Razotuđenja komune  

3.1            Studija procesa razotuđenja komune  

 

Povijest čovječanstva je povijest nemoći čovjeka i vladavine autoriteta, povijest autoritativnih, nametnutih i stoga otuđenih kategorija vrijednosti, otuđenog djelovanja pa tako i otuđenog znanja. Povijest čovječanstva je povijest otuđenja ili otuđena povijest.  

Ako mislite da je razvoj društva učinio situaciju danas nešto drugačijom nego što je bila varate se. Ona je samo donijela nove forme iza kojih se krije vjekovna potreba vladanja čovjeka nad čovjekom. Danas se većina predsjednika država kune u demokraciju a na svakom koraku je uspješno izbjegavaju koliko god je to moguće zato što vole vlast u svojim rukama. Večina popova se moli Bogu da Isus Krist dođe što prije ali u stvarnosti oni bi puno više voljeli zadržati pravo da interpretiraju njegove riječi onako kako im to najbolje odgovara. Većina vlasnika kompanija se kune u slobodno tržište dok se u stvarnosti jako trude da ostvare monopol na tržištu. Većina učitelja je uvjerena da vole prenositi znanje učenicima a u stvari oni vole da vladaju nad učenicima pomoću znanja koji posjeduju. Većina roditelja se kune u vlastitu ljubav prema djeci ali iza te ljubavi se najčešće krije ljubav prema moći koja kontrolira djecu. Svi teže privilegimama ali privilegije su zlo za privilegirane ljude i i za cijelo društvo.

Nema sumnje da svi ti vlastodršci nad čovjekom sputavaju čovjeka u svakom trenutku njegova života. Čovjek kada postane svijestan sebe u takvom društvu već je vezan za utjecaje otuđenih generacija i prisiljen je da prihvati otuđen svijet jer mu je drugi nedostupan, jer ga ne vidi. Ukoliko čovjek pokuša da prevlada nepogodnosti proizašlih iz otuđenja teško može doći do rezultata jer mu je otuđenje oduzelo mogućnost da prepozna svoje prirodne potrebe, jer uveliko razmišlja preko otuđenih premisa sagledavanja uzroka nepogodnosti, jer nailazi na prepreke otuđenog društva. 

Otuđeno društvo je zbog nedos­tatka objektivnog znanja podložno slučajnom izboru opredjeljenja koje vuku korijen u otuđenim vizijama pogodnosti. Takvo društvo je sklono idolatriji, fetišizmu i vrlo površnom izboru životnih opredjeljenja. Čovjek u otuđenom društvu temelji vlastitu vjeru u pogodnosti na otuđenim postavkama i stoga prije ili kasnije doživljava razočarenje. Tada čovjek dolazi u proturiječnost sa vlastitom prirodom što mu donosi velike nepogodnosti. Kada čovjekove otuđene potrebe u realnom životu naiđu na prepreke u njegovoj otuđenoj svijesti ugrožena je i njegova egzistencija. Tada i sama sumnja u ispravnost njegove orijentacije donosi napetost koja ga tjera da se bori za otuđenu viziju opstanka. Ta borba često bez ikakve stvarne potrebe ugrožava drugog čovjeka.  

Ugrožavanje čovjekovih otuđenih potreba donosi agresiju po kojoj se otuđenje može i prepoznati. Takav čovjek čeka bilo kakvu priliku ili autoritativni poziv da agresivno nastupi. Ukoliko čovjek formira narcisoidnu viziju svijesti tada inducira veliku destrukciju prema svojoj okolini. Destruktivno orijentirani čovjek uništava uvjete za ostvarenje vlastitih pogodnosti. Takav čovjek umjesto da pročisti svoje misli i izvuče zaključke u grani­cama mogućnosti i tada krene naprijed, prolazi slijepo sa jakim destruktivnim emocijama kroz život i kao takav bori se u korist vlastite nemoći, za vlastite nepogodnosti.  

Kada su u čovjekovoj viziji vanjske sile isuviše jake, tada čovjek potiskuje svoje potrebe. Potisnute potrebe čovjek ne može zadovoljiti što kroz svakodnevni život u čovjeku inducira nedefinirani nemir. Odvajanje života od čovjekove prirode donosi neurotične poremećaje i depresivna stanja. Izlaz iz takvih stanja čovjek često nalazi u privremenom potiskivanu emocija pomoću alkohola, droge ili medikamenata.  

