evidence. On the contrary, I believe that the Rothschilds have never been wealthier or more powerful than today.

 

How can the Rothschilds increase their wealth and influence in the world while decreasing their visibility? The Rothschilds, as the wealthiest people in the world, have cleverly made contracts with poor agents who then represent them in the ownership of companies. As a reward, these people usually receive about 15% ownership as a gift, to incentivize their work, while the rest belongs to the Rothschilds. These people were immediately able to buy mansions, yachts and planes. They are very grateful for it, loyal to the Rothschilds, and do their best not to disappoint them. Such contracts are mutually very beneficial.

 

An example: After the arrest of Mikhail Khodorkovsky for tax evasion in the oil company “Yukos” in Russia, the Russian government threatened to seize his stocks. Then the control over Mikhail Khodorkovsky’s shares of “Yukos” was transferred to Lord Jacob Rothschild. The source is the article from “The Washington Times,” November 2, 2003: “Arrested oil tycoon passed shares to banker.” The article was republished on the web page Action Report Online. This article is significant because it indicates that Jacob Rothschild was most likely a real majority owner of the company “Yukos.” Khodorkovsky simply did not have the money nor the knowledge to step alone in such a big business and made the wealth he was ascribed. In this case, greed had forced Jacob Rothschild to make a mistake as he showed a high possibility that he hid his wealth behind Khodorkovsky. It should be added that the value of these shares, according to Forbes, exceeds the entire wealth of the whole Rothschild family.

 

Can we assume that the Rothschild model of hiding their wealth behind Khodorkovsky was applied to the other families throughout history? Of course we can. The Rothschilds were the wealthiest people in the world long before the wealthy families Rockefeller, Morgan, Buffet, and others appeared. The Rothschilds have most likely sponsored the rise of these families in a similar fashion to Khodorkovsky. The Banking Monopoly states: “During WWI, JP Morgan was thought to be the richest man in the US, but after his death, it was discovered that he was only a lieutenant of the Rothschild’s. Once Morgan’s will was made public, it was discovered that he owned only 19% of JP Morgan companies “. David Icke writes in Children of the Matrix that the Rockefellers and Morgans were just “gofers” for the European Rothschilds. Political Vel Craft argues: “Warren Buffett Is Rothschild’s Front Man In The United States.” None of these articles provides evidence that the Rothschilds contracted Rockefeller, Morgan, Buffet, and others to represent them in the ownership and management of the world’s biggest companies because the contracts that regulate their relationship are secret and as such are inaccessible to the public.

 

But the articles provide beyond a reasonable doubt that something like that is more than possible. In this way, the Rothschild family most likely controls the largest banks, the most profitable companies and the most influential media. They are united in a single hierarchical organization that has absolute financial power, which brings them political power and controls all power centers in the Western world. In such a manner, the Rothschilds most likely manage the Western world, although they are not in politics, nor on the lists of the world’s wealthiest.

If there were two centers of such power, then they would have fought for dominance and through their strife we would know who they are, but there is no such thing. The absence of such conflicts tells me with complete certainty that the Rothschild family has monopoly power in the Western world. Therefore, we can hold the Rothschilds accountable for almost everything in the western world. This article will do that to a large extent.

Jacob Rothschild hides his power so much that he does not hesitate to use any means to present himself as a humble philanthropist. An insinuation: A photo of Jacob Rothschild taken by mistake in his home, Waddesdon Manor in England, with the “richest” man in the world, Warren Buffett, and California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, has recognized Jacob Rothschild as a very influential man. That is most likely why Jacob Rothschild decided to present Warren Buffett as a great philanthropist and himself as a man surrounded by such people. I think that Jacob Rothschild was behind Warren Buffett’s statement that he intends to donate 85% of his wealth to charity. Of course, in this case, this wealth belongs to Jacob Rothschild. The source: Reuters.  

In 2012, David Rockefeller decided to sell 37% of his Wealth Advisory and Asset Management Group to Jacob Rothschild for an undisclosed sum. Source: Financial Services. It’s no surprise they cooperate well, but this is not the problem here. When people buy something, they usually need to pay taxes. According to the law, there are some exceptions and buying corporations is one of them. In this particular case even issuing a bill is not necessary. Why is the law so convenient for those who purchase corporations? 

 

The Rothschilds have such massive financial power that they could easily redeem all the worth of the stock exchange. Also, they offer investments to independent companies that the companies could hardly refuse. If the owners of the companies accept the terms of the investment, they may even retain control of their companies. It is critical for the Rothschilds that they are cooperative. If these companies oppose the Rothschilds, they run into problems. A considerable campaign comes to mind that was supposed to split Microsoft in two because of the allegedly unacceptable monopoly that the company had in the world. The majority owner Bill Gates started playing bridge with Warren Buffet on which occasion Buffet probably explained to Gates the importance of “cooperativeness” in the Western world. I believe that Bill Gates accepted and since then there was no pressure to split Microsoft anymore. 

 

The same happens with entire countries. Saudi Arabia has been cooperative with the Rothschilds, and therefore nobody touches it. The Rothschilds do not care what oil company exploits oil in the world as long as it belongs to them. If it does not, then the people who control the oil lose their power or even their lives like Muammar Gaddafi and Saddam Hussein. I do not claim that the Rothschilds have organized the killing of those people. No, their deaths were a side product of the Rothschild’s need to control oil in the world. I do not claim either that the Rothschilds wanted to steal the oil. It will still technically belong to Iraq and Libya. But the Rothschilds will bring to power obedient people contrary to Muammar Gaddafi and Saddam Hussein. Thus, the Rothschilds will establish control over these countries and then of course over their oil. No one else has such power. The Rothschilds are able to achieve this goal because they are invisible and cannot be held accountable. 

One of the most important agents of the Rothschild family is George Soros. By portraying himself as a “great benefactor,” at the end of the millennium, he helped the reforms in Eastern Europe and donated one billion dollars to these countries through his organization “Open Society.” The name he gave his organization is at least shamelessly hypocritical because he is one of the prominent members of the most closed society. He is a pirate who wounded many countries and their people as a result of his greed. William Engdahl wrote about it in his article: The Secret Financial Network Behind “Wizard” George Soros. The article also presents Soros’ connection with the Rothschilds.

 

Can the people who do not believe in conspiracies explain why Soros has donated one billion dollars? Here is my explanation. It was not a gift but a big scam by which the agents of the Rothschild family’s secret organization took the properties of Eastern European countries. I have no evidence. But if you think that the pirate Soros donated one billion dollars to the countries of Eastern Europe to let independent people get rich, then the Rothschild’s conspiracy has successfully formed the way you think. By giving donations to Eastern Europe, Soros promoted capitalism as an ideal system financed parties and media, and corrupted politicians. That allowed other agents of the Rothschild’s to step in an organized manner and buy the state ownership in these countries. That is how an investment of one billion dollars returned trillions. This is the only proper way to interpret Soros’ philanthropy. It was organized crime. Some local people in these countries got rich as well, but they are agents who run the Rothschild companies and generally work for commissions.

 

The governments of East European countries received assistance from representatives of the West, binding them to follow the policy of Western countries. If some government of the East European countries opposes the policies imposed from the West then that country experiences rebellion against the government. The President of Ukraine, Viktor Yanukovich was dismissed by violent revolution because he tried to build a closer relationship with Russia. This was a very sophisticated operation that funded the revolution in Ukraine, which has misguided the world about occurrences in Ukraine by controlled media, which has forced the leaders of the world to support a violent change of government in Ukraine. Who could have an interest and the power to achieve it? Only the Rothschilds.

 

Russia opposes the aggressive policy of the West, and therefore the West increasingly attacks it. I believe that this is the beginning of the third major aggression against Russia after Napoleon and Hitler. I do not think it would be an armed war between America and Russia because both sides know they cannot win. The battles will be performed by economic and political exhaustion and will last until one of the parties gives up. The Russians defeated Napoleon and Hitler, and I believe they might defeat Rothschild as well, primarily because they are moral contrary to the corrupt West and therefore stronger. It would take years, if not decades, of exhausting struggle, during which the countries will stagnate, and people will suffer.

The Rothschild family decides for whom people vote for in the US elections and in all the influenced countries around the world by investing large amounts of money to political parties that are most suitable to them and by promoting them through the media they control. In the end, it does not matter to them who will win because they finance, through their agents, all influential parties that follow their interests around the world. Thus they ensure that the policy that suits them would be accepted wherever liberal democracy exists. In the 2012 presidential elections in the US in, both the dominant parties have spent around a billion dollars. There were more candidates for the presidential position, but the Americans did not even know they exist. Where is the democracy? This is the hidden dictatorship of the Rothschild family.

 

It very rarely happens that things do not work out as the Rothschilds predict. But it does happen. On the way of conquering the world, the Rothschilds met resistance from the Serbs. Serbs resisted the Rothschild family in the attack on Yugoslavia for ten years. The Rothschilds lost patience and decided to break the opposition by way of military aggression of NATO pact on Yugoslavia in 1999. Only the Rothschilds can organize aggression against a sovereign country without consequences because no one can connect them to this aggression. Only Rothschild can mobilize all the western media to justify this aggression through lies which have backed the support of the world nations for aggression against Yugoslavia. Only Rothschild can benefit from it.

 

US President Bill Clinton, as the highest authority of NATO, was supposed to command the aggression against Yugoslavia. He knew that such a command would be criminal because it did not have permission from the UN. Therefore, Clinton persistently refused to issue such a command even though the Rothschilds pressured him for years. Then the Rothschild agents set up the Lewinsky case and blackmailed him with impeachment if he refused the aggression against Yugoslavia. Only the Rothschilds can blackmail the US President in such a manner. President Clinton, of course, preferred his position more than the lives of thousands of people and commanded the attack on Yugoslavia. Immediately after his approval, the Lewinsky case was forgotten entirely. Please see the chronology at CNN. Clinton got a 500 million dollar donation to build his library in Little Rock, Arkansas. May it be the reward for the attack on Yugoslavia? I wrote excessively about the war on Yugoslavia in the article My debt to Yugoslavia. I am deeply convinced that an investigation against US President Bill Clinton for the criminal aggression on Yugoslavia would lead to Jacob Rothschild. But who can sue President Clinton?

The successful aggression on Yugoslavia encouraged the Rothschilds to go further in conquering the world. Thus, in turn, came Iraq and Afghanistan, countries rich with minerals. These states were independent, and that is something the Rothschild family certainly wanted to change. To make this easier to accomplish they chose George W. Bush for the US President in 2000 because he was entirely on their side as opposed to President Clinton. For the aggression on Afghanistan and Iraq, they needed the support of the people. It was found in the terrorist attack in New York on 9/11/2001. I think the Rothschilds would wait way too long for such an opportunity so I believe they made it happen much sooner by the help from their Muslim allies which the terrorists did not know about. There is an open suspicion that Saudi Arabia was involved. President Bush immediately accused Afghanistan and Iraq of the terrorist attack even though he had no proof. He gave the ultimatum to Afghanistan and Iraq which they could not accept and ordered the aggression against these countries.

 

Practically only the Rothschilds can control the American government, only they could benefit from the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan, only they are able to launch the aggression, and only they could establish a puppet government there. Only they could have profited from these wars. To hide their responsibility if something went wrong, they cunningly sought reserve culprits for the wars. They could not find anyone else but the US government itself. Therefore they formed the conspiracy theory that claims the Bush administration carried out the attack on the twin towers in New York 9/11/2001 to obtain a pretext for attacks on Iraq and Afghanistan. This is nonsense. President Bush did not have the operational ability to derive a significant personal benefit from the aggression on Iraq and Afghanistan. I am sure President Bush did not know about that because he was surprised and reacted very awkwardly when he heard that the planes hit the World Trade Center.

