Essays

My investigation of 9/11      I’ve investigated the terrorist attack on 9/11.                  2017-11-05

Cancer and Conspiracy        Presents why cancer is not cured yet.                               2014-10-12

What God Wants                    Presents what is God’s will and how to fulfill it.              2013-10-18

Mayan Prophecy is True       Presents the prophecy of Maya                                         2012-12-21

Jacob Rothschild is Guilty   Presents the conspiracy of the Rothschild family           2012-12-20

Homosexuality                       Presents homosexuality.                                                     2012-11-20

Failures of Marxism              Presents how to achieve socialism and communism.   2012-04-04

Epilogue                                  Presents the conclusion of today’s society.                     2011-04-27

The Future of Economics     This essay presents the future economy.                        2011-02-12

The Future of Values            This essay presents the future values.                              2011-02-12

The Future of Democracy    This essay presents how to develop democracy.            2011-01-15

Wisdom                                   This essay presents how to achieve wisdom.                  2010-12-17

Open letter                              I sent this letter to Lord Jacob Rothschild.                       2010-10-23

Everlasting life?                     This essay talks about interpretations of Christianity.    2010-08-24

Alienation                               This essay presents alienation.                                           2010-07-08

Do you love?                           This essay presents how to achieve love.                         2009-06-22

Privileges are Evil                 This article presents the evil of privileges.                         2009-03-08

The End of Capitalism          This essay defines a system after capitalism                   2009-01-06

My Clash with Sciences       This essay defines the mistakes of sciences.                   2008-12-04

My Debt to Yugoslavia         This essay presents the war in Yugoslavia.                        2008-08-08

Has Antichrist Come?           This article presents the possible Antichrist.                    2004-01-07

Am I Jesus Christ?                My scientific work will create paradise on Earth.              2003-11-29  

Am I Jesus Christ?

Am I Jesus Christ, Messiah, Krishna, Maitreya Buddha?

I am a scientist who has applied for the work position of Jesus Christ. Why? Jesus Christ is supposed to make heaven on earth, and I have defined how to do it in my book Humanism.

 

I have created a new social system, which provides security, stability, and a good life for all. The most important part of the new system is establishing equal rights among the people. Equal rights have actually never existed because individuals have always taken power over others. Privileged powers are the reason the history of humankind was so evil. Therefore privileges must be put to an end. Now I will explain how to do it.

 

We must participate in making all decisions affecting our interests. For example, we can directly decide what percentage of our salaries we need to pay for taxes and what is the best way to spend it. Today, leaders of countries allocate most of the tax money for armies. Once people decide about the allocation of tax money, armies will cease to exist and waging wars will be impossible.

 

I have invented democratic anarchy. What is this? This is a system where each person gets an equal right to evaluate any other person. A positive evaluation should bring a grant of let’s say one dollar to the assessed person, and a negative assessment should carry a one dollar penalty. In that simple way, each person will get real power in society and therefore will be respected. This measure will direct people to produce the highest possible conveniences to others and to abolish making inconveniences. That means bullies will not harass children at school anymore, bosses will not abuse employees, politicians will not lie to people. If the president of a country does not follow the people’s needs, he might get millions of bad evaluations, which will cost him millions of dollars. Everyone will be responsible to all and that will eliminate the evil of privileges. In such a system human beings will become values, and that will form a good society.

 

My system offers more market than capitalism could afford. The market for public work posts will be specially developed. A worker, who provides more profits, produced goods, better, cleaner, or cheaper production at any time for any job in public companies, would get the job. I am a genius who has developed the idea for almost 30 years, and I am confident it would work correctly. No economy can be more productive than the one where the best worker gets each job. Such an economy will quickly become more profitable than the capitalist one so that capitalism will be forced to recede. Private enterprises will join the public companies, and the owners will be adequately compensated. The new economy will bring security and abundance to all.

 

So then if I am so smart why has nobody recognized me so far? Two years ago Google opened a competition calling for good ideas to change the world. I participated with my project along with more than 150.000 others. The winner has not been declared after more than a year. Why? Google has difficulties accepting my idea because it presents the end of capitalism, the very system Google is built on. Google also has problems rejecting my idea because my system will one day completely change the world and make it a beautiful place to live. I think Google has dropped the competition and my project is the reason.

 

I wrote thousands of letters to social scientists, but they didn’t respond to me. Why? Social sciences are so useless today for proposing a good society , that nothing can prevent them from going down in history. Everything will change. The economy I have proposed will be so simple that people would be able to master it without attending schools. All people will become good economists, psychologists, judges, philosophers just because they live in the system I have proposed.

 

I wrote the screenplay Heaven that presents the bright future of humankind, but I could not get support to make the movie. Also, I do not have access to media. Why? Antichrist is here. He rules the world by secretly possessed wealth his family has been gaining for centuries. His name is Jacob Rothschild. He controls banks, corporations, governments, NATO, media, and all of us. We depend on him everywhere. He takes our freedom by using the power that should belong to us. But my idea will prevail. Six years ago I offered him to give up from ruling the world and save his wealth. If he refuses it, he will lose everything. Once you people accept the system, I have proposed you would gain the power to live without him, but he will not be able to live without you.

 

My system is the only reasonable solution for humankind, but it is still not recognized. We are approaching December 21, 2012, and I will try to make it a day of the recognition of my work. I question whether I am Jesus mainly to bring attention to my work. I can do the same by asking whether I am Messiah, Krishna or Buddha. I might be recognized as all of these saviours, but I feel pretty good as Aleksandar. My teaching will save the world from all human evil and improve it beyond the wildest dreams today.

 

April 30, 2010

————-

Seven years ago I wrote:

 

Am I Jesus Christ? 

 

Christians await the return of Jesus Christ, who according to the Bible resides in Heaven next to God the Father. I must say that I didn’t hear nor see God the Father and that fact says that I am most likely not Jesus Christ. However, when Jesus Christ returns to Earth, He should create paradise on earth. I have defined the only possible way that will unconditionally and unavoidably achieve it. This fact says that I still may be Jesus Christ.

 

***

Twenty years ago I was very disappointed with the world around me and therefore decided to find a way to create a good society. It took me ten years to define a new socio-economic system that would make a good society and the same amount of time to get a clear vision of how the future of mankind would look like. I have presented the results of my research in the book Humanism. The system I have proposed is entirely different and much better than all known models and will, as time passes, replace them all.

 

Three professors of philosophy, sociology and economy from the Belgrade University were very kind to read my book on my request. Their reviews of my book basically say that I am not crazy, that I did not write stupid things and that I offer a significant change and improvement to society. They were not able or not willing to analyze my work deeply because my book turns everything they knew upside down.

 

The system I have proposed is much simpler than the one used today; however, it still requires a lot of time for its understanding because it is entirely new. For getting used to the new way of thinking and taking a good picture of the new system, besides reading the book it is necessary to perform a lot of time in its analysis, and that is something that I was not able to initialize with anybody so far. Someone might guess that scientists receive many new systems daily so that they do not have time for studying my work. That is not a case. Besides, there is only one irrefutable study in the history of humankind that promises Paradise on Earth and that one is mine.

 

In the last ten years I have sent thousands of letters to University professors, social scientists and researchers; presidents of countries, corporations and various societies; editors of journals, newspapers, publishing houses; online magazines and newsgroups; political parties, foundations; to ordinary people all over the world and got some responses but actually, I have not made any progress.

 

Authorities have been mentally oppressing you people from the ancient time so that you have not developed an ability to find the truth in you without their influences. To build a better world, I do not use “rocket science” in my book but straightforward and logical conclusions that are strange to you. That is the reason I have to build a big authority on me myself so that you even consider accepting my ideas. Unexpectedly, it seems that the Christian religion might help me in that.

 

***

At the beginning of this year (2003) I found, through the Internet, significant similarities between what I wrote and what Jesus Christ is supposed to do. I will talk about the main points that I found in the Holy Bible and which are accepted among religious people as the absolute truth. I quote here important verses from the Bible and from religious articles from the Internet:

 

When Jesus came the first time it was to settle the problem of sin. He did not come to settle the problems of government nor the social dilemmas that harass our world. When He comes again He will solve all government problems, and political and social ills. Source.

 

Jesus Christ will return to earth to spiritually transform its people and establish utopia, a paradise on earth. The combination of removing Satan’s influence, giving humanity God’s Spirit and teaching the world the laws and ways of God will produce 1,000 years of peace and a society blessed beyond its wildest dreams. Source

 

The ideals of happiness, peace, freedom, justice, and prosperity, all of which have been merely dreams of most of the world’s people throughout the ages, actually will be realized during the Millennium. The millennial reign of Jesus Christ will be a transition government from the inept, corrupt rule of mankind to the orderly, perfect rule of God, the Father (1 Cor. 15:24-28). As impossible as it may seem now, all evil permanently will be detached and disunited from all good after this period of 1,000 years, the Millennium, has concluded. Source

 

The wolf and the lamb shall feed together, the lion shall eat straw like the ox. (Isaiah 65:21-25)

 

And He shall judge among many people, and rebuke strong nations afar off; and they shall beat their swords into ploughshares, and their spears into pruning-hooks: nation shall not lift up a sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more. But they shall sit every man under his vine and under his fig tree; and none shall make them afraid; (Micah 1-4).

 

“I will cleanse you from all your filthiness and from all your idols. I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit within you; I will take the heart of stone out of your flesh and give you a heart of flesh. I will put My Spirit within you and cause you to walk in My statutes, and you will keep My judgments and do them” (Ezekiel 36:22-27).

 

Jesus’ reign will bring: Abundance, prosperity, stability, restoration and security (Amos 9:13 -15).

 

My book describes the system that will fulfill the achievements of these quotes. Please find what it is about in these short articles here: Humanism Shortly and here: Essential Thoughts.

 

In the new system, I have proposed, evil in society will not exist anymore. Paradise will be established on Earth, and as it is said in the Bible, everyone would go from here to Heaven. However, I doubt those quotes above are supposed to be understood entirely literally. For example, if I were Jesus Christ, I would neither like to be the President nor the King of the World. I value my freedom. However, my absence from power will not be missed because I made a better solution. I have created a system that will allow you people, to take control over yourselves, following the will of God.

 

I am sure that the realization of the system I have proposed is an inevitable process. The system will work because it follows the nature of society. The nature of society is, in its essence, straightforward but so far it was not defined accurately, and the history of humankind has been proving it by social instabilities. I am also sure that there is no other reasonable choice for society because it does not have more than one nature. If Jesus Christ comes after me, He would not be able to find a better solution for humankind in the existing nature. The system I have proposed may be tested in a few years in a small community, and that would give the answer, whether I am right or wrong. If the system I have proposed proves that it may make Paradise on Earth where “lions and antelopes will eat together,” where state’s laws will not be needed anymore while the people will live in perfect harmony, am I then Jesus Christ?

 

Another essential fact in the Bible is Judgment Day.

 

Quote: Romans 14:10-12 – We shall all stand before the judgment seat of Christ. Every knee shall bow and every tongue shall confess. Every one of us shall give account of himself to God. In this life people often fail to keep appointments, but no one will be absent for this appointment, and no one will be tardy. No excuses will be accepted. No amount of wealth, influence, or power can prevent your appearance.

 

That cannot be taken literally otherwise I would pity Jesus Christ. Every second about 5 people die around the world. Jesus Christ would have to work non-stop on it and judge each man in 1/5th of a second. That seems to me unlikely. For that purpose, God must have some kind of information technology that collects information about each man. I have simulated a similar process in my system. Such a process might show the people what they should expect when they die while they are still alive. Please pay attention to the value of the productive power of man from the article Humanism Extensively for example. If a man at the end of his life possesses a positive value of his productive power, he would probably go to Paradise, and vice versa, if at the end of his life he would have a negative productive value he would probably go to hell. A man with a negative value of productive power will certainly not have a pleasant life in this world. That will force people to be very responsible for everything they do, and that will contribute to building Paradise on Earth.

 

I’ve found, in the Holy Bible, some similarities between Jesus Christ and me but I will not talk about it anymore because many people can satisfy these criteria. Besides that, the Bible gives too many choices for all kind of interpretations. Also, I question the total accuracy of the verses in the Bible because men wrote them for two thousand years. A man is very inclined to imagine, invent and add onto things and events and that is a reason there might be exaggerations and controversies in the Bible. That is a reason I would rather talk about simple facts that might contribute to being considered as Jesus Christ.

 

I was born in Zagreb, Croatia, former Yugoslavia on April 30, 1955, at 7:30 PM. Immediately after my birth, the salute roar of cannon fire thundered throughout Zagreb and all major cities in Yugoslavia, together with fireworks in the honour of May 1, the socialist Labour Day. In the socialist countries, the 1st of May was as important of a public holiday as Easter or Christmas in the Western world. The doctor who helped deliver me then said to my mother that a prince was born. Isn’t this an interesting sign? Can this sign indicate the birth of Jesus Christ?

 

In socialist Yugoslavia, religion was not very popular. I was baptized and used to go to church once a year. Until this year I was barely religious, better said I was neither a believer nor an atheist. If I were a strongly religious man, I would have developed sensitivity to the signs that God has probably sent to me and would be much more aware of who I am. But, I am still new to religion, do not know much and do not want to make a mistake. However, I think there is a chance that I am Jesus Christ and it surprised me. I know, I as Jesus Christ is supposed to be the highest authority in the Christian religion, but unfortunately, I missed all of the courses about that, or somehow I do not remember anything. Take my excuses, and I will try my best to make up the omitted knowledge.

 

When I decided to find a good solution to change the world, I got the basis of the vision (see Humanism for Dummies) about the future of mankind almost instantly, and that vision has given me the strength to be persistent. Might it have come straight from God? Or must it? It is not a rarity that a young man wants to change the world. I am probably a unique person because I was persistent over developing my system for the last twenty years while the work has been mostly hard and I have not received any recognition for doing it. However, I did get small support from people. This support is presented here: Comments.

 

I was proclaimed as one of the best architects in Yugoslavia even before I graduated the faculty (see The Republic Square). Soon after my graduation, I gave up from a successful career as an architect to find more time for defining a good solution to change the world. Whoever knew me, suggested to give up from changing the world with a comment that it was impossible and a loss of time. But I knew I was on the right track right from the beginning of my work. On the other hand, you people have the fully defined system in my book available now, and you still do not know what to think about it. Isn’t it strange?

 

I delivered two lectures about my work in Belgrade, Yugoslavia in 1992 and 1993 while there was a war. Ten years later, on November 1, 2003, I had my first public appearance at a conference of the Society for Utopian Studies in San Diego, South California. At that time, there were massive, furious wildfires there. Before my departure to California I joked to my wife Dušica: “If an earthquake occurs in California while I am there, I must be Jesus Christ.” I spent only one night in San Diego. When I woke up the next day (November 2) in my hotel room and turned on the TV, the first message I received was: “San Bernardino Mountains (close to San Diego) was shaken this night by two earthquakes with a magnitude of 3.5”. Coincidence?

 

Jesus Christ is expected to make miracles by which He is apparently supposed to be recognized. Jesus Christ should, for example, be able to walk on water. I saw the magician, Criss Angel, walking on water on television. So why has nobody considered him as Jesus Christ? If I learned how to make such an illusion, would I then have a chance to be accepted as Jesus Christ? However, I think that I have made a far greater miracle than walking on water. I have defined how to make the world a beautiful place to be, how to create heaven on earth. This is something that nobody has ever managed to do. Now, one could complain that my theory has not been proven in praxis yet, and it might be wrong. Also, one could suggest that Jesus Christ would make a paradise on earth and that would make Him recognized. I would have to respond that even the Lord Jesus Christ is not expected to force people to go down the correct path, but the people are expected to embrace the way of Jesus Christ. People will one day accept my path because they will not have any other choice. My path is the only right path.

 

Dear people, the terrible situation in the world pressures me to act vigorously. I believe that the situation is much worse than you might think and that must be changed. Besides it, crime, rape, and killings have come to my neighbourhood. Evil has never been closer to me than now, and that must end. On top of everything, I think that the Antichrist is here among us. He must be stopped, and the system I have proposed will do it.

 

All my life I’ve wanted to do something good and important but I hesitated to announce a possibility that I could be Jesus Christ because I cannot even imagine in what kind of trouble I would be getting into. If I am not Jesus Christ, you will tease with me, but I would not care much about that. If I am Jesus Christ, I might be in danger from anyone who would not like it. The only thing I can do in that case is hope the Bible is right about my destiny and that God will protect me. Unfortunately, I cannot entirely rely on it because I do not know which part of the Bible carries the authentic God’s words and which part presents the creative imagination of writers through generations.

 

In the end, I have decided to take the risk and to stand firmly as much as I can behind my book. If I successfully advocate my book, you would accept the system I have proposed much sooner. In fact, it is just about whether the system will be implemented before or after a series of catastrophes. When you accept the system, I have proposed it will undoubtedly save you from all the social evil without matter what race, nation, religion, class, age, or gender you belong to.

 

**

My book “Humanism” has been available free of charge worldwide since the year 2000 when I published the Serbo-Croatian version at my web site www.sarovic.com. The English translation was released the next year. In the last three years, about 200 people have downloaded my book, but I received almost no responses from them. The silence follows me all the time everywhere, and I do not know why! However, so far I have exchanged opinions with individuals who have read my articles but have found out it was pretty much a loss of time. The system I have proposed could not be understood enough without reading the book. Therefore, I will avoid further talk about my book to anyone who would not previously read it.

 

Dear reader, if you believe in Jesus Christ and allow just a little possibility that I might be Him, I would like you to read my book. It is written in such a way that everyone who gives a small effort is supposed to understand it. (Don’t worry about technicalities; it’s the job for scientists and me.) I want to distribute at least 200,000 copies of the book in the next three years. Do not listen to anybody but yourself when contemplating whether this book is good enough for changing the world. There are millions of authorities around you that prevent you from finding the truth in you. You indeed may and should discuss the book with other people but, in the end, make the final opinion on your own. When you form your opinion, I would be grateful to you if you write to me in up to 50 words whether you like the book or not and why. That would tell me a lot. If you don’t want the system that only means you would need more time to start loving it. “I guess you guys aren’t ready for that yet. But your kids are gonna love it.” (Back to the Future – Part I:-)

 

The book is actually not religious so that I feel like I need to give a conclusion about my view of religion. Not one theory ever has been convincing in presenting how to make something from nothing. This is actually the most significant jump and the greatest enigma for philosophers and scientists. The Bible says that God did precisely this when He created our world. The Bible does not elaborate technical details of it, or we are too imperfect to be able to understand. Maybe just our ignorance is the reason why is the presentation of God in the Bible very simplified. The Bible probably presents the will of God, but I doubt it does it very accurately because men certainly have difficulty to receive and understand the words of God.

 

The theory of evolution states that natural selection develops life from the lower level towards the higher one. The stronger being survives and there lies the foundation of the development. But is it enough? A deep logic and miraculous harmony exist among atoms, molecules, genes, nature, and space, without which we would not exist. Does something protect us? Most likely, there is some kind of supernatural power-up somewhere, which somehow, contributes to the development of nature and of course of us, people. I have accepted it as supernatural because I cannot imagine it anyhow. I have recognized the name of It as God. I have not seen nor heard God, or I am not aware of it. I accept the existence of God also because the Bible predicted 2000 years ago the coming of Messiah who should lead people in the right way and establish harmony to society. My book completely fulfills it, and that is the reason I am applying for Jesus Christ’s position. One may claim that the result of my work has been just a millennial aspiration of people who lived in injustice and evil. Well, if that was the case, then the prophecies written in the Bible are really fantastic coincidences. I firmly believe one day, far from now, science will get to know God whatever It is, and then we, on the planet Earth will really find out something about Him.

 

God might have had full control over the “Big Bang,” or maybe He left some independent influences in the process to the natural laws He had created. We do not know. God might have created the whole evolution process, or maybe His natural laws did something independently. Or maybe, in both cases, something completely different happened that we could not even contemplate. We should accept that we do not know it. We do not need to argue about who is right or wrong when we cannot prove anything. Finding the solutions to mentioned dilemmas is far more difficult than finding solutions to all other questions that bother us today so that the full answer in these dilemmas will be found much later than answers to all other issues today. I believe God has influences on us but also, we have our choices and He encourages it. He is good.

 

I would gladly discuss the issue with decent people as much as I can through the discussion forum at this web site. Also, I will write more about religion as soon as I find something new. But do not expect much more from me even though I would like to find answers to many questions. God will not put the answers into “my dish.“ It never happens that easily and that is good. What would we do if already have answers to all questions? Life would lose one of its most important senses. Discovery is actually a beauty of living.

 

Feel free to redistribute this article worldwide.

 

Aleksandar Šarović

November 29, 2003

 

Continues on: God’s Will

Has Antichrist Come

Has Antichrist Come?

Yes, he probably has. If you analyze the current systematic conquering of the independent countries of the world, you can easily find that behind all of these aggressions a pattern of strong, unique power emerges that includes economy, military, media, and politicians. I will try to present that this power belongs to the family Rothschild. I think Antichrist is the head of Rothschild family and his name nowadays is Jacob. He rules the world totally invisibly by the secretly possessed economic power his family has built through centuries.

 

How the family stays invisible while becoming richer and more influential in the world, is easily visible in the recent Russian affair “Mikhail Khodorkovsky.” Khodorkovsky is a 40-year-old Russian businessman who started with the low Russian Government salary, and in ten years he earned billions of dollars in owning the oil company “Yukos.” But it should be said that all his skills emerged from the senior post that he held in the Communist Party’s Youth of Russia. That fact opened him the door to senior government officials including the President of Russia, Boris Yeltsin who enabled him to manage privileged businesses. Because of the wish to achieve the greatest profits, the legality of the Khodorkovsky’s business was very questionable. Then President Putin got in power in the Russian Federation. As a result, Mikhail Khodorkovsky was arrested on October 25, 2003, for charges on fraud and tax evasion. Then the control over Mikhail Khodorkovsky’s shares of “Yukos” was passed to the banker Lord Jacob Rothschild. The source is the article from “The Washington Times,” November 2, 2003: “Arrested oil tycoon passed shares to banker.” The reprint of the article is available on the web page Action Report Online. This article is significant because it indicates that Jacob Rothschild was most likely a real majority owner of the company “Yukos.” Khodorkovsky simply did not have the money nor the knowledge to step alone in such a big business and make the wealth he was ascribed. Jacob Rothschild had estimated that Khodorkovsky was close enough to the Russian president Jeltsin to enable him a good profit from Russia and that is the reason he hired him as his agent. But in this particular case, greed has forced Jacob Rothschild to make a mistake because he showed a high possibility that he hid his wealth behind Khodorkovsky.

 

Other Russian tycoons such as Boris Berezovsky, Roman Abramovich, and Vladimir Gusinsky also made a fortune practically in no time just like Khodorkovsky did. The legality of their business is under investigation in the same way as the legality of Khodorkovsky’s business. That says they are most likely connected to Jacob Rothschild as well. After being accused of the business crime in Russia, Boris Berezovsky was granted political asylum in Great Britain, the state where Lord Jacob Rothschild has a significant influence.

 

There is another very influential person without whose connections the transfer of the Russian wealth to Jacob Rothschild would not be possible. His name is George Soros. He was born in Hungary to a poor family. After the Second World War, he immigrated to the West where he, not that long ago, miraculously and quickly became wealthy by trading stocks. Most likely, that happened through the influence of the Rothschild family the same way as the new Russian tycoons became rich. These Rothschild’s financial operations would not be possible without the corruption of the Russian government. That was most likely performed by links that his man, George Soros established in Russia through his Institute called “Open Society.” Please read the article The Secret Financial Network Behind “Wizard” George Soros by William Endahl or George Soros: An Evil Rothschild Agent by Brother Nathanael Kapner that presents his relationship with the Rothschilds well.

 

According to this introduction, you may get the impression that the family Rothschild had interest only in Russia, but of course, that would be false, it operates very effectively throughout the whole world. Could we suppose that this Rothschild’s pattern for hiding their wealth behind other families was being implemented earlier in the past? Of course, we could. Not only is the Rothschild family the wealthiest banking family today but it was also the first excellently organized family that spread its business all over the world hundreds of years ago. In that time they had almost a monopoly in lending money to the European Kings. There is no safer and more profitable business than lending money to countries. Therefore, they could have easily later sponsored the rise of the families Rockefeller, Morgan, Goldberg, and others the same way as they sponsored Khodorkovsky and Soros. But it is also possible that these wealthy families may be relatives and partners of the Rothschild family. However, it’s quite apparent that they do not compete with each other on the “free market.” Have you ever heard them argue with each other? Certainly not. Why not since capitalism is all about free competition and they are the carriers of the world capitalism? Simply, the answer is they are one body with one head. They are actually not capitalists; they are feudalists or even slaveholders. Please find more about the Rothschilds in the article: Rothschild Family at Wikipedia and in the article: The Rothschild Dinasty by Des Griffin.

 

The Rothschild family possesses a hierarchically organized structure of agents who buy everything valuable in the world. The Rothschild family may, for instance, own “Coca Cola” and “Pepsi Cola” and from the top of Olympus watching these companies fighting on the market. The Rothschild family, together with their partners might own half of the world but thanks to the capitalist system and its secret business regulation policy that is established practically everywhere, nobody except them themselves is able to know it. By controlling the main businesses and media they actually control the governments in the western countries, and that means they control the whole western world. If you follow the world policy, you can easily see that democratically elected leaders of the countries change, but the policy follows the interests of the rich and therefore stays more or less the same. A high level of united criminal policies around the world points out the fact that there is an invisible organization that rules the world. The facts I have collected about the Rothschild family, tell me that they are the leading family of that organization. I am talking here about a conspiracy that captures almost the whole World. Only the “evil axes” of the world such as China, North Korea, and Cuba are resistant to the influences of the Rothschild family because they are closed to the world.