Što je čovjek otuđeniji od vlastite prirode, veće su devijacije njegove ličnosti, veće protuvrijednosti u čovjeku, teže kontrolira vlastita emotivna stanja pa tako i energiju. Tada je čovjek sklon bilo kojem obliku autodestrukcije. U ekstremnom slučaju otuđenje, nezadovoljenjem potreba, formira napetosti takvih razmjera da čovjek ne može objektivno pojmiti prirodu. Takav čovjek je bolestan čovjek, a takvo društvo je bolesno društvo.                        

Sve što čovjek u životu radi, radi sa idejom vlastitog prosperiteta. Međutim, u današnjem otuđenom društvu, gdje su formirane subjektivne, pogrešne kategorije vrijednosti, učinak je suprotan. Otuđeni čovjek živi po principu vlastite negacije, on djeluje protiv vlastite prirode zato što ne poznaje svoju prirodu. 

****

Problem otuđenja društva je širok i dubok i stoga mu se treba suprostavljati na sveobuhvatan način. Dosadašnjom analizom se može zaključiti da sve društvene nepogodne pojave proizlaze iz čovjekove nemoći odnosno neznanja i otuđenja nastalog autoritativnim ograničenjima. Sa time u vezi može se zaključiti da sve društveno pozi­tivne pojave mogu proizaći iz znanja stečenog u prirodnom životu baziranom na slobodi i ravnopravnosti svih pojedinaca jer se samo tako razvija čovjekova produktivna moć.  

Vlast čovjeka nad čovjekom je svakako glavni problem današnjeg društva. Ona mora biti uklonjena ukoliko želimo riješiti probleme koje imamo. To nije nimalo lako ostvariti ali ova knjiga nudi uvjerljivo rješenje. U tom rješenju mi svi moramo nešto malo žrtvovati ako želimo da dobijemo puno više i da izgradimo daleko bolji svijet. 

Društvo treba da formira sistem koji može produktivno egzistirati bez autoriteta i njihovih ideologija u slobodi i ravnopravnosti svih članova. Ono treba omogućiti svakom pojedincu da vlastitom praksom stjeće znanje. Čovjek sam kao pojedinac teško može formirati objek­tivnu predodžbu o zakonitostima kretanja u prirodi jer ga samostalnost lako usmjerava prema subjektivnim određenjima pa tako i prema otuđenju. Društvo kao skup subjektivnih individua može ravnopravnim odnosom kroz praksu formirati objektivniju viziju stvarnosti. Što društvo bude više upoznavalo objektivnu zakonitost prirodnih kretanja, kategorija vrijednosti i svoju prirodu, to će manje biti otuđeno, to će se više približiti vlastitoj prirodi a to znači i prosperitetu.  

Ova knjiga prikazuje proces razotuđenja društva. Da bi se razotuđenje moglo provesti mora se uspostaviti sloboda i jednakost među ljudima. Jednaka prava među ljudima i istinska demokracija će oduzeti moć autoritetima i uspostaviti zdravo i dobro društvo. Ova knjiga prikazuje kako se takvo društvo može izgraditi. Naglasak knjige je na političkim i ekonomskim odnosima jer su oni osnovni odnosi u društvu.

 

Humanizam

3              Humanizam
3.1                  Studija procesa razotuđenja komune
3.1.1                     Osnove politike humanizma
3.1.2 
                    Osnove ekonomije humanizma

3.1.2.1                         Dobar kapitalizam

3.1.2.2                         Dobar socijalizam

3.1.2.2.1                               Cijena rada
3.1.2.2.2                               Raspodjela rada
3.1.2.2.3                               Cijena robe
3.1.2.2.4                               Novac
3.1.2.2.5                               Obrtna novčana sredstva
3.1.2.2.6                               Razvoj privrede
3.1.2.2.7                               Raspodjela dohodaka
3.1.2.2.8                               Upotreba nekretnina
3.1.2.2.9                               Zajednička potrošnja
3.2                  Razotuđenje udruženih komuna
3.2.1                     Udruživanje politike
3.2.2                     Udruživanje ekonomije
3.2.3                     Udruživanje država
3.3                  Očekivanja novog sistema

Screenplays

Scenarios

 

My book “Humanism” presents the development of society starting from capitalism to socialism to communism, the most developed society. The book introduces a lot of new ideas in the political and economic fields so that it might not be easily understandable to the average reader. For this reason, I have created three stories which simply, through dialogue, present the most significant characteristics of all three systems. Together, they show a bright future for humankind.