 

But numerous experts who claim that the WTC building number 7 was demolished with explosives were found, and they accused the US government. This conspiracy theory is presented a lot in the media which would not be possible without the support of the Rothschild family that controls the media. I am an architect, and I know that the steel structure is weak when exposed o high temperatures and rapidly loses its loading weight capacity when it is exposed to fire, as opposed to concrete structures. Building number seven was burning on low floors almost all day collapsing under the heavy load of the building, which looks like a demolition. The same thing happened to the twin skyscrapers. They collapsed faster because they were strongly damaged by the hit of the planes.

 

With such conspiracies the Rothschilds deceive people. The accusation against the US government does not bother the Rothschilds at all, because it serves to carry the burden of all the evil that the Rothschilds commit. Some indication exists which presents the possibility that the Rothschilds bypassed the president, helped the terrorists in the United States achieve their goal, and obstructed the investigation to bring suspicion to the US government. Thus they remove any possible doubt from themselves. I wrote more about it in the article: My Investigation of 9/11.

 

The Rothschilds support false conspiracy theories because they invalidate the credibility of real conspiracies. Many people write about the evil Rothschilds even though often they do not have evidence. The Rothschilds have never sued any such writers because such trials would bring negative attention. Instead of it, they encourage all kinds of attacks on themselves because the more nonsense people write about them, the less credible their attacks are. Even more, Rothschilds often accuse themselves of the stupid conspiracies. For example: Before it’s News recently published: “Rothschild Takes Down Malaysian Airliner MH370 to gain rights to the Semiconductor Patent – Getting Rid of Those Who Stood In His Way!” What a stupidity! It is equally absurd as if they are accused of stealing food from a grocery store. The authors of such texts should be afraid the Rothschilds might sue them for slander. Of course, unless the Rothschild’s agents hired them to write such articles. Such articles can bring benefits to the Rothschilds because of its shallowness they devaluate the real accusations. Unconvincing conspiracy theories create the opposite effect so that people dismiss conspiracy theories as impossible in today’s “democratic society.” And that is a part of the Rothschild’s conspiracy as well. With such articles, the Rothschilds become innocent people who suffer unjust accusations in the eyes of the world. They are very crafty. Media under control of the Rothschilds deliberately indoctrinate people by imposing misinformation and shallow values, because misinformed and stupid people are obedient and cannot resist.

 

On the other hand, nobody investigates the real conspiracy. In the TV broadcast, Democracy Now on 3.2.2007, the U.S. General Wesley Clark said that immediately after 9/11, the Pentagon planned attacks on Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran. Is that not enough proof that there is a conspiracy? Clark is a real whistleblower because he unadvisedly betrayed the criminal action by the U.S. authorities. The U.S. Army General’s statement has not awakened any interest in the U.S. judiciary or the media. On the other hand I am not sure if whistleblowers Assange and Snowden have said anything that is not known, but still, they are persecuted by the American justice system. Why? Because the U.S. justice and the media are controlled by the Rothschild family. The media have a purpose of removing public interest from the real issues by imposing endless useless public discussions. Assange and Snowden are victims created precisely for that purpose. If what they have revealed did not fit big capital, you would not know that they exist.

 

To return to the US aggression on Iraq and Afghanistan; if you physically attack a man you will most likely end up in jail; if you attack Iraq and Afghanistan, kill hundreds of thousands of people to steal their resources, nothing will happen. It cannot be like this. Given that I am very well versed with the aggression against Yugoslavia, I recognized in the criminal aggression against Iraq and Afghanistan the handwriting of the Rothschild family. Have you ever asked yourself why the President of the US may be impeached for cheating on his wife but cannot be impeached for the criminal aggression against Iraq? I am deeply convinced that the investigation against US President George W Bush for the criminal aggression on Iraq would lead to Jacob Rothschild. But who can sue President George W Bush?

To decrease the dissatisfaction of the people in the United States due to wrong policies of George W. Bush, the Rothschild family, aided by their agent David Rockefeller, chose the young and intelligent Barack Obama for the US presidential position in 2008. I read somewhere that David Rockefeller, agent of the Rothschild family, first congratulated Barack Obama on his victory long before the election. Barack Obama as a humane man attracted the American left and tried to remove the problems that the conservative Bush administration built in America. But he was not strong enough to succeed in doing so. Just before the nomination for the presidency, Obama graduated Harvard law. People who complete university must be obedient followers of authority otherwise they would not be able to complete their studies. The Rothschilds knew that they could relatively easily manipulate young Obama and that is why they chose him. 

 

The Rothschilds turned an exemplary law student who believes that everyone is innocent until a court proves him guilty into a criminal and murderer. Obama signed an order for the predatory arrest of Osama Bin Laden that resulted in his cruel murder in 2011. He spat on his own diploma. Why did he do this? He felt pressure from the media and the U.S. government officials that surrounded him. They are all controlled by the Rothschilds because otherwise, they could not be in the position they hold. No one has convinced me that Osama Bin Laden had anything to do with the terrorist actions that are attributed to him. If you noticed, all the media’s gravest charges have been proved only by putting his picture on the television screen. It is possible that the death was the silencing of a man who was wrongly accused and who could tell an uncomfortable truth in court. 

 

America, pressured by the Rothschilds, kills people around the world with the excuse that in this way they fight terrorism, spread democracy and human rights. That is a lie; this is only about the discipline of disobedient countries. Obama sends drones that kill people in Afghanistan daily under the pretext that it prevents terrorism and spreads democracy. This is terrorism. Could you imagine Afghan drones flying over the United States and killing people because America is an undemocratic and terrorist state? The biggest crime of President Barack Obama was the aggression against Libya. I am deeply convinced that the investigation against US President Barack Obama for the criminal aggression on Libya, would lead to Jacob Rothschild. But who can sue President Barack Obama? 

On the way to conquering the world, the Rothschilds certainly want to conquer Russia. In the recent election campaign the newly elected President of the United States, Donald Trump promised the reconciliation with Russia. President Trump also announced the crackdown on lobbying by “the global elite,” which is synonymous with the Rothschilds. Why would he do this? They have the same interests. I think that nothing significant will be changed. So a choice of continuing conflict between Russia and America is more likely than cooperation.

 

Sometimes leaders of states lose their lives violently. Knowing what kind of power the Rothschild family possess, if I were in the position of public attorney, I would ask the Rothschild family if they know something about the unsolved murders of Presidents John Kennedy, Salvador Allende, Olof Palme, Nicolae Ceausescu, Slobodan Milosevic, and others. For this, of course, political will has to exist. If it appears, I believe that the Rothschilds would get scared of such an investigation and would stop creating the criminal policies of society. I believe that this would immediately reduce the problems in the world.

 

Other heads of “developed” Western countries are also either corrupted or incompetent because other people have no access to such positions. The Rothschilds founded the Bilderberg group. It is a private organization that openly recruits and ideologically directs leaders of the Western world. No wonder that the presidents of Great Britain, France, Italy, and Turkey have recently adopted rebels in Syria as legal representatives of the government. This is a crime. These rebels were secretly created and financed by the Rothschild family with the goal to take control over Syria. That is how the Rothschild family replaces the disobedient governments of independent countries. Thus gaining control of all the resources of this world that they do not have yet under control. And since they are entirely invisible, no one can stop them in that.

 

A few years ago I saw on a YouTube video, which cannot be found anymore, that the Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu said: Do not worry we control the U.S. government. An intelligent man cannot afford such an arrogant statement if the process of the enslavement of American society is not completed. However, Netanyahu did not tell the truth because Israel does not control the U.S. government, but rather the Rothschild family does. The Rothschilds control the US Congress as well through the AIPAC (The American Israel Public Affairs Committee). If any senator or representative of the people opposes the Rothschilds, they will not be politicians anymore because AIPAC has the power to dismiss disobedient politicians and they know it. The American laws have been created in a way that suits the rich for centuries. No wonder why those who purchase corporations are not required to pay taxes. America is a colony of the Rothschilds. This is indirectly confirmed by the National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter, Zbigniew Brzezinski. He said in 2012, “I do not think there is an implicit obligation for the United States to follow like a stupid mule whatever the Israelis do. I think that the United States has the right to have its own national security policy. ” This sentence shows all the weakness of the US administration to the power the Rothschilds possess.

 

The Rothschilds control the judicial departments of Western countries as well. They have established the International Court in Hague to judge the nations that oppose them. So that is why the Serbs were punished. In 2012, the judgments were made by which the Croatian generals Gotovina and Markač and Kosovar politician Hardinaj were declared innocent in the war in Yugoslavia while the Serbian general Tolimir received a life sentence of imprisonment. The civil war in Yugoslavia produced evil on all sides. General Tolimir is no more guilty than the other three people. The judgments are crimes of the corrupted court. Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic was killed in Hague by the drug against leprosy, which annulled the activity of medications for the heart. As the court had no evidence against him, the tension of the four-year stressful trial and most likely inadequate medical treatment for his ailing heart killed him in 2006. Vojislav Šešelj, president of the Serbian Radical Party, was in jail in the Hague tribunal for ten years without a verdict, then he was released without a sentence. That court is a crime itself and a shame on today’s society. Judges from all over the world judge at this court and that means that judges all over the world are corrupt and that there is no justice anywhere. James Bissett, former Canadian ambassador to Yugoslavia, claimed that George Soros, the agent of the Rothschild family, funded the International Court in Hague. This means that the Serbs were tried by the same man who attacked them. It says to me that the family Rothschild has an impact not only on governments around the world but also on the judiciary system. The family Rothschild should be charged for the evil they produce but this, of course, is not possible with a corrupt court. Besides, no one knows that they are responsible for it and therefore he creates the evil in the world uninterruptedly.

In short, power corrupts, and as long as there is power over people, there will be corruption. In my book, Humanism – A Philosophic-Ethical-Political-Economic Study of the Development of the Society,I have proposed the elimination of the power of man over a man. This is the only way to build a good future for humankind, but powerful and corrupted people do not accept such a system. Others are so influenced by the system of education and the media that they could not recognize the benefits of the system I have proposed.

 

The conspiracy has absorbed science as well. Sometime early in 2012, I watched a video from the conference of “The Institute for New Economic Thinking.” In this video, George Soros has called upon all economic schools, including Marxist, to contribute to finding a way out of the financial crisis. The call is not sincere because if it were, they would analyze the economic ideas I offered to them, but they had no such intention. They do not want to solve the financial crisis because it suits them better than the release from the economic crisis. What’s that all about? The plight of capitalism is not based on a lack of production, but on the lack of purchasing power of people. If the big businesses cared about bringing the economy out of the crisis, they need only to find a way for people to earn more.

 

For this reason I wrote the article Let’s Remove Unemployment where I offered shortening working hours proportionally to the unemployment rate. In this way, the ratio of jobs to workers would be equal. That would establish a fair market of work which would justly regulate the salaries of workers and profits of employers. In such an economy, the owners of companies would have to attract workers by increasing wages. The increased purchasing power of workers would increase the trade of goods and services, and that would bring businesses higher profits and would pull the economy out of the crisis.