 

The roots of this conspiracy might have been described in the book “The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.” The protocols are allegedly the minutes of one meeting of Elders of Zion that happened hundred years ago. You may find them here: The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. The book gives low-level directions how a powerful Jewish secret organization may conquer the world. Most people think that the Protocols are a forgery made against the Jewish people and that is most likely the result of propaganda. I cannot see that the Protocols talk about the Jewish people, they present particular interests of a very narrow circle of people. And these people are very successful.

 

There are many similarities between what the Protocols say and the situation we have today in the World. For example, all state governments of developed countries proclaim the same policy: formal democracy where the real power is possessed by the rich, market economy where money has the most significant freedom and control over everything, and NATO power that secures such ideology. Those who do not agree with such ideology are under an orchestrated attack of media, politicians, conspiracies, and military power all over the world. Any different idea from the mainstream such is for example mine does not have access to media, policy, science and consequently does not have access to the people. That is exactly what is defined in “The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.” One does not need to be very bright to understand who has interest in it and who has the power to realize it. However, I doubt the Protocols are a complete program for the conspiracy against the world because it looks more like a propaganda pamphlet aimed at a narrow circle of people than like a program. Today, Jacob Rothschild has a much more developed manifest for his program, but there is no way we can take a look at it.

 

***

Family Rothschild tries hard to present itself as a regular, modest banking family. But, nothing is ordinary with the Rothschild family. They possess the most valuable assets in the western world and have such a financial power that might buy all promising ones. However, they hide their possessions, wealth, and power. Actually, they remind me of the mafia which pretends to earn money for living by owning a convenience store. Do you think that I exaggerate? They can quickly produce unemployment and bankruptcy to ordinary people and take all their assets. The most famous case was the creation of the economic crisis in the USA in 1929. It is presented in detail in the article How the City of London Created the Great Depression by Webster G. Tarpley. They did it to make workers very afraid for their existence, to make workers dependent of their power, to take freedom from workers and middle class, to make them silent when they work hard for low salaries, to discipline them without complaints. People who do not have a choice may be called slaves. They want total control over people and work hard to get it all the time. Fortunately, they cannot repeat such depression anymore because now it would move the world leading power to the countries which are not under their influences. Their worst nightmare is communist China on top of the world.

 

Do you know that the US Federal Reserve Bank is economically and in any other way the most powerful place in the world? Thomas D. Schauf described in his article: The Federal Reserve Is Privately Owned how the Rothschild family, together with their partners, took control over the US Federal Reserve, over the US and over the “free” world. You can find the same information in Zeitgeist – The Movie: Federal Reserves by Peter Joseph. The Federal Reserve Bank is responsible for the emission of money. The bank normally loans money to the state when the state needs it. The problem is it prints money from thin air and then takes it back from the American taxpayers with interest. How much the American taxpayers owe to the bank right now, you can find here. The annual interest of the debt which is by the way mostly privately owned is approximately eight times bigger than the wealth of “today’s richest man on the planet.” Source: Treasury Direct – the official web site of the US government. Is something questionable here? If you try to find who is the owner of debt at the official web site, you will not find their first and last names but the list of companies, banks, funds, and organizations. They are mostly owned by a small group of associated people. If the number of principal owners was large, and if they were mutually independent, then they would argue and fight each other over the higher profit, and we would see it. These people are far richer than the publicly proclaimed “richest person in the world.

 

Everything is cheating. If you, dear reader, try to print money and buy something with it, you would undoubtedly finish in jail. The Rothschild family does precisely that, but their operations are legal, thanks to the accepted policy of the bank system, and to the corruption of the state system. In 1963, President John Kennedy ended the Federal Reserve System by the Executive Order 11110 and ordered the U.S. government to restore its Constitutional-mandate of controlling the money. President Kennedy was killed 5 months later. Before his death, President Kennedy openly stated that of a vast capital conspiracy existed against humanity: President John F Kennedy: Secret Society Speech. The result of the murder investigation was very doubtful according to Michael Parenti: The JFK Assassination: Defending the Gangster State.

 

Whoever had any doubt about the intentions of the policy of the west after the aggression on Yugoslavia in 1999 should not have it anymore. There, all the masks were taken down. This was a pure imperial, and fascist aggression waged against all laws concerning it and against UN charters. That was the crime. Formally, the president of US Bill Clinton started the war. He had normally resisted committing the crime but do you remember how long he was threatened with the impeachment inquiry because he lied in the Monica Lewinsky case? I think that was blackmail. The case was forgotten entirely right after the aggression started.

 

I have personally witnessed a very treacherous world policy created in order of weakening Yugoslavia and forcing it to give up from its sovereignty. After the free elections in 1990, the people of the Republic of Serbia kept the socialist party in charge while people from other Yugoslav republics chose pro-Western governments. This is the reason Serbia defended its sovereignty vigorously while other Yugoslav republics accepted the Western model of capitalism mostly unconditionally. In purpose to weaken the Serbian resistance, the West strongly supported pro-Western orientated Yugoslav republics. That started the war and the national leaders, wishing to have an essential role in the histories of their nations, made the war pretty nasty. The war finished when Serbia gave up from its sovereignty. But what really lies behind that? Yugoslavia had the best economy in Eastern Europe, and the war destroyed the very idea that the socialist economy might be right. Last but not least, the war made the economy cheap to purchase.

 

The aggression on Yugoslavia was heavily supported and encouraged by the mainstream media and influential people including leaders all over the world. Biased propaganda and all kinds of lies were synchronically distributed worldwide on purpose to justify the aggression on Yugoslavia which lasted, in fact, for more than ten years. You, dear reader, might be deceived by the large propaganda machinery you were exposed to, but your leaders do not collect information there. They had the embassies and intelligent officers in Yugoslavia, and they had to know what everything was about, but apparently, they didn’t have the power, bravery, interest, or desire to tell the truth. The participation in the crime was seemingly more convinient to a large number of them. Yes, many of them, unlawfully, participated in bombing Yugoslavia, many of them killed people there.

 

The aggression on Yugoslavia had to be happening under the control of a very powerful but also totally invisible world organization, and that had to belong to the Rothschild family. Many signs pointed out that George Soros, a man of the Rothschild family, had a lot of interests in Yugoslavia. Source, the article Portrait of George Soros by Neil Clark presents it well. What kind of interest does the Rothschild family might have exactly had in the aggression on Yugoslavia I can only speculate. But we can find it out by calling those who directly waged war to be responsible for the crime they committed before any court, and then the Rothschild family would be indeed called upon for its responsibility as well. You may find more about the war in Yugoslavia in my article: My debt to Yugoslavia. The Rothschild family and their partners have more or less finished the colonization of Eastern Europe. They bought everything valuable there or will soon, and they took control over all of the governments. The Russian government is the only one that might resist the Rothschild family.

 

The aggression on Iraq in 2003 was also waged against all existing international laws. That is a crime as well. When an ordinary thief commits a crime he finishes in jail when the president of the US commits an incomparably worse crime, he is re-elected. So how may that be possible? Simply, the media under the control of the Rothschild family, sophisticatedly convinces the people, not only this is a normal thing but also that this is the best possible solution. Can you imagine a criminal gets to a restaurant, orders a meal, and at the end asks a waiter to pay the criminal to eat? Worse than that happens to you, but you cannot see it. You produce bombs for the rich, then you pay these bombs with your tax payments, and finally the rich use these bombs to enslave other nations and to steal their wealth. Do you understand what cheating is about? You even give your lives in to help the rich taking the wealth of other nations. All presidents of countries or governments who joined the president Bush in the aggression on Iraq are criminals as well. So how come that might be possible? Simply, we live in a total conspiracy where ignorance, lies, immorality, fear, and corruption raise and then rule everywhere.

 

I am convinced that an independent investigation would conclude that the Rothschild family stood behind the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and many others as well. Simply, it has such a significant influence everywhere, so that the wars would not be possible without the support from the Rothschild family. The problem is the Rothschild family is above the law so that no one can perform such an investigation. Actually, the law that might prosecute them at the world level does not even exist. The Rothschild family is addicted to getting valuable natural resources and control worldwide, has means to achieve that goal at any price, and can hardly be stopped. They have committed aggression on “evil axes” through all kinds of pressures all the time. If that would not bring a satisfactory result soon enough to them, they will arrange wars there or commit real aggression. However the most likely, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, China, and after that the whole world would be in great danger. Allegedly the Rothschild family had financed most of the wars in the last two centuries, and that tells us they had interest in them. In our current situation, there is no reason to believe that something might change in the future. In our current position, the future is bleak.

 

Let’s suppose the Rothschild family with their companions would take control over all of the countries around the world. Then, dear readers, you would be next. Even if you possess a small convenience store, they will open a bigger one next door to yours with half-price merchandise. With their financial power, they would easily be able to bear the losses until you are forced to close your business. Their last step would be the whole control over all of the people around the world, and that means your complete slavery. Their needs are alienated and therefore cannot be saturated. Consequently, they are not able to do anything but Hell on Earth.

 

But of course, the Rothschild family with their companions will undoubtedly face resistance by China and Russia, numerous world organizations, revolutionaries, freedom fighters, terrorists, and by progressive powers. Today, many brave people who fight back, already exist, but they are not well known because they do not have access to the mainstream media owned by the rulers of the world. Fortunately, the Internet was invented, and it gives you a chance to get different information. I recommend you read, for example, Michael Parenti, or Stephen Gowans 1 and 2. They wrote numerous articles you would not be able to find in mainstream world media. If you are interested to know what really happens in the world, you better read them.

 

***

The Rothschild family is, but its power depends on you people. That is the reason they make you follow them even though you do not know it. They create a policy of your society, and you do not know it. They have created your needs and possessed the environment that satisfies these needs and you do not know it. You work for them, and you do not know it. You buy their products, and you do not know it. They lend you money, and you do not know it. They take your taxes for their interests, and you do not know it. They provide for you every day, directly or indirectly, with the information they want from preschools, through universities, up to the evening news. That means you think the way they want; that means you are what they want you to be and not what you are supposed to be by your nature. They have established and support competition everywhere as the primary tool for your survival. That makes you live in a destructive, immoral environment. That makes you hate each other. That makes your life miserable. Their capital is free in today’s world, and you are not, you depend too much on them. You live in Hell even though you might not know it because they worked hard to make you not also be able to imagine a better life might exist. You are always afraid for your future but should be much more fearful because of their intentions. However, they have made you quiet even by having a chance to have a job. The corruption is higher when the position in society is higher. It makes you passive when you should organize and resist authorities. But there is also a problem; you do not know what you should do, or how to do it.

 

The situation does not need to be as bad as it is today at all. That is the main reason I have created and proposed a new system. It will serve you people and not only the elite. The new system will allow you, people, to cooperate with other people and decide on your future. The system would allow you to create a policy of your society. You will be able to form your needs freely and to satisfy them. You will be able to get any job you want. The new system will give you freedom and will put a capital under your control. The system will relieve you from fears about your future. It will provide you with a healthy happy life. It will make you love each other. And according to the Bible, “lions and antelopes will eat together” meaning in the system I have proposed, all the people will live in perfect harmony. Simply, it will make Paradise on Earth. That is not even very difficult to accomplish. For the beginning, you people only need to believe in the better future and not in the existing system the rich people have created for themselves. I just need to attract you to read my book and think. That should release you from the fear that you may lose some well-being in the new system or from the opinion that nothing can be changed.

 

Sadly, I cannot get enough support even from intellectuals, scientists, and professors who are supposed to give the most significant contribution to the development of new progressive ideas. When I immigrated to Canada, I tried to take a master degree in sociology at York University, Toronto. The mentor of the sociology department told me that I had satisfied the requirements for the studies but my book “The Humanism” was not acceptable as my master dissertation work. So far the professors in Canada and in the US were actually not willing to even give me a review of my book. Why? Mostly, they do not have time for me. If they find the time, they have difficulties to understand what my ideas are about. If they understand my ideas, they are not willing to accept them because they turn upside-down almost everything social sciences have established so far. Besides that, some auto-censure is involved as well. Many professors, and especially the younger ones who might accept new ideas more easily, are undoubtedly concerned about their reappointments at colleges and universities. The development of new ideas has been suppressed everywhere, and that is the main reason the policy of society does not change, even though huge needs exist.

 

Anyway, I do not need to do anything more than I already did to change the world. My book has defined the idea of the new system enough to start changes that would one day make Paradise on Earth. However, the more persistent I am, the sooner the bright future of humankind would be established. When you people find out what the book is about you will undoubtedly accept my idea and refuse to serve the rich. Please read the book and find out why. Without your support, the rich people, including the Rothschild family, will be impotent. Believe it or not, the new system will enable you to organize yourself well, and then you would be able to live without them, but they would not be able to live without you.

 

The new system I have proposed will stop the Rothschild family. My book and this article will disturb them, and that may put me in danger. If I were Jesus Christ, I would rely on God and on his protection. But even though there is a chance I may be Jesus, it still does not mean that I am Him. Dear people, if something unexpectedly wrong happens to me, to my family, or to my collaborators on this project, I want you to know that I blame the Rothschild family and their partners for it. I also count on that the Rothschild family cannot stop the realization of the system I have proposed. They cannot destroy the book already released to the world. The recognition is just a question of time. That means one day my name will be well known around the world. If a tragedy happens to me, to my family, or to my collaborators, I count on you people to prosecute and judge the Rothschild family. If it happens that I am Jesus Christ, I rely on God but also on Christians to never forgive the Rothschild family for any evil that they may possibly do to us. There is a saying in the country I grew up: “God protects those who take care of themselves.”

 

The Rothschilds are Jews. I need to emphasize that I do not have any intention to blame Jews as a people for anything. They have a culture that is not very admired around the world today, but once the system I’ve proposed starts to work, they will become a distinguished people of the world. Speaking of the Rothschild family, the best choice for them lies in joining the system I have proposed. If they refuse, they will lose everything. Namely, their wealth does not have value without the support of your people. The new system will teach you how to find the values of God defined in the Bible, and then you will stop supporting the antichrist. If the Rothschild family accepts the new system, they would openly become one of the most distinguished families in the world. They may even rule the whole world because the system I have proposed would need someone to do so. But this time the leaders will really become directly responsible to the people of the world. Therefore, in that case, the Rothschild family would start contributing to creating Paradise on Earth.

Here is one of rarely published photography of Lord Jacob Rothschild (right). The picture was taken in his home in England. He is accompanied with the just elected Governor of California Arnold Schwarzenegger and “the second richest man in the USA” Warren Buffet.

 

My Debt to Yugoslavia

My Debt to Yugoslavia

I wrote this long article about the war in Yugoslavia because the truth about it has still not been revealed. Left is the map of Yugoslavia between 1945 and 1991. It had six republics and two autonomous provinces.

 

If a man lives well in his homeland, he normally loves it. So I loved Yugoslavia. Evil people attacked it. It hurt me a lot. I used arguments to defend Yugoslavia to the extent of my abilities. Unfortunately, my words did not reach many people, and therefore, I couldn’t help. I have been a witness to the great injustice that the Western world imposed on Yugoslavia. I immediately realized that it could not have been a coincidence. Still, I did not know who was behind it, so I began my research with the causes and responsibilities for the war in Yugoslavia. Here I briefly summarize the most important observations, which are mostly unknown to the public.

 

In 1990, aggression was committed against Yugoslavia. It lasted for ten years. In this essay, I will try to present the fact that the Rothschild family committed aggression. I wrote more about the Rothschild family in the article Has the Antichrist Come? The Rothschild family has built such enormous economic power in the last two hundred years that it can control the governments of Western countries. They are trying to put the whole world under their control. And so the time came for Yugoslavia. The result of my investigation is presented in the order in which the understanding dawned on me. I wrote it with the idea of making tomorrow better.

 

***

 

People in Yugoslavia used to live quite well before 1990. The living standard was relatively high, and relations between people from the six republics with their six nations and three religions were usually harmonious. These people mainly belong to the Slavonic group and mostly spoke Serbo-Croatian. There was a gap between the rich and the poor, but it was insignificant. Education was free. Health care was covered. One felt safe wherever he went, not only because of the great police but also because people in the surroundings were generally peaceful.

 

Yugoslavia had a sound system, but it was still far from ideal. Yugoslavia was a socialist country with social ownership of the means of production, giving people economic security. But, that security somewhat obscured freedom. Life in Yugoslavia was ideological and bureaucratic. The socialistic system protected workers by privileging all workplaces. This caused irresponsibility in the production process from the level of workers to the level of management, which systematically damaged companies. That irresponsibility of the people was one of the reasons that led to the fall of Yugoslavia. The slower economy lowered workers’ purchasing ability compared to more developed capitalistic countries where job responsibilities were better defined. Even though the income was still higher than that of workers in less developed capitalist countries worldwide, it all led to people’s dissatisfaction. At the federal level, all decisions were made by consensus of the representatives of republics, which was not easy to reach. The whole country would suffer inconveniences if the decision could not be made.

 

This situation followed political pressures from the West supported by economic blackmail that destabilized Yugoslavia. Here, I quote an excerpt from the book “A Century of War: Anglo-American oil politics and the New World Order” by William F. Engdahl, which refers to the situation in Yugoslavia in these times:

 

Under the IMF policies, the Yugoslavian GDP sank in 1990 by 7.5 percent and by another 15 percent in 1991. Industrial production plunged 21 percent. The IMF demanded wholesale privatization of state enterprises. The result was the bankruptcy of more than 1,100 companies by 1990 and more than 20 percent unemployment. The economic pressure on the various regions of the country created an explosive cocktail. Predictably, amid growing economic chaos, each region fought for its own survival against its neighbours. Leaving nothing to chance, the IMF ordered all wages to be frozen at 1989 levels, while inflation rose dramatically, leading to a fall in real earnings of 41 percent by the first six months of 1990. By 1991, inflation was over 140 percent. In this situation, the IMF ordered full convertibility of the dinar and the freeing of interest rates. The IMF explicitly prevented the Yugoslav government from obtaining credit from its own central bank, crippling the ability of the central government to finance social and other programs. This freeze created a de facto economic secession, well before the formal declaration of secession by Croatia and Slovenia in June 1991.

 

The last prime minister of Yugoslavia, Ante Marković, tried to repair the situation in 1990 by accepting the West’s demands and introducing capitalism. He said that such changes required naturally free parliamentary elections, and he worked to implement them.

 

The dissatisfaction of the people and the liberal movement created under the pressure of the West became ideal for great manipulators, nationalists and criminals who, to win the support of their people, transferred the sources of the problem to Yugoslavia. At that time, I still did not know that the “new world order” gave financial and political support to the worst people in all the republics to initiate fights among the peoples and thus weaken Yugoslavia. With the help of corrupt leaders, the “new world order” intended to achieve Yugoslavia’s political and economic colonization. It was nothing but crime.

 

The economic irresponsibility of the people of Yugoslavia found its resonance in political irresponsibility when, through the manipulation of the “new world order,” all republics except Serbia and Montenegro smoothly elected people with bad intentions toward Yugoslavia. The newly elected leaders demanded control over the republic’s resources and accused Yugoslavia of the inconveniences of living together. They immediately sabotaged the program of Federal Prime Minister Ante Marković, which would undoubtedly introduce Yugoslavia into the EU. Thus, the conflict between the republics arose, leading to the Yugoslavia war.

 

Soon, the new leaders in Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Macedonia announced referendums on secession from Yugoslavia. Their results showed that most people from these republics wanted to secede from Yugoslavia. The Serbs did not wish to secede because they lived in significant numbers in almost all the republics of Yugoslavia. The republics were created under the control of President Tito, who divided the Serbs among the Republics much more than the other nations because they were the most numbered people. This way, the policy of world imperialists, called the “New World Order,” has formed great irresponsibility of the people for their futures and successfully prepared the ground for their conquests.

 

The leaders of the separatist republics declared their independence from Yugoslavia. They called upon the constitutional rights of their republics, which stated that nations were entitled to their self-determination for secession from Yugoslavia. The problem is that nothing inside the constitution law determined how to achieve withdrawal. The secessionists worried about the Yugoslav Constitution Law, which demanded that a consensus of the representatives of all nations must adopt all decisions related to the country’s fate. According to the Constitution of the SFRY, the secession of republics was possible only after establishing an agreement between the representatives of the republics. Taking into account that this obligation did not suit secessionists well, they got the idea that Yugoslavia no longer needed to exist because four of the six republics wanted secession. I think that in those times, the majority of the inhabitants of Yugoslavia would have supported the survival of Yugoslavia. Still, the people of Yugoslavia were never asked about their fate.

 

World imperialists, through full control over public information, misled the world about the reasons for the crisis in Yugoslavia, which was, of course, a form of support to secessionists and pressure on the authorities in Yugoslavia. Then, under the influence of world imperialists, all the countries around the world recognized the secession of the Yugoslav republics even though it was in contradiction with international law. The Helsinki Convention expressly forbids the violent change of borders in Europe.

 

Then, secessionists persistently worked on eliminating Yugoslavia. The United Nations supported this, and finally, Yugoslavia was removed from the UN. Yugoslavia had to ask for re-admission to the UN. The world powers exercised their power by imposing unjust precedents on Yugoslavia. In any case, the demand for the abolition of Yugoslavia was an aggression against Yugoslavia. It also denied the Serbs the democratic right to remain in the country they wanted.

 

People from secessionist republics naively received strong support from the “New World Order” with sincere gratitude. The World imperialists masterfully realized the old tested formula “divide and conquer.” The secessionist countries were immersed in bloody civil wars, which set them back decades. If we exclude the privileged members of society, all these nations already live worse than they had lived in Yugoslavia, and the imperialist world benefits from it.

 

I was against the dissolution of Yugoslavia, but I would not have felt threatened or been severely against it if it happened peacefully. The leaders of the republics who avoided a peaceful agreement and dissolution of the crisis in Yugoslavia were implicitly advocating the war. War brings out the worst kind of people who create the worst atrocities. These leaders had to know that, and that is why I consider them responsible for all the crimes that happened in Yugoslavia.

 

Slovenia

 

In the summer of 1991, the Slovenian government declared independence and cut all ties with Yugoslavia. It took off the frontier symbols of Yugoslavia and announced that Yugoslavia no longer resided there. Given that it had not established an agreement on the secession of Slovenia at the Yugoslav level, this act was an aggression against Yugoslavia. The Yugoslav Federal Army had the constitutional obligation to protect the territorial integrity of the country; therefore, a few days later, the YFA sent tanks to take the border crossing of Slovenia to Italy, Austria and Hungary. It was expected that the surprise and noise of powerful tank engines would do the job, so the army sent tanks without ammunition. However, the Slovenian territorial defence forces were not surprised at all and attacked the YFA with real ammunition.

 

Well-organized propaganda appeared throughout the world at that time that accused the communist army of attacking Slovenia. The YFA soldiers were members of all Yugoslav nations, and incidentally, almost all critical positions in Yugoslavia were held by Croats. The army commander, Veljko Kadijević, was half-Croat, half-Serb. This unnecessary war lasted ten days. A few dozen soldiers were killed in the war. The YFA had almost ten times more casualties than the Slovenian forces because it did not have explicit orders to fight in Slovenia. After establishing peace, the entire YFA withdrew from Slovenia.

 

The question is, why did Slovenia not request secession peacefully? No one would have opposed their request. I think that Milan Kučan, the President of Slovenia, gave some kind of answer to that. I listened to the news all day during that time. One morning, somewhere in the middle of the war, Kučan asked the YFA for a cease-fire. The next afternoon, he met in Austria with the Foreign Minister of Germany, Hans Dietrich Gensher. After that, he stated he did not want to cease fire anymore.

 

Croatia

 

Croatia’s situation was much more complicated because over 600,000 Serbs lived there, or about 12% of the pre-war population. Besides Croats, the Serbs in Croatia were the constitutive people of Croatia, according to the Constitution Law of the Republic of Croatia, and they did not want to secede from Yugoslavia.

 

For this reason, the newly elected Parliament of the Republic of Croatia decided by majority vote to take constituting rights from the Serbs in Croatia and proclaim them as a minority. This could be called a democratic robbery of Serbs in the state of Croatia or a democratic crime. After that, the Serbs declared the part of Croatia where they had lived for centuries as a majority as the Republic of Srpska Krajina. The status of the new republic was not defined, but there was an idea that if Croatia remained in Yugoslavia, Srpska Krajina would stay in Croatia, but if Croatia separated from Yugoslavia, Srpska Krajina would separate from Croatia and join Yugoslavia.

 

Serbs still have memories of the Ustashe regime in the Independent State of Croatia (NDH) from World War II, which killed hundreds of thousands of Serbs. The new Croatian government tried to present Croatia to the world as a democratic country, but in practice, Croatia was a follower of the Independent State of Croatia, the racist genocide creation of Hitler in World War II. Croatian President Franjo Tuđman publicly said that the NDH was the eternal aspiration of the Croatian people. At the pre-election rally in 1990, Franjo Tuđman said that he was proud that his wife was neither Serb nor Jew. The new Croatian government introduced a new monetary bill called ‘Kuna’, which previously existed only in the NDH during the Second World War. In the Croatian cities of Zagreb, Split, Zadar, and Slavonski Brod, there is a street named after Mile Budak. He was a Croatian fascist ideologist in World War II who created a formula that stated a third of the Serbs in Croatia should be killed, one-third expelled, and the last third converted to the Catholic religion. It was not difficult for Serbs to recognize the new Croatian government, and they rebelled.

 

I lived in Croatia before the war started and witnessed the events there. The forces that lost World War II in Croatia were preparing revenge on Yugoslavia. Croats were preparing for the war quietly before openly speaking in the media. The new Government of Croatia did not even try to find any compromise with the Croatian Serbs. Still, it acquired weapons in Hungary and tried forcibly to recover the territorial integrity of the republic. After that, the Krajina Serbs received weapons from the territorial defence forces under the framework of the YFA and resisted the Croatian armed forces. The low-intensity struggles started, and the YFA preserved the lines of separation.