 

Since movies are generally popular, I’ve presented the stories in the form of screenplays. Right now I am trying to find a director or producer for this movie. Until I succeed, by reading this screenplay you may get to know the principles of how a very developed society will look like in the future.  

 

Scenario “Good Capitalism” – This scenario presents the highest stage of humane capitalism through storyline. Unemployment would be eliminated by shortening work hours. Employers would reduce turnover by raising wages which, in turn, would bring better life to all. The script has been completed in December 2011.

 

Scenario “Good Socialism” – This scenario presents the highest stage of humane socialism through storyline. Socialism will win over capitalism by having more market of work than capitalism could afford. That would make socialism more productive than capitalism so that it will send capitalism down in history. The scenario is in production but you can read a part of it. 

 

Scenario “Good Communism – The scenario presents humane communism through storyline. It is the final stage of socialism. To achieve it, all the people should allocate, by their free will, all their incomes for taxes. That would make all goods and services free of charge for all the people. The script has been completed in September 2006

 

The Society

1.2    Society

 

By their nature, the individual is a free biological being and a social being as well. “The individual who knows” is aware that they will satisfy their natural needs to a greater extent by associating with another individual. By associating with others, the individual accomplishes a higher power in nature and, accordingly, a greater possibility of satisfying their natural needs. The joining of people represents a community of individuals with specific and collective needs.   

A “society that knows” is based on equal human rights. The establishment of equal human rights is the only condition for creating a good society. Without equal human rights, a good society cannot be formed. Equal human rights mean that whatever is allowed to somebody in social relationships must be allowed to everybody else, and vice versa, what is forbidden to somebody must be banned to everybody.  

The individual is a natural need for another individual and the value as well. In a “society that knows,” each individual has respect to all members of society irrespective of the differences in their degree of ability or power. In such a society each individual is entitled to participate in the decision-making processes about the rules for joint activities. In this way, the sum of all individual needs form the optimal collective needs of society, which determine the rules of the social relationship.  

Such rules establish the rights and obligations of individuals. The rights determine the freedoms of people, while obligations diminish them as the people are forced to behave toward nature and society in the way that suits the community as a whole. “The society that knows” regulates the rules of the social relationship by reducing the personal inconveniences and by increasing the collective conveniences to all. Such rules suit all members of society to the most significant extent possible.  

Society has the same reactions to the relationship with nature as individuals. “The society that knows” forms needs following its nature within the limits of the natural power of realization and thus satisfies their needs and accomplishes the conveniences.   

One can say that the individual during their lifetime takes the roads of development of the society. A child has neither knowledge nor ability to meet their natural needs. The parents who know how to live following their nature are satisfied and as such develop love toward the children. They take over ongoing care for meeting the children’s natural needs. Such an attitude brings warmth and joy, which is a prerequisite for the prosperity of both the child and society. The people not deprived in their youth, later become sound protagonists in society.     

“The individual who knows” brings benefits to themselves and the society as a whole. Therefore, “the society that knows” is interested in having each member be familiar with the amount of knowledge they possess. “The society that knows” forms an impartial knowledge about the laws of movements in nature, and educates the young members on the rights, duties, and responsibilities for their wellbeing in society and nature. The young who see active and satisfied adult members of “the society that knows” form a belief in a convenient future and, therefore, accepts with pleasure the rights, duties and responsibilities of the community. “The society that knows” forms the education that follows the interest of the students and the society, as in this way the act of education satisfies the needs and desires of the students and produces benefits to society as a whole.   

Society meets its needs by work. “The society that knows” establishes needs by mutual agreements, and then by the associated work meets the needs and in such a way accomplishes benefits. “In the society that knows” each worker has an equal right to work in every work post, and the most productive interested worker gets the job. In this way, society reaches the most significant productivity and the highest values in the production, while freedom in choosing jobs enables work to become a value for itself.   

“The society that knows” distributes work to workers in the way that the work posts form balanced conveniences to them as well as in distributing the results of work. Such an approach builds an equal interest of workers to perform every work. Such social attitude toward work allows the coverage of all work posts with the workers who perform their jobs following their own natural needs and abilities.   