 

But it would also reduce the economic dependence of workers on businesses. That would free workers from fear of their financial future. Workers would no longer be interested in fighting wars for the interests of big business around the world, for example. Big business is not interested in making money because it already has all the money; it has an interest in controlling the people, and its best bet is during a crisis. And that is the main reason the economic crises exist. All economic crises, including the U.S. Great Depression, are incurred through monetary and interest rate manipulation of the Rothschild family. Webster Griffin Tarpley wrote about that. Through economic crisis, the Rothschilds force independent entrepreneurs to bankruptcy and cheaply take their wealth. So Rothschild’s wider circle of people depend on their power. Then workers, through fear for their own future, silently accept unfairly low wages and their own powerlessness. And if they rebel against the injustice that is happening to them, they at best can abolish the government, but that can change nothing. The policy controlled by the big business remains the same.

 

The shortening of working hours proportionally to the unemployment rate should be the first idea to come to the mind of an independent thinker to reduce the suffering of workers and improve the economy and society. But such a view is nowhere to be seen. Why? Because it is forbidden by the conspiracy of the Rothschild family. Such an idea would start a transformation of society towards a better socio-economic system. That is why such an approach cannot be heard at universities or in media. None of the media, including those on the left, wanted to publish my article “Let’s Remove Unemployment.” Why? Because most of them are controlled by big business and the rest is influenced by imposed knowledge. The brainwashed people do not believe that such a simple measure can fix society and economy in the first place because they’ve never heard for it. An idea that does not have access to the public cannot be accepted by political parties either. So the cycle of powerlessness never ends.

 

But why did Soros call the Marxists when he knew that they were the greatest enemies of capitalism? Then I realized that they are not afraid of Marxists. Probably half the professors of sociology in the Western world are Marxists. They openly teach Marxist philosophy in universities, which would not have been possible if Marxism could undermine capitalism in any way. I am deeply convinced that the Rothschilds consciously manipulate the Marxist-oriented professors by putting them on the wrong path. This way, they reduce the possibility of the appearance of an excellent left-social system that could defeat capitalism. I wrote about it in the article Marx still prevents the progress of society.

 

This conspiracy was established a long time ago. Apparently, Lenin returned to Russia from exile with suitcases full of money. The reason? Russian Czar Nicholas Romanov angered the Rothschilds with his support of the American government in conflict with the Bank of England. Besides, the Russian Czar allegedly repaid the debt to the international bankers and did not want to continue to borrow money from them. That was enough for the Rothschilds to finance the revolution. Marxism is planned for disobedient countries. In the West, the revolutions were prevented by the murder of the Marxist leaders. Rosa Luxembourg for example. A similar thing is happening to Syria right now. This is possible only because no one can imagine that the Rothschild family is behind all of it. They realize their interests through the financing of crimes because no one can connect the crimes with them.

 

The Rothschilds have imposed a system of education that makes people stupid. I am not exaggerating. Such education helps them to stay in power and rule over society. How did they do it? They have been supporting mistaken scientists for centuries who develop wrong or insufficiently right knowledge, and by the help from politics which they also control, they have imposed such knowledge to the system of education. Almost all social scientists may belong to such a group including Karl Marx. Sigmund Freud is a supported creator of the unsuccessful theory of psychoanalysis, which is mostly rejected. The philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche was supported in developing a wrong philosophy from the standpoint of creating a good society. Less well-known Bell, Weinberg, and Hammersmith are promoted in the development of the theory of homosexuality registered in the genetic code. I’ve shown that this theory is wrong in the article Homosexuality. These scientists have become authorities mostly with the help of the Rothschilds.

 

University students have been forced to accept the incorrect or not enough correct knowledge of such authorities if they want to pass exams. Intellectuals who have taken such knowledge became incompetent and could not find an escape from the problems of society. The best students of the wrong or insufficiently correct sciences became the most influential people in the community and then spread false knowledge. In this way, the Rothschilds have produced weak and useless sciences. I wrote more about it in the article My Clash with Sciences. Scientists who are deeply influenced with false knowledge cannot improve the world; nor understand or accept progressive ideas. That is the reason the world cannot move forward.

 

Conspiracy has affected food production as well. In my article Epilogue, I wrote that indications exist that the Rothschild family deliberately poisons food to produce food cheaply and make more profits. Thus also hire medical and pharmaceutical industries more, over which they have control too. Furthermore, health care and the pharmaceutical industry are not keen enough to treat people honestly, because healthy people are not spending money on medical treatment. There are indications that the Rothschilds deliberately poison people with food to reduce the Earth’s population. William Engdahl in his book Seeds of Destruction states that the expansion of genetically modified crops and food all over the world today, have reached that scope that can and must be proclaimed as “genocide, crimes against humanity.” Dr Peter Gøtzsche exposes big pharma as organized crime. The Canadian Cancer Society warns of a rapid increase in cancer cases and predicts that every other Canadian will become ill through their lives. Causes of cancer are hardly researched and discussed because every debate will accuse new manufacturing technologies and could accuse corporations that make money at the expense of people’s lives.

 

The conspiracy of the Rothschild family has reached every pore of today’s society. Only cooperative people, those who follow the interests of big business have access to the media and are in influential positions in society. They are obedient because they are corrupted by their positions in society and by the markedly high living standards that the system gives to them. People believe that these corrupted individuals deserve everything because of their hard work and skills, but this is not true. They are only pawns of the people who actually run society. But that is not all, the Rothschilds control their opposition as well. They corrupt fighters for justice who publicly confront the existing system but do nothing to change it. They took control over the “Occupy” movement. Also, they like to support indoctrinated fighters for justice who are unable to make progress. Noam Chomsky, for example, is an honest fighter for justice, but has his fight helped humankind? Has he offered a solution that might improve the situation around the world? He has not. And so the Rothschilds must love his contribution to the betterment of humankind. While people who might improve society, like me for example, do not have financial support, do not have access to universities, media, or politics, and cannot help. Every day you can see all kinds of published nonsense, but my philosophy that defines the bright future of humanity has no access anywhere. Everything is based on a deep conspiracy. People who believe media and follow fighters for “justice,” actually work in favour of their own powerlessness.

 

This article has been sent to hundreds of news publishers and was published only by Veterans Today. Why? A large number of editors do not believe in conspiracies, those who believe are afraid of the Rothschild family (unfortunately, influential RT is among them), and the rest are controlled by the Rothschilds. Even the media specialized in conspiracies did not want to publish it because their primary task is to write nonsense ordered by the Rothschild family.

The conspiracy is completely hidden, so the public does not know anything about it. It is possible that only Jacob Rothschild has access to the entire conspiracy. He has far more power than any emperor in the history of humankind, but nobody knows it. I believe that his wife thinks he is just a successful businessman. Even his son Nathaniel, until recently, did not know how influential his father was. When he learned that he would inherit his power, he suddenly transformed from an irresponsible adventurer to a very successful “independent” businessman. Of course, a narrow circle of his family was acquainted with the conspiracy, as well as several other family members, including, of course, David Rockefeller, who rules in the name of Rothschild over the United States. In the hierarchy below them, no one, I repeat, no one, I believe not even Soros, knows how powerful Jacob Rothschild really is. That is why the conspiracy remains undiscovered.

 

So then, how have I discovered how powerful Jacob Rothschild is? Around the turn of the millennium, I became convinced that the Rothschilds rule the Western world by studying various documents on the Internet. Many papers and the genealogy of the Rothschild family suggest that the London branch manages the whole family. A variety of statements, articles, and documents indicate that Jacob is the head of the London branch. That is how I realized that Jacob Rothschild is the secret ruler of the Western world. He suits the role perfectly as a quiet man mostly known for his love of arts and flowers. This image is, of course, built up so that no one would have thought that he could be the leader of a global conspiracy. I have no substantial evidence against Jacob Rothschild because it is impossible to collect it without the help of governments. State governments are corrupted, incompetent, or afraid of the power of corporations, so they have no intention to search for evidence and accuse Jacob Rothschild. By finishing my research, I concluded that there might be only a 0.1% chance that he is not at the head of the conspiracy hierarchy and a 0% chance that he is not among the top five. Jacob Rothschild is certainly guilty for the conspiracy against humankind.

 

The situation in the world is only getting worse, and so I have decided to act. It makes no sense to attack presidents, governments and corporations under media accusations of evil in the world because they are only highlighted puppets Jacob Rothschild has managed and protected. This article is not proof against the Rothschilds, but it provides sufficient information and explanations that, beyond a reasonable doubt, can and should invite public prosecutors to launch an investigation against the Rothschilds. But this requires political will, which corrupted governments do not have. Therefore, the sad situation in the world does not change. We must not allow evil to act freely. This article’s task is to inform people about what is happening in the world, and I expect the unsatisfied people to exert political pressure on their governments to launch an investigation against the Rothschilds. Or choose new governments that will show the courage to initiate such an investigation. Once the Rothschild family is accused of the crime, the crime will end. Then, the evil in the world will end as well.

 

Written 20.12.2012

Updated 29.11.2016

 

February 26, 2024. Today, Jacob Rothschild, the secret ruler of the Western world, died. From now on, his son, Nathaniel Rothschild, takes his secret position while pretending to be an ordinary citizen.

 

Recently, it came to my mind that the family may be successfully debunked by going after seemingly benign conspiracies, such as Chemtrails, Global Warming, or Flat Earth. Flat Earth is one of the most successful conspiracies ever, making people believe they are bright while the Rothschild family controls them by manipulating public information. People who spread seemingly benign conspiracies would more readily admit who pays them than those who commit crimes. Investigators just need to follow the money that drives the spread of conspiratorial ideas. The Western world is obviously controlled by one center, and according to me, nobody else but the Rothschilds has the power to make it happen.

 

Continues on Mayan prophecy is true.

See also Has Antichrist Come?

References:

The Truth Behind The Rothschild Family: World’s Only Trillionaires

2005.03.27

Let’s finish with capitalism

The new system I have proposed would offer much more market than capitalism can afford. In the first place, a permanently open labour market will be established. Each public work post will have to be given to the worker who envisages and offers the highest productivity at any time. Productivity could be measured by earned money, by quality and quantity of produced goods, or by productivity evaluation of workers by customers. A worker who offers more profits, manufactured goods, and better or cheaper production will get the job.


That is an idea. How to make such changes to bring the most possible advantages and the least possible disadvantages to society is just a technical question. I have defined a pretty good solution in my book Humanism, but that is what would probably be much more developed by the practice. Today a labour market almost does not exist. Once a developed labour market starts to work, it will bring higher productivity, disalienation, balance among people’s needs, harmony to the people, benefits to society beyond the wildest dreams today.


No economy can be more productive than the one where the best available worker gets each job. Such an economy will easily become significantly more productive than the capitalist one so that the latter will be forced to recede.


In a good society, a human being is a central value and not capital. When capitalism is done humanism will step in, and an unthinkably better future of humankind will start.


Mayan Prophecy

Mayan Prophecy is True

Before reading this article it would be a good idea to read Jacob Rothschild is guilty for the conspiracy against humankind. A good society will be much easier to establish when the Rothschild family is stopped. It’s not hard to do. People who face increasing problems of living, mainly protest and demonstrate on the streets of cities around the world. I must tell that the protests against governments are useless because governments are just predetermined, scapegoats. Nothing would be better if people replace a head of state or government. Protests against corporations and banks also cannot bring success, because they are only tools of power. People should demonstrate against the Rothschilds because they are to blame for all the problems. Once accused, they will retreat into defence, which will allow for a better tomorrow.