 

In Croatia, I worked as a fire protection inspector for the Interior Affairs of the City of Zagreb. One day, on the eve of the war, my colleague came back from a meeting with the senior police chief and transferred the message to our department in which there were about 20 inspectors – quote: “If any of you are members of the Serbian Democratic Party, you will be shot in the head.” All the policemen in Croatia probably heard this message. I have never been a party member, but this was too much for me. I resigned from the job and immediately left Croatia. While working as a police inspector in public companies, I often communicated with the company’s referents for national defence. I heard from them that the Croatian Government was preparing a massive mobilization for the war in which I did not want to participate in any way. I was right. Very soon after I departed from Croatia, I received a call for war mobilization. Many Serbs left Croatia because of this; many Croats did as well. Then, the Republic of Srpska Krajina prepared the war mobilization of people. Many Croats left Krajina because of it, and some Serbs as well.

 

Now, you might be thinking that my colleague’s statement about getting shot in the head was a stylistic figure. Far from it. Not a few months passed since my refuge when a man appeared on Serbian television who claimed that the Deputy Minister of Internal Affairs of Croatia, Milan Brezak, hired him to kill the President of Srpska Krajina, Milan Babić. As evidence, a recorded telephone conversation between them was presented. The opposition in Serbia quickly declared that the telephone conversation was a forgery done by President Slobodan Milošević. However, it was not a forgery. In fact, I recognized the voice of the telephone operator in the Republic Internal Affairs of Croatia.

 

The Croatian Government needed heavy weapons to return its lost territory of Srpska Krajina, and the guns were already there in Croatia, located in the YFA barracks. Therefore, it prepared an attack on the YFA barracks, accusing the YFA of the aggression and the loss of their territory. The attack occurred on 25.08.1991. At that time, Croatian television proudly reported that on the first day of the war, 90% of the YFA objects fell to Croatia. That was true, but they were mostly abandoned buildings or facilities with little or no YFA soldiers. The YFA barracks were too hard to capture because they had heavy weapons and responded forcefully, although the soldiers were mainly recruited eighteen-year-olds. After that, the YFA had no choice but to free its army by attacking the Croatian armed forces. It began in September of 1991 and ended with the destruction of Vukovar and the siege of Dubrovnik. Well-organized world propaganda accused the Serbs of the war in Croatia.

 

The YFA had always been preparing for aggression from outside, and it was incapable and unprepared for what followed. One YFA soldier dissatisfied with how the war in Vukovar was led took an armoured vehicle and went to Belgrade, where he smashed several parked cars to attract attention to his revolt. Nothing happened to him. A few months later, one American soldier in the United States did the same thing during peacetime conditions and got shot in the head without warning. That is the way most developed democratic countries solve such problems. That is how they “protect” human rights; thus, there are no rebellions.

 

The new Croatian government made master imputations. For example, on October 7, 1991, an explosion in the courtyard in the middle of the “Banski Dvori” palace in Zagreb demolished it. At this time, the Croatian President, Franjo Tuđman, Yugoslav President Stjepan Mesić, and the Yugoslav Prime Minister, Ante Marković (all Croats), were in the palace. Croatian authorities have accused the Yugoslav Federal Army of the attempted assassination of the democratically elected Croatian leaders. The YFA denied any involvement. 

 

The Croatian government dragged out the investigation into the explosion in “Banski dvori.” Still, it did not show the basic information about where the explosions took place and what damages each explosion caused, as if it had no interest in showing the case. So, an independent observer cannot conclude whether the explosion was planted by the Croatian government to accuse the JFA or whether it was caused by a bomb or a rocket fired from a JFA plane. But President Tuđman knew when and where the explosion would occur.

 

Nobody was hurt inside the heavily demolished palace “Banski Dvori” despite being full of people, although a random passerby was killed. How is it possible? On that day, many senior employees of the “Banski Dvori” did not come to work, which is very strange, mainly because the President and Prime Minister of Yugoslavia came from Belgrade as guests. Before the explosion, Franjo Tudjman and his guests stayed in the large reception room. The room had two doors. One was destroyed in the blast, and the other was intact, beside which they all were sitting. Behind this door were two large safes in the middle of the next room. The Croatian TV immediately broadcast it after the explosion. The security staff member said the blast had moved these safes, which sounded illogical since chairs were not moved around. I immediately noticed that the safes were placed there to prevent the explosion from hurting President Tudjman and his guests. However, a change of plan occurred, and they all left the room just before the explosion and went to the opposite part of the “Banski Dvori,” where they could not be harmed. This is presented in Croatia as a miracle, but I am convinced everything was planned.

 

Who might have profited from the explosion? The next day, Franjo Tudjman, under the pressure of this act, declared the independence of the Republic of Croatia. He also attracted many undecided Croats to his nationalist side and displayed the Yugoslav Federal Army as a gang of murderers. The Prime Minister of Yugoslavia, Ante Marković, returned to Belgrade to his alleged assassins the next day after the attack. It all says to me that the explosion in the Croat President’s Palace in Zagreb was most likely the work of the President of Croatia, Franjo Tudjman. If the JFA carried out an airplane attack on the Banske Dvore, President Tuđman must have organized it with the help of an agent provocateur in the JFA, or he was helped by foreign secret services that had their agents in the JFA.

 

On December 7, 1991, five members of the special police unit of the Croatian Republic killed the Zec family with a 14-year-old daughter just because they were Serbs. They hadn’t even tried to hide their bodies; they just threw them in the dump. The murderers smoothly acknowledged all that they did to the Croatian Court but were released due to irregular judicial procedures. The irregularity consisted of the fact that the lawyer of the accused was not present in their interrogation. To me, the explanation was a transparent forgery. No one readily admits to killing if it is not part of a secret plan. That’s why I think that the court had no intention to punish the murderers at all. The case was supposed to show the Serbs that the laws in Croatia were unrelated to them and that they should leave Croatia. After that, Croatian President Franjo Tuđman gave a medal for a heroic act in the war to Siniša Rimac, who was one of the killers of the Zec family.

 

In Croatia, such an ugly situation has been made for the Serbs that two of about twenty of my former colleagues who were Serbs and worked with me in the Inspectorate for fire protection in Zagreb committed suicide or are presented like they committed suicide.

 

During the war in Croatia, the EU and the UN offered help to stop the fight. Many truces were established, but only when Croatia recognized that it could not win the YFA was the so-called Cyrus Vance plan accepted. Representatives of Yugoslavia, Croatia, Srpska Krajina and the UN signed the plan. According to this plan, the YFA withdrew from Croatia, Srpska Krajina was disarmed and came under the protection of UN military forces until the problem between the Serbs and Croats would be resolved through negotiations.

 

When peace was established, the Vatican and Germany committed unnecessary aggression on Yugoslavia silently in January 1992 by supporting the violent secession and recognizing Slovenia and Croatia as independent states. Was it revenge from World War II when Germany formed the Independent State of Croatia? However, other countries have followed suit. Thus, the borders of Yugoslavia have not been changed peacefully through mutual negotiations as required by international law (UN, Helsinki Convention) and the Constitution of the SFRY, but forcefully through international recognition of illegal secession.

 

Newly recognized Croatia did not accept anything less than the full reintegration of the Serb Krajina, which the Serbs refused to take. In 1995, the Croatian government mobilized the army to capture the territory of the Republic of Serbian Krajina, even though it was under UN protection. I don’t think something like that would have been possible without the support of more significant powers. At the time of the Croatian Army’s attack, named Operation “Storm,” NATO aircraft destroyed Serbian communication and radars “by mistake.” According to Cyrus Vance Plan, Yugoslavia had an obligation to protect the Srpska Krajina in case Croatia attacked it. Still, probably due to pressures from outside, that was not done. Serbian Krajina had a vast desert territory and fewer people than Croatian mobilized soldiers. Serbian Krajina could not defend itself, so the inhabitants left it.

 

The Croatian Helsinki Committee for Human Rights claims that during Operation Storm, 677 civilians were killed, mostly older people who did not want to leave their homes. The Veritas Documentation-Information Center lists 1,205 killed or missing Serbian civilians, among them 522 women and 12 children. Twenty thousand houses were destroyed or burned. The regime of President Tuđman ruined the birth house of the famous Serbian scientist Nikola Tesla in the village of Smiljan. His relatives in this village were already dead. They were killed by the Ustase regime in August of 1941, together with 500 other Serbs of this village.

 

This picture has not been presented anywhere in global news media. Why? The international community, very concerned when the YFA started to crush the Croat armed rebellion, was indifferent when the Serbs suffered aggression. This was the most significant departure in Europe since the Second World War, in which 200,000 Serbs, whose ancestors lived in Croatia for centuries, left Krajina in 1995. This picture has not been presented anywhere in global news media. Why? Today, 400,000 fewer Serbs live in Croatia than before the war. Two-thirds of Serbs left Croatia, or 8% of the Croatian population.

 

The Croats should have had the right to self-determination like any other nation. But after the crimes they committed against the Serbian people in WWII, they had to do it through negotiations with the Serbs. Instead, they expelled the Serbs from the Croatian constitution, threatened them, attacked them and exiled them from the Croatian state. Croatia is a criminal creation supported by the most powerful countries and the UN. How is it possible?

 

Bosnia and Herzegovina

 

Bosnia and Herzegovina had three constituent peoples: Muslims, who are since 1992 officially called Bosniaks, Serbs and Croats. With this respect, the decisions related to the fate of Bosnia and Herzegovina should be taken by consensus of representatives from all three nations. It was not suitable for Croats and Bosniaks, so they decided the fate of Bosnia-Herzegovina by the democratic majority. Bosnians wanted an independent Bosnia and Herzegovina, and the Croats only understood the secession from Yugoslavia as the first step. The second step is supposed to be the secession from Bosnia and Herzegovina to join Croatia, but the connection is not made yet. Due to the complicated situation, the agreement on the Yugoslav level, where such problems under the Constitution of Yugoslavia had to be solved by consensus of the nations, was the only reasonable solution. However, the authorities in Bosnia and Herzegovina chose war.

 

The newly elected Bosnian government wanted to rule the whole of Bosnia and Herzegovina, but Serbs and Croats did not agree to that. Then, an informal division of Bosnia started on the territory where the nations had a vast majority. However, small fights started for areas where the regions were mixed.

 

To prevent war in Bosnia and Herzegovina in March of 1992, the EU proposed a solution to the crisis in BH through a so-called Cutiller plan. Representatives of all the people of Bosnia and Herzegovina accepted the agreement and signed it in Lisbon, Portugal. This made peace in BH. After that, the President of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Alija Izetbegović, spoke with the U.S. ambassador in Yugoslavia, Warren Zimmerman, and told him he was not satisfied with the plan. Then, the American ambassador encouraged Alija Izetbegović to withdraw his signature from the agreement, which he did. Immediately after that, the fighting in Bosnia and Herzegovina continued, but negotiations in Lisbon did not stop.

 

In April 1992, the U.S. and the EU recognized the independence of Bosnia and Herzegovina. It seems that they did not care about establishing a peaceful solution there. It was irrelevant to them that the government of BH in Sarajevo did not have control, even in the whole of Sarajevo. It was not an essential fact to them that 1,500,000 Serbs, or one-third of the Bosnian Herzegovinan population, did not want to secede from Yugoslavia. It was not an essential fact to them that all sides of the conflict were armed. They had to know that their recognition had to lead to war, and they did know it. That was the policy of evil intentions toward everyone living there. Why?

 

Until the recognition of the independence of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the YFA was normally at home in BH. However, it was treated as an aggressor on territory under the control of Bosniaks and Croats. In May of 1992, the YFA agreed with the Bosnian authorities to withdraw its troops from the barracks in Sarajevo and Tuzla, which were in the territory of Bosniaks’ control. On that occasion, the Bosnian army attacked the YFA vehicles and killed one hundred and one young soldiers and their elders. Television cameras recorded it all. Please click to see this video document: YFA Convoy attacked in Tuzla. These were the first vast crimes committed on the territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The international community hardly recorded it, and the criminals have never been trialled or charged in court. The Yugoslav Federal Army did not respond to the massacres in any way, even though it had the right to do so because it was attacked.

 

But the Serbs in Bosnia were not obliged to rest. In war, there is no possibility to blame and punish individuals for the atrocities done, so the crimes of individual blame go to their people. The Serbs owned a majority of the heavy weapons of the YFA that were located in Bosnia and Herzegovina because the Croatian and Bosnian soldiers and officers deserted from the YFA, leaving the heavy weapons to the Serbs. If the separation and division of Yugoslavia were performed peacefully, the people would share all weapons. By possessing heavy weapons, Serbs in Bosnia occupied the territory they considered belonged to them relatively quickly. That is the reason well-organized propaganda around the world declared Serbs as aggressors.

 

The UN, led by the United States, accused Yugoslavia of the war in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Yugoslavia was called to stop; otherwise, it would face UN economic sanctions. While Yugoslavia did cooperate with the Bosnian Serbs at that time, it had no power to command them. Also, the Serbs in Bosnia did not have a significant interest in attacking them because they had mostly realized their war goals. Yugoslavia could not stop the Bosnian and Croatian army operations that were far more severe because they did not achieve their war goals. That was the reason the Bosnian government did not want to negotiate peace. The Bosnian authorities were those who did not allow anyone to leave Sarajevo. It was convenient for the Bosnian government to act like victims, but they did not suffer in any way. Bosniaks suffered quite a lot, the same as the Croats and Serbs.

 

Shortly after the ultimatum, a massacre took place in Sarajevo on Vase Miskina Street, where an explosion killed 17 people (Bosnians and Serbs) and wounded about a hundred. All Bosnian media, even today, unanimously accuse the Serbs of it. The Serbs have denied guilt the whole time, and even today, say that the Bosniaks made the explosion for the Serbs to be accused. In favour of it was that the Bosnian television cameras came to the crime site in less than one minute. I would like to ask Bosnian authorities how that was possible. An independent investigation was never conducted. I think that the truth has to be found because otherwise, there would forever remain two versions of the massacre and the antagonism between the Serbs and Bosnians. If we judge it according to who made profits from that massacre, then the answer is the Bosnian government. After the recognition of the independence of Bosnia and Herzegovina by the EU and the U.S., Bosniaks lost interest in the negotiations about the fate of Bosnia and Herzegovina in Lisbon. The massacre in Sarajevo gave them an excuse to stop the talks. The Serbs were declared criminals all over the world, and the UN economic sanctions were imposed on Yugoslavia. After that, all the people in Bosnia and Herzegovina were tortured for three years because the national leaders did not give up on their demands.

 

News February 2, 2014, The ICTY Tribunal in Hague: The grenades at Sarajevo Markale market (1994) were not shelled by Serbs but by the Muslim Army of Bosnia and Herzegovina. A former Bosnian Muslim policeman who was a protected witness at the Hague Tribunal stated during his testimony in defence of Radovan Karadžić that the Army of Bosnia and Herzegovinafired the grenades at market Markale in Sarajevo by order of then-leader Alija Izetbegović, in Winter of 1994, which murdered 66 and left 140 people injured.

***

Now, I will say a few words about the Serbian crimes. Local Serbs killed two hundred wounded Croatian soldiers captured in the Vukovar hospital after the fall of Vukovar.

 

It was revenge. The executors of the crime were punished by lengthy prison sentences, but the order creator for this crime was not found. To me, the command to kill looks like a fraud of foreign secret services. Anyhow, the local Serbs were to blame. The YFA did not respond to it even though it had to because it commanded the entire operation. Although the Yugoslav Army had intense moral training, in practice, the morale declined together with the fall of Yugoslavia. Since the YFA did not react to it, the killing of prisoners spread to Bosnia and Herzegovina. This led to the greatest shame for the Serbian people. This originated with the massacre in Srebrenica.

 

Srebrenica is a town in eastern Bosnia where mostly Bosniaks lived in the early 1990s. During the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina, the United Nations, led by the United States, declared the city an UN-protected zone. Srebrenica was supposed to be demilitarized then, but it was not. Srebrenica thus became a safe place for Bosniaks who attacked neighbouring Serb villages, where, according to the Serbian Orthodox Church, they killed 3,287 Serbs from 1992 to 1995. The Serbs had to stop the killings, so they attacked and occupied Srebrenica on July 11, 1995. On that occasion, the Serbs allegedly killed 8,000 Muslim prisoners.

 

The massacre did occur, but Canadian General Lewis MacKenzie, the first commander of the UN protection force in Bosnia and Herzegovina, claims the number of Bosniaks killed was much lower. After several years of investigation, a list of over 2,000 murdered Bosniaks found in and around Srebrenica has been submitted to the International Court of Justice in The Hague. This number also includes casualties during three years of intense fighting. The perpetrators of that crime were Serbs who took revenge for the death of friends and relatives killed by Bosniaks. Also, a list of about 5,000 Bosniaks reported missing was submitted to the court in The Hague. According to the Bosnian side, 6,066 victims of “genocide” were buried in the memorial center in Potočari near Srebrenica, while according to the Serbs, that number is exaggerated.

 

The International Court of Justice in The Hague has accused Serb leaders in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Radovan Karadžic and Ratko Mladić, of ordering the killing of captured Bosniaks. Analyzing the propaganda of the Western world, it is evident that this accusation was aimed at subduing the Serbs in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Strategically, such an order would be insane and counterproductive when the whole world was watching what the Serbs were doing in Bosnia. Logic says that Radovan Karadžić and Ratko Mladić had no interest in ordering such a crime. However, they are responsible because they led an army over which they did not have enough control.

 

Norwegian film directors Ola Flium and David Habdich investigated the Srebrenica massacre and made a documentary about it, A Town Betrayed. The film can be viewed on YouTube. Among other things, the film shows the statement of former Srebrenica police chief Hakija Meholjić, who, along with other Bosnian delegates, attended a meeting with Alija Izetbegović in Sarajevo. The meeting took place two years before the Srebrenica massacre. In the film, at 28:10, Meholjić reports on what President Izetbegović told them in a closed meeting before the main session. President Izetbegović said: “President Clinton suggested to me that if Chetniks (Serbs) enter Srebrenica and kill 5,000 Muslims, there will be military intervention by NATO forces at Serb positions throughout Bosnia and Herzegovina. What do you think about that?”

 

President Izetbegović could not have had any interest in inventing this, so it could be assumed that President Clinton actually said this. This statement is no surprise because the US administration was openly on the Bosniak side, trying to subdue the disobedient Serbs who resisted their domination. The only surprising fact is that President Clinton was very precise in naming the city of Srebrenica and the required number of Bosniaks killed. It sounds like it was part of an elaborate plan. It is also astonishing that this event happened two years later, precisely as President Clinton portrayed it. It is, therefore, necessary to analyze how President Clinton could have foreseen this crime.

 

The offer made by President Izetbegović assumed that the Bosnian military forces would withdraw from Srebrenica, which happened on the order of President Alija Izetbegović. Thus, Bosniaks remained unprotected so that Serb troops could kill them. This is precisely what happened, although there are different versions of that event. But how could President Clinton know in advance that Serbian forces would commit such a crime? Serbs have never done anything like this in their entire history. President Clinton could only know that a massacre would happen if his people organized it. America had to have its agent in the Serb forces who organized the killings of Bosniaks while Serbian Army General Ratko Mladic was in Belgrade.

 

Who could that agent be? General Momčilo Perišić was captured on March 14, 2002, during a secret meeting with US diplomat John David Neighbor at the Šarić Motel on the Ibar Highway in Serbia. According to the official report on the case, General Perišić handed Neighbor secret military documents showing the Serbian army’s involvement in the wars in Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Both were immediately arrested, but Neighbor was soon released because he had diplomatic immunity. On February 5, 2021, the High Court in Belgrade sentenced Momčilo Perišić, former Chief of Staff of the Yugoslav Army and former Deputy Prime Minister of Serbia, to three years in prison for handing over state secrets to the United States in 2002.

 

But why would General Perišić betray his homeland? The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia in Hague, in one of the last indictments in February 2005, General Perišić was indicted for murder, inhumane acts, persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds, extermination, attacks on civilians for failing to stop his subordinates of committing the siege of Sarajevo, Zagreb rocket attack and Srebrenica massacre. On September 6, 2011, the court in Hague sentenced General Perišić to 27 years in prison for war crimes and crimes against humanity.

 

The accusations against General Perišić were known ten years earlier when the Americans were already in conflict with Yugoslavia, so they needed a traitor in the Serbian army to provide them with the necessary information. Therefore, they could offer General Perišić a waiver of responsibility for the Hague charges in exchange for cooperation, and General Perišić could accept that. That could be the reason why, two years later, on February 28, 2013, the Appeals Chamber of the Hague Tribunal ruled that Momčilo Perišić was not responsible for war crimes committed by the Bosnian Serb Army in Sarajevo and Srebrenica because they were not under Yugoslav command. Thus, the Hague Tribunal annulled the previous sentence of 27 years in prison and acquitted Momčilo Perišić of all charges in the wars in Yugoslavia.

 

That was a precedent that did not happen to other Serbian generals. That precedent may indicate that the United States used its influence in the International Court of Justice in Hague to help its agent. Now, when the Norwegian documentary “A Betrayed City” shows that Presidents Clinton and Izetbegović were able to organize the Srebrenica massacre, it is essential to investigate General Perišić’s possible involvement in the massacre.

 

General Momčilo Perišić might have become a traitor to the Serbs in Bosnia seven years before he was captured in Serbia. The Americans could not find a more suitable person in Bosnia and Herzegovina than General Perišić because he was the most influential Yugoslav general in the Serbian Republic and probably the only general who would have the power to impose the massacre of Bosniaks in Srebrenica. But, of course, General Perišić certainly did not do that voluntarily. Once a traitor to his homeland begins to cooperate with the Americans, he has no choice but to listen to the Americans.

 

But even if General Perišić did not organize the murder of Bosniaks, someone had to organize a systematic killing of such magnitude. Serbs had no good reason to organize it. It could only be organized by a Serb traitor in Bosnia. It should still be assumed that the Americans have found a traitor among the Serbs because they benefited from it. Besides, It is the standard American procedure in all conflicts. It can be determined who ordered the killings because it is not difficult to follow the track of the command to the organizers. Some Serbs certainly know who did it, but they cover it in solidarity, believing they resist the enemy. If one starts from the assumption that America organized the murder of Bosniaks, the investigation will name a Serbian traitor, whoever it was. That would redeem the Serbian reputation in Bosnia to some extent.

 

The accusation against the Serbs gave NATO an excuse to start bombing the Serbs in Bosnia. A month later, the Croatian Army carried out an aggression called Storm on Srpska Krajina, which was also protected by the UN, and on that occasion, it killed 1,268 Serbs while 1,080 went missing, but NATO did not respond to it at all. Why does NATO have double standards? NATO did not stop bombing the Serbs in Bosnia and Herzegovina until the Serbs signed a peace agreement in Dayton. Thus, the war ended in Bosnia and Herzegovina. By the Dayton Agreement, the Serbs got the recognition of the Serbian Republic and 49% of the territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which was approximately what they were offered by the Cutiller plan that they accepted before the beginning of the war. So why, then, was the war waged?

 

Serbia

 

The U.N. economic sanctions imposed on Yugoslavia because of the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina closed plants and led to the collapse of the Serbian and Montenegrin economies. Economic sanctions had a more substantial impact on the economy than war. Legal trade traffic across the border of Yugoslavia was utterly suspended, and all business operations had to go through smuggling tracks. Yugoslavia started to depend on criminals. That is how world powers today destroy disobedient states. This whole time, Yugoslavia took care of about an average of 500,000 refugees who had been expelled or run away from the secessionist republics.

 

Serbia and Montenegro remained under UN economic sanctions even after the peace agreement in Bosnia and Herzegovina was established in 1995. Why? The UN did not give a definite answer, but there were insinuations that the unsolved problem with Kosovo and Metohija still existed. Serbs consider Kosovo and Metohija the cradle of their nation and their culture. Almost all Serbian medieval Monasteries are located there, while traces of old Albanian culture do not exist. It says to the Serbs that they are native people of Kosovo and Metohija and that it belongs to them.

 

The problems in Yugoslavia started in Kosovo and Metohija in the eighties. According to the Constitution of Kosovo and Metohija, which was created under the control of Yugoslav President Josip Broz Tito in 1974, the province of Kosovo and Metohija has formally been in Serbia. Still, it has the same rights in Yugoslavia as the Republic of Serbia, or sometimes even higher. The province of Kosovo and Metohija made all decisions on its own, while Serbia had to establish consensuses with its provinces for some matters to make decisions.

 

Kosovo and Metohija was a very underdeveloped province which was receiving significant financial assistance from all of Yugoslavia. Nevertheless, the communist government of the province was not successful in initiating the development of the economy. So Kosovo and Metohija became a bottomless pit, and its prosperity could not be seen anywhere. Such a situation was dissatisfactory to all of Yugoslavia, including the people of Kosovo and Metohija. This led to the development of nationalist movements in Kosovo and Metohija, which was aiming for the province’s independence. At that time, The journey towards independence was based on Albanians’ high birthrate. On the other hand, the Serbs had been leaving Kosovo and Metohija, either because they received a good redemption price for their properties from the Albanians or because they felt threatened in the province where Albanians, in the year 1990, had nearly 90% of the population.

 

Then, Slobodan Milošević entered the scene. Instead of developing the economy of Serbia and having good relations with the Albanians to solve problems, he responded to Albanian nationalism with strong Serbian nationalism. He organized massive rallies supporting its policy. After that, Slobodan Milošević requested that the Communist leadership of Kosovo and Metohija returns the constitutional functions to the Republic of Serbia that Tito gave them in 1974. Under intense pressure from the Serbian nationalist movement in 1989, the Parliament of Kosovo and Metohija returned it. It was a Pyrrhic victory for Slobodan Milosevic because the Albanians only increased their separatist tendencies after that. Also, strong nationalism in Serbia provoked nationalism in other republics of Yugoslavia. Thus, Slobodan Milošević increased the problems in Yugoslavia. I wouldn’t say that Slobodan Milošević had bad intentions toward anyone. He was just not capable enough of the challenges he met. His opposition to the world imperialists, while previously not having sufficient support at home and abroad, was a big mistake.