An autonomous worker works only if they have a direct interest. On the other hand, if they lose such interest, they lose the need to work and stop working. In associated labour, the worker is forced to work when it is a collective need, regardless of whether it suits them or not. Associated labour may be inconvenient and, therefore, in “the society that knows” each individual may exercise the right to perform work that brings them less inconvenience.   

An autonomous worker bears responsibility for their work by their work accomplishments. In associated labour, an irresponsible worker may inflict great inconveniences to the working collective because of the relation existing among the work processes. This is why “the society that knows” forms the efficient principles of accountability for the workers who fail to perform the work obligations and for behaviour not suitable to society. Therefore, each member of such a society behaves responsibly toward nature, community, work, and work results. Being aware of their responsibility, they form the work needs following their nature and possibility of realization. Such an orientation is a precondition for satisfying needs and for the basis of a constructive orientation of society.   

In “the society that knows,” the products of collective work are distributed according to the contribution of each individual in the process of production. The work that produces a higher value brings greater conveniences to the society, and thus deserves a higher reward in the share of the products of communal work. The distribution of work results among the workers has also performed according to the degree of inconveniences occurred during the work. A more inconvenient work duty requires a higher compensation, and therefore it receives a higher share in the distribution of the conveniences coming from the result of work. In the distribution of produced goods we should count the contribution of workers’ ancestors as well because each result of work contains a vast quantity of past labour.   

“The society that knows” always forms solidary distribution elements, which guarantee the existence of the entire population, regardless of whether they participate directly in the production. In that way, society creates a view that the individual is a value to the individual. Solidarity provides products intended for individual consumption to everyone who needs it. It establishes social stability and helps the development of new forces in society that reproduce such orientation.  

The society that continually manages to satisfy its needs is a satisfied, powerful and noble society. The community with generous members necessarily helps each other and develops unity which brings prosperity. It believes in its force and is confident to be able to reach conveniences. The consequence of such belief results in love appearing among the members of society, the social equilibrium and harmony with nature.   

In such a society each member helps the development of every individual, as in this way they also contribute to their own development. Giving is a source of manifestation of the power of being that brings great benefits. “The society that knows” ensures the reproduction of constructive orientation and can plan its development and prosperity. Such a society is a healthy society.

The Individual

 

1.1       Individual

 

Nature contains an infinite quantity of matter charged with energy which creates an endless multitude of forces, actions and reactions, tensions and equilibriums. The individual is a living part of nature; they possess the sensorial ability, thoughtfulness and the ability to act consciously. By moving, nature creates sensorial advantages and disadvantages to the individual. The sensorial difference between the advantages and disadvantages forms the individual’s needs.  

The individual defines their needs through thoughts. By thoughts, the individual creates and accumulates the consciousness of the advantages and disadvantages of their relationships with nature. In different conditions, thoughts form different emotional states. When the state of nature does not suit an individual, it creates in them a sensorial and emotional tension that concentrates energy towards finding an appropriate state.   

The individual mostly meets their needs by conscious action. The intensity of their actions depends directly on the degree of the disadvantages. Small disadvantages induce small moving energy, while significant obstacles that also bring into question their survival, accumulate the entire individual’s strength in their struggle for survival. The process of activity lasts until the individual satisfy their needs.  

Satisfaction of the needs brings advantages that are proportionate to the intensity of surpassed disadvantages. Advantages appear in the form of relaxation from the inconvenient tension and in a sensorial and emotional satisfaction. The process results in saturation. The relation of the needs and saturation change periodically, with the intervals dependant on the nature of the needs. The period of saturation relieves the individual from their needs.   

The individual depends on nature, therefore they are not entirely free. In its broadest sense, freedom represents a state of full independence and, accordingly, does not allow the formation of needs, either. The individual who has vital needs does not need freedom in the broadest sense. In a narrow sense, freedom should be a state which allows the satisfaction of needs because the individual who cannot meet their needs are not free. Such freedom is a condition for the accomplishment of the individual’s subsistence, for the development of their abilities, powers, cognition, and therefore the individual can and needs to have such freedom.   

Nature has unlimited power compared to the individual; however, thanks to their biological development, the individual adapts to the movements of nature and develops their abilities so that in normal, natural conditions they can meet their natural needs. The individual can be free in nature. Their freedom is based on their ability to do what they want; however, such freedom depends on their cognition that they want what they can do.   