If you people, want to relieve the colonial chains you must stop Jacob Rothschild. Syrians, peace and justice cannot arrive in your country until you stop Jacob Rothschild. Iranians, if you want the West to let you live in peace, you must stop Jacob Rothschild. Serbs, if you want to cleanse your name, you must stop Jacob Rothschild. If your country is over-indebted and riddled with high and imposing taxes, Jacob Rothschild is as guilty for it because he corrupts politicians. Workers, if you want to ensure the right to work, you must stop Jacob Rothschild. He deliberately keeps the unemployment rate high to pay you less for your work. Folks, if you had any problem that has affected you, Jacob Rothschild is guilty of it. If you live in poverty, Jacob Rothschild is guilty because he seizes the money that should belong to you. If you, or your loved ones, have been a victim of crime, Jacob Rothschild is guilty because he has built a criminal society. If you’ve lost someone close in the war, Jacob Rothschild is guilty because he is the primary initiator of wars. If you are hungry anywhere in this world, Jacob Rothschild is guilty because he builds an immoral society. If your spouse has left you, Jacob Rothschild is accountable for it because he has created an unhealthy society. If you are not the most significant authority for your children, Jacob Rothschild is guilty because he breaks families. If you are sick, if you are high or drunk, Jacob Rothschild is guilty because he formed a sick society. If you are dissatisfied and unhappy, Jacob Rothschild is guilty because he does not allow the formation of a healthy community. Folks, even if you lack nothing, you would not be mistaken if you fight against Jacob Rothschild, because he builds a very uncertain future.

My voice is not strong enough, because I have not access to the media, so I ask kindly for your help. I made up this poster, which accuses Jacob Rothschild. Get it by clicking on the image above or on this link. Create a picket sign from it. When you decide to demonstrate against anyone, anywhere, bring that picket sign with you because Jacob Rothschild is undoubtedly directly or indirectly guilty for what ails you. You may also attach this poster on the rear windows of your car or print it on a T-shirt. Show to the world that you are tired of injustice and evil. You people have the power; you just need to use it. If a sufficient number of you people carry this poster, it will send a strong message to society that will stop the Rothschilds and open the gates for the creation of a much better future for mankind.


It would not be wrong, for instance, if you come and bring the posters to the front of Waddesdon Manor, Buckinghamshire, England, where Jacob Rothschild lives. Go there and accuse him of the evil that has befallen on you. Inform RT (Russian Television) about it. They will be happy to broadcast your demonstration worldwide. Russian TV is the biggest thing that the Russian government has made because it is probably the only influential television in the west independent of the Rothschild family.


I am convinced that Jacob Rothschild is a coward. He has lived far too comfortably that he could be brave. Once you people start demonstrating against him and accusing him of his crimes, he will be scared and will stop committing evil. This statement, of course, leads me to danger. In this regard, I declare: If by some chance I get struck by lightning while I am walking my dog Meda, or if I eat a green salad with polonium dressing, or something like that happens to me, I want you to know that I accuse Jacob Rothschild of that.


Under the influence of the Rothschild family, you people persistently choose a very complicated option that cannot solve any of the social problems of the world. My philosophy is, and it will resolve all the social issues of the world. Once you begin to examine my philosophy, the Rothschilds will not have any chances.


My philosophy is based on equal rights among people. Only equal rights among the people can build a bright future for humankind. To be more explicit, as long as privileges exist there cannot be equal rights among people, and society can not solve its problems. It cannot be good. There are only one “equal rights,” and I have defined them. Equal rights among the people will save this world from evil and build a paradise on earth. In this paradise evil will no longer exist, no one will fear for their future. All people will be happy and satisfied. The changes will be so significant that practically nothing will remain the same. The history before the implementation of my social system will be called barbarism and from the implementation will be called civilization.


My philosophy will realize the messianic prophecy. This means that I am messiah Aleksandar. According to the Mayan prophecy, the Messianic changes are expected to start today, 21.12.2012. That is why I published this article just today. Today, by this action against Jacob Rothschilds I have begun a movement of transformation in society. I do not know when the change will occur, but I know that it will happen because there is no other alternative for the realization of a good society.


21.12.2012


2005.03.24

Let’s decide alone about our taxes

Taxes have a purpose to serve the collective needs of people. People should determine such needs, but they have almost nowhere the influences on the creation of tax policy. For example, workers were never asked how much they would like to pay for taxes. What is even worse, they do not have an influence on how the tax money will be spent. Formally, this spending is provided by governments and parliaments. Yes, we choose our governments democratically following their proposals at elections. But we cannot rely much on it because they rarely keep their promises. For example, I have never heard any governments proposed tax increases at elections; however, the practice shows that taxes grow.

 

The Governments are supposed to use the tax money to follow the interests of the people, but they don’t. The control over the accumulated wealth through taxes gives the most significant power in the state, and the governments tend to spend the tax-collected money in the way they like. However, even governments do not have the most significant control over this money. In the western world, rich people have the most significant power. They have invented a very developed mechanism that gives them control over everything including the tax-collected money. The mechanism starts with friendly advice and lobbying of governments and representatives in parliaments and finishes with corruption and blackmailing. They are very successful in it, and that means the collective spending follows the interests of a few and not of the people. This is not fair. We all pay taxes, but only some have the power to use it. That must be changed.

 

In the new system, I have proposed, nobody will be able to take the power that belongs to the people. Each person will have the right to participate directly in creating the tax policy. Each person will do it by splitting their own gross income into a part intended for their personal spending and a part intended for taxes. All of the workers will break their salaries in such a way. The total sum of the money intended for taxes to the community will form the total amount of money for taxes. This amount will then be collected from workers according to their income heights. Maybe I was not clear enough: The individuals will not pay taxes in the amount that they want, they will participate in creating the total amount of tax money, and then this money will be taken from workers according to their income height.

 

In the same manner, the people can make the further allocation of the tax money for the various common expenses groups. It could be money for health care, education, building new objects or infrastructure, etc. Theoretically, the people can further decide on the distribution of the funds inside the groups as long as they have interests in it. Managers will perform the final disposition. They will make the best possible money distribution for people because they will pay their responsibilities for doing it to the people by receiving evaluations for their work from the people.

 

The new tax policy will significantly contribute to the development of society without a matter of what kind of decisions the people will make about taxes. Following the living experience, people will learn how much money needs to be allocated for taxes and what is the best way to spend it. They will obviously allocate more money in the fields of their most substantial interests. In such a simple way the public spending will most efficiently follow the interests of the people and the people will be most satisfied with it. Once the people get the power to decide about taxes and how the collected money would be spent, nobody will be able to take this power from them because they would not allow it.

 

Humanizam ukratko

Humanizam ukratko

Ljudi su bezuspješno pokušavali izgraditi dobro društvo stoljećima. Ja sam prihvatio isti izazov, bio sam vrlo ustrajan i uspio sam u svojoj knizi “Humanizam” definirati sistem koji će riješiti probleme društva kroz stoljeća. U toku rješavanja problema došao sam do zaključka da dobra budućnost zahtijeva potpunu promjenu današnjeg sistema. U budućnosti gotovo ništa ne može ostati isto kao što je danas. Iz tog razloga novi sistem nije lako razumijeti niti primijeniti iako je daleko jednostavniji i bolji od bilo kojeg poznatog modela. Ipak ukoliko uložite mali napor u proučavanje ovog sistema vidjet ćete kako će izgledati budućnost čovječanstva. Slijedeći kratki opis moje knjige “Humanizam” svakako vrijedi pročitati.

Ljudi teže većoj moći. Oni određuju svoju moć uspoređujući se sa drugim ljudima. Takva usporedba postoji kao potreba društva i zato je treba prihvatiti bez obzira što je ona najvjerojatnije posljedica otuđenja društva. Produktivno društvo treba razvijati produktivnu moć čovjeka. Mi takvu moć možemo mjeriti. Što je mjera koja prikazuje čovjekovu produktivnu moć bolje definirana to se bolje usmjerava djelovanje društva, to je društvo bolje. Potrebno je kreirati sistem koji će definirati ukupnu vrijednost produktivne moći čovjeka pomoću vrijednosti njegova minulog rada. Ta vrijedost treba uključiti vrijednost nekretnina, novca, akcija, nagrada, obrazovanja i svih drugih vrijednosti koje čovjek posjeduje. Osim toga ona će uključiti vrijednost rada koji donosi porast produktivnosti privrede i sve sve druge vrijednosti koje su prihvaćene danas u društvu i koje mogu unaprijediti društvo.

Sa druge strane ukoliko čovjek proizvede štetu vrijednostima koje postoje u društvu kao na primjer ukoliko je odgovoran za gubitke privrede, ili ukoliko prouzrokuje nepogodnosti u društvu, ili ukoliko počini neki kriminal tada će izgubiti odgovarajuću vrijednost na skali koja prikazuje njegovu ukupnu produktivnu moć. Udruživanje različitih oblika vrijednosti će zahtijevati široku studiju i zasigurno teške pregovore u društvu. Ipak poslije nekog vremena bi se mogli kreirati novi regulirani standardi za sve oblike vrijednosti i štete koje čovjek može napraviti u društvu. Takva regulacija će se automatski primijeniti kad god je to potrebno. Tako će se demokratski formirati novi sistem vrijednosti koji će sumirati ukupnu vrijednost produktivnih moći čovjeka. Takav sistem vrijednosti će nadopuniti i obogatiti sadašnje oblike vrijednosti, bazirane na kapitalu sa novim humanističkim vrijednostima i na taj način će značajno unaprijediti razvoj društva.

Vrlo je razumljivo i poželjno da takav sistem vrijednosti postane važan u društvu i zato ga treba dopunski stimulirati. Neka svaki čovjek dobije demokratsku glasačku moć u društvu proporcionalnu ukupnoj vrijednosti njegove produktivne moći. Ova mjera predlaže nejednako pravo glasa ljudi ali bi u stvarnosti bila doprinos razvoju demokracije. Do sada su moćni ljudi upravljali društvom sami iako su se često sakrivali iza formalne demokracije. Moćni ljudi nisu nikada bili voljni dijeliti svoju moć sa društvom u ime plemenite ideje jednakosti jer se to protivi osnovnoj otuđenoj potrebi čovjeka da ostvari veću moć u društvu. Zato je potrebno napraviti kompromis koji će biti podjednako prihvatljiv svim ljudima. Svaki čovjek će imati glasačku moć proporcionalnu njegovom doprinosu i doprinosu njegovih predaka u izgradnji svih oblika vrijednosti koje društvo posjeduje. Treba naglasiti da će nejednako pravo glasa ipak biti formalne prirode jer pojedinac koliku god glasačku moć imao ne može značajno utjecati na donošenje odluka u demokratskom procesu. Sa druge strane novi demokratski sistem će otvariti mogućnost da svi ljudi konačno stvarno participiraju u donošenju odluka od njihovih interesa.

Razvoj kompjutorske tehnologije omogućava narodu da neposredno participira u donošenju svih važnih odluka od zajedničkog interesa putem referenduma. Sva pitanja za referendum treba da kreira parlament koncenzusom političkih partija. Princip koncenzusa na najefikasniji način štiti interese manjine. Pitanje za referendum koje ne bude prihvaćeno koncenzusom se neće postaviti na referendumu. Svaka odluka može imati skalu vrijednosti pripremljenu od strane parlamenta u kojoj svaki glasač odabire vrijednost koja mu najviše odgovara. Srednja veličina iskazanih vrijednosti svih stanovnika u funkciji njihove glasačke moći će ukazivati na prihvatljivost svake odluke u društvu. Ovo bi bio početak stvarne vladavine ljudi i najbolji način utvrđivanja potreba društva.