 

Regardless of the UN sanctions, Yugoslavia did not give up on its independent policy. It tried to establish some form of agreement with the Albanians in Kosovo and Metohija on a shared future. Still, after the disintegration of Yugoslavia, the Albanians did not accept anything less than full independence, which Serbia could not allow. Then, somewhere in 1996, Albanians in Kosovo and Metohija began to get weapons, founded the Kosovo Liberation Army and started to kill the Serbian police. In 1998, the U.S. Government added the Kosovo Liberation Army to the list of terrorist organizations. However, former Canadian ambassador to Yugoslavia, James Bissett, observed that “the American war against terrorism” was not affecting the KLA. Before the war in Kosovo, U.S. administration representative Richard Holbrook publicly met with the rebel leaders of the KLA in Kosovo, which at that time was on the U.S. list of terrorist organizations.

 

In early 1999, someone encouraged the inhabitants of the village of Račak, a strong base of supporters of the Kosovo Liberation Army, to attack the Yugoslav special police force. After the fierce battle, 45 Albanians were killed. These people have been sacrificed because they did not have any chance against the highly equipped and skilled Yugoslav special police forces. This period is very well displayed in these documentaries: NATO’s Illegal War Against Serbia and Lies About Kosovo War. These 45 dead Albanians helped NATO give an ultimatum to Yugoslavia by which Yugoslavia had to accept the occupation of NATO forces. Why, for example, did NATO not provide a warning to Bosnia and Herzegovina when the Bosnian army committed the massacre of one hundred and one soldiers of the Yugoslav Federal Army when they tried to withdraw from Tuzla and Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina before the war even started? Yugoslavia refused NATO’s ultimatum in the town of Rambouillet in France, and that meant it would be attacked.

 

However, attacking an independent country that did not attack another is an imperialist crime, according to the UN Charter. Therefore, NATO tried to justify the aggression against Yugoslavia on charges that the Yugoslav Army slaughtered up to 100,000 Albanians and expelled up to 700,000 Albanians from Kosovo. They could not present any evidence for these accusations because none of them were right. The aggression is carried out exclusively by bombardment, so in its first mission, NATO became a terrorist organization. The aggression lasted 78 days. By the judgment of the District Court in Belgrade, No. 381/2000 of 21 September 2000, William Clinton, Madeleine Albright, William Cohen, Antoni Blair, Robin Cook, George Robertson, Jacques Chirac, Hubert Vedrine, Alan Rishar, Gerhard Schroeder, Joseph Fisher, Rudolf Scharping, Javier Solana and Wesley Clark, were sentenced to a prison sentence of 20 years each for the NATO aggression that caused the death of 1,191 citizens of Yugoslavia and that demolished 25,000 houses, destroyed 78,000 industrial facilities and 66 bridges. People still die today from the radiation of the illegal uranium-enriched bombs NATO threw on Yugoslavia. Please watch the documentary Bombing of Serbia 1999 by Nemanja Trbojevic.

 

The war ended with the UN Peace Resolution 1244. According to it, the Yugoslav army withdrew from Kosovo, the administration of Kosovo was taken over by the UN, NATO was supposed to protect the inhabitants of Kosovo, and the future status of Kosovo should be determined by the negotiations between the Serbs and Albanians, respecting the integrity of Yugoslavia. However, the last conditions of the agreement did not occur. NATO did not protect the remaining Serbs in Kosovo. A former Canadian ambassador to Yugoslavia, James Bissett, claims that after the departure of the Yugoslav army, around 2,000 Serbs were killed in Kosovo, and the rest fled. Please watch the documentary Kosovo – Can You Imagine by Boris Malagurski, which shows the fate of Serbs in Kosovo after the NATO aggression. Western media has never announced the crimes against Serbs that were committed there. Why? The former war crimes prosecutor Carla Del Ponte stated in her book The Hunt: Me and War Criminals that Kosovar Albanian guerrillas transported 300 Serbian prisoners to Albania, where they were killed and their organs removed and trafficked. If NATO carried out the aggression against Yugoslavia because of the 45 killed Albanians in Kosovo, why did it not attack Kosovo and Metohija for the crimes that Albanians in Kosovo committed against Serbs? If we take all of this into consideration, is Kosovo not a criminal creation of the Western world? On top of it all, the United States and most EU member states recognized the independence of Kosovo contrary to the UN Peace Resolution 1244.

 

Yugoslavia still has not been released from the UN economic sanctions. So what was the problem? The problem was the President of Yugoslavia, Slobodan Milošević, who was propagated to be the primary blame for all the evil in Yugoslavia, had to fall. Rulers of the world managed to take Slobodan Milosevic out of power in 2000 when elections were held in Serbia. After about ten years of suffering, which the Serbian people were exposed to, the Serbs became tired. They gave more votes to Vojislav Koštunica, the leader of the Democratic Party of Serbia than to Slobodan Milosevic. However, Vojislav Koštunica did not receive more than 50% of the votes in the first round of the elections, so the second round of voting should have been held. The opposition in Serbia declared that the election result was a fraud and assisted by powers from outside the country, and they raised a violent revolution in Serbia. If the opposition went to the second round of the election, Vojislav Koštunica would have legally and peacefully won the democratic election. The powers from outside of the country wanted blood in Serbia. It did not happen just because Slobodan Milošević did not want it.

 

Slobodan Milošević was removed, then arrested and delivered to the International Court in Hague against the Constitutional Law of Yugoslavia. Now, it should be noted that the International Court in Hague is not legal because it was formed by the UN Security Council and not by the UN Assembly. The International Court in Hague was, in fact, created by the imperialist world to prevent any resistance to their hegemony. Thus, the criminal gets the legal right to condemn its victims.

 

Now, I have to say that Slobodan Milošević was sometimes arrogant as the President, which is not a wise characteristic of a politician, but he did not commit any crime. Please see the documentary: “SHOCKING: Slobodan Milošević was INNOCENT!” on YouTube in 5 parts: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. The International Court in Hague came to the same conclusion eleven years later in the trial of General Ratko Mladic. Slobodan Milošević did not defend himself; he tried to protect his country. He did it very successfully, and because of this, he was systematically murdered there. The prosecutor did not have any proof of Slobodan Milošević’s guilt, so the court mistreated him for four years through an endless trial of war details not related to him. Slobodan Milošević had heart disease. Every medical doctor can confirm that the heavy stress of four years in court endangered his life. Before his death, he cried every day to receive help from an independent doctor but was rejected by the court, which resulted in the infarct from which he died.

 

Finally, by the enormous intervention of the world powers, obedient people came to power in Yugoslavia. Thus, in the end, Yugoslavia capitulated. Only then did the peace come. Only then were the UN sanctions lifted from Yugoslavia. In the end, Yugoslavia consisted of the Republics of Serbia and Montenegro only. It was such an unsuccessful creation that it could not survive. In 2003, it was entirely abolished by the wish of the Governments of Serbia and Montenegro. That is how my homeland was removed from the world map.

 

The aggression of the Rothschild family

 

All that I have written so far can be easily checked. So how come no one has displayed it to the world? I set myself simple questions:

 

Who has the power to dictate what the world media will publish?

Who has the power to present an entire nation unfairly?

Who has the power to impose economic sanctions to one nation unjustly?

Who has the power to remove a founder of the UN from the UN membership?

Who has the power to kill people in an international institution of justice?

Who has the power to make leaders of countries commit crimes?

Who has the power to profit from all of this?

 

Thus, a range of intense powers, including economy, military force, media, and politicians, which were used in the attack on Yugoslavia, says to me that there is a strong force that unites them. After a long period of study, I realized that the Rothschild family and their partners govern the world. I presented my findings in the article Has Antichrist Come? My observations fall into a conspiracy theory; however, have I not enclosed enough evidence that the conspiracy exists? Here is an enclosed YouTube video: Zeitgeist – The Movie: Federal Reserve, which shows the basics of the theory of conspiracy quite convincingly.

 

The Rothschild family is primarily a banking family who first organized its operations around the world. They could not manage all their businesses, so they hired expert agents to lead their companies in their names. To stimulate these agents to earn more money, they receive small shares of the ownership and become partners. The Rothschilds have created the entire hierarchical structure of their partners through the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries and still do today. Some people call this structure Masons, and the top of the hierarchical structure, Illuminati. The Rothschild family has learned that hiding their wealth behind their partners is better so that their power grows while they remain invisible. For almost 300 years, the Rothschild family and their partners could have bought half the world while no one knows it. Thus, the Rothschild family has built a power higher than the largest imperators in the history of humankind, and they rule the world imperceptibly. Being invisible, they cannot be called responsible when they cause evil around the world.

 

The agents of the Rothschild family do not spare money establishing control over the media since the media forms public opinion, and after that, they can virtually do whatever they want. The Rothschild family cannot redeem state media, but it still achieves control over it through governments, which the family puts under its control. This way, they have created propaganda in the whole world against Yugoslavia. One-sided coverage of the war in Yugoslavia around the globe is sufficient proof to me that there is an organization that controls world media. According to the data I have collected, the Rothschild family, with their partners, must have control over the organization.

 

If the owners of the world’s largest corporations, such as Rockefeller, Morgan, Goldberg, Wartburg, Goldman, etc. (who also hide their power) were independent of the Rothschild family, then they would, according to the competitive nature of entrepreneurs in capitalism, be confronting each other, but they don’t. Some rivals of the Rothschild family would have publicly disclosed the truth about the war in Yugoslavia, but it did not happen. It tells me that the old wealthy families have built a partnership with each other to control the world better. The Rothschild family is the leading family of the association because it stepped into the world market in an organized manner a hundred or more years before the partners mentioned above. I would like to stress again that this story is about a conspiracy. The leader of the world conspiracy cannot be David, the head of the Rockefeller family, because he is very exposed. He publicly tells the Presidents of the United States what they should do. The conspiracy leader must be someone who does not appear in public, like the head of the Rothschild family. His name is Jacob, and he is most famous for his love of art.

 

Through its agents, the Rothschild family helps the election campaign of influential politicians around the world so that the politicians obey them. Politicians do not have much choice. Anyone who does not follow the policy that conforms to the Rothschilds can be presented very critically in the media, which may quickly bring their career into question. I remember a very reasonable U.S. president, Jimmy Carter, whom the media has declared to be one of the least capable American presidents of all time, and that ended his career. Slobodan Milošević was not sufficiently aware of his enemies’ power, so he resisted them strongly. That is the reason he ended badly. People, please think a little bit about this; all the information you have received about Slobodan Milošević came from the people who attacked him. Is not this horrible? A former Canadian ambassador to Yugoslavia, James Bissett, claims that the charges against Slobodan Milosevic were pure fantasy. There is something even worse than that; James Bissett claims that George Soros funds the International Court in Hague. That means the people who judged Slobodan Milosevic are the same people who attacked him.

 

Yugoslavia resisted the world powers for eight years, and finally, the world powers lost their patience. When they presented Yugoslavia badly enough through their media, the world powers demanded the world politicians do something “in the name of justice.” In the beginning, “justice” was mainly based on the accusation of Yugoslavia and the illegal recognition of the secessionist republic independence. The demand for imposing UN economic sanctions on Yugoslavia passed relatively quickly. After that, the leaders of the Western countries received a request for military aggression against Yugoslavia. Here, Russia put a veto in the UN Security Council, however. Attacking an independent state without the consent of the United Nations was a crime. Therefore, this request could not be easily passed. Formally, US President Bill Clinton was supposed to launch the attack on Yugoslavia. Naturally, he resisted committing the crime. Then appeared the Monika Lewinsky case, where the media showed great interest in the sexual life of President Clinton, informing about it every day for more than a year. Then, the American Congress, Senate, and Supreme Court found the interest in the sexual life of the president of the US and subpoenaed him to testify about his sex life before the Grand Jury. Since when are the US Congress, Senate, and Supreme Court interested in the sexual life of the American president?

 

The answer is – from the moment Bill Clinton resisted committing the crime of aggression on Yugoslavia. President Clinton lied before the Grand Jury about his sex life, which is what most people would do in his place. And because he lied under oath about his sexual life, it led to charges of perjury, obstruction of justice and his impeachment. Bill Clinton’s sexual life might have removed him from the presidential position. Seriously?

 

Bill Clinton’s impeachment process was nothing else but blackmail. The blackmail forced President Clinton to lead the criminal NATO aggression on Yugoslavia or else face removal from his position. Of course, President Clinton preferred his job more than the lives of thousands of people and commanded the attack on Yugoslavia. The Lewinsky case was completely forgotten the moment that Bill Clinton decided to carry out military aggression against Yugoslavia. Now the question comes up: who has such a power to manipulate the American Congress, Senate, and Supreme Court and to blackmail the president of the United States? It is undoubtedly a powerful organization with exceptionally wealthy people. It narrows down people who may commit such a crime to a few, and the investigation should not have problems finding people responsible for it even though they hide their wealth and power of influence.

 

It should be pointed out that not all members of NATO bombarded Yugoslavia. The aggression committed: Belgium, Canada, the Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The aggression refused Greece, Island, and Luxembourg. Honour to them! All the presidents of states or governments who joined President Clinton in the aggression against Yugoslavia are also criminals. How might that be possible? Naturally, the Rothschild family has built conspiracys against humanity throughout the centuries, in which ignorance, lies, stupidity, immorality, fear, and corruption grow and then rule. Dear readers, you have received all the information about the war in Yugoslavia from the same people who started the aggression in the first place. Is this not a horrible fact?

 

The Rothschild family did not destroy Yugoslavia to give the Yugoslav people democratic rights. This, indeed, is not the case. It destroyed Yugoslavia to take control of the people of the former Yugoslavia easily. Through their agent “benefactor” for Eastern Europe, George Soros and his “open society,” the Rothschild family gave donations to the opposition of the Communist Party, which was in power in Yugoslavia. This opposition was interested in destroying Yugoslavia, mainly itself, so that the donors did not need to interfere much in their affairs. But there was coordination. Maybe you have not noticed, but the destruction waited in line, one after the other: Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo and Metohija.

 

However, maybe some higher justice exists! Have you noticed that the chief domestic destroyers of Yugoslavia, Janez Drnovšek, Franjo Tuđman, Gojko Šušak, Alija Izetbegović and Ibrahim Rugova died of cancer? Coincidence? Please check how many national leaders die from cancer in any country around the world, and maybe you will then become aware of what a coincidence it should be. With this respect, if my name were Janez Janša, Milan Kučan Stjepan Mesić, Vladimir Šeks, Ejup Ganić, Haris Silajdžić, Hashim Thaçi, Ramush Hardinaj or so, I would check my health more often.

 

All the mentioned politicians were utterly united in the desire for their states to become members of the EU. However, the people of these states were not even close to having the united wish of joining the EU. Why did these politicians fight so hard to get out of one country and then hurry to join another? It is even stranger that Yugoslavia and the EU have no significant organizational differences. But that all is irrelevant to them. The only relevant fact to them is to be in the real center of attention because it gives them power. They know this can be achieved only by obeying the rules that higher powers preach. These people are interested just in naked power, and they realize it over the bodies of dead people.

 

The Rothschild family did not destroy Yugoslavia to leave the Yugoslav companies to free market either. Their agents attacked Yugoslavia from the inside. Who are these agents? They are the newly established owners of companies in all the republics of former Yugoslavia. They first conquered the media because they controlled public opinion. Now, whatever newspapers you read in the region of former Yugoslavia are under the control of the Rothschild family or follow the Rothschild family’s policies because they do not know what else to do.

 

All new tycoons who made fortunes from nothing are agents or partners of the Rothschild family, even though they might not be aware of it because they communicate with the lower agents of the Rothschild family only. The tycoons have received enormous amounts of money at their disposal to invest in everything that promises good business. They also have priorities in purchasing companies with the help of local politicians that they have corrupted. Even if these tycoons were successful businesspeople in socialist Yugoslavia, they were offered the recapitalization with a large sum of money and business connections that they could not refuse. Some petty thieves could independently have enriched themselves through the robbery of public property, but big thieves cannot survive long without the support of the Rothschild family. The Rothschild family, with its partners, keeps all significant roads of production under their control so that they can quickly push non-cooperative entrepreneurs out of the game. Thus, the colonization of all the republics of the former Yugoslavia was conducted.

 

Briefly about the reasons for the violent breakup of Yugoslavia

 

Yugoslavia was the country with the most developed socialist economy in the world. The Rothschild family tried to show that the results of socialism cannot be good, and they succeeded. Without Rothschilds, there would be no war in Yugoslavia. The war destroyed what the peoples of Yugoslavia had built for generations and jointly owned. The war broke business ties between the republics, the market decreased, and earnings decreased, so companies lost value and were sold cheaply to partners of the Rothschild family.

 

But why exactly were the Serbs to blame? When the Rothschild family does evil, they need someone to take the blame for them. What nation could be more suitable for the Rothschild family than the Serbs, who were the only ones to elect socialists in the whole of Eastern Europe? That’s why they had to get a particular lesson. But certainly, the worst thing for Yugoslavia was that it led to an independent policy, that Slobodan Milošević did not allow a rapid and uncontrolled transition to capitalism, that he did not allow social companies to be sold for nothing to the Rothschilds. This is why Slobodan Milošević had to fall.

 

World powers under the control of the Rothschilds made life miserable for all the peoples of Yugoslavia. When they finally imposed peace, all nations, except the Serbs, proclaimed them their saviours. All these nations are, in fact, grateful to their criminals, executioners, torturers, and thieves, even though they don’t know it. The most terrifying fact is that today, there is an entirely invisible force that can do evil to an entire country, destroy it, rob it and enslave it without anyone knowing anything about it.

 

***

 

This article has a significant shortage of evidence that proves a direct connection between the Rothschild family and the destruction of Yugoslavia. The Rothschild family does not appear in public, does not give statements, and does not leave visible written traces, so it is challenging to unmask them. I think that the Rothschild family can be easily connected to the war in Yugoslavia by conducting an investigation of the former U.S. President, Bill Clinton, for the criminal aggression on Yugoslavia in the International Court of Justice in Hague. But, oh well, the U.S. Government does not recognize the jurisdiction of the Court for its citizens. Was it not because this Court was unjust from the very beginning? Can any American court run an investigation of its former President? Theoretically, it can, but Americans are almost continuously aggressing other countries, and no president was ever called responsible for it. This world does not have a good defence from evil, especially not from such evil. That’s why we live in destructive times.

 

The other presidents of the states that have performed the aggression on Yugoslavia have just followed the media lynch demands, and except for British Prime Minister Tony Blair, they cannot blame Jacob Rothschild. I have presented here that the Western media covered the aggression on Yugoslavia like members of organized crime. The investigations against them could lead to Jacob Rothschild.

 

However, maybe the easiest way to connect Jacob Rothschild with the aggression on Yugoslavia is by proving that Slobodan Milošević was murdered in the International Criminal Tribunal in Hague. There is a basis for investigation against the doctors who have been caring for the heart disease of Slobodan Milošević in the court in Hague. Three months before his death, a medical check-up found traces of the medicine Rifampicin in his blood. It is a drug for leprosy and tuberculosis, which is known as a neutralizer of some effects of the medication Milošević received for his high blood pressure and a heart condition. Milošević was informed about it four days before his death when he stopped taking the medicine.

 

Finding the not-needed medicine in Milošević’s blood that reduces the drug’s effect on his heart condition could be characterized as a murder attempt. The investigation into why the medicine for leprosy and tuberculosis was traced in his blood was never performed. The court released notes that Slobodan Milošević had open access to medicine, so he was able to take it on his own. In other words, he may do it on purpose to kill himself. The investigation of Slobodan Milošević’s death did not consider that he cried to receive help from an independent doctor. The court rejected his request, and it resulted in the infarct from which he died. It is no surprise that the investigators concluded that Milošević died of a heart attack as a natural cause.

 

However, many doctors stated that his death would certainly be prevented by the routine operation of coronary angiography and stenting. This is an elementary medical proceeding of heart disease, which would save his life. His doctors have to answer why such a routine intervention of inserting stenting in his heart artery was not performed. More information can be found here: Death of Slobodan Milošević. The investigation against the Medical Officer of the Detention Unit, Dr. Paulus Falke, can show that somebody must have ordered his death, and that can lead to Jacob Rothschild.

 

A brief public appearance, which occurred four years ago in the home of Rothschild in England, could show how much power the Rothschild family possesses. In the next picture from left to right are Warren Buffet, currently “the richest” man in the world, the Governor of California, Arnold Schwarzenegger, and Lord Jacob Rothschild.

 

The photograph was probably taken to impress the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, who conflicted with Jacob Rothschild at the time over the Russian oil company Yukos. Later, Jacob Rothschild found that the publication of the photos was a big mistake because it transformed him from a retiring lover of arts and flowers into a mighty person in the world. I think that Jacob Rothschild invested an effort in keeping his status as a modest philanthropist by presenting the meeting as a meeting of philanthropists.

 

That could easily be the main reason why Warren Buffet, currently declared the wealthiest man in the world, decided to give 85% of his wealth, or about 50 billion dollars for humanitarian purposes, to the Foundation of Bill Gates, the majority owner of the company Microsoft. This scenario would be possible only if these 50 billion dollars belonged to the Rothschild family. It looks to me like a very probable scenario. Thus, one could conclude that the Rothschild family provides its beginners with a 15 percent commission. Whether these 50 billion dollars would go to humanitarian purposes or it is just a show for the people remains to be known. Indeed, a beneficial arrangement stood behind it for all involved sides. I believe that behind the grey, refined, apparently good-natured sir in the picture above, enormous power is hidden, such a potential that almost nothing may occur on the world level without his approval.

 

His son, Nathaniel Rothschild, in the following picture, gets his first experience ruling the world. He attended the proclamation of the Independence of the Republic of Montenegro, on which occasion he expressed his congratulations to the President, Milo Đukanović.

 

The presence of Nathaniel Rothschild in that act can be interpreted as the result of his help in attracting significant foreign investments for the construction of Porto Montenegro (which is one of the models of government corruption). However, Montenegrin television showed his presence only in the afternoon news, while it excluded him from the evening news. This caught my attention because such important ceremonies are not cut short in prime time. I concluded that the Montenegrin television tried to cover up his presence. This led me to the conclusion that the presence of Nathaniel Rothschild at the Declaration of Independence of Montenegro was, in fact, a signature at the end of the successfully completed job of breaking up Yugoslavia. Montenegro was the last republic that broke away from the former Yugoslavia.

 

I’ve discovered the intentions of the Rothschild family by watching CNN and the BBC. Of course, I don’t believe in the propaganda of those media, but I still watch them because they show where new crises will appear. How will they not know when they are in the service of crisis creators? Crises don’t even “exist” if these media don’t publish them. As a rule, they attack independent countries of the world and then, under the pretext of fighting for justice and democracy, discredit the governments of such countries. The Rothschild family will try to destabilize any country that is not under their influence or control. It is a crime, and that is what we should call it.

 

***

 

If this article looks convincing to you, please recommend it to your friends. The more people are aware of the evil that the Rothschild family and its partners induce, the less they would dare produce it because, one day, they may be called accountable for what they are doing. This is the purpose of this article. I fight for the whole society to cease their fear for the future and have a good, healthy and joyful life. This is worth a little risk.

 

Written on 08.08.08

 

February 26, 2024. Today, Jacob Rothschild, the secret ruler of the Western world, died. From now on, his son, Nathaniel Rothschild, takes his secret position while pretending to be an ordinary citizen.

 

Recently, it came to my mind that the family may be successfully debunked by going after seemingly benign conspiracies, such as Chemtrails, Global Warming, or Flat Earth. Flat Earth is one of the most successful conspiracies ever, making people believe they are bright while the Rothschild family controls them by manipulating public information. People who spread seemingly benign conspiracies would more readily admit who pays them than those who commit crimes. Investigators just need to follow the money that drives the spread of conspiratorial ideas. The Western world is obviously controlled by one center, and according to me, nobody else but the Rothschilds has the power to make it happen.

 

Aleksandar Šarović 

 

My clash with sciences

My clash with sciences

My education

 

I am a genius. It seems to me that people think geniuses are those rare individuals who have high intelligence. Intelligence is just an excellent asset to a genius, but it isn’t necessary. A genius is a person who preserves his nature, a person who feels very well which way to go, the one who is able to select the most essential information from an unlimited quantity. He is a person who unmistakably feels what note to choose when composing music. A genius is a person who knows and does great deeds.

Geniuses are a product of freedom. A genius does not accept the knowledge of which the purpose he does not understand. That is how he protects his genial nature. He is nothing else but a supernatural person who can do what he likes. Everyone is supposed to do great deeds in the fields of their interests by their nature. Everyone should have the characteristics of a genius. People are not geniuses because they alienate themselves from their nature or they cannot do what they like.

 

It is hard to be a genius today mostly because people are prisoners of the culture of imposed knowledge. Schools do it the most, so they are the primary origin of alienation. Students cannot pass exams if they are unable to reproduce the imposed knowledge. People who obey to imposed knowledge have to suppress their natural needs, instincts, and feelings and thus, they alienate themselves from their nature. Such people copy needs, emotions, customs, and words that they have accepted from authorities throughout their lives. People who are alienated from their nature do not feel enough of what they need according to their nature and therefore take alienated knowledge readily which develops the process of alienation.

 

Alienated people from their nature are not able to create genial works. They become the opposite of geniuses; they become living machines. Imposing knowledge is a misfortune to the people. Please do not get me wrong; knowledge is necessary for human development, but it must not be imposed; it should be freely accessible and accepted. However, no one can avoid the torture of imposing knowledge today. Scientists especially cannot because they cannot be scientists without a university degree. That is why there are no geniuses in the sciences today. Forgive me if I’m wrong, but I do not know of any. The more the schools demand acceptance of exposed knowledge, the less the chance students will have to protect their human abilities and, in accordance, they have less chance to be geniuses.