During their lifetime, the individual acquires a multitude of favourable and unfavourable sensorial and emotional states arising from relations with nature. By controlling and arranging their reflective determinations as regards to the sensorial and emotional aspects of the life practice, they create knowledge about the conditions bringing advantages and disadvantages in nature. Knowledge formation is the individual’s greatest ability. Knowledge implies the forming of objective definitions of the laws of movements in nature, the definitions that under equal conditions form equal reactions irrespective of the degree of advantage or disadvantage that such definitions create to people. Objective definitions present the laws of the movements in nature as they are.    

Knowledge gives power to the individual to meet their needs by a conscious and organized work. The individual opposes the disadvantages in nature with planned work. They produce the means needed for their survival and the creation of more significant advantages. The working ability gives the individual a high power in nature.   

Anything that creates benefits has its value. The individual accepts the value in cases where differences may exist between advantages and disadvantages, where needs are not satisfied or may not be satisfied. The value is proportional to needs.   

The work output has its value in use or natural value. Natural value of the products of labour meets the individual’s natural needs related to the survival and living standard. The work brings advantages by itself to some extent so that it has some usable value to some extent as well. The individual’s bright future lies in finding the job that brings more benefits in its duration because in that way the individual reaches more existential conveniences. As a general rule, such conveniences last longer and may also be more intensive than the conveniences arising from consuming work results.   

By using knowledge, the individual defines the rightness of movements in nature, and the more deeply they reveal them, the more broadly they can apply their regularity. Knowledge gives the individual the power that is in its form unlimited to nature. The more the individual develops knowledge, the higher the needs they can create and meet, the more control they have over the conditions forming their sensorial and emotional states. “The individual who knows” can discover and build their progressive orientations, to live in harmony with their nature, to rely on their forces, to believe in their power and themselves. Such an individual can understand their relationship with nature, to develop love with nature, to develop a constructive relationship with nature, and to find pleasure in connection with nature. Such an individual necessarily lives in harmony with nature. 

The more the individual knows, the more they meet their natural needs, the more balanced they are, the more they believe in conveniences, the more optimism they build toward life, the more relaxed, content, joyful they live. Generally speaking, this is a description of an individual who lives a natural productive life and as such can be easily recognized.   

Wisdom is the highest level of knowledge. It is acquired only by the experience gained by healthy, natural living. The wise individual continually satisfies their natural needs and therefore experiences a significant satisfaction. They have everything they need, irrespective of the quantity and quality of what they have, and consequently, they are satisfied. By overcoming the inconveniences, the conveniences also lose importance. In other words, when differences between the possible conveniences and inconveniences get smaller, the needs also get smaller. The more the individual knows the less need they have, which means that by living they come closer to freedom in its broadest sense. 

Humanism Shortly

 

        1    Humanism in five words gives what humanism is in five words.

        2    Humanism in a sentence gives an idea of the book in one sentence.

        3    Humanism in Essence gives an essence of the book in 350 words.

        4    Humanism in Hints gives a basic idea of the book in 650 words.

        5    Humanism for Dummies gives an inspiration for the book in 2300 words.

        6    Humanism in Brief gives a more theoretical view of the book in 2800 words.

        7    Humanism Clearly gives a practical view of the book in 3100 words.

           Humanism is joy of living or how the system gives joy of life in 2900 words.

        9    Humanism Extensively gives an extensive view of the book in 5600 words.

Diskusije o religiji

Nedavno sam otkrio ogromnu sličnost između onoga što sam kreirao i onoga što bi Isus Krist trebao kreirati kad se vrati na planetu Zemlju. To otvara neku mogućnost da ja mogu biti Isus Krist. Zato sam dopunio ove internet stranice sa diskusijom o kršćanskoj religiji. Ja sam nov na tom polju tako da će mi vaši komentari pomoći da naučim nešto. Znam, ja kao Isus Krist bi trebao biti najveći autoritet u kršćanskoj religiji ali nažalost, propustio sam sve tećajeve o tome. Prihvatite moju ispriku a ja ću vam dati svoje mišljenje bazirano na logici i intuiciji koju sam mogao dobiti direktno od Boga. Naravno ja nisam siguran u to i zato vas molim da sve to uzmete uvjetno.

 

Otvorite slijedeće diskusije:

 

1.    Samo jedno viđenje problema        3 komentara

2.    Odgovor jednoj velikoj kršćanskoj organizaciji        1 komentar

3.    Pitanje        2 komentara

4.    Dileme        1 komentar