Koliko god demokracija bila razvijena ona će uvijek imati ograničenja jer ne može uvažavati pa čak ni uzeti u razmatranje posebne potrebe pojedinaca. Pojedinci će uvijek biti preglasani i zato mogu biti ugroženi. Taj nedostatak može biti odstranjen uvođenjem novog sistema pomoću kojeg će pojedinci moći sami efikasno braniti svoja prava i štititi svoje posebne interese u društvu. Ja sam ga nazvao demokratska anarhija.

Demokratska anarhija je novi oblik društvenog odnošenja u kojem svaki čovjek ostvaruje jednaku zakonodavnu, pravosudnu i izvršnu vlast u društvu. To je moguće ostvariti tako da svaki čovjek dobije pravo da ocjenjuje djelovanje bilo kojeg čovjeka. Svaka povoljna ocjena treba dobitniku ocjene automatski donijeti mali porast u vrijednosti njegove produktivne moći. Sa druge strane svaka nepovoljna ocjena će rezultirati istim oblikom kazne. Obzirom da će svi ljudi imati podjednako pravo ocjenjivanja i da će davati vlastite ocjene neovisno od bilo kakvih pisanih pravila takva demokracija će poprimiti formu anarhije. Demokratska anarhija će uputiti svakog člana društva da stvara maksimalno moguće pogodnosti u društvu i da smanji ili ukine stvaranje svih oblika nepogodnosti. Ovakva mjera će definitivno umanjiti nekontrolirane ili nedovoljno kontrolirane moći pojedinaca proizašlih iz povlaštenog statusa u društvu. Povlašten status je po svojoj prirodi jedan od glavnih uzroka nastanka velikih nepogodnosti i problema u društvu. Narod će tako na vrlo jednostavan način po prvi puta u povijesti čovječanstva ostvariti veliku neposrednu moć u društvu koja će rezultirati visoko harmoničnim i konstruktivnim društvenim odnosima.

***

Ekonomski prosperitet se stvara dobrim planiranjem proizvodnje i potrošnje i dobrom realizacijom plana. Najbolji plan proizvodnje i potrošnje se može ostvariti neposrednom narudžbom potrošnje od strane potrošača. Iz tog razloga novi sistem će preuzeti postojeću tržišnu ekonomiju ali će postepeno razvijati proizvodnju po narudžbi potrošača. To je upravo ono čemu današnje korporacije teže jer poznata potrošnja osigurava stabilnu proizvodnju. Najveća efikasnost realizacije plana će se ostvariti sa centarliziranim hijerarhijskim sistemom odlučivanja u procesu proizvodnje jer ostvaruje najefikasnju koordinaciju zajedničkog djelovanja. Centarlizirani sistem u praksi lako ostvaruje veliku stabilnost privređivanja i punu zaposlenost radnika. Ukoliko kreiranje novih radnih mjesta neće biti potrebno, puna zaposlenost će se uspostaviti skraćivanjem radnog vremena proporcionalno stopi nezaposlenosti. Takva privreda će nalikovati na model današnjih velikih korporacija ali će uvesti značajne novosti koje će doprinijeti ostvarenju znatno veće produktivnosti proizvodnje i znatno većeg zadovoljstva ljudi nego nego što ga privatne kompanije mogu ostvariti.

Takvu privredu je moguće ostvariti samo dobrovoljnim udruživanjem proizvođača u zajedničku “humanističku“ korporaciju na određenoj teritoriji. Stanovnici određenog teritorija koji dobrovoljno predaju svoje privatno vlasništvo društvu će proporcionalno vrijenosti predatog vlasništva ostvariti porast vrijednosti njihove produktivne moći. Vrijednost produktivne moći čovjeka će predstavljati “humanistički“ oblik akcija jer će svaki čovjek ostvariti dohodak za rad u “humanističkoj“ kompaniji, proporcionalan vrijednosti svoje produktivne moći. Drugim rječima, u novom sistemu čovjek će ostvariti dohodak proporcionalan njegovom doprinosu (uključujući i doprinos njegovih predaka) u izgradnji i održavanju svih oblika vrijednosti koje društvo posjeduje. Udružena ekonomija će pružiti znatno veću sigurnost i znatno veće pogodnosti i ta činjenica može ohrabriti stanovnike određene teritorijalne cjeline da dobrovoljno udruže svoje privatne kompanije u “humanistički“ oblik korporacije. Ukoliko se neka privatna kompanija ne želi udružiti u zajedničku korporaciju tada će nastaviti da djeluje kao nezavisno poduzeće.

U svrhu izbjegavanja privilegija centraliziranog sistema privređivanja koji u pravilu donosi nisku produktivnost, biti će neophodno uspostaviti stalno otvoreno tržište rada. Svako radno mjesto treba popunjavati radnik koji ponudi najveću produktivnost u bilo kojem trenutku. Ova mjera će vjerojatno naići na teškoće u procesu realizacije zato već na prvi pogled izgleda riskantno i bolno. Međutim, takvi nepoželjni efekti će se odstraniti pomoću nove regulacije raspodjele rada. Treba naglasiti da je ova mjera nužna zato što će omogućiti definitivno ukidanje radnih privilegija koje predstavljaju osnovu nepogodne orijentacije i problema u društvu. Osim toga slobodni izbor rada će omogućiti radu da postane neposredna vrijedost. Radnici će voljeti ono što rade i tu leži vjerojatno najveća pogodnost predloženog sistema.

Nova ekonomija će nužno zahtijevati efikasan sistem utvrđivanja odgovornosti radnika za realizaciju predviđene produktivnosti. Sistem će utvrditi novi način podnošenja odgovornosti radnika pomoću vrijednosti koja prikazuje njihovu produktivnu moć. Neostvarenje predložene produktivnosti i profita ili njeno smanjivanje će specijalnim automatskim postupkom smanjiti ukupnu vrijednost produktivne moći radnika proporcionalno veličini njihove odgovornosti u procesu proizvodnje. I obratno, porast produktivnosti i profita će povećati ukupnu vrijednost njihovih produktivnih moći proporcionalno njihovoj odgovornosti u procesu proizvodnje. Sistem će biti baziran na tako velikom stupnju odgovornosti rukovodioca i radnika da će se oni morati dogovarati sa svim zainteresiranim stranama i uspostaviti visoki stupanj koncenzusa prije donošenja odluka.

U slučaju da je produktivnost ograničena radno mjesto treba da dobije radnik koji zatraži najmanju cijenu tekućeg rada i time niži dohodak. Tržište rada će formirati objektivnu mjeru neposredne vrijednosti rada. Kada radnik bude sam odredio cijenu svog tekućeg rada biti će najzadovoljan zaradom.

Ukratko, u “humanističkoj” kompaniji, radnici uključujući i rukovodioce, će se takmičiti za svako željeno radno mjesto koristeći svoju produktivnu moć. Oni će ostvariti pravo na rad na željenom radnom mjestu ukoliko ponude najveću produktivnost za takvo radno mjesto. Poslije toga, oni će biti direktno odgovorni svojim sugrađanima za realizaciju vlastite ponudjene produktivnosti pomoću vrijednosti koja prokazuje njihovu produktivnu moć. Takva ekonomija će lako postati znatno produktivnija od kapitalističke i zato će privatna poduzeća po prvi puta biti prisiljena na povlačenje i na pridruživanje novom sistemu.

Nova ekonomija će razvijati tržište rada i smanjivati tržište roba. To će doprinijeti razvoju efikasnije ekonomije i racionalnom iskorištavanju prirodnih bogatstava. Sa druge strane, smanjeno tržište roba neće uzrokovati slabiji kvalitet roba jer će svi proizvodi biti podložni ocjeni potrošača. Takve ocjena će prikazivati i produktivnost rada proizvođača i samim tim će imati utjecaj na dohodke proizvođača. Iz tog razloga proizvođači će organizirati proizvodnju u nekakvom obliku dogovora sa potrošačima. To će biti najbolja moguća proizvodnja.

Novi sistem će omogučiti radu da postane neposredna vrijednost a roba će gubiti svoju otuđenu prometnu vrijednost. U takvoj orijentaciji leži svijetla budućnost čovječanstva.

***

Budućnost demokracije se neće više bazirati na izabranim liderima već će stanovništvo neposredno formirati politiku društva, na prvom mjestu ekonomsku politiku. U sistemu udruženog vlasništva nad sredstvima za proizvodnju i novac će također biti udružen. Udružen novac omogućava uvođenje neposrednog oblika demokracije u ekonomiju. Svaki glasač će neposredno participirati u raspodjeli zajedničkog novca ostvarenog dohotkom “humanističke” kompanije. Novac će se raspoređivati za potrebe razvoja ekonomije (ukupna količina novca namjenjena investicijama privrede), za individualnu potrošnju (ukupna količina novca namjenjena dohodcima radnika) i za zajedničku potrošnju (ukupna količina novca namjenjena zajedničkoj potrošnji svih stanovnika). Izabrani parlament će prije izjašnjavanja svakog glasača koncenzusom utvrditi moguće intervale vrijednosti u raspodjeli zajedničkog novca. Obzirom da novi sistem predlaže nejednako pravo glasa svaki glasač će raspodijeliti ukupnu vrijednost svoje produktivne moći po glasačkim grupama. Suma glasačkih izjava svih glasača po glasačkim grupama će kreirati makroekonomsku politiku društva. Veća količina novca usmjerena u jednom pravcu smanjiti će potrošnju u drugima i na taj način će usmjeravati ekonomiju društva. Tako će se neposredno demokratski unaprijediti današnji sistem raspodjele dohodaka, utvrđivanja fiskalne i razvojne politike društva.

Raspodjela novca predstavlja osnovu problema današnjag društva. Demokracija je ovdje potrebna više nego bilo gdje. Ukoliko dozvolimo neposrednoj demokraciji da rukovodi raspodjelom zajedničkog novca dati ćemo šansu i dobiti ćemo rješenje za veliki broj problema današnjeg društva. Bez sumnje jednaka glasačka moć neće biti prihvatljiva ljudima koji imaju dominantnu moć danas. Zato je potrebno definirati nejednaku glasačku moć prihvatljivu za sve koja će biti bazirana na vrijednosti koja prikazuje produktivnu moć čovjeka. Ako žrtvujemo jednako demokratsko pravo možemo dobiti stvarnu demokraciju, kolektivno vlasništvo nad sredstvima za proizvodnju, jednako pravo na rad, i neograničenu slobodu individualnog radnog i svakog drugog izbora. To je definitivno vrijedno prihvaćanja.

Opisani politički i ekonomski model će poboljšati efikasnost i stabilnost proizvodnje, uvesti pravdu u proces proizvodnje i raspodjele, i pribaviti značajno veće pogodnosti svim članovima društva. Generalno rečeno, opisani sistem će osloboditi ljude autoritativnog pritiska i dati će im slobodu da slijede vlastite interese ali će prisiliti ljude da poštuju druge ljude. Takvo iskustvo će demistificirati autoritetima nametnute vrijednosti i učiti ljude da žive u skladu sa vlastitom prirodom što će ih osloboditi od svih oblika otuđenja današnjeg društva. Ovaj sistem će nadalje učiti ljude da formiraju potrebe u skladu sa njihovom mogućnostima zadovoljenja. To je glavni uvjet prevladavanja destruktivnosti u društvu jer ljudi koji konstantno zadovoljavaju svoje potrebe nisu destruktivni. Predloženi sistem obećava prirodan, harmoničan i visoko prosperitetan razvoj društva. Razvojem ovakvog sistema će se također realizirati do danas nemogući zadatak: “Od svakog prema mogućnostima i svakome prema potrebama.” Ako pročitate moju knjigu “Humanizam” koja je besplatno dostupna ovdje u najmanju ruku više nećete imati velikih sumnji u takvu mogućnost.