 

Only spiritually free people can create genial deeds. Looking at the world around me I can recognize geniality in the band Pink Floyd. They made deeply touching, compelling and beautiful music that is distinguished from everything else I have heard. This is the music of sorrow, suffering, criticism, and hope. The music portrays our world at the turn of the millennium brilliantly. If their composing were conditioned by a finishing music conservatorium, maybe these libertarian people would have given up from the academy and would not have been allowed to compose such beautiful music. If they found the strength to finish the music academy, I believe that it would certainly somehow alienate them from their nature and they would not be able to compose such grandiose music.

 

***

 

I consider my complete education as violence to my needs and freedom, and that is what it really was. Not only was my body captured in school, the school tried to enslave my thoughts, but I resisted drastically. I cannot say the resistance was my conscious decision. It was something built in me. I did not learn anything there, and that is the reason I had to attend the fifth grade again. Then I found I had to learn just enough not to repeat the whole year.

 

After finishing high school, I enrolled in the study of architecture. I liked the creative work of building houses. Through considerable difficulties of studying an uninteresting program, I did graduate the faculty. A professor who led my graduation work told me that he had never seen lower average exam marks than mine. I knew that without him and in those times I became conscious of the fact that being a lousy student advantaged me considerably compared to others.

 

As a third-year student in the faculty, I was proclaimed as one of the best architects in Yugoslavia when I won the competition for the arrangement of The Republic Square in Zagreb. It needs to be stressed here that I got the reward thanks to the sound logic I managed to save through refusal of alienated knowledge, and of course, my love for architecture that gave me tremendous work energy. The sensitivity, objectivity and creativity I have been developing throughout my whole life helped me win the competition, not the studies at the faculty. If people feel their nature, loves what they are doing, and if they have a talent for what they are doing, they will achieve much better results than they could obtain by studying and receiving diplomas.

 

At the end of my architectural studies, a collection of books by Erich Fromm fell into my hands. Fromm strongly criticized the world we live in. I had similar views, and during those times I already created the basic ideas as to how a good world should look like, but it didn’t cross my mind that I am the one who should do something about it. By reading Fromm, I found that in the field of social improvements I could give much more to society than in architecture. That’s how I decided to change the world. It excited me a lot and gave enthusiasm and tremendous energy to work. I started writing my book “Humanism – A Philosophic-Ethical-Political-Economic Study of the Development of the Society,” without any doubt of my credibility.

 

However, I had to earn money to live. Philosophy requires vast freedom of thoughts, which a job in the field of architecture could not give me because creative work in architecture captures too much time. That was the reason I gave up from architecture entirely right after the graduation. At that time I found the job as a fire protection inspector. An average person can learn the entire knowledge I used for this job in a few short courses. The position did not burden me much, so I was able to write, yes, the most important book ever.

 

Writing the book inspired tremendous creativity in me, far more significant than architecture. Good ideas about changing the world have been coming to my mind without end. When that happens, a person cannot stop even if he would like to. It brings a lot of satisfaction. But also, I needed to invest a lot of effort to compose thoughts. I did it by analysis, cleaning, and rewriting the notes. In the development of new ideas, I did not use existing sciences because I didn’t know them well. I used basic logic that was already pretty much developed in me in those times. When basic ideas were finished, I had to research existing sciences to connect my thoughts to the existing state. By understanding what my goal was, I didn’t have any difficulties in studying the issues anymore. In the beginning, I thought my book would have been finished in one year, but the problems were much more complicated than I had predicted and it was not my only preoccupation, so it took me ten years to finish the book. I’ve got the power to work from understanding that my book would one day change the world entirely and create a sound and sane society.

 

When I finished the book, I started presenting my ideas to scientists. Unfortunately, the only support I got was from Professor of philosophy Andrija Stojković from the University of Belgrade. He wrote a review of my book. He also helped me spread my ideas among scientists in Belgrade, in Hegel Society and in the Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, but we were not successful.

Perhaps in hope to find interested people for my philosophy in the west, I immigrated to Canada, in 1993. I was trying to work professionally on my philosophy by searching for funds from various organizations and foundations but didn’t receive any. Again, I got into a situation in which I had to earn money for a living. During that time, an economic crisis was in Canada, and there were not many available jobs. The exception was new computer technology. The situation forced me to buy a computer and computer books, and I began learning computer programming. The demand for programmers was much larger than the supply so that I got the first job easily. Nobody asked me for any diploma. I was not an especially good programmer because the job was not interesting to me. My thoughts were focused continuously on my philosophy.

 

Fortunately, my wonderful wife Dušica had an understanding of my work and offered me to take care of our daughters and home, and to work on my philosophy in my spare time, while she earned money for life. That’s how I got the time to work on my philosophy. You wouldn’t understand how grateful I am for that. The whole world should be thankful to her as well. She was the only person who had an understanding of my work, and without her, I wouldn’t be able to find enough free time to think about my philosophy and write what you are reading.

 

Criticism of sciences 

 

Since I finished my book “Humanism,” 16 years ago, I have been sending thousands of letters to professors of social sciences trying to interest them in how the bright future of humankind would look like, but I did not succeed. I’ll try to explain why.

 

Science is an objective and systematic knowledge about facts and laws of reality acquired by systematic analysis and experiments. Scientists create and develop sciences. Scientists naturally aim to learn higher expertise and, on this path, they create new theories that should bring conveniences to society. If such approaches do not conflict with reality directly, scientists accept their opinions as objective or accurate. However, relative harmonies of such theories with actual facts, still don’t guarantee the objectivity of such arguments. They may be subjective, or in other words, wrongful. The subjective approaches create alienated knowledge or false knowledge that alienates a person from reality. If scientists are prominent enough authorities, society accepts their alienated knowledge, which then alienates all the people from objective reality. Once received alienated knowledge serves generations of scientists as the basis in spreading alienation. Such sciences aim society to wrong path and prevent acceptance of objective knowledge. It aims society to solve problems inside frames that cannot bring good results. Alienated knowledge as a general rule brings disadvantage to society.

 

***

The social sciences, especially, are on the wrong or not good enough paths. They are very alienated from objective reality. The alienation has come from not sufficient challenge of ideas coming from social science authorities throughout history. The essence of social science should be creating the vision of how to build a good or at least better path to the future of humankind, but the scientists do not have it. They should be initiators of positive changes in society, but they are not. As a result, they do not have influences on social events.

 

In the wish to approach social sciences, I tried to enroll my master’s degree in sociology at the University of North York. One of the professors there sincerely advised me not to waste my time with sociology, explaining that I would not be able to get any job with a master degree in social sciences. I understood it as his opinion that there are no benefits of sociology. I responded to him that I had new ideas about the advancements of society, but he didn’t show any interest in listening to me, the same way thousands of other scientists didn’t. Another professor at the same University briefly reviewed my book “Humanism,” and told me that I satisfied the requirements for the studies, but my book was not acceptable as my master dissertation work.

 

The book that will change society entirely and make the world a beautiful place for living is not acceptable to social sciences! This example shows clearly how generations of scientists may turn into a dead-end street when they base their intellectual paths on alienated knowledge. What to say about the professors of Marxism? In Yugoslavia, Marxism was an obligatory subject in all high schools. Then the capitalist revolution came, and Marxism was revoked. What thousands of professors and doctors of Marxism do now?

 

Do you think philosophy is science? I don’t. If it is indeed a science, there would be some benefits from it, but I cannot see them. Philosophy is a word of Ancient Greek origin which means ”love wisdom.” It tries to give basic answers to the questions about human beings and their existence in nature and society. Naturally, one of the most significant interests of philosophers was defining the origin of the world. All of the answers philosophers proposed throughout the history of mankind were probably alienated from the objective reality. We live in an endlessly small part of an indefinitely large world to be able to define its origin objectively.

 

Great philosophers were through support or criticism of their predecessors writing large amounts of books trying to build and present objective opinions about the reality that surrounds us. But they did not succeed. The proof lies in the fact that philosophers did not define the basic idea for creating a good society yet. The powerlessness of philosophers to find objective answers to the questions that bother people has resulted in the creation of a massive amount of alienated knowledge. Studying philosophy today doesn’t mean seeking for wisdom because it is not known what it means. Studying philosophy today means learning about the history of failure of human thoughts. It is harmful because an enormous amount of alienated knowledge leads people to the wrong path where they can hardly recognize the origins of problems.

 

Philosophers are full of good intentions, but I have not noticed that they worked seriously enough on how to improve the world. Why? One of the rare attempts did the philosopher Karl Marx. He wrote in the Manifesto of the Communist Party: “Workers of the world unite against the capitalist exploitation!” But Marx did not define how a proper organization of society should look like.

 

Maybe he thought that united workers would develop the best possible self-organization of their communities, and meet the needs all of the people. However, nobody has ever succeeded in implementing it. The problem is two people can relatively easily agree on something but never about everything, all people can hardly agree about anything. Marx’s successors have solved this problem by taking all power into their own hands. They have become authorities and authorities tend to oppress people. This way, the authoritarian socialism immerged which regressed Marx’s intentions.

 

The problem lies in the fact that nobody has ever tried to create a system that might function without the influences of authoritative powers. I did it, and that’s the reason I succeeded in defining a good society.

 

Philosophers mainly agree that people must have equal rights, but in reality, they do not exist, and philosophers don’t recognize that sufficiently. Therefore, it isn’t surprising that they don’t understand the significance of the Golden Rule, which I believe first time is written in the Bible: “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you!” Or: “Do not do unto others what you do not want others do unto you!” All that philosophers have searched for to make a good society one might put into this sentence. But taking into account that the significance of this sentence was not understood clearly enough, no serious attempts were ever made to realize the idea.

 

I have invented how to make the golden rule work. This will be achieved by the system of evaluations among people. I called it democratic anarchy. Each man will get an equal right to evaluate a few other people by his own choice. Each positive evaluation should bring a small, but a noticeable award to the people being assessed, and each negative assessment should carry punishments to the negatively evaluated people in the same form. What would we get with that?

 

The system of evaluations will remove the privileges of people which are the origin of evil in society. A small equal power in the hands of the people will make people respect each other strongly. Human beings will become values to other human beings. Everyone will try hard to please people as best as they can and diminish or abolish creation of all forms of disadvantages. This will create what philosophers in the history of humankind have tried to reach unsuccessfully, this will solve the problem of today’s democracy, this will eliminate the evil in society and create a sound and sane society.

 

***

 

The scientists of political science have created a complicated political science that is very alienated from the nature of society. It happened due to the absence of deep enough analysis of political reality throughout the history of humankind. The political science certainly cannot give answers to the problems of today’s society and does not have the vision as to how a good political system, equally acceptable to all, should look like. The highest level of political science today is called democracy. However, political scientists, together with other social scientists, were never able to form a consensus to determine what the developed democracy is supposed to look like. The problem is not about the impossibility to make such an agreement; it is about the complete lack of will to form it. Scientists of political science are extended hands of the state political system, and they do not have any wish to change or confront it.

 

The most prominent professors and doctors of political sciences today do not analyze politics trying to offer the best solution for people, they analyze politicians and try to support those who best fit agenda of the rich. They know it is their best bet to get the air time in the media and to be prosperous political scientists. So the most prominent intellectuals are just public gossip people. They like to gossip like everybody else. So politics today is just a big show which does not have anything to do with democracy. If political scientists try to enter deeper into sciences, media would not support their work, and nobody would know they exist. Neither political science would help them because it depends on the rich people. The media airs the opposition as well but only those who cannot endanger the governmental policy. In this way, it gives an impression that democracy exists. That’s the reason we live in a formal democracy in which the people almost don’t have any influence in forming the policy of society.

 

I have defined a developed democracy in which people will directly impact all questions of their interest. It will be based on democratic anarchy and direct democracy.

 

The people will primarily be interested in creating the macroeconomic policy of society, which is unthinkable today. Each human will directly participate in deciding what minimum income in the community should be. The average value of all statements will determine the minimum salary of workers. In such a way, the decisions of people will coordinate the economic security of workers and their income based interest to work.

 

Also, each person will be involved in the decision as to what part of their gross income they want to allocate for taxes. The sum of all decisions of all people will form the tax policy of society. The money will then be taken from people’s incomes proportionally to the height of their income. Furthermore, each person will participate in how the tax money is going to be spent. They will decide what part of their tax money they want to spend on: education, health care, housing, recreation, infrastructure, etc. The sum of all the statements of all people will define the allocation of tax money. The advantages of such a democracy will be huge. The collective consumption will not be alienated from the people anymore. It will satisfy the needs of the people in the best possible way. The people will be delighted. The people will accept their communities more. This is the way to disalienate society. When such a democracy is established political science would probably not be needed anymore. The problem is the rich prevent me from spreading this kind of democracy to the people.

 

***

The scientists of political science have created a complicated political science that is very alienated from the nature of society. It happened due to the absence of deep enough analysis of political reality throughout the history of humankind. The political science certainly cannot give answers to the problems of today’s society and does not have the vision as to how a good political system, equally acceptable to all, should look like. The highest level of political science today is called democracy. However, political scientists, together with other social scientists, were never able to form a consensus to determine what the developed democracy is supposed to look like. The problem is not about the impossibility to make such an agreement; it is about the complete lack of will to form it. Scientists of political science are extended hands of the state political system, and they do not have any wish to change or confront it.


The most prominent professors and doctors of political sciences today do not analyze politics trying to offer the best solution for people, they analyze politicians and try to support those who best fit agenda of the rich. They know it is their best bet to get the air time in the media and to be prosperous political scientists. So the most prominent intellectuals are just public gossip people. They like to gossip like everybody else. So politics today is just a big show which does not have anything to do with democracy. If political scientists try to enter deeper into sciences, media would not support their work, and nobody would know they exist. Neither political science would help them because it depends on the rich people. The media airs the opposition as well but only those who cannot endanger the governmental policy. In this way, it gives an impression that democracy exists. That’s the reason we live in a formal democracy in which the people almost don’t have any influence in forming the policy of society.


I have defined a developed democracy in which people will directly impact all questions of their interest. It will be based on democratic anarchy and direct democracy.


The people will primarily be interested in creating the macroeconomic policy of society, which is unthinkable today. Each human will directly participate in deciding what minimum income in the community should be. The average value of all statements will determine the minimum salary of workers. In such a way, the decisions of people will coordinate the economic security of workers and their income based interest to work.


Also, each person will be involved in the decision as to what part of their gross income they want to allocate for taxes. The sum of all decisions of all people will form the tax policy of society. The money will then be taken from people’s incomes proportionally to the height of their income. Furthermore, each person will participate in how the tax money is going to be spent. They will decide what part of their tax money they want to spend on: education, health care, housing, recreation, infrastructure, etc. The sum of all the statements of all people will define the allocation of tax money. The advantages of such a democracy will be huge. The collective consumption will not be alienated from the people anymore. It will satisfy the needs of the people in the best possible way. The people will be delighted. The people will accept their communities more. This is the way to disalienate society. When such a democracy is established political science would probably not be needed anymore. The problem is the rich prevent me from spreading this kind of democracy to the people.


***


Law is an extended hand of the political system. The science of law is alienated from its objective reality the same way all others social sciences are because it was created by the privileged class of people. Unjust society creates an unjust legal system. From this injustice emerges the cruel system we live in. A cruel system creates cruel people. Cruel criminals do cruel criminal acts. Cruel judges punish criminals cruelly. The cruel justice may find its justification through preventing cruel people from producing evil, but such justice is not satisfactory. Crime is on the rise everywhere, and prisons are full.


The law is probably the most conservative social science that ensures the official system in society. It is precious to political power. In Canada, students cannot enter the school of law before they graduate some other faculty. But because of that after the graduations, lawyers get some privileges that formally nobody besides them has. Without them in Canada, one cannot buy real estate, cannot divorce, cannot perform legal proceedings; practically people cannot protect their rights without them. Privileges always form some sort of immorality; therefore justice can easily switch into injustice.


I would like to present one obvious example. It is about the International Court of Justice in Hague. The Chief Prosecutor of the court, Louise Arbour, indicted Slobodan Milošević, the president of Yugoslavia for war crimes in the middle of the aggression from her country, Canada, as a member of NATO, on Yugoslavia in 1999. Not one accusation against Slobodan Milošević was proved in the four years of the trial in Hague. If prosecutor Louise Arbour took a closer look, she would have noticed that her Prime Minister of Canada, Jean Chretien, did commit a war crime indeed by sending Canadian bombardiers to kill people in aggression on Yugoslavia. The aggression was committed against the charters of the UN, Canadian laws, and even against the constitution of the NATO pact. But she didn’t accuse her Prime Minister of the war crimes. This immoral woman was then awarded for her deeds by promotion to the Supreme Court of Canada and UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. I think that the International Criminal Tribunal for former Yugoslavia in Hague is an immoral or even criminal place that shamelessly calls itself justice. I also believe this court is the beginning of the end of everything that is accepted as justice today.


Once the system I’ve proposed is accepted, People will have equal legislative power in society. It will be manifested by the equal rights evaluation among people. I have called it democratic anarchy. I have to repeat it because it is essential, the positive assessment will bring small awards to the assessed people, and negative evaluations will result in the same form of punishment. Such a little power in the hands of people will eliminate privileges which are the primary cause of evil in society. People will respect each other. They will learn to create the highest possible advantages to other people and diminish or abolish the creation of all forms of disadvantages. In such a system, people will determine what is right and wrong through their own practice. Lawyers will not be needed anymore, and science of justice will probably finish in history textbooks. Then the moral time will emerge.


***

Economics is the social science that studies the production of goods and services. Today is accepted the economy of the free market or the capitalist mode of production where the means of production are privately owned. The capitalist mode of production has managed to perform the most efficient allocation of production resources based on the market competition of enterprises. Capitalism has realized the highest increase in production productivity in the history of humankind, which created the most top growth of living standard ever.

 

But the capitalist economy also has significant disadvantages. The economics of capitalism help capital owners. They do not deal with the exploitation of workers. Furthermore, the free market brings instability to the production process that capitalism cannot solve. Capitalists prevent the removal of disadvantages of the capitalist economy because it would necessarily endanger the survival of capitalism.

 

However, I have created an entirely new publicly owned economy that will solve the problems of capitalism and establish greater productivity than the capitalist form of production can. The new economy will mostly base production on consumer orders. This will create a democratic planning economy that will ensure stable production. It will guarantee employment and economic security for every person. It will achieve high productivity and stability by lowering the company’s market competition to the level of jobs. A worker who offers the highest productivity for any public workplace at any time will get a job. This is a significant change that I have presented in detail in the book “Humanism.”

 

The new economy will establish a very efficient system of accountability as a condition of ensuring high productivity of the economy. This will create the most productive economy possible. It will be higher than private entrepreneurship can produce so capitalism with all its negativities will go down in history.

 

The market will determine the amount of workers’ wages. The right to work will be provided by a worker who requires a lower salary for the same job. The more inappropriate jobs will be better compensated for income, which will equalize the interest of workers for all jobs and they will be satisfied with the wages. Work competition will eliminate privileges in the production process, which will eliminate corruption as the main source of the immorality of today’s society. Workers will be able to choose the jobs they prefer, and they will enjoy the work. Work will become a value for itself.

 

After capitalism, humanism will emerge, a system that will far better follow the needs of people. The economy of humanism will be simple, and every man will be able to understand it in the short term. Accepting a new economy, however, requires in-depth analysis and extensive debate in society so that it can be accepted. I never managed to accomplish this.

 

Conclusively, I would say that social sciences will lose their importance. The new system I have proposed will demystify social sciences to their real essence and then we will all get to know social sciences well. The same way that people speak their mother’s tongue well, without matter of the level of education, all people will become good sociologists, philosophers, lawyers, economists, psychologists, artists, etc., just because they live in the new system.

 

***

The situation in natural sciences is not much better. Medicine is definitely not on the right path enough. Today, cancer is cured by chemotherapy and radiation. These methods stop cancer to some extent, but they also harm patients. As a general rule, cancer more wins than losses. I would say that these methods are somewhere in the range of the Middle Ages use of leeches to cure illnesses. Medicine doctor, Lorraine Day, has entirely abandoned medical science and won her breast cancer by changing the way of living and by eating healthy food. I’ve heard for many such cases. Why doesn’t medical science research it? The development of medicine requires serious studies of traditional alternative medicine, but modern medicine refuses it.

 

The fact is big corporations have taken control over methods of curing illnesses, and they earn a lot of money healing people. They don’t even have the interest to be successful in healing people because healthy people do not spend money on medicine. This is the horrible truth. Traditional medicine is forbidden in modern medicine. That has happened, firstly, because the medical sciences are conceited by possessing new knowledge and secondly, because conventional medicine cannot bring profit to corporations. The documentary Vaccine Nation presents it well. Modern medicine is very inhibited. I don’t remember the last time modern medicine invented a cure against an illness. In fact, the same medicine change s its name to bring higher profits to the pharmaceutical industry. Medicine doctors should ask themselves, is their purpose supporting the pharmaceutical industry or curing people? I am not saying that modern medicine does not bring betterment to people, but objectively it requires a general reform.

 

I believe that most illnesses originate from unhealthy living, through the alienation of people from their nature, and through the stress that emerges from it. Once the system I have proposed is accepted, it will enable people to live in harmony with their nature and illnesses will then significantly disappear. Also, I believe that people in the future will acquire a basis of medical sciences, as much as family doctors have so that they might be able to cure themselves alone or recognize the illnesses and visit proper medical specialists.

 

***

Psychology is a science that studies the mental processes and behaviour of a human being. It tries to solve the problems of man’s psyche. All these problems originate from the alienation in society. In an alienated society, man is a wolf to man. He imposes his will to other people and tries to build conveniences to himself regardless of what effects it might have to other people. Psychology is naturally completely powerless in solving social problems, so it can’t be very successful in solving psychological problems either. Psychoanalytic Sigmund Freud and Carl Gustav Jung created their own teaching and brought hope in curing mental disorders. They were very popular, but their teaching was abandoned as unsuccessful because it was alienated from the causes that cause psychological problems. All psychological problems originate from the cruel, immoral social system, the system that puts obligations and discipline in first place, the system that kills humanity, the system with no human warmth or love. Psychoanalytic help people as much as they are able to make a human touch with people who have psychological disorders. The more the doctors show they care for their patients, the more they are able to help them, because this is what is missing most in today’s alienated society.

 

When the new system I have proposed is accepted, people will not be able to benefit themselves at the expense of others. That will be provided by the system of evaluation among people. I will repeat it again to stress the importance. Each person will get an equal right to evaluate a few people they choose by his free will. Positively evaluated people will automatically receive small awards and people who get negative evaluations will be punished in the same form. Such assessment will be significant enough to people so that they will try hard to create the highest possible conveniences to other people and avoid or stop producing damages to them. All people will be careful and caring towards other people. In such a manner, man will become a value to another man. In such a manner man will build and develop love in him himself. This will remove psychological alienation. That will bring mental health, and I believe psychology will not be needed anymore.

 

***

Physics, chemistry and biology are natural sciences that have brought significant benefits to people. However, they also have theories that cannot be proven and might be alienated from their objective nature or, in short, wrong. All of chemistry is one big theory including nuclear physics. So far, work in these scientific fields confirms the validity of these theories, but that doesn’t mean it will stay the same in the future.

 

These sciences bring a lot of damage to humankind as well. Scientists give themselves rights to play with atomic and molecular modifications too easily. This is especially wrong when nobody knows for sure what consequences they might bring to human. If such researches may bring profits to corporations, they strongly support them without paying much attention to possible harmful effects on people.

 

Nuclear power plants produce vast amounts of radioactive material that is unhealthy for people in the long run. The food we eat is produced by the use of fertilizers, hormones, antibiotics, pesticides, and chemical products that are unhealthy for people and nature. All chemical materials are created with the intention to improve life, but they are actually long-term pollutants of the ground, water and air. The planet earth is one massive, unhealthy storage of waste. There is a lot of initiatives around the world to protect the human environment from pollution, but corporations resist them because these measures reduce profits. Capitalist corporations are interested in profits only, not in people. It comes to my mind that genetically modified food was first produced and consumed in the U.S. Nobody knows in certainty what the consequences of such food have or will have on people. Scientists have very different opinions about that. Scientists who oppose the use of genetically modified food do not have access to the media controlled by corporations.

 

The disease of cancer is growing. Governments of countries around the world almost synchronically accuse cigarettes of that and therefore, prohibit smoking to make themselves look like they work seriously protecting the people. Of course, I do not think that smoking is healthy, but I don’t believe either that smoking is the primary cause that spreads cancer. A combination of some research I did shows that the United States has a smaller rate of smokers than Asia or Africa, but it has a larger the rate of lung cancer. Greece has the highest smoking rate in the world, but it does not follow with the highest percentage of people suffering from lung cancer. Something else causes cancer more than cigarettes, and it comes from developed countries.

 

More and more people are buying expensive organic foods. This is indeed not because chemically, and biologically treated food is healthy. Please see the documentary movie Food, Inc. about the food we buy and eat. In the future, people will devote more attention to healthy feeding and the protection of their environment. In the system I have proposed, corporations will no longer have the power over the sciences. Scientific research must be independent of external influences, but scientists will be required to adopt the standards of producing healthy food. The new system will stop poisoning the people and polluting the environment.

 

***

Technical sciences are those that have objectively developed the living standard of people and most likely bring maximum benefits to society. But if human needs are alienated, then these objective sciences become alienated from their meaning as well. In the developed world, production has overcome the real human needs, it has become its own self-meaning. It has become much more a condition of survival of the system we live in than the real needs of people. I cannot find words strong enough to express how wrong it is.