Aleksandar Šarović

Natrag na početak

 

What God Wants

What God Wants

Jesus Christ is supposed to create Heaven on Earth when He returns to Earth. After long-term scientific work, I concluded that equal human rights would bring Paradise to Earth. If I’m right, does that mean I could be Jesus Christ?

 

God created a wonderful world

 

Something has created the nature in which we live. Nature is complex, functional, rational, beautiful and harmonious. If one pays attention to any part of nature, one may notice perfectionism in the logic of its creation. I doubt it could have been developed without help from a tremendous intelligent power. I have accepted the name of this power is God. I doubt God has control everywhere in nature; instead, I believe God has created a super algorithm capable of bringing the best possible results in generating forms and relations of nature. For example, if people discover that it would be better to jump instead of walk, God’s algorithm might build them wings in a few million years. We, the people, have to learn from nature to understand God.

 

The origin of religions

 

Some individuals have claimed they received messages from God and passed on his will to the people. This was the origin of all religions. Religions contain ancient wisdom that brings good to people, which is why we can say that they carry the will of God. The Bible has presented wise and beautiful words of God. The following verses from the Bible confirm that God wants people to create a good society:

 

Psalm (89:14) ‘Righteousness and justice are the foundation of your throne; steadfast love and faithfulness go before you.’

 

Amos (5:7,15) ‘Ah, you that turn justice to wormwood, and bring righteousness to the ground! …Hate evil and love good and establish justice in the gate.’

 

Galatians (5:22-23) ‘The Spirit’s role in a person’s life is to perfect the person’s character, to make him like God. Its fruits, being shown in human behaviour, are the divine attributes of God: “The fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control…”‘

 

Colossians (1:9-10) ‘The essence of all true spiritual knowledge lies in God’s divinely ordained laws. It is God’s desire that we be “filled with the knowledge of His will in all wisdom and spiritual understanding… in every good work and increasing in the knowledge of God.”‘

 

Isaiah (9:6-7) “The government will be upon His [Christ’s] shoulder. And His name will be called Wonderful, Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace. Of the increase of His government and peace, there will be no end.”

 

Micah (4:4) “Every man will sit under his own vine and under his own fig tree, and no one will make them afraid.”

 

But why do the messages of God in the Bible pass only the knowledge from the time when religion originated? Why has God, as almighty and all-knowing, not teaching people science or how to build a good society? Does the lack of knowledge in the Bible mean that God’s messengers invented God’s words, or could they not understand his words well enough? However, since different people received different messages from God, they have formed different religions. But God has not sent different messages to diverse religions; he certainly did not deceive people.

 

Mistakes of religions

 

The range of material written in religious books is very comprehensive but not helpful in defining a good society. God is not a blabberer; he is a highly effective creator, meaning his messages should also be effective. In contrast, many sentences in religious books confront wisdom and cannot make a good society. Such sentences definitely cannot be sent by God.

 

Many religions force people to follow the will of God obediently. God certainly does not want to force people into anything because coercion cannot make a right. Power over people is a need of spiritually undeveloped people. Control over people is a privilege that brings evil. This control creates stupidity, greed, hatred, destruction, wars, and hell on earth. It has nothing to do with the will of God. With this in regard, the religions which force people to follow God are in confrontation with the intention of God. God does not need power over people. He is far above such need. God wants people to create a good society.

 

Can we assume that among those people who wrote religious books were some who wanted to reach power over people? When you see how quickly today’s religious preachers improvise verses from the Bible to achieve intellectual superiority over religious people, we can assume some writers of holy books did the same. These people entered wrong ideas into religious texts that have nothing to do with the will of God. They created contradictions in the Bible. For example, God’s 6th commandment states: “Thou shall not murder,” and Jesus Christ, Son of God, according to Luke (19:27), said: “But as for these enemies of mine who didn’t want me to be their king – bring them here and slaughter them in my presence.” The contradictions in the Bible do not present the mistakes of God but of people. They have prevented the progress of society. God wants people to live well, but people deviate from his will.

 

I have discovered how to achieve the will of God 

 

My philosophy, based on equal human rights, will bring the righteousness and justice demanded in the Bible. Moreover, equal human rights will solve society’s problems and create Heaven on Earth. Therefore, equal human rights must be God’s will.

 

Today, we have defined equal human rights insufficiently. Equal human rights are established formally, while reality suggests they are not equal. Presidents of countries may send people to war, and people cannot do it to them. Bosses may fire workers, and workers cannot do it to them. Teachers may force students to accept knowledge, and students cannot do it to them. Where are the equal human rights there? Throughout history, authorities have prevented the development of equal human rights to maintain their privileges. As a result, equal human rights have never existed, which is why society was never good.

 

Equal human rights imply that all people have equal opportunities in their lives. This includes the right of all people to participate equally in the decision-making regarding all issues of common interest. However, until recently, it was impossible to establish equal human rights because nothing could collect the needs of all people and harmonize the optimal decisions that may satisfy all people. This has become possible with the development of computer technology.

 

We need a democracy that will successfully follow individual and collective needs. I believe such a democracy must give people equal legislative, judicial, and executive powers. Everyone shall get equal rights to evaluate others for whatever they do. Each positive evaluation should bring a small reward to the assessed person, and each negative assessment should result in a small punishment. Such a policy would make everyone work hard to please others and avoid hurting anybody. This should create a good society. The equal evaluating power among people presents a new form of democracy, and the freedom of evaluation presents a new state of anarchy. Therefore, such a policy can be called democratic anarchy. Democratic anarchy alone should be capable of building a much better society than we have today. I have presented democratic anarchy in more detail in the article Democratic Anarchy is the Future of Democracy.

 

***

 

Equal human rights also mean that every person must have the right to work. As long as there is unemployment, such a right does not exist. Unemployed people have to accept poorly paid jobs to feed themselves. It causes the exploitation of workers. Shortening work hours may reduce unemployment till it is completely removed. It will raise the demand for workers and their salaries in the free market until exploitation is eliminated. This will create just relations in the production processes. Workers will earn greater wages, purchase more, and the economy will grow. Such a policy would solve today’s socioeconomic problems and build good capitalism. I have defined good capitalism in the article: Full Employment is a Turning Point of Capitalism.

 

Equal human rights are supposed to improve the economy significantly. The ultimate stage of equal human rights will create an equal possibility for workers’ employment at every public work post at any time. It will be necessary to open a permanent competition of workers for every public work post. Every public job will be filled by the worker who offers higher productivity, more responsibility, and demands a lower wage. It is nothing but a developed work market that is open at all times. I know it sounds impossible because such a division of labour never existed, but realizing it is just a technical problem.

 

I have defined an economic system that will effectively evaluate workers’ productivity, harmonize workers’ rewards, and define workers’ job responsibilities. Of course, such an economy cannot be realized soon because it will require a lot of development before people embrace it. But once people establish it, the burdens and benefits of a living will be justly distributed, forming a just economy. In addition, no company can be more productive than one where each job gets the best available worker. As a result, private companies will lose the productivity battle with public companies, sending capitalism down in history. This will create good socialism. I have defined it in the article: Developed Marked of Work will Create Socialism.

 

The final result of establishing equal human rights will be visible in good communism, where people will develop equal consumer rights. Socialism will teach workers to value work more than money. Then, all people may voluntarily assign all their incomes for taxes, making all goods and services available free of charge. This will be good communism, which should be a synonym for Heaven on Earth. I believe that nothing more than equal human rights is needed to create a good society, and nothing else can make it. I have presented the bright future of humankind in the scientific book Humanism – A Philosophic-Ethical-Political-Economic Study of the Development of the Society.

 

Also, I have shown the result of my work through three stories in three screenplays, Good Capitalism, Good Socialism, and Good Communism, for ease of understanding. By reading these screenplays, people can learn how to save the world from social evil and make it a good place to live.

 

Then, am I Jesus Christ?

 

Messiah is supposed to save the world from social evil and make it a good place to live, so I publicly proclaimed myself a secular messiah five years ago. Those rare people who have read my proclamation probably consider me a character from a fairytale. People can hardly accept new critical ideas because they have not developed an ability to think independently by living in an alienated society that authorities have established.

 

Might it also mean that “I am the way, the truth, and the life”? (John 14:6) According to the Bible, God will create Heaven on Earth (Amos 9:13-15). Christian authorities believe Jesus Christ will be highly involved when returns. Since I have defined Heaven on Earth and belong to the Christian religion, should it not mean that I am Jesus Christ and that my path only leads to God the Father? I asked this for the first time 19 years ago here: Am I Jesus Christ?

 

The Church has not accepted me as the Messiah because I have not seen or heard God the Father (Or I am unaware of it, which does not help). According to the Bible, Jesus Christ and God the Father are one. But then, should not Jesus Christ have presented much more knowledge to be equated with the world’s creator? He showed less understanding of this world than ordinary people do today. Also, it is hard to tell how much Jesus Christ’s teaching was original or a reflection of his time. Egyptians preached another world before him.

 

According to the Bible, I also cannot be Jesus Christ because I know nothing about another world and eternal life. However, I can say something about it from a secular point of view. In the article Everlasting life, I quoted the studious Christian website “2001 Translation Bible,” which translates the original Bible written in Greek again. In the article “Does the Bible promises eternal life?” the answer is: “The fact is, it doesn’t… at least, not in those exact words. Why not? Because the Greek word that other Bible translators render as “everlasting” (aionos) doesn’t mean that. It’s what we get the English word “eon” from, and it means a long time.” Due to the different meanings of related words in other languages, Bible translators have sometimes interpreted the lyrics freely.

 

I accept the possibility of eternal life because I do not have evidence that it does not exist. However, I asked myself whether eternal life is desirable, even in spiritual form. (The laws of physics deny the eternity of matter.) One could say that the actor Christopher Reeve was practically destined for a spiritual life. He fell from a horse, broke his neck and was immobile for life. He did not like such a spiritual life, was unhappy and even thought of suicide. But suppose eternal spiritual life exists. Can one imagine this eternal life if an individual desires a glass of red wine that they could never drink?

 

Why do Christians believe that eternal life must be good? I think I have an approximate answer to this question. People who are not free, people who are afraid, are not able to satisfy the needs of their lives. And there is no difference between authorities and their dependents here. Narcissistic authorities need to achieve societal supremacy and are slaves to their megalomaniac ideas that cannot be realized. People who live under the oppression of authorities and obediently follow them cannot meet their needs. They both do not live well and fear death because they feel their lives have not satisfied their expectations. I believe that is why they need faith in a much better and eternal life in heaven.

 

People who live in freedom and who are responsible for their lives live in its fullness. Such people are not afraid of death because they recognize that they have fulfilled their life expectations through living. Death brings them freedom in the broadest sense because they practically do not need anything anymore. Spiritual writers have shown such a state of mind in their work. For example,  Henryk Sienkiewicz in the book “Quo Vadis.” In real life, Albert Einstein presented it by refusing surgery to prolong his life. I believe God made the best solution for the people, and having a longer life than God predicted would be a disadvantage. God allocates a good life and death as a gift to the people who follow his will based on a productive way of living.

 

Finally, numerous Christian interpretations of the Bible suggest that Heaven and Hell are not locations but states of mind. If this is true, I should be accepted as a candidate for Jesus Christ’s work position because my philosophy based on equal human rights will make people love unconditionally, bringing freedom, justice, peace, wisdom, and joy to everyone. If my philosophy creates Heaven on Earth, there is no reason for Jesus Christ to come the second time to Earth. Then, the question would be, does he exist at all? It would be wise for the Church and Christians to examine my philosophy and determine if I might be a candidate for Jesus Christ’s work position for creating Heaven on Earth.

 

Authorities block my philosophy because every social improvement must take power from them. As a result, people can hardly see my work. And thanks to the alienation authorities have imposed throughout the history of civilization, those rare people who have read it have not recognized the importance of my work. Consequently, social progress is plodding. Accepting me as a candidate for Jesus Christ’s work position will make people pay attention to my work, dramatically accelerating the coming of Heaven to Earth.

 

18.10.2013

 

2005.04.16

Let’s talk to each other

This web site is well visited for years now. Currently, I have an average of 150 visitors and 2 downloads of “Humanism” daily. However, I seldom receive an opinion about these pages from the readers. Why is that?

 

I suppose that the ideas are incredible so that the readers probably think the best would be to leave discussions about the new system to authorities, either to leaders or experts. Here problems come immediately. Without matter of how the leaders are chosen and how good scientists are they are not able to understand the new system any better than the average people because my ideas are entirely different from the knowledge they collected.

 

Besides that, the authorities possess privileged statuses in society. The system I have proposed takes privileges away from the people and requires responsibilities that they do not like. These are the reasons the authorities mostly do not want to know my ideas exists.

 

All people try to gain power in society, and they might succeed in some fields. If they are successful, they protect their privileges from the influences of other people and rule. In such a way, rule owners, chiefs, professors, parents. In that way, almost all the living space becomes limited or even inaccessible to the people. In such a way, a man takes away the freedom of thoughts, decisions, and acting from other people. But of course, the authorities convince people they are free, probably with the purpose to prevent them from searching for freedom. The truth is; we live in a closed society where privileged alienated powers of authorities rule over the people. This is what makes us miserable. This is what degenerates us as human beings. This is what must be changed.

 

Everyone who has built any kind of privileges may hesitate to accept the system I have proposed. You may ask yourself now whether the new system is going to take power from you? This is the wrong question. The correct question would be: Why do you need control over anyone? The answer is straightforward, that is because the society you live in does not give you enough of a chance to manifest your productive power. You can only see alienated powers around yourself, and that is the reason you seek the power in the alienated fields.

 

Yes, privileges give feelings of power and happiness. However, such power and happiness are just temporary illusions. Their influence is similar to the impact of illegal drugs. When the effect ends, pain occurs. That is the reason we do not need power over anyone, we need the ability to realize our productive orientation. We need freedom of choice and work, freedom of manifestation of our productive power of being. This freedom will really, for the first time begin with the system I have proposed. The system will bring unlimited productive possibilities to society that will undergo unthinkable advantages.

 

To achieve this goal we only need to prevent authorities from taking power that belongs to other people. The system I have proposed guarantees equal rights among the people. That is what authorities today preach publicly and what they secretly and successfully fight about. In searching for a better future, we should not rely on authorities.

 

A “Great“ leader is not needed anymore, not to mention he would even be harmful. The system I have proposed gives power to the people, and it will not allow anybody to take it from the people. All of the people will be able to compete in producing more advantages to others. I know it sounds like a phrase but please try to get accustomed to the system I have proposed, and you will see that is right. Creating advantages to other people will become the highest value in society. That is how good will defeat evil forever. That will bring benefits to society one cannot imagine today.

 

One does not need a university degree to understand the new system. It is very simple because the laws of human and social nature are very simple. These laws became complicated when we do not understand them, and because of it, we create knowledge that does not apply to their essence. Such knowledge alienates us from our nature and complicates our lives.

 

Please do not hesitate to ask questions, to give your remarks and comments. Tell me which ideas of mine you do not like; maybe we can find the universal language. I really do not understand why the system I have proposed was not accepted immediately when I finished the book twelve years ago. Let’s open a dialogue. Write to me. Any comment will help me explain the system better.

 

I am running a fierce battle to get readers. Please recommend this web site to your friends. Unfortunately, along with all the media today, it seems that is my only way to spread the ideas. The sooner the new system becomes known, the sooner the wish to be implemented will appear, the sooner a better future will start.

Cancer and Conspiracy

Cancer and Conspiracy

Cancer is the leading cause of death in the USA immediately after heart disease. The accepted methods of treatment: chemotherapy, radiation and surgery are very aggressive to humans. Chemotherapy uses poisons such as mustard gas to kill cancer cells. Cancer cells are weaker than healthy cells in the human body and by the use of poisons die before healthy cells. Of course, healthy cells die in the process as well as the human defence system against diseases. Radiation operates in a similar principle and surgery removes the cancerous tissues.

 

According to statistics of the American Cancer Association, 60% of patients survive cancer. These statistics may be exaggerated because of more favourable statistics regarding the fight against cancer suit the association better. It should be noted that according to the same statistics, people who survive cancer 5 years after the detection are considered cured. If the cancer returns after this period, it is a new case. This suggests that cancer survival is realistically below 60%.

 

Furthermore, under the influence of cancer-fighting drugs, people sometimes experience fatal heart attacks. If this or similar cases of deaths are not attributed to cancer, which is possible because it is a grey area, then the real survival rate is significantly below 60%. People younger than 45 years present 3% of the total number of deaths, while 70% of fatalities come from those aged 65 and over. The older bodies are weaker and bear the aggressive treatment harder.

 

The American Cancer Society predicts that every other man of the present population will get cancer while one in four will die from it, and one in three women will get cancer and each fifth will die.

 

This information should alert the American government to accumulate resources in the fight against cancer, but they do not. I guess the American government is convinced that enough has been done in the battle against cancer. In the last 40 years, the United States has spent over 200 billion dollars trying to cure cancer, but the cure is not found. It seems the apathy has overcome which accepts that nothing more can be done. The truth is that the whole fight against cancer is under the control of big business whose insufficiently successful treatment methods earn massive profits and that is more important to them than the lives of people. Dr. Peter Glidden explains it well in short.

There are many theories of cancer originations, as well as alternative methods of prevention and treatment of cancer in which nothing is invested.

 

Dr. Otto Heinrich Warburg (1883 – 1970), one of the leading cell biologists of the twentieth century, in his book “The Metabolism of Tumours,” claims that the primary cause of cancer is a lack of oxygen in the cells. Normal cells cannot survive without oxygen, whereas cancerous cells can. According to him the primary cause of cancer is the replacement of the oxygen in normal body cells by a fermentation of sugar. Cancer is no more than a defence mechanism that some cells use to survive without oxygen. The support of this hypothesis lies in the fact that the heart is the only organ that hardly can have cancer because of the lack of oxygen in the heart causes heart attack and death.

 

Dr. Warburg exhibited that the lack of oxygen creates acid cells. Tumorous cells are highly acidic. A healthy pH level (potential of hydrogen) in the cell has a value of 7. All values less than that are acidic which is unhealthy. A lower pH signifies lower concentrations of oxygen molecules, which destroy healthy cells and help the growth of cancer. All values above 7 are alkaline, which has a higher level of oxygen molecules, favouring the growth of healthy cells and hindering cancer growth. According to Dr. Warburg, tumorous cells cannot survive in the presence of high concentrations of oxygen.

 

Dr. Otto Heinrich Warburg received a Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine in 1931. He was also the director of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Cell Physiology in Berlin. It is surprising that the work of such a high authority has not been supported for over 80 years. To be clear, it is not easy to convey oxygen into the cell body because the kidney discards the excess of acidity and alkalinity. However, there are no justifications for the lack of research in the field of increasing the alkalinity of the body which, according to Dr. Warburg, will eradicate cancer.

 

Dr. Theodore A. Baroody, in his book Alkalize or die, from 2002, wrote: “Any stressor that the mind or body interprets and internalizes as too much to deal with leaves an acid residue. Even a mild stressor can cause a partial or total acid-forming reaction.” And continued: “The countless names attached to illness do not really matter. What does matter is that they all come from the same root cause: too much tissue acid waste in the body.”

This introductory presentation suggests that cancer is the result of an unhealthy lifestyle. Unhealthy diet, physical inactivity, and stress reduce the supply of oxygen to the cells and thus favourite the occurrence of cancer. So we can prevent cancer by eating healthy and being physically active. Exercise increases breathing and thus provide more oxygen to the cells which strengthen the body. 

 

Food creates acidity or alkalinity in the body, all depending on what one eats. Unhealthy eating habits that produce acidity and should be avoided are meat, milk, sugar, refined flour, salt, and all their products. Healthy alkaline foods one should increase consumption of are raw fruits and vegetables, whole grains, honey. In this regard, cancer can be suppressed or reduced through a diet prevalent in alkaline foods. Elderly and sick people need to consume mostly such foods. 

 

Dr.George W.Crile (1864-1943) one of the most excellent American surgeons claimed: “There is no such thing as a natural death. All deaths from so-called natural causes are merely the endpoint of progressive acid saturation. Any form of poor health indicates a disturbed state of body chemistry balance – generally an acid state. In fact, over-acidity is common to all health-robbing conditions. An infant is highly alkaline. An 80-year-old person is highly acid. Death is 100% acidity.” Also, he stated: “It is entirely impossible that cancer appears in a person who avoids foods that produce acidity and who rids the body of the acidity with a healthy alkaline diet. In general, cancer is not contracted nor is it inherited. What you are inherited eating habits, environmental and lifestyle. This can result in cancer.” 

It has always been known what healthy food and healthy life are. A government that is concerned about the lives of the people would have to inform the public about the difference between healthy and unhealthy lifestyles. One cannot say that the governments in the Western world do not try to suppress cancer. The Canadian government, for example, recommends a healthy diet and sport and recreation. It calls for free clinical examinations for early cancer detection. It cures all citizens of Canada for free. (However, I cannot help feeling that the Government, by paying the bills for all citizens, primarily supports the Canadian medical industry.) It banned smoking in public places and introduced high taxes on cigarettes. Nevertheless, governments need to stimulate healthy lifestyles a lot more.

 

Western governments should stimulate the production of healthy food by applying tax burdens on unhealthy foods and by prohibiting the use of harmful ingredients in food. The food industry nowadays mostly processes foods with acidic characteristics, then for inexplicable reasons, removes its nutrients and inserts unhealthy substances. For example, from wheat they remove proteins, fats, and minerals, so only acid starch in the end remains. Then they bleach it using chlorine which destroys nutrients in the human body. Such food is consumed far more regularly than cigarettes, and therefore it most likely presents a more significant source of cancer than smoking. But taxing junk food would reduce the profits of the food industry; one of the most profitable industries for big business. They will surely oppose it. Big companies sponsor election campaigns in Western governments, and they will not act against their interests. They will not be taxing junk food.

 

Big businesses lobby in the parliaments of Western countries to permit the use of antibiotics, pesticides, preservatives, and toxins in food production to create higher profits. They have established the Codex Alimentarius Commission, an international standard for food production with which they impose rules for food production worldwide. In such a manner they plan to impose unhealthy food ingredients to all of humanity. This will make people ill worldwide. Furthermore, sick people are profitable to the pharmaceutical and medical industries. These industries really have no interest in healing people because healthy people do not need their products and services. The production of food, drugs and medicine, complement each other in creating profits and not in the health of people. We live in a very unhealthy and immoral society, physically and spiritually.