 

Mathematics is probably the most objective science that undoubtedly, significantly contributes to advancement in society. But the question is how much is it objectively needed? The math I’ve used in my work as an engineer and programmer is probably only the math that is taught in middle school. I was required to take high-level mathematics at the University, just to meet the bureaucratic requirement for acquisition of the title Bachelor of Architectural Engineering. I think that the bureaucratic standardization of knowledge in the scientific world should be removed as harmful. It is at least a loss of time. It is not necessary to learn complete sciences if one does not need the knowledge, or if one is not interested. Life practice should demonstrate what knowledge a man should acquire to perform the job he wants, and then it is necessary to provide access to needed knowledge to everyone at any time.

 

 

The Future of Sciences

 

Authorities have throughout history been building unjustifiably complex, mystified and alienated sciences. Not only that sciences have incorrect or insufficiently correct basis, but academic recognition gives credibility to such base, which damages society. It directs people to wrong paths, the paths that cannot solve the problems of society because they are alienated from the nature of the origin of social issues. Also, lack of critical acceptance of knowledge accustoms people to expect answers to all questions from authorities. That alienates people from the power to mobilize their own abilities to solve problems. Usually, such an attitude impoverishes a man’s abilities to recognize, understand and resolve scientific, work, and everyday life problems.

 

Alienated knowledge is mainly wrong; it doesn’t allow people to see the exit from the dead-end street in which humanity has entered. I’ve made a significant breakthrough because I didn’t accept alienated sciences. I kept a natural logic and felt about what is right and what is not. In preparing the solutions to the problems of humanity, I’ve just used simple reasoning with which I achieved straightforward answers that the alienated people through the system of education were not able to perceive. The basis of this logic can be expressed as follows: “In the future people will no longer go to school to learn what is good, they will learn what is good in everyday life.”

 

The most complex changes in the system I have proposed will probably be related to the division of work. The future economy will have to be able to follow the changes of social needs through greater mobility of labour. The only good division of labour that such changes will be able to support will be based on a constantly open free market. The worker who offers the highest productivity in any public workplace at any time will get the job.

 

Bureaucratic determination of necessary knowledge to perform different work tasks by formal education and examinations, will not be able to follow new requirements and will no longer exist in the new system. Bureaucratic conditions unnecessarily reduce the ability for workers to be employed in positions they want, because formal education requires a lot of time. I would say that an average person can learn most jobs in a short period. Why then does education last 12 to 20 years or even more? School in the first place has a goal to lead people to the way that authorities have imposed throughout history. In that manner, the followers of authorities guard their privileges. This is a very alienated path that harms people. Such education becomes a break for the development of society.

 

Formal education should not be a condition for obtaining a job because it is not a sufficient guarantee of workability. The best learning comes through practice. When a man loves what he does, he quickly learns everything he needs to perform his job. The new system that I have proposed will establish a new, highly effective method of accountability for the possible insufficiencies of the realization of working proposals of workers. The new system will enable workers to give far greater guarantees for the productivity of their work than they can through diplomas, recommendations, experience or morality in society. The responsibility of every worker will be much higher than the private entrepreneurs today have. This responsibility will be so high that nobody will try obtaining a job for which they don’t have enough knowledge.

 

Although diplomas will no longer be an important factor in hiring, education will continue to be necessary, but it will change significantly. The opinion formed in capitalism that education is profitable for students makes education expensive. But knowledge is beneficial for society as a whole because educated people produce benefits to society. Therefore education should be free. In the future, all of the people will have simple and easy access to all knowledge, and to all sciences.

 

The central principle of education in the future will be based on the shortest and most straightforward way to achieve the required knowledge. One can assume with great certainty that most students will not study subjects that disinterest them or don’t give them direct benefits. Doctrines that are not going to get interested or bring immediate benefits to society will go down in history. People will determine what sciences will survive and which will not by their own interest. Education in the future will aim to teach students the knowledge they consider necessary. This is the path of disalienation of sciences. Students will take specialized courses on their own free will. They will make their curriculum of studies on their individual needs and abilities. I assume that the lectures in the classical sense will mostly no longer exist. Knowledge is already available over the Internet, and this trend will expand and improve. I think a focus on the future apprenticeship will be based on the consultation of students with teachers, where teachers will explain to students what material wasn’t sufficiently clear to them when they were studying on their own. Students and professors will discuss problems in particular fields of work and perform exercises through workshops. These workshops will probably include online students from around the world.

 

I will try to explain clearly in one example what the shortest way to achieve required knowledge exactly means. Let us say that someone wants to study rocket science. He begins the studies and soon finds out that he doesn’t know enough maths to be able to follow the lectures in rocket science. He will then stop the study of rocket science until he learns enough maths to continue studying rocket science again. Education will be very accessible and straightforward in the future.

 

Today, for example, an average surgeon needs to educate himself for more than twenty years. What slavery to the bureaucracy that is! What a loss of time in the most creative edge! I think that the average educated person may acquire proficiency in surgery in a much shorter time if he removes everything that is unnecessary. How? The student surgeons will typically attend the operations of experienced surgeons. When a student finishes the program to be a surgeon, he will estimate alone whether he is able to perform a surgery. The surgeons will not evaluate their own skills wrongfully because the regulation of the work responsibility will be much stronger than it is today. The patients will not be in danger of non-professional surgeons because experienced surgeons will supervise the beginners. Besides that, when a beginner surgeon feels capable of surgery, he will still need to convince patients that he is capable of doing it because patients will choose their surgeons alone. A surgeon who makes a big mistake performing a surgery might lose patients forever. So if a beginner surgeon doesn’t feel capable of delivering an operation, he could attend additional education as much as he feels he needs.

 

Today’s complicated system of education has created the opinion that ordinary people cannot easily overcome the knowledge used by experts. This is wrong. Everyone is able to do it if they find an interest and ability to do it. Everything in nature is simple, and that is the reason the essence of any science is straightforward. In the fields of sciences, there is nothing that cannot be easily understood. Science becomes complicated when subjective, powerless and ignorant people alienate them from their real essence. Then we are talking about alienated or false doctrines.

 

I think that in the future, all people will be interested to know and understand the basics of all sciences. People learn while they are alive. People in the future will understand the essence of all sciences much better, but that doesn’t mean that all people will be experts in all scientific fields. Great scientists need to study and work for years to perform at an expert level. A pianist can quickly learn where all the notes on the piano are, but a good pianist needs to practise playing for years, and that makes him a pianist. An excellent pianist must love music, and that love gives him the inspiration to sit for hours before the piano and exercise. The same applies to the experts at every workplace and every science.

 

Aleksandar Šarović

December 4, 2008

The End of Capitalism

The End of Capitalism

Today is accepted the capitalist economy in which the means of production are privately owned. The capitalist form of production, based on the competition of private entrepreneurs has created the most efficient allocation of economic resources ever. Thus, capitalism has achieved the highest productivity of the economy in the history of humankind, which has established the highest growth of living standards for people. However, the competition of private entrepreneurs has considerable disadvantages. The better producer wins and pushes the losers out of the market. Winners take all, and the losers get nothing. That is why capitalism is brutal. Its side products are fear, greed, and struggle for survival on the market. This struggle is objectively unnecessary because the current production is strong enough to meet the needs of people efficiently.


Capitalists systematically exploit workers by taking a part of the income that should belong to workers. Although there is no objective method for determining the level of exploitation, one may say that the difference between the cost of work freely formed in the fair labour market where workers may choose their jobs and the one where they must take jobs because they have to earn money for a living is exploitation. Unemployed workers must accept any job to feed their families. That is why capitalism deliberately maintains the level of unemployment at around 5 percent. There are various ways to regulate such an unemployment rate from importing workforce up to raising interest rates. High-interest rates increase the cost of production, reduce demand for goods and then, of course, decrease demand for work. Capitalism swears by the free market, but it consciously reduces the labour market to exploit workers more.


Exploitation can be eliminated by removing unemployment through a state regulation. If governments establish shorter working hours for workers proportionally to the unemployment rate, it will make the number of job posts and workers equal. The workers could then request wages they consider appropriate for the work tasks they perform, and then they wouldn’t be exploited. This measure would establish better relations in the process of production, a more stable income of workers, and therefore, of course, more stable production. The entire society would gain a lot from this. So why has nobody ever proposed such a simple measure? This is because increasing the incomes of workers reduces the capitalist profits and that is the reason capitalism opposes it. Capitalism is immoral, and that is the reason we live in immoral times. Such immorality must end if humanity wishes to have a good future.

 

Capitalism is very demanding in depriving the freedom of people. In today’s society, virtually only capital is free. People have developed only consumer freedom on which capitalism bases its survival. Therefore, excessive consumption is established in the modern world, which is mainly its own purpose. I don’t understand people who buy carts full of useless, cheap goods, mostly produced in China, which then very quickly become trash, which even then brings new expenses because it has to be transported to waste. Regardless, the citizens of the developed world consider consumption as a maximal value. This is the alienation that capitalism has deliberately imposed over people by using enormous propaganda. In the developed world, consumption has reached its limit when it cannot objectively bring consumers a better life, the same way as a full-fed man cannot enjoy eating more food. However, due to significant alienation, the consumers aren’t aware of it.


Economic Crises

 

Economic crises are an integral part of capitalism crisis arises as a result of an insufficient balance between supply and demand. Capitalism doesn’t have a solution that can prevent crisis because the entire production is based on the free competition of manufacturers in an unpredictable market. The cycles of production expansion and recession accelerate faster so that economic instability and a crisis of capitalism occur more often. I think that the frequency of crises will soon force people to seek a better solution than capitalism. Finally, I would like to say that capitalism exploits the natural resources of our planet Earth on mass. The limited resources of the planet Earth are the final limitation for economic growth as well as an insuperable obstacle for the survival of capitalism.


Capitalism cannot escape economic crises, but disasters can be reduced by sound economic policy. Such a policy is not popular in the capitalist world because it diminishes the freedom of capitalist entrepreneurs. The big financial crisis occurred in 2008 in the U.S. To ensure economic growth, its survival and maximize profit the U.S. banks started offering loans to virtually all people who have requested it. The banks have decided that providing credits with insurance companies is a sufficient guarantee for their investments. People found the possibilities for quick profits and massively demanded relatively cheap bank loans with which they were buying, building and selling houses. In the beginning, the entire U.S. economy benefited greatly.


The most prominent economic experts of the American capitalism have enjoyed the proper business of the economy, and they didn’t want to pay attention to the fact that a significant expansion of production naturally brings culmination, saturation, and stagnation of production and often ends in a recession. It just happened in a relatively short period. Overproduction of apartments and houses from the high-profit business encountered difficulties in finding buyers. The recession of production is equal to a catastrophe for the debt based economy. When manufacturers cannot earn enough money to pay the bank loans, they go bankrupt.


Individual cases are not a problem because banks can recover their claims by selling the debtors’ mortgages. In the massive manufacturing recession that began in the United States, a vast number of debtors appeared who could not pay their money loans and were forced to declare bankruptcy. Banks were no longer able to recover money loans from debtors because they couldn’t sell the ownership of the mortgages even by reduced prices. The massive recession has led banks to the threshold of bankruptcy. To make things worse, a liberal economy has expanded throughout the entire world almost, so the whole world has become mutually dependent. This is how the world economic crisis started.


The American economy

 

Banks lead the economy of capitalism. The bankruptcy of banks would trigger the liquidation of the economy. That is the reason states prevent the bankruptcy of banks through bailouts. It should be said that rescuing banks deviates from the basic principles of liberal capitalism because a company that doesn’t preserve liquidity in capitalism disappears. One can even say that the states rescue capitalism by using socialist measures.


USA rescues private banks in the U.S. by borrowing money from the U.S. Federal Reserves. The U.S. Federal Reserves are the Central American Bank, which is also privately owned. This means that the U.S. rescues private banks by getting into debt with the largest private bank in the world. The U.S. Federal Reserve is the owner of the U.S. national debt. The total U.S. national debt is a sum that presents all the domestic annual costs reduced by the income taxes citizens of the U.S. pay yearly. So, re-borrowing with the Federal Reserve Bank renews this debt. The U.S. Federal Reserves don’t have enough money to loan to the U.S., so the bank additionally emits money from “thin air” for the needs of the U.S. The U.S. federal debt returns American citizens from the income taxes. Does it mean that the U.S. bails out private banks by using the money that American citizens return to the central bank? It is quite possible.


The bailout cost somewhere around one trillion dollars. The banks were supposed to return the money but were they did so? The banking system is very complex and as such creates grey zones where corruption rules. The wealthy people have such a power in the US that they are capable of legalizing what would usually be considered a crime. After the bail out the national debt rapidly increased for about one trillion dollars almost immediately and it never rapidly decreased. Instead, it continued to grow which tells that the debt was not being paid. The Federal Reserve Bank helped private banks but not the people, and I firmly believe the American people will pay a good part of it through taxes. This is a big injustice.


The owners of the U.S. Federal Reserve possess immense wealth. They regularly collect interest from the U.S. national debt, and of course, they do not have the interest the American national debt ever returns. In fact, their interest is for the debt to keep growing because that way, they achieve greater exploitation of the American people. The only concern that they have, stems from the fact that they do not want to kill the cow they milk. That is the reason they have almost eliminated interest, the symbol of capitalism. Does it not indicate the end of capitalism?

However, despite this, the American Government cannot use money from the taxes, because all the money goes to the loans return. So the current costs of the U.S. government are funded by new loans to the same bank. The owners of the Federal Reserve are legal pirates. They have managed to impose to the American people through the organized media propaganda and corruption of politicians, that their piracy is the most normal thing in the world.


The U.S. Government must take a right to issue money from the Federal Reserves because otherwise, the American people cannot escape the problem. However, it might be difficult to do it. President John F. Kennedy did precisely this by Executive Order No. 11110. Soon after that, he was killed. Executive decision No. 11110 of President Kennedy was revoked immediately after his death by the president Lyndon Johnson. The American debt is growing progressively and thus creates one massive problem that will encounter in the future.


***

Capitalism is based on a debt economy, which is the leading cause of today’s economic crisis. However, in the media, the crisis is explained by greater consumption than earnings. I don’t think this explanation is good enough. There is a much larger quantity of produced goods on the market than consumers can buy. The market balanced it but anyway this is the source of the crisis. The crisis is the result of considerable disproportions in the earnings of people. Some people earn too much, and others too little. To be able to buy needed goods those people who have too little get into debts with interest with people who have too much. When the debts accumulate, the debtors can no longer afford to buy new goods because they have to return the debts. This debt restrains the economy. One can say capitalism suffocates itself.

 

The American industry is in big trouble as well. In the consumer-saturated society, one cannot produce goods for unknown consumers and expect they will be so thrilled with such products that they must buy them. Capitalism is based on the fear of survival. That fear works counterproductively for capitalism in the recession of production. When the recession comes, workers and companies are afraid for their future, so they keep their money because it is the highest guarantee of survival in an uncertain future. They then decrease their spending and do not buy goods. This strongly affects companies because they cannot sell their products so that they endure great difficulties up to the point when they collapse into bankruptcy. Workers lose their jobs massively, they do not receive income, do not buy goods and the crisis progressively deepens.

 

A similar economic crisis occurred as a result of deflation in the year 1929. There are some indications that behind the crisis, stood the most significant capital, which withdrew money from the market, which brought a vast number of the companies into bankruptcy. At that time, the state hasn’t even tried to save the economy. In this manner, the most significant capital took wealth from bankrupt people and increased their power.

 

The crisis today is different from the Great Depression in 1929 because the U.S. intends to save the American economy. The ruin of the American economy would remove the U.S. as the dominant force in the world and bring China or some other country to the top. This is the worst nightmare for the carriers of U.S. capitalism, so they cannot allow it. The American economy will be helped by the U.S. financial assistance this time.

 

Emitting money from thin air usually leads to inflation where money loses its value. Inflation encourages consumption, which renews the economy. Despite the massive emission of the U.S. dollar, inflation is still not significant. It is firstly because the U.S. gives the impression that it pays back borrowed money even though the debt is being recalculated all the time and grows. The inflation is also not high because payment transactions around the world take place mostly with U.S. dollars. Virtually all countries around the world maintain the value of the U.S. dollar through their economies, and this gives higher value to the dollar than America deserves. Emission of the U.S. dollar is, in fact, a form of exploitation of all countries around the world.

 

However, the emissions of the U.S. dollar needed to bail out the economy are so significant that they will undoubtedly lead to inflation. Inflation sounds horrible to those who have much money because it reduces the value of their money, but it is still a far better solution than the collapse of the American economy. Perhaps after that, the U.S. dollar will probably no longer be the only world currency. However, I think that the biggest problem for the U.S. economy is the U.S. manufacturers leaving the United States and going to cheaper production countries. If the U.S. does not re-establish its production well enough and does not reduce its costs, especially those imperialistic ones, it may perish. I think that the mistakes of the American policy have been so significant that the U.S. will in the foreseeable future, lose political and economic primacy in the world. It is not even wrong because more equitable countries, create more equitable people.

 

The American President

 

The new President of the U.S., Barack Obama has received significant support from the American people, and perhaps most importantly, from the media. It said to me that the considerable capital had accepted him as an appropriate person to resolve the problems coming from the economic crisis. Barack Obama will decrease tensions in American society by his human qualities and abilities. I think US President Barack Obama will reform the U.S. health care system and get the US closer to the health standard of the developed world.

 

Americans, like all other nations, are taught to believe that a good democratically elected leader can solve their problems. It should first be noted that there is no option to such beliefs, and secondly, these beliefs are wrong. First of all, power corrupts, and practically incorruptible people do not exist. Also, wealthy people have more power than American leaders. They perform much pressure on the US presidents from all sides including media and president’s who under their control, assuring the presidents that the options that the rich represent are the best. Under such pressure, Obama declared the war in Afghanistan righteous even though it can never be. Besides, U.S. politics in Afghanistan cannot achieve success. One cannot win people who are willing to give their lives for the goals in which they believe. The only good thing President Obama can do in Afghanistan is to stop the war, but it would confront him with wealthy people who profit well from that war and on which he very much depends.

 

Furthermore, President Obama is trying to find an escape from the crisis that the U.S. economy is in by improving. The rich people prevent it because every improvement of capitalism must take power from them. Barack Obama and all other good leaders who try to restrain liberal capitalism by reforms cannot achieve significant success because the rich people stop it. After sound, but unsuccessful leaders, disappointed people, often choose a strong right-wing leader who makes the situation worse. However, the worst in all this is that people have no alternative. People today are powerless and in it lay the foundation of the social evil today.

 

***

Technically, there is room for improvement for capitalism, which might bring betterment to society, but capitalism is very close to its limits. Capitalism is not a good enough system. Capitalism is immoral. Capitalism is based on the privileges of authorities and the powerlessness of ordinary people. Privileges are unjust and create alienation. As long as there are injustice and alienation in society, it cannot be good. Capitalism is not enough rational system because it requires too much unnecessary work. Capitalism cannot establish a stable production and therefore cannot establish a stable society. That is the reason capitalism cannot prosper.

 

Capitalism suffers in production-saturated societies but prospers well in scarce societies. That is why capitalism often searches for help in wars in which it destroys everything and practically runs its development from the beginning. Capitalism may withdraw from a crisis; however, one should not think about how to help capitalism survive, but rather about the creation of a far better system than capitalism for all the people. Such a system must take power from authorities and give it to the people, and this will solve all social problems of capitalism. I have proposed such a system, but it is so different from all existing models that people cannot accept it quickly even though they would all live far better. However, my proposal may open discussion which by the time may bring better future of humankind closer.

 

 

The New Social System: Humanism

 

The new democratic tax policy is a necessity

 

States plan and order their spending. Countries are the largest consumers, and therefore they can stabilize production to the grand scope. Today it is the job of elected representatives of the people. The future of democracy will no longer be based on privileged elected representatives in parliaments and leaders. The development of computer technology allows people to directly participate in making all key important decisions of common interest. Individuals will directly form a policy of society, and in the first place, economic policies.

 

People will be particularly interested in deciding on the macroeconomic policies of the society. The state budget will be created through direct democracy. People will directly determine how much money they will want to single out for taxation from their gross incomes. The sum of all such decisions from all people will form the total tax in society. Please, do not get me wrong. This does not mean that each person will pay as much tax as he or she wishes. It means the people will participate in the formation of the state budget and then they will pay taxes according to the heights of their incomes.

 

Furthermore, every person can decide on how the tax money is going to be spent. Each person will determine how much of his tax money should be allocated for: the defence of the state, public security, education, health, housing, recreation, building infrastructure, etc. Theoretically, people can decide on a collective consumption within the groups as much as they want. They will have a far greater overall impact if they are democratically allocated. In such a way, the people will become active members of society and so; they will accept their community a lot more. Collective consumption will no longer be alienated from society. Following the living experience, people will learn how much money should be collected for taxes and what the best way to spend it is. Thus, this spending will follow the needs of people in the most efficient way. Once people get the power to decide in society directly, they will be so satisfied with it that they will not allow anyone to take such power from them.

 

***

The measures, which I have mentioned so far, can be applied in capitalism. The new system that I have proposed accepts the model of the market economy. Private companies will continue to operate in the same way as today. Significant changes will occur in public companies. They will organize new production, far more productive than the private companies can achieve.

In capitalism, the opinion is built that states are lousy businessmen. So far that is relatively true.

 

The reason can be found in more privileged working positions of workers in the state sector comparing to the ones in private companies. Following the philosophy that inadequately interprets the working rights of workers, jobs in the state sector are generally protected. The workers can hardly lose their jobs even if their work performance is weak contrary to the workers in privately owned companies. Workers in public or state companies do not have enough developed the income-based stimulation to work more. Good work is often not paid better than a lousy one. Workers in the state sector, especially managers, can often benefit more by corruption at the expense of the company rather than from their work. As a result, state companies lose the productivity battle against private enterprises. Privileged jobs, poor wage policies and corruption create the bad productivity of state companies. However, by the structure of production, the state-owned companies are hardly different from the capitalist system of production, and therefore the result of work in state-owned companies should not be worse than the privately owned companies. However, it may be much better.

 

Even though the privileges of workers in private companies are less than the ones in public companies, they still exist. The majority of jobs usually are occupied, and they are not available to other workers even if they might be more productive than existing ones. Also, there are positions in private companies that are more awarded by high income than the workers would demand on the free market. Why is that? Capitalists need buffer zones between themselves and exploiting workers, which are unconditionally obedient. Secondly, it justifies inequality and thus gives the stability of capitalism.

 

Capitalism still does not have a developed mechanism of rewarding good work and punishing a lousy one. Income awards are punishments, are not fairly distributed. Perhaps it could be presented best by the management of American corporations. They are compensated by severance packages in the millions of dollars even if they have damaged their companies by their incompetence. I see no other reason for that than it is essential for the rich people to preserve the immorality of the system. The money they are sacrificed shows how important it is to them. This is a form of corruption that does not give a good perspective to private companies and the capitalist system.

 

Privileges of all kinds must be put to an end. A good economy requires the complete abolition of privileged work positions. One should protect the economic existence of workers rather than jobs. It is necessary to allow an access of every worker to every work post. That would be accomplished by giving every public job position to the best available worker. Also one needs to develop an objective system of remuneration to each employee for good work and a system of punishment for bad work. These measures will build a sound economic future.

 

The new division of work is a necessity

 

The state-owned companies will accept an entirely new economic system that will be far more economically productive than private companies. Firstly, the changes will affect the division of labour. There is no fairer or better distribution of labour than an open market competition of workers for every position. The worker who envisages and offers the highest productivity for any public work post at any time will get the job. Productivity could be measured by earned money, by quality and quantity of produced goods, or by the productivity evaluation of workers by clients. A worker who offers more profits, manufactured goods, better, cleaner, or cheaper production will get the job. That is an idea. How to make such changes to bring the most advantages and the least possible disadvantages to society is just a technical question. I have defined a pretty good solution in my book Humanism, but that will probably have to be more developed through practice.

 

This kind of labour division naturally requires equality of the number of work posts with the number of workers. Otherwise, it could lead to unnecessary fights for jobs. The new system will make full employment a reality. If the creation of new work positions is not needed, full employment will be achieved by reducing work hours proportionately to the unemployment rate. Also, under the new system, each job will be equally desirable. This will be accomplished by giving the job with defined productivity to the worker who demands the lowest price for current labour and, consequently, a lower income. The price of current work will be one of the factors that determine the height of the salaries. Therefore, better jobs will realize relatively lower incomes and worse jobs will be compensated through relatively higher incomes. This way, the labour market will set an objective measure of direct work value and will balance the interest in all job posts. Since the workers themselves will be setting the price of their current labour, by the same token, they will be the most satisfied with their earnings.

 

The system would have no meaning if the workers on their wish to achieve greater competitive power, offer productivities that they would not be able to realize. Today’s politicians do precisely that for example. The new economy will form a very effective system of accountability for the realization of productivities workers offer so that they would not dare offer productivities they cannot accomplish.

 

No economy can be more productive than the one where the best available worker gets each job. Such an economy will easily become significantly more productive than the capitalist one so that the latter will be forced to recede. Also, the workers will no longer be interested in working for private enterprises where they do not have enough freedom to choose jobs or decide their income, nor do they have the opportunity to cut into the profits. In the new system workers will participate in the distribution of profits, which as a rule is not the case in private companies. Soon after this system is implemented, private enterprises will be forced to withdraw and join the new system. They will be adequately compensated for their companies.

 

Defining the value of man’s productive power is a necessity

 

To create a good society, one should define and accept all values that are or should be, essential to the community. Then, one will need to determine which of these values each person possesses. The sum of all values that a person creates throughout his life, presented by a numerical value, may be called the human productive power. The human productive power will be one of the most critical factors which will determine the amount of worker’s income. This value will be significant.