 

Big businesses support only those methods for treating cancer which bring profits to them and reject methods that do not make money. The average initial cancer treatment through adopted methods costs around $50,000. Big profits certainly discourage the medical industry from finding a cure for cancer, and it is indeed not interested in finding an inexpensive one.

Dr. Tullio Simoncini, Italian doctor and oncologist, born in 1951, practiced the use of baking powder in the fight against cancer. Baking powder, or sodium bicarbonate, has a pH value of 10 and, as such, according to Dr. Warburg, is very suitable for the treatment of cancer. Dr. Simoncini claims that cancer causes the fungus Candida albicans, which is explained in his book: “Cancer Is A Fungus.” Baking powder is indeed the best-known anti-fungal drug, and traditional medicine recognizes it as a cure for many health problems. Besides, baking powder is very inexpensive and adequately used is not harmful to the health of people in any way.


Dr. Simoncini’s teachings have attracted a lot of people suffering from cancer worldwide in the last 20 years. There are numerous testimonies that Dr. Simoncini cured their cancer. Many of them were scrapped by modern medicine. Unfortunately, one patient died after his treatment. I do not know if Dr. Simoncini made a mistake in the therapy, but he lost his medical licence in court and was sentenced to a prison term of three years. It was because his method of treatment was not permissible by the Italian authorities. In the United States 600,000 people die each year from cancer, and of course, no doctors lost their permit nor were they sentenced to jail because they used the legalized methods of treatment.


The regulation of cancer treatment in the world is mainly based on U.S. policy since the United States is recognized as the leader in the development of modern medicine. In America, the procedures are regulated by The Food and Drugs Administration (FDA), The American Medical Association (AMA), The American Chemical Society (ACS), The National Cancer Institute (NCI), and so on. Big businesses have used their economic power to develop control over these institutions and systematically suppress or ban all natural ways of treating cancer. Modern medicine considers natural healing unverifiable and prohibits doctors to use natural medication even though there is plenty of evidence on the effectiveness of treatment.


Science completely withdraws from Dr. Simoncini. First, it should be noted that science is very conservative and secondly, the big capital has been directing it for centuries. Science cannot develop without money, and big businesses only support science which is suitable for them, ignores science that is not useful to them, while science which acts against their interests corrupts or sabotages. Thus, scientific books are saturated with a large amount of incorrect or insufficiently correct knowledge. A scientist who adopts incorrectly or incompletely right knowledge would hardly accept their mistakes even when they become aware of it.


Medical doctors criticize Dr.Simoncini’s work with the thesis that it is not supported by science and clinical practice and that it is contrary to the widely accepted facts of oncology and microbiology. Besides that, scientific circles claim that the work of Dr.Simoncini has no scientific evidence supported by credible experiments and clinical trials. How can he prove his claims with scientific evidence and clinical trials when his method of treatment is not permitted when clinics are forbidden from using his process of healing? Thus medical science actually prevents the healing of people.


Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez, an American nutritionist, has treated cancer patients for more than 30 years by using only natural, healthy food. He argues that the results of his treatment of pancreatic cancer are better than the results achieved by chemotherapy. He has no problem with the authorities because no one can charge him for treating people with healthy food, but he does not have support from the American Institutes without which one cannot effectively fight cancer.


Dr. Gonzalez accuses conventional medicine of not supporting natural healing methods but trying to undermine them. In his book “What Went Wrong” he presents the struggle for recognition of his treatments by the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine and the National Cancer Institute. He did not succeed because biased scientists have sabotaged his work. They were entirely disavowing the positive results of his work. Alternative methods of cancer treatment cannot get support.

The adoption of the natural methods for cancer treatment and for the implementation of clinical research, must not be prevented, especially not because there are no side effects of such therapies. This does not necessarily need to eliminate chemotherapy and radiation as accepted methods of combating cancer. Clinical trials expanded by new treatment methods can present whether the results of such an anti-cancer treatment can be better. I believe it can be. I have as a philosopher come to the conclusion that truths in nature are very simple and we just need to see them. Therefore, I believe that the cure for cancer is somewhere among us, and we just need to pick it up.

 

I believe that a cure for cancer would have been discovered or at least good prevention if big capital did not prevent the effective fight against cancer. Big businesses are secretly united within a single entity and manage to lobby their interests in all governments, institutes, universities, and the media of the Western world, and thus they realize the power that rules the Western world. If there were two centers of power, they would fight each other for supremacy, and we would see it. You saw how uncooperative Slobodan Milosevic, Saddam Hussein, and Muammar Gaddafi ended up. There is an incredible conspiracy behind the big business. I wrote about it in the article: “Jacob Rothschild is Guilty for the Conspiracy Against Humankind.”

 

Through analyzing the failure of the fight against cancer, I cannot help feeling that big businesses use cancer to reduce the over-population of the planet Earth. Cancer is beneficial to big capital because it rids marginalized people, those who do not have enough money for a healthy life, and especially the non-productive elderly. This is a result of the ideology of capitalism, according to which profit is the highest value. The insufficient interest of state governments, academic institutions and the media to solve the problem of cancer suggests that they are all controlled by the same center and are implicitly involved in the crime of murdering people. Conspiracy has affected every pore of today’s society, and I do not see the possibility of a successful contest for the welfare of humankind if we do not face the source of the conspiracy. This is Jacob Rothschild.

October 12, 2014

Related video material:

Suppressed Cancer Cures – Dr. Simoncini – Fungal Hypothesis

What the Cancer Industry doesn’t want YOU to know

Every Cancer Can be Cured in Weeks explains Dr. Leonard Coldwell 

Proven Cancer Cure vs Corruption of The United States Government

SHOCKING Cancer Cures – 100 Years of Suppressed Medicine – Watch This! 

A World Without Cancer — the Story of Vitamin B-17 by G. Edward Griffin

 

Back to Top     

2005.02.10

Let’s love each other

Love is the highest achievement that a man in his life could reach, and therefore it gives the greatest satisfaction possible. In a natural society, love is probably a natural phenomenon that self-develops. In the alienated society in which we live in today, we do not know how to love each other. If we try it, the result is often in controversy with the achievements because the alienation has made our love perverted. To learn how to love, we must return to our nature.


A child loves its parents because it needs them. If as an adult he still depends on authorities, he still loves them, but his love is pretty much underdeveloped, to say the least. Our culture has accepted a system of privileges that stimulates the growth of authorities and restrains the power of subordinated people. The privileged authorities namely take away the freedom and oppress subordinated people. The relation between intrusive authorities and obedient followers always presents some kind of sadomasochism and is therefore very unproductive. It is a perversion of the meaning of love and indeed develops it.


On the other hand, the privileges develop authoritarian narcissism. Narcissism is, in fact, falling in self-love. It is an inferior form of love that prevents the development of love and therefore, prevents a man from reaching the most significant possible advantages a man could achieve in the developed form of love. If you desperately need to become a boss or any kind of authority, if your primary goal in life is earning money, you may achieve an illusion of happiness, but you are headed in the wrong direction.


Narcissistic happiness has a very alienated nature that quickly turns into a conflict with the objective reality and therefore contrary to love, the narcissistic happiness is very unstable and promptly disappears. After such happiness certainly comes disappointment which brings even more significant disadvantages of living and very destructive orientation of such a man. Therefore narcissistic people are much easier to hate than love.


A man can hardly recognize his narcissistic character in himself so that you probably think that narcissistic people are some other people and not you. Almost all people possess some narcissistic characteristics due to the reason our alienated everyday culture teaches us to be narcissistic. Generally speaking, we may say that more privileged people are more narcissistic and therefore they love less. However, the differences are often only in shades. That is the reason the world we live in, is as it is.


To overcome the narcissistic orientation of people we need to accept the nature of society. If a man wants to differ from animals, then he must recognize that the nature of society has a foundation based on freedom and equality of the people.


Therefore, the system I have proposed offers each man full independence, freedom of expression and acting under the condition that such freedom of expression and acting cannot bring other people harm or disadvantages. The system will be forcing people to respect each other. That will be achieved by the system of mutual evaluation. Each man will have an equal right to evaluate the activity of any other person.


Each positive assessment will automatically bring a small award to the assessed person, and each negative evaluation will result in the punishment of the same form. This will direct each member of society to create the highest possible advantages for the community and to diminish or abolish the creation of all kinds of disadvantages.


Technically watching this looks much like love because love is based on indiscriminately caring for others and in giving. But it is still not loving. Once the implementation of this system starts, the people would probably not feel satisfaction in the very act of giving and therefore, that would not be love. In the beginning, the pleasure will come from the egotistic need to getting better evaluations from the people. However, it will be beneficial because people will be creating advantages and avoid making disadvantages for all society.


Narcissism is the leading cause that prevents people from accepting my ideas, from having good and joyful lives. Narcissism is the worst enemy to humankind ever, but most people do not know that it even exists. That is the reason my struggle is very hard. However, I am very persistent in promoting the new system, and one day it will be accepted. Then the people will be relieved from narcissism which is the condition sine qua non for learning what love is.


Developed love requires an entirely productive orientation of a man that is pretty much unknown in our society. That is the reason love is rare today. The new system will enable such direction. It will free people from all types of alienation the authorities have been imposing to society through the history of mankind and will teach people to live following their own nature. The responsibility before the people that the new system proposes will motivate people to set their needs following the possibilities of satisfying them.


This is the chief prerequisite for overcoming destructiveness in society because people who permanently satisfy their needs are not destructive.


Then society will be developing a new culture that will create productive orientation of people. Society will start building love in its best and most beautiful shape. Even the worst people may find some love in themselves when they are satisfied with their lives. As time passes, they will love as well. Love is the final result of the system I have proposed. Once people start loving each other, they will make an entirely new world, benefits that are beyond the wildest dreams in today’s alienated society. You can find more about that in my book Humanism.


A developed man does not depend on anybody because everything he needs he could achieve alone; he loves other people unconditionally just because they are. He finds great satisfaction in free productive acting, in building himself as a productive man and even greater joy in love.


Unknown medical doctor wrote: Let’s dance in the rain!

How to Dance in the Rain:

 

It was a busy morning, about 8:30, when an elderly gentleman in his 80’s arrived to have stitches removed from his thumb. He said he was in a hurry as he had an appointment at 9:00 am. I took his vital signs and had him take a seat, knowing it would be over an hour before someone would to able to see him. I saw him looking at his watch and decided, since I was not busy with another patient, I would evaluate his wound. On exam, it was well healed, so I talked to one of the doctors, got the needed supplies to remove his sutures and redress his wound. While taking care of his wound, I asked him if he had another doctor’s appointment this morning, as he was in such a hurry.

 

The gentleman told me no, that he needed to go to the nursing home to eat breakfast with his wife. I inquired as to her health. He told me that she had been there for a while and that she was a victim of Alzheimer’s Disease. As we talked, I asked if she would be upset if he was a bit late. He replied that she no longer knew who he was, that she had not recognized him in five years now. I was surprised, and asked him, ‘And you still go every morning, even though she doesn’t know who you are?’ He smiled as he patted my hand and said, ‘She doesn’t know me, but I still know who she is.’

 

I had to hold back tears as he left, I had goose bumps on my arm, and thought, ‘That is the kind of love I want in my life.’ True love is neither physical, nor romantic. True love is an acceptance of all that is, has been, will be, and will not be. With all the jokes and fun that are in e-mails, sometimes there is one that comes along that has an important message. This one I thought I could share with you. The happiest people don’t necessarily have the best of everything; they just make the best of everything they have. I hope you share this with someone you care about. I just did. ‘Life isn’t about how to survive the storm, But how to dance in the rain.’