 

The value of human productive power will incorporate, firstly, capitalist values, such as real estate, money, shares, and all assets that capitalism recognizes as valuable. This measure will look like a free association of private enterprises although the merge will be achieved under heavy pressure from higher productivity of public companies. Owners of private companies will receive stocks for their ownership of the integrated company. They will also find an interest in the fact that a merged company would be more stable to conjuncture changes.

 

This would in principle mean that the former owners of companies would realize smaller profits in good businesses of the merged corporation, but also smaller losses in bad businesses because the large corporation will cover the disturbances of earnings on the market. Also, the production of such corporation will be more stable because it will be increasingly based on customer orders. If owners of private companies could have an option to join such a company today, they would most likely do it because that would save more of their capital value in a frequent crisis of capitalism.

 

The value of human productive power may establish an effective system of responsibilities of workers for realizing the offered productivity in the production process. Workers will increase their competitiveness at the desired workplace by offering greater responsibility for the job. The responsibility will be expressed in numerical value. The higher the number, the greater the responsibility it will mean and the greater right to work. This is an idea for which I hint here. It cannot be understood well enough without reading and analyzing the book Humanism. The same goes for most of the new ideas I am presenting here. The higher responsibility will naturally realize a larger share in profit, in the case that the company’s profit increases. Such profit will now be expressed in a value that reflects the workers’ human productive power. And vice versa, in case of production losses, workers who propose higher responsibility for their work will realize more significant declines in value representing their productive power.

 

***

The good future of humankind cannot be based on the value of capital only. Man needs to become the most significant value, and this orientation can be stimulated by the value that presents the human productive power. Besides the capital-based value that represents an element of human productive power, we need to recognize and include all other values that society accepts or should accept. Such values are people themselves, their education, work experience, contributions that they have given, and awards that they have received for creating values to society, etc. The pooling of different forms of value will require a comprehensive study and – indeed – difficult negotiations in society. However, after some time, new, democratically regulated standards of all values that can be created in society could be established. Such regulation will automatically be applied whenever necessary.


If the society would like to stimulate education, it might raise awards for higher education in the value that represents human productive power. If, for example, a region has too low a birth rate, people may decide to award parents with more children with this kind of value. And vice versa, if a region has too high a birth rate, people may decide to punish parents who have more children by a particular value representing human productive power.


The value of personal productive power will be especially affected by disobedience to the law. If a person acts against the law, he will lose a legally defined value from his productive power. Each crime may be judged by existing laws and recalculated into a value representing human productive power. If a person commits a severe crime, he might lose all the value from his productive power, and even get to a negative value. The proposed system can make an assignment of such a negative productive value much more painful than a prison can be so that prisons will not be needed anymore. Each person will avoid committing any crime carefully. If a person still gets such a negative productive power, he will try hard to fix it, and that will only be possible through hard productive work and by outstanding behaviour over a long period.


Taking into account that most people would probably not like to have their productive power compared to that of other people, such a value may be kept secret, known only to the owner of the value himself. However, that will not work for people who fall into the negative value of productive power. They will be very visible to everyone.


Society may regulate whatever it needs through evaluation of human productive power. However, all values cannot be regulated, because people have varying individual needs. Therefore, the value representing personal productive power should also depend on unregulated values, based on people’s opinions about the free actions of others. This is an entirely new measure and, in my opinion, the most critical step of the future. I call it democratic anarchy.


Democratic anarchy is a necessity

 

Democratic anarchy is a new form of social relations, wherein every person exercises equal legislative, judicial and executive power in society. It is possible to accomplish it in a manner that gives each person the right to evaluate the activity of any other person. Each positive assessment should automatically bring a small increase in the total value of productive power to the assessed person. On the other hand, any negative evaluation will result in a punishment of the same form. Let us say that awards and penalties of such assessment would have an equivalent value of one dollar. If the society were afraid of such power of individuals, the power of the evaluation could be reduced. Even the assessment with the power equivalent to just one cent would be enough for the improvement of society.


Democratic anarchy will direct each member of society to create the highest possible advantages for society and to diminish or abolish the creation of all forms of disadvantages. Given that all individuals will have the equal right of evaluation, and that they will give their assessments independent of any written rules, such a democracy will assume the form of anarchy. In this straightforward way, the populus will for the first time in the history of humankind realize a great direct power in society, which will result in highly harmonious and constructive social relations.


Individuals will not have much power in society, but their evaluations joined together will be very powerful. A person who receives a large number of negative assessments would try hard to avoid doing anything inconvenient to other people. Besides, the person who receives bad evaluations would never know who has evaluated him negatively so that he would try to improve his behaviour towards everyone. This is what will take privileged powers from all the people; this is what will eliminate social evil and form a good society.


The system of democratic anarchy will especially affect authorities. The higher the position an authority has in society, the greater the responsibility they would bare to society. For example, the president of the US might get 100,000,000 bad evaluations from the American people for bad policies, lies, and criminal aggression on countries. That would cost him 100,000,000 dollars in only one month. Non-privileged presidents would not dare perform bad policies anymore. However, if it happens somehow, they would run away from their positions very fast. Only the most skilful and brave individuals would dare lead countries. They will not be authorities anymore, but our servants.


Democratic anarchy is the most potent tool of justice ever. How come? The answer lies in time. There is a saying: “Silent water moves hills.” The permanent power of evaluation even with such a small power like one dollar will make people respect each other strongly. Human beings will become values. Everyone will try hard to please society in the best possible way. That will create a miracle no other tool of justice has ever been able to make. That will create a good and sane society. In the future, the system of evaluation will probably abolish state laws, police, military force, and very states. Nobody will need them anymore. A perfect society will be formed, and everyone will recognize that. Human society will become prosperous beyond the wildest dreams today. I wrote more about democratic anarchy in the article The Future of Democracy.


***

It is understandably desirable that the value of human productive power becomes very important to society and therefore its acceptance should be additionally stimulated. That will be accomplished, firstly, by giving each person voting power in society, proportionate to the value of his productive power. I am talking about a significant change in the democratic system. Today, people have only the right to choose their parliamentary representatives. They have neither opportunity nor right to participate in making other decisions that regard their interests in society. We need a compromise equally acceptable to all. Let each person have a right to participate in making any democratic decision in society, but let him earn this right by his productive contribution to the development of value in society. This system proposes unequal voting power, accepted by a consensus of political parties. In reality, it will contribute to the development of democracy because the people will, for the first time, get a chance to participate in decision-making about all questions regarding their interests directly.

 

Secondly, each person should get an income for work in publicly owned companies, proportionate to the total value of his productive power. The value of human productive power will thus become a humanistic form of shares. This measure will additionally encourage residents of specific regions to voluntarily merge their private companies into one big “humanistic” company.

 

Thirdly, the value of personal productive power must be inherited through generations to be accepted. Through the implementation of such measures, every member of society will recognize the value of human productive power as high importance – this will contribute significantly to the development of society.

 

 

The economic security of people is a necessity

 

Capitalists are not interested at all in how consumers will make money for the purchase of goods they produce, even though there is no survival of capitalist enterprises without it. Liberal capitalism does not want to take care of the losers on the market, and this is another reason why capitalism must go down in history. The new system will ensure the economic independence of individuals as a precondition for achieving freedom and survival of society as a whole. Only one individual who is not economically cared for enough may endanger the whole community. Also, the system of work competition needs a higher degree of economic security and stability than today, so that each resident will receive some income. The height of individual income will primarily depend on the value that presents the productive power of man, then on the price of the current work, as well as on the accomplishment of proposed productivity.

 

The people will also directly establish the level of minimal earning directly. If workers’ interest in performing their work is insufficient, the society may directly reduce the minimum income, which would stimulate workers to work more. If productivity is higher than necessary, the community will then increase the minimum salary and thus reduce the income-based stimulation for work.

Society as a whole will guarantee the economic security and stability of individuals. This will remove the fear that rules throughout the world today. If people were not afraid for their financial future, they would be spending money, and that would quickly pull out today’s economy from the crisis. However, capitalism finds the primary motivation for work from fear for the economic survival of workers, and that is the reason it cannot guarantee financial security to people. The new system will build motivation for work from the free choice of choosing work and in the satisfaction that comes from it.

 

Besides that, the restoration of demand would help the economic crisis of capitalism, but this is not sufficient enough. Consumption already exceeds the real people’s needs in the developed world. A long term exit from the crisis of humankind should be sought in changing the system of values that rule today.

 

 

To each according to their needs is the future of humankind

 

By that time, people will learn that collective consumption is significantly more rational and stable than individual consumption, so that they will directly decide to allocate more money for taxes from their gross incomes. The more people allocate money for taxes, the more free goods and services will be allocated for the needs of the collective consumption of society. This is the consumption that the most developed democracies in today’s world spend mostly on national defence purposes. Given that the new system offers stable and good relations among nations, people will no longer allocate money for the needs of armies and armies will cease to exist. In the new system, war will no longer be possible. People will direct funds for the needs of the collective social standard. I am talking about vast amounts of money that can significantly improve the standard of society. The new system will enable the introduction of free individual consumption. Some states today have free education, free health treatments; some states distribute some goods and services freely. Why would a new system not provide more?

 

People will change very much in the new system. I think that one far away day; in purpose to establish a more stable and rational economy, all people will freely allocate all the money from their gross incomes for tax purposes. Then, all of the goods and services will become freely available to all people. The goods will lose their alienated market value, but the value of the use of goods will remain. It will be worth the same as air is worth today. I am not talking about utopia or oppression of people, but about the advanced technology system that will follow the needs of the people. If only one man, however, would like to keep his income, theoretically the completely free goods and services would not be applied.

 

 

The conclusion

 

The new economy will naturally step in; it will remove the shortcomings of capitalism and ensure further development of civilization. It will mainly base its production on customer orders so that it will be stable. It will level down the market competition from the level of companies to the level of work posts. There is no more productive economy than the one in which each position gets the best possible worker, and that is the reason why capitalism will go down in history. The new economy will eliminate the disadvantages of capitalism and will bring much more significant advantages to society. After capitalism, humanism will arrive, a system that will follow the needs of people a lot better.

 

The political and economic model described here will improve the efficiency and stability of production, introduce more justice into the process of production and distribution, and provide significantly higher advantages to all members of society. The open market of work posts will eliminate the workers’ privileges. This will further eliminate corruption, the main source of the immorality of today’s society. The market for labour will give people the freedom to choose jobs that they like more. Work will become an immediate value to itself, and people will enjoy working. People will be free. Freedom is a state when people do not have to ask permission for anything from anybody except their conscience. Of course, freedom is dependent on the possession of a conscience. Conscience will be built on a large degree of defined responsibilities of people. Accountability will be so high that people will base their mutual relations in cooperation at all levels of human relationships, and in that manner, they will develop a productive development of society.

 

In general, this system will rid the people of authoritative pressure and give them the freedom to follow their interests, while at the same time forcing people to mutual respect. Such experience will demystify alienated values imposed by authorities throughout history and will teach people to live following their proper nature, which will, in turn, free them from all types of alienation characteristics of present-day society. People will then realize where real values are. Furthermore, the system will teach people to set their needs following the possibilities of satisfying them. This is the chief prerequisite for overcoming destructiveness in society because people who permanently satisfy their needs are not destructive. The proposed system promises a natural, harmonious and highly prosperous development of society.

 

Once this system is adopted in a smaller community, the people will make this community a beautiful place to live. When the rest of the world sees that, it will not have any other choice but to follow suit. The new system will establish a sound and sane society all over the world. It will build a bright future for humanity. Conclusively, I would like to point out that the system I have proposed, represents not only the best solution for the future of humanity but also represents the only good solution. It will bring prosperity to society regardless of the level of economic development. The biggest problem is the time needed for people to understand the system, accept and implement it.

 

 

Aleksandar Šarović

January 6, 2009

References:

 

Overdose: The Next Financial Crisis Director Martin Borgs made a fresh insight into the greatest economic crisis of our age: the one still awaiting us.

 

Credit As A Public Utility: The Solution to the Economic Crisis – video speech of the former U.S. government official Richard C. Cook, who sharply criticized the American Federal Reserve Bank.

 

Zeitgeist: Addendum . Video made by Peter Joseph that digs deep into the core of the problems of capitalism. However, the movie fails to provide enough efficient solution to the problems.

Privileges are Evil

Privileges are Evil

Privileges are definitely the biggest mistake of mankind of all the time. I would define privileges as a condition that gives individuals power over others. Our culture, which we inherited, teaches us that power over people is a value so that privileges become values as well. The word privilege immediately reminds us of people who have power or the very successful people, but privileges are far more widespread. Almost every person is somehow privileged, and that is not good. This article mainly presents the sources of privileges, the reasons why they are not good, and how they can be removed.

 

Talents a man himself possesses should not be considered as privileges, but skills in the alienated society easily earn privileges. Ability should not be considered a privilege, but if ability gives people power over others, then it becomes a privilege. Work should not be considered a privilege, but if the job gives people control over others, then it becomes a privilege. Achieved material wealth should not be considered a privilege, but if it gives people power over others, it becomes a privilege. Beauty should not be considered a privilege, but if beauty gives power over others, it becomes one. Hope you get the point.

 

Most people, by their subjectivity, consider privileges as overcoming their own powerlessness in nature. Privileges can easily create to the man the illusion of power in nature and then it gives him great happiness that looks like the real overcome of his powerlessness in nature. Such a man tends to start admiring himself greatly and creates a narcissistic feature of his own character. This feature of character glorifies the subjective vision of conscience, which develops the alienation of man from objective reality. A narcissistic man is so burdened with himself that he is not able to notice anything valuable besides him exists. He loses respect for people, and that prevents him from reaching natural benefits in relationships with other people. He loses respect towards nature as well. Legend says that Narcissus felt so in love with himself that he did not manage to learn to swim, so he drowned in the lake where after a fall while he was watching his reflection.

 

A man objectively does not need privileges, but subjectively they easily bring an illusion of power in nature, fool people and become a significant value. However, privileges bring happiness to the narcissistic man coming from the subjective vision of power, and therefore he invests a great effort in maintaining the survival of his own privileged status. But normally, it does not matter how much a narcissistic man tries, nothing can overcome his weakness in nature. Obviously, it is not possible to keep beauty and youth, and everyone who tries to do so is their own worst enemy because they are condemned to lifelong suffering. Other alienated needs are more challenging to identify, but the final result is the same. Privileged people in real life must encounter conflicts with objective reality. Then they necessary suffer. Pain destroys the souls of narcissistic people, and they very often find escapes from the painful suffering in the perversion of their own sensibility.

 

Narcissistic people, by their subjective consciousness, may identify the loss of privileges with the loss of their existence, so that any threats to their privileges causes them to panic and fear, and they desperately seek salvation. Hurting someone’s narcissism provokes hatred that cannot forgive. Nothing attacks people as much as someone’s injured narcissism, nothing destroys marriages as much as someone’s injured narcissism, nothing kills people as much as someone’s hurt narcissism, and nothing provokes wars as much as someone’s wounded narcissism. Injured narcissism is the leading cause of destructiveness in society. All evil in the history of humanity comes from narcissistic forms of the character.

 

Privileges corrupt people. People that privileges cannot spoil are so rare that they can be considered nonexistent. I am not sure that privileges would not be able to corrupt me at least a little bit. Privileges should be prevented as a requirement of establishing a constructive orientation of people. Preventing privileges means overcoming narcissism and destructiveness in society.

 

Powerless people tend to reach privileges. The higher the feeling of the weakness of a man in society and nature, the higher is his need for creating privileges. With this in regard, the more we overcome the weakness of people the more the problem will be solved. The powerlessness of people will be overcome by using the system I have proposed.

 

Privileges may be developing from childhood

 

An exaggerated concern for children may be a more severe problem than the neglecting of children. I will try to explain it with the example of the upbringing of Adolf Hitler. The mother of Adolf Hitler admired his son unconditionally. She did everything she could to please him. She did all his chores instead of him. Psychologist Erich Fromm believes that this is not loving because of the lack of responsibility for the future of the child, and I agree with him. Adolf Hitler grew convinced that he was perfect without the investment of any effort. In this way, he developed his extreme narcissistic view of the world. The world for him existed only as far as he could subjugate it to his needs. His mother was just a maid for him who fulfilled all his wishes and pulled him out of unpleasant situations. This made him irresponsible towards life and incapable of loving.

 

Of course later on in real life, as a result of ignorant upbringing, Adolf Hitler experienced many painful moments. The pain brings most people back to reality but not extremely narcissistic Adolf Hitler. While he was suffering in unpleasant reality, he got into his shell and performed endless internal monologue to himself with which he justified his inadaptability to society. The speaker skills he developed in this way helped him expose himself to the German people during a sensitive political moment. The rest is history. Adolf Hitler’s story is not about criminal genetics but about the very irresponsible upbringing of the child. I am convinced that if his mother did not spoil him during the earliest years of his life and if his father spanked him occasionally, Adolf Hitler would probably became a prominent retailer or something like this, and 35 million people would not be killed in the Second World War. With this respect, even violent parents are not as bad in the upbringing of their children as the ignorant parents who spoil them. They are the greatest enemies to their children while at the same time they do significant damage to society.

 

Millions of children around the world are brought up similarly as Adolf Hitler, where parents really damage their children with good intentions. Spoiled children are very irresponsible and do not develop their natural abilities. They have big problems throughout life and suffer because of it. A child’s high degree of narcissism can be identified by excessive confidence or by exaggerated fear, and also by strong aggressiveness or extreme isolation. A child’s aggression can only be removed by severe penalties while in the case of excessive seclusion a lot of knowledge and attention are needed. If parents show weakness towards children’s aggression or indifference towards children’s depression, they can easily create very inadaptable children who will be unhappy in their lives and during one moment of crisis they may become murderers. The Virginia Tech massacre is such an example where a student killed 32 people and wounded many others before committing suicide.

 

If parents do not fulfill their parental duties in the upbringing of children, then it is most likely too late for the productive development of children. Then only psychiatrists or oppressive state apparatus can somewhat help. Now you are probably wondering where is the boundary in upbringing that divides responsible and irresponsible children towards their future. This border is defined by the knowledge that is the fruit of the equal people relationship. This is a state where children will not feel superiority or inferiority. I’ve established a system that will achieve such a society in my book Humanism.

 

Economic privileges

 

The owners of the means of production realize the most widespread form of privilege today. In a society where there is high unemployment of workers, employers are especially privileged. Unemployed workers are forced to accept low-paying jobs to feed their families. The privileged owners of the means of production exploit it by abusing workers giving those poor wages while accomplishing higher profits for themselves. Then, employers develop narcissistic traits that make them insensitive to the needs of workers. In this manner, the exploitation of workers occurs; the foundation of today’s problems in society.

 

The solution to these problems is straightforward. All that needs to be done is reduce privileges of employers. Their privileges will be reduced by abolishing the unemployment of workers. This can be done by reducing work hours proportionally to the unemployment rate. Once unemployment is removed, employers will have to compete with each other to hire workers by increasing the incomes of workers. Workers will achieve a higher purchasing power and will buy more, which will help the capitalist economy produce more and profit more. The problem is that the increase of workers’ rights reduces the privileges of employers and the latter vehemently oppose it. This problem must be resolved because only the equalization of the rights of people can build a good future of humanity.

 

In the final stage of the development of the new humanistic system, I have proposed the complete abolition of employer privileges by introducing a system of work competition in public companies. I have proposed a work competition among workers in public companies. Each work post will be taken by a worker who offers the highest productivity at any time. No one position in public companies will be privileged any longer.

 

In the new system, each work position will be equally desired. This will be achieved when each work position with defined productivity get a worker who asks for the lower price of labour. Labour price will be one of the factors that determine the height of income, but it can be said that better jobs will achieve relatively lower salaries and worse jobs will be compensated with relatively higher incomes. Thus, the labour market will balance working interest in all jobs.

 

The new economy will form an advantageous system of accountability for the realization of productivity workers offers so that they would not dare offer productivity they cannot accomplish. Responsibilities of managers and workers will be so significant that they would have to mutually agree on the production and establish a high degree of consensus before making decisions. This kind of market economy will result in co-operation at all levels of production processes and thus, will contribute to the development of a productive society.

 

No economy can be better than the one where every job gets the best worker available. Such an economy will easily become significantly more productive than the capitalist one so that capitalism will be forced to withdraw. When capitalism ends humanism will begin. It will abolish privileges by creating equal rights relations in society and will build an unthinkably better future for humanity.

 

My experience with privileged people

 

The owners of the means of production might be privileged to the consumers as well. The owners of the ski resort, Mt. St. Louis and Moonstone in Ontario are privileged. Their privilege arises from the fact that Ontario is a flat province so that the little hill they possess at a distance of 100 kilometres from Toronto is always full of skiers. This privilege made the owners of the ski resort arrogant.

 

Last year, I went with my family there to ski. We bought tickets for the ski lift. I placed my ticket in a special transparent pocket designed just for that purpose. When I entered the lineup of the ski lift, the owners told me to put the ski pass on a string or to leave. I answered that I would go if they returned my money for the ski pass. They did not reply to my request; instead, they used force and push me down into the snow. One of the workers jumped on me while the owner struck me with his boot in the ribs. My wife and daughters watched all of this, screaming at them to leave me alone, so they did. I immediately called the police expecting that the police would protect the citizens, but this was not the case. Namely, the police in Canada protect private capital more than people. The policemen told me that I must leave the ski resort.

 

The privilege of ownership of the ski resort gave them great power, and that alienates those people from their own nature. And so they have built a high degree of narcissism, and as such, they have lost the ability to correctly perceive the natural laws and reach a normal healthy life. They cannot find happiness in their lives. If these arrogant people somehow get unlimited power, they might become some variant of Adolf Hitler. Many arrogant people around the world would repeat what Hitler did if they got the chance. It would be entirely wrong to conclude that such opportunities cannot occur again.

 

Now, I am living in a big building that has an outdoor and indoor swimming pool. There is a service of maintenance and a board of directors composed mostly of retired people who make decisions of common interest. For a director position in the Board of Directors mostly apply residents who need power over people, and they like using this power. Life experience taught me that people who love power are the worst people because they love to use their power at the expense of others. The Board of Directors has hired a woman who works as a lifeguard at the pools and maintains order. She forbade me from protecting my five-year-old daughter with sunscreen at the outdoor pool because someone from the Board of Directors wrongly informed her that sunscreen damages the pool installation. This was misinformation because sunscreen may be harmful to the Jacuzzi but not for the pool. However, this rule was in force for years and harmed the users of the swimming pool.  The other tenants have told me in confidence that they protect themselves from the sun at home before they get to the pool. I succeed to revoke this stupid decision by writing a letter to the management board. 

 

I played amateur soccer and basketball for more than forty years. I mostly did it because running is healthy. I was never particularly handy with a ball, but it was always more comfortable for me to run after the ball than running around a stadium. I scored a lot of goals and enjoyed it a lot. One should cheer as much as they can because it is healthy. On the other hand, there are players to whom winning is the issue of “life or death.” They do not show joy in the game, they play very aggressively and cannot stand defeat. These are mainly talented people for sports whose talents build their privileged statuses in games and consequently the narcissistic feature of their character. They bring conflicts into sports. Finally, I’ve escaped from such conflicts by not playing collective sports anymore. The relationship between my orientation and theirs is the relationship between health and illness. People are not aware of that because if they were, they would select good and not evil for themselves. One day my philosophy will solve such problems.

 

In the system that I have proposed, every man will get an equal right to evaluate any other man. Each positive assessment should automatically bring a small prize to the assessed person. On the other hand, any negative evaluation will result in a punishment of the same form. Let us say that awards and penalties of such assessment would have an equivalent value of one dollar. Arrogant people, such as the mentioned owners of the ski resort, members of the Board of Director, and talented soccer players make a lot of mistakes to many people, and because of that, they would receive a large number of negative evaluations for an extended period. After that, they would no longer dare to create any disadvantages in society. Such measures will definitely reduce the uncontrolled or insufficiently controlled power of individuals coming out from privileged statuses in society. Only then will the destructive orientation of society be overcome.  

 

Privileges made Clinton, Bush and Blair criminals

 

What can one expect from truly privileged people? U.S. President Bill Clinton opposed the request from wealthy people to commit criminal aggression on Yugoslavia until the Monika Lewinski case was imposed on him. I wrote more about it in the article My Debt to Yugoslavia. Enormous pressure was put on President Clinton to comment on the nature of his relationship with Monika Lewinski. As a result, he gave a false statement before the Commission of the U.S. Congress, negating the nature of his relationship was sexual. Now I’m asking from when the U.S. Congress is interested in the sexual life of American presidents and why? But the Monika Lewinski case was so “important” for the survival of the United States, that Bill Clinton should eventually be impeached from the presidential position. This is the story for naive people. This story only served as blackmail for President Bill Clinton to force him to commit the aggression on Yugoslavia which was the interests of the most influential people of the world. Apparently, the career was much more important to President Clinton than the lives of innocent people. After the aggression against Yugoslavia, the impeachment was forgotten entirely. Here is the chronology of the Monika Lewinski case. Official information on how the case was closed was never released.

 

Keeping his position was not Bill Clinton’s only benefit through the aggression against Yugoslavia. When his term for presidency expired, he established a philanthropic foundation, “William J. Clinton,” to finance his library in Little Rock, Arkansas and charitable efforts in dozens of countries to reduce poverty and treat AIDS. When his wife, Hillary Clinton, wished to take the position of the U.S. Secretary of State, Bill Clinton was demanded to release the list of donors to his foundation to avoid possible conflict of interest. It was presented that the Bill Clinton Foundation collected a rather large amount of 492 millions dollars. I claim that many donors of his fund supported Clinton’s aggression against Yugoslavia and their donations were the reward for the criminal action. This is corruption and crime of the worst kind. President Bill Clinton has to take responsibility before the court for what he did.

The aggression on Iraq was a crime according to the resolution of UN. The aggression began with U.S. President George W. Bush and UK Prime Minister Tony Blair on charges that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein produces weapons of mass destruction (WMD) based on nuclear-biological-chemical reactions. Such weapons in the hands of the terrorist organization Al-Qaeda could supposedly be used against the United States. The investigation has shown that the allegations were lies. Anyone who tries to make a small effort to see events around the world objectively would clearly see that the aggression on Iraq was conducted for control of Iraqi oil. British MP George Galloway furiously attacked the criminal US and British intervention in Iraq.


U.S. President George W. Bush and UK Prime Minister Tony Blair, through the aggression on Iraq, have killed hundreds of thousands of Iraqi people and more than 4000 of their own troops, along with 30,000 wounded. In addition to this, George W. Bush spent one trillion U.S. dollars on the war, which must be returned by the American people. Every citizen of the United States now owes $4,000 more to the American Federal Reserve Bank for the aggression against Iraq. If someone tries to steal $4,000 in America, he will finish in prison, but when the President of the USA robs every citizen in America for this amount of money, nothing happens.


It should be said that this is the type of crime for which most courts around the world would judge the most severe penalties. Well, then why have the presidents of USA and UK Prime Minister not been called to bear their responsibility for the war crimes before the court? It is evident that leaders of the developed world are privileged people who are above the law. It must not stay like this. As long as there are people above the law, justice will not exist. Without it, people who live on planet Earth cannot hope for peace, prosperity, or a beautiful future. President Bush and Prime Minister Blair, together with their associates, must be prosecuted for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people, for the enormous material damage that their criminal aggressions have caused, for the costs the war brought to their people, and for the pirate robbery of Iraqi oil.


Once the system of evaluation that I have proposed is adopted, the state presidents will no longer be privileged. The system will prevent the heads of states from calling wars. Also, people would individually allocate no money from their taxes for armies and armies would cease to exist. In the new system, waging wars will be utterly impossible.


Rothschilds are the most privileged people

 

One should not think that American presidents commit crimes to earn all the profit. American presidents come and go and cannot organize the exploitation of conquered countries for the short period time of their mandate in such form that they could earn significant profits from their aggression. Some people have power over the American presidents, and they stay at their positions permanently. These are the owners of corporations. Leaders of these corporations have a name, and they must be held accountable for what they did. I am convinced that the principal owners of these corporations are the Rothschild family, and behind them are the families Rockefeller, Morgan, Wartburg, etc. Forgive me if I skipped any more precious names.


I wrote more about these families in my article Has Antichrist Come? I do not think that American presidents work under direct orders from these wealthy families. Around the presidents are located the exclusive rings of associates who attended the schooling of the mentioned wealthy families. Hardly anyone can get close to the presidents without excellently passing the exams. These associates impose the will of the wealthy families to the presidents. That is the reason the change of the US President or the UK Prime Minister almost does not change the policies of these countries.


The Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Morgans, Wartburgs and others cannot escape the responsibility for what they have been doing. A lot of people call them out on Google and YouTube for the crimes they have committed. I believe that in the foreseeable future, most of the people around the world will understand that these families are the evil that governs the western world and are the prime source of problems in today’s society. They will realize that releasing the world from the control of these wealthy families means freeing the world from exploitation, poverty, war, alienation, and all other disadvantages of today’s society. Then these families will be in real danger. But I do not want the path to a better future of humankind to be dirtied with anyone’s blood.


I want the future to be built on the equal rights and universal agreement of all the people. I think that the best solution for these wealthy families is to accept the system that I have proposed. By accepting the system I have suggested, they would protect themselves from lynch. The new system would undoubtedly punish these wealthy families for their crimes. But what would the penalties be? Death sentences practically don’t exist today, so they do not need to fear about that. In the system that I proposed, there will be no prison sentences, so they should not need to worry about that either. They will lose their privileged status. That would not be pleasant to their alienated conscience, but I would not recommend them to unleash their anger upon me. I think that the world would not forgive them if they attacked my philosophy or me. Besides that, they should be grateful to me because, without my philosophy, nothing could guarantee the survival of their families.


When the system I have proposed is accepted, I am convinced that these families would still remain the wealthiest families in the world. One cannot deny that by organizing capitalism, these families have created the most significant economic progress and huge betterment of the society. By accepting the system that I have suggested, they will lose the power of secretly ruling the world, but it was not particularly successful anyway. See what their results are! Besides, I think that even if they were far more skilled than they are, they would not be able to reign throughout the world because it is not possible. The people would rebel even if they were in golden cages. People need freedom in the first place. When the world is finally free of their chains, they would no longer have to hide their powers.


People all over the world will recognize them as the most distinguished families. Is this not an excellent recognition? In the new system, they would even be able to take open control over the entire world, because the system that I have proposed would need someone to lead the world. This time, the leaders will actually become directly responsible to the people worldwide. If they make mistakes, they might get billions of bad evaluations from people, which would cost them billions dollars every month. Even they would not be able to afford it and therefore would work hard to create a sound policy of the world. In this case, the Rothschild family and their partners would begin to contribute building a far better future for humanity. In this case, all people win, and nobody will lose. Is this not a good offer? If they think about it, they will find the system I proposed is the best option for them as well.


Life is better without privileges.

 

I never wished to be privileged. Never in my life was my goal to have power over others. I needed money for the fulfillment of natural needs only. Maybe sometimes a little more, but earning money was never a primary goal in my life. That has given me a lot of time to concentrate on my real needs, and that is why I have achieved success in my own life. That success can be measured in the first place by the fact that I have no problem with myself. I do not drink alcohol, I do not take any medication, I have neither neurosis nor depression, and I do not lack anything. On top of it all, I have a lovely family. Someone can say that this is not a big success in life, but I would respond to them that not many people manage to achieve such a state. It is especially hard for privileged people to make such a result. Also, by finding my inner freedom, I was able to achieve significant progress in my philosophy. Success is great not because my philosophy was challenging to create, but because no one else has worked seriously in this field. People are so burdened with alienated values that I did not have real competition in the area of my work.


But, as a young man, under the influence of society, I was ambitious to promote myself. I reached some success in the field of architecture but found out that it was not a successful period in my life. Notably, that period reminds me of my great dependence on smoking. At that time, I never even tried to stop smoking because I knew that there was no chance to overcome my addiction. Then, I focused on my philosophy, which brought me inner peace even though I continued to have a habit to smoke. When my first daughter was born, I felt I should stop smoking in the name of our health. I was preparing myself for a terrible battle against cigarettes. And then came an incredible surprise; I quit smoking without any problem. I think my work helped me build inner peace that liberated me from my dependence on cigarettes. If I was successful in the quitting, why wouldn’t other people be able to achieve similar results? A healthy life, which my philosophy addresses, will help people all over the world get rid of their problems, and of the addictions that prevent them from having a good life.


Someone might think that my indifference to achieve privileges, to earn money, to build power in society, to promote at work and buy houses, result from my megalomaniac need to change the world. This would not be true. I’ve just discovered that the freedom in the field of my own interests that is also good for people brings more satisfaction than any privileges can. But in one moment of my life, I noticed that all the values I need were located behind non-crossable walls that prevented me from reaching them. I found my goal when I decided to tear down the walls, to change the world and make it an excellent place to live. Or to be more explicit, I am by nature a little lazy, and if I were able to find interests and satisfaction in everyday life, I would never focus on my philosophy. I was not even a talented writer. Changing the world was not an easy goal, but I had no choice.


But wait a moment, weren’t all the great founders and leaders, including imperators, claiming that they wanted to build a good world? Yes, but there are vast differences between them and me. I would point out that the most significant difference comes from the fact that the great founders and leaders, including imperators, had privileged power over people, while my system will not give me any higher authority than any other person has. Also, my system will bring good life and happiness to all people worldwide, which no great founders or leader, including imperator, has ever managed to achieve.


By my nature, I hardly start something, but once I move, I do not give up. Then nothing can stop me on my way. At this point, I have been developing new ideas for 27 years that will one day change the world entirely and make it a beautiful place to live; but still, I have not reached success in society. In the last nine years, 250,000 people have visited this web site, and they took 2,500 copies of my book Humanism. Yet, none of them have found it valuable to join me in my effort to improve the world.


What’s the problem? People usually recognize my good intentions, but generally, they have little confidence in themselves to review them. No one is engaged in researching the development of society, and that is the reason people think that new ideas are unrealizable. They are convinced that otherwise, some institution would work on them. People expect that the authorities lead them on the right path, but authorities do not want changes that reduce their power. Each turn of the accepted knowledge is a threat to the privileges of authorities, and practically the foundation of society needs to be changed in order a good to create a sane society. The road to progress is closed. Despite that, I know that I have defined how the bright future of humanity will look like, I know I am right, and that is the reason I cannot find more significant meaning to my life than working on my philosophy. It brings me the work satisfaction from which I will not give up.


Privileges must be removed

 

Privileged statuses bring pleasure to most people, but I would say that this status is alienated from the natural needs of people so that it necessarily results in real disadvantages that people, due to of their ignorance, do not associate with privileges. In most cases, such people cannot find their inner peace. They are under constant stress and seek relief through alcohol and drugs. Furthermore, the state of internal tension prevents people from recognizing objective reality. The state of inner tension makes it difficult for people to sense the correct path and make proper decisions in their lives. It makes it difficult for people to re-examine the premises that led them into their current situations and makes it difficult for them to be enlightened. Privileges certainly alienate people from the possibilities of finding satisfaction in the natural relationship among people. In reality, privileges are powerlessness itself.


All problems in society are caused by an inadequate system of values. Expecting that privileges of any form of having power over others can bring happiness is just as likely as getting happiness from cocaine. They are both hallucinations based on illusions. Privileges are evil. When society revokes privileges only then it will get a chance to achieve a better life. It is not easy to do, but there is no other path. Changes in society that do not abandon privileges are cosmetic changes only, and cannot bring prosperity to mankind.


The escape from this evil lies in the formation of the objective system of values which will be based on the natural needs of society. The system that I proposed will build such values. It will establish man as the highest value in society. The new system will form a scale with which the value of man could be defined and measured so that people can easily notice and accept it. Once the objective values are accepted by society, forms of alienated powers arising from privileges will lose their importance because objectively, they are not values. The new system will direct people to the right path. It will give people the being power they need so they will not ask for privileges anymore. And if people would still be interested in a search for privileges, they will not be able to find any because the new system would remove them.


The system I have proposed at this web site is not only the best solution to the problems of today’s world, but it’s also the only good one. That’s the reason my system will be accepted by the whole world. This system prevents hunger, fear, corruption, narcissism, racism, immorality, crime, war, and all types of destruction in society and encourages the development of productive human powers. In short, the system promises a better life for everyone and harmony to the people. It will turn the main principles that humankind has been established on so far upside down. The impact on the people will be so enormous that future generations will call everything before the implementation barbarianism, and everything from the implementation on will be known as civilization.


My humanism will save the planet Earth from all social evil and will create love, joy, peace, health, beauty, freedom, security, justice, equality, harmony, abundance; and will make a paradise on earth.


Aleksandar Šarović

March 8, 2009

Do you love

Do you love?

 

Equal Human Rights will Make People Love Unconditionally

 

Erich Fromm wrote a scientific book about love, “The Art of Loving.” He defined love as the rational orientation of people based on freedom and mutual respect. His contribution to understanding love is significant, which made his book very popular. However, Erich Fromm’s attempt to teach people love failed to spread love worldwide because he based love on people’s consciousness. The problem is that people’s conscience is a category with no power to establish freedom, rationality and mutual respect, and nothing else exists. As a result, people have not discovered how to love unconditionally. This paper intends to present that love directly depends on equal human rights. Equal human rights will give people the power to demystify indulging values of the outer world and to accept the inner world where all love of people is located. This paper teaches people to find love in themselves and develop it unconditionally.

 

***

 

People have the ability to love by their nature. Love is the most significant achievement people have and may develop in their life. Love is a state of mind based on caring for others, bringing the joy of living. Love is the condition of the soul that enriches the person who loves and the whole world. People who love carry a feeling of inner peace, stability, lightness and joy; that is how loving people can be identified. In a natural society, love exists on its own and develops spontaneously.

 

People decline love when they alienate themselves from their inherited ability to love. It starts by comparing themselves with other people. Instead of searching for the causes of a good life in themselves, people find the superficial explanation of life benefits, comparing their life with the lives of others. Then they quickly come to the subjective conclusion that power over people brings satisfaction and a good life. This conclusion is false. The need for dominance generates conflict among people causing social problems. Power over people has nothing to do with a good life and even less with love. People cannot fight with others and love them at the same time. Conflict among people alienates them from the chance to accomplish a good life. This article will present that the escape from all social problems lies in equal human rights. It is also a condition for maintaining and developing love. The purpose of this article is to explain it.

 

 

Narcissism 

 

The lack of equal human rights creates narcissism. Narcissism is a subjective state of mind primarily developed by the privileged statuses of people, which gives people an impression of superiority. One can generalize that the more privileged people are, the more narcissistic they are. For example, spoiled children, excellent students, and influential people are generally more privileged, which likely means more narcissistic. But narcissism can also grow in the subjective minds of everyone as a reaction to an inferior position in society, which is nothing but the lack of equal human rights.

 

The differences among narcissistic people are often only in nuances because every person can build an illusion of power or privileges in a world of their thoughts. Practically all people possess some narcissistic character traits because our alienated culture teaches people to be narcissistic. The less narcissistic people are, the healthier they are for themselves and society. The more narcissistic people are, the less they love.

 

Some people call narcissism self-love because successful narcissistic people may look lovely and charming. They adore their images, character, deeds and success in society. They enjoy their abilities, their thoughts, their beauty, their characteristics, their family, their nation, and everything that is connected with them.

 

Does narcissism contain love in itself? Rather not, but the problem is, in fact, semantic. If one can say, “I love chocolate,” where the term “love” actually means “enjoy,” then one can stretch the meaning of love to narcissism but in a very inferior form. Narcissism and love are separate categories, as their names suggest. People possess both characteristics; however, people who love more are less narcissistic and vice versa. In the following pages, people with more developed narcissistic characteristics are called narcissistic people; even though they can love, their abilities to love are less developed.

 

Narcissistic people are very ambitious. They want to climb the social scale by becoming an authority; their goal in life is success either by achieving power, earning money, winning a contest, or whatever they find appealing. They prefer to compete and, even more so, to win! The ego of the narcissist is very passionate, giving them enormous energy, which provides excellent opportunities to win but less chance to love. People who love base their mutual relations less on competition and more on cooperation.

 

Narcissistic people are subjective and tend to give their successes greater importance than they deserve. The narcissistic culture has raised superficial forms of value such as power, wealth, fame, beauty, strength, speed, etc. These values have become the most valuable goals in today’s society. They are objectively not so beneficial to people, but the alienated society has put them on a pedestal. Alienated values cannot bring genuine advantages to individuals. On the contrary, those values usually bring the opposite. These values damage the long-term possibility of creating social prosperity.

 

If narcissistic people are successful, as famous singers, actors or politicians might be, they are delighted, and their ego shines. This is mainly because such happiness finds the illusion of overcoming their powerlessness in nature, and therefore, the narcissistic pleasure may be pretty intense. As such, it can easily deceive people into thinking they are on the right track. Narcissistic happiness is primarily based on illusions because narcissism alienates people from objective reality.

 

The problem is, by developing their narcissistic character, narcissistic people value themselves significantly more than others. As a result, such people lose respect towards others, reducing the chance to reach the natural advantages in relationships with others and diminishing the opportunity to love.

 

Since narcissistic people overestimate themselves, they can easily confront objective reality. They hardly tolerate competition that may threaten their vision. Sooner or later, life shows narcissistic people they are not as strong, bright, or beautiful as they would like, bringing them stress and frustration. Any happiness people exercise undeservedly through illusions comes back as a painful payment. Narcissistic people often try to escape their tension by indulging in the abuse of substances; thus, they can be recognized.

 

Dissatisfied narcissistic people may quickly clash with other people. It can be said that virtually all conflicts in society are based on the damaged narcissistic character of people. By their subjective vision, narcissistic people can identify threats to their alienated needs as threats to their existence. It induces the fight for the survival of their illusions. The more narcissistic vision is threatened, the more they hate and the more brutal conflict they produce. All the cruelty of this world comes from endangered narcissism. An injured narcissism causes a destructive orientation in narcissistic people. Such people can fall into depression, which can develop into the need for self-destruction that can be extended to the need to destroy the world.

 

Genuine people have reasonable expectations, which they may fulfill, reaching stability. If the world does not match the needs of genuine people, they do not hate; they feel saddened. Sadness is a much healthier emotion, and unlike hatred, it allows people to find a way out of an unsatisfactory situation. Love always benefits those who love, while narcissism can hardly achieve that. Narcissism will rather induce evil in narcissistic people spreading it to the world around them. Narcissistic people produce trouble in their surroundings. People must eliminate narcissism to achieve a prosperous future for humankind. This will be possible by implementing equal human rights.

 

Love of authorities

 

Genuine authorities impact society through their positive example and help others when asked for it. They never impose their knowledge or values on others. Unfortunately, such authorities are rare today.

 

In alienated societies, authorities have built privileged power over people by forcing people to accept their subjective knowledge. Such authorities are inadequate because they cannot improve the community. Throughout the history of humankind, inadequate authorities have created a vast amount of false knowledge that society has adopted. Such knowledge is alienated from objective reality and therefore prevents society from natural development.

 

Authorities and people may build a stable mutual relationship, which might look like love. Authorities need obedient people to establish their power. Obedient people need authorities because it is more convenient for them to depend on the authorities than to be left alone in a frightening world. But the relationship between authority and followers is only an illusion of love. If we extend the meaning of love, such love is at least undeveloped. It should be rather labelled as a perverted concept of love.

 

A relationship based on the servility of obedient people and the control of authority always presents some degree of a sadomasochistic relationship, which is unproductive. A sadist is a person who finds pleasure in dominating people, which can be developed into extreme brutality. On the other hand, a masochist finds pleasure in submission to authorities until complete obedience. Sadomasochism should be considered a very unhealthy relationship. More about it may be found in my article Equal Human Rights will Eliminate Sadomasochism.

 

Today’s society is not enough aware that all the evil in the world origins in a lack of equal human rights. Authorities build privileges and exploit people through the unfair distribution of social wealth. Unsatisfied followers of authorities are potential time bombs that wait for a reason to release their stress anywhere in real life.

 

In a society without equal human rights, narcissistic authorities deceive obedient people and, on the way to achieving greater power, use them to subdue other people or nations. Obedient people, dissatisfied with the life authorities cause, accept leaders’ demands uncritically, becoming blind henchmen. That easily creates some form of group narcissism which only may look like love, while building militant foundations for conflicts and wars. A humble masochist, under authority’s guidance, may become a heartless weapon in the leaders’ hands. Militant people do not love. People who love do not support wars. This article claims that the escape lies in equal human rights, which will eliminate social problems, including sadomasochism.

 

 

Falling in love

 

Probably the first association that people have with the word love is falling in love. Falling in love is the most famous expression of love today and perhaps the most described and sung term of all time. People often mystify falling in love with magical romantic feelings that rise under no control. I would say that the main characteristic of people who fall in love is fear and hope. Juvenile uncertainty and optimism toward life bring a high possibility of falling in love.

 

Young people usually think they need to find an appropriate person to fall in love with, and magically romantic love will happen. First, I would like to emphasize that there is nothing magic in falling in love. It is entirely commercial behaviour that gives an illusion of a magical performance. People know how much their attractiveness is worth in the alienated value market because everyday life teaches them that. An appropriate person for love is a product of in-depth preparation and random events. There is almost nothing wrong with it because a person should choose a partner who suits them more. Rational behaviour in the choosing of partners is more than welcome. But the people who quickly fall in love are pretty subjective, which means they are not reasonable enough. They are quite foolish in selecting partners.

 

When an appropriate person for falling in love appears in the sight of a subjective person, high energy of happiness is released that attracts. Suppose it finds an appropriate response from the other side. In that case, a miracle of “love” appears, which indulges the release of all the brakes, and all the doubts about the acceptability of the partner disappear. The person then feels “the chemistry,” and the world becomes beautiful. This miraculous phenomenon described in countless songs is just a sweet illusion resulting from the liberation of considerable insecurity. There is almost no love there. People who are confident in themselves can hardly fall in love, but they are capable of loving.

 

Falling in love brings such great happiness that it can be compared to escaping death. People fall in love because they feel dead in authoritarian societies that take freedom from them. In the act of falling in love, people release themselves from the pressure authorities have imposed on them throughout their lives. Falling in love compensates for all the powerlessness people have felt in society and builds an illusion of power. It brings euphoria, and people wrongfully assign it to the “loved” person. This is why falling in love is an illusion.

 

Falling in love is very superficial, and a person who falls in love often quickly satiates with the loved one. If the emotions towards the loved person end, they are never loved because love lasts. Love develops practically the whole life. Love is an active learning in practice that brings pleasure. The person who loves does not stop getting to know their partner. By learning more about their partner, a person learns how to improve their partner’s life. That brings the joy of love.

 

Many people can’t wait to fall in love. If they knew better, they would avoid the state of being in love. Falling in love is sweet, but it harms the people who fall in love because the happiness that uncontrollably rises challenges people’s capability to see objectively the situation in which they are. People alienated from their productive orientation can hardly love. Love is a consequence of the productive orientation of people based on equal human rights. Productive people have difficulty falling in love, but they can love. Love is stable and grows with time. Once people accept equal human rights, they will build productive relationships in society, teaching people how to love, and they will love.

 

 

Love of children

 

Love is a natural phenomenon that develops from childhood. Loving parents take care of their children, showing them what love is. Unfortunately, today’s society has become alienated from its nature and does not know love enough to be able to pass it on to children. An authoritarian society, by alienated demands, suppresses the ability of parents to love their children. In capitalism, parents don’t have time to give their children the love they need because they must work to survive. Capitalism seems interested in disintegrating families to get more dependent workers and consumers. It is a political problem that should be solved by reducing working hours.

 

Furthermore, in an alienated society, parents are often occupied with their ambitions, so they do not have enough time for their children. They usually hide their ambitions behind their sacrifices for the family’s welfare, overestimating the value of their ambitions and underestimating their children’s lives. Children who do not receive enough love are emotionally handicapped and less able to love. Such children can easily become long-term problems for themselves, their parents and society. Children can discover how to love later in life, but in an alienated society, this rarely happens.

 

Instead of love, parents often pressure their children to submit to their will in the name of “higher interests.” Alienated parents cannot see the needs of their children objectively. Parental pressure alienates children from their nature, reducing their chances to live well. Children who oppose adults can easily be right because they are closer to their nature. Therefore, the resistance of children should be respected, which is nothing more than the promotion of equal human rights. Once accepted by society, equal human rights will teach parents to discover love and give it to their children. Only then can a bright future for humanity begin.

 

Love needs equal human rights

 

People need the freedom to liberate themselves from the influences of alienation authorities have imposed throughout history. Free people will discover through practice the genuine way of living. This is the so-called process of disalienation. It will be achieved by recognizing that a good society must be based on equal human rights.

 

But just a moment, haven’t people today already had equal rights after the development and acceptance of equal human, civil, legal, constitutional, and other human rights all over the world? Of course, they have not! It is only formal equality and propaganda by immoral authorities. The presidents of countries may send people to war, and people cannot do it to them. Bosses may abuse or fire workers, and workers cannot do it to them. Teachers may force students to accept knowledge, and students cannot do it to them. Where are the equal rights there? People probably think it is entirely normal because they have always lived in such a society, but this is not normal!

 

***

 

Equal human rights will solve social problems by developing democracy. It will be achieved by giving people equal legislative, judiciary and executive powers in society. Everyone should get equal rights to evaluate others for whatever they do. Each positive evaluation should bring a small award to the assessed person, and each negative evaluation should result in a small punishment. Such a policy would make everyone work hard to please others and avoid hurting anybody. This will significantly contribute to creating a good society. The equal evaluating power among people presents a new form of democracy, and the freedom of evaluation presents a new form of anarchy. Therefore, such a policy can be called democratic anarchy. Democratic anarchy alone should be capable of building a much better society than we have today.

 

Let the evaluations have an equivalent value of one dollar. Each reward a person receives from somebody will bring them one dollar, and each penalty will take away from them one dollar. In that manner, all people will become equal authorities with little direct power in society. It is essential to emphasize that the number of assessments will be limited so that people will evaluate only the best and worse individuals. However, democratic anarchy will still have enough power to direct each member of society to respect other people. As a result, people will become valuable to others, creating significant advantages for the community and diminishing or abolishing disadvantages.

 

Here is one example: the US President might get 100,000,000 bad evaluations from the American people for bad policies, lies, and criminal aggression on countries. This would cost him 100,000,000 dollars in only one month. Presidents who fail to meet people’s needs will quickly resign from their positions. Only the most skilful and brave individuals would dare lead countries. They will not be authorities anymore but sincere servants of the people.

 

Technically, democratic anarchy will create similar phenomena as love among people because it will bring caring for others as love does. But it will still not be love. Once the implementation of democratic anarchy starts, most people will probably not feel satisfaction in giving, which is the basis of love. Initially, the pleasure may come from the egotistic need to receive good evaluations from people and avoid bad ones. However, it will be beneficial because people will create advantages and avoid disadvantages for all of society.

 

Democratic anarchy will remove social privileges. It must be stressed that the privileged status of individuals causes enormous problems for society. Democratic anarchy will teach people that no matter what their successes are, they must not forget that they are equal community members. This will liberate people from narcissism and enable the development of love. Democratic anarchy is presented in more detail in my article Democratic Anarchy is the Future of Democracy.

 

***

 

Equal human rights need to be introduced in production processes as well, which will significantly improve the economy. First, society needs to introduce full employment of workers through shorter work hours. Then people need to accept a permanent open competition of workers for every public work post at any time. Every public job post will be filled by the worker who offers higher productivity, more responsibility, and demands a lower wage. It is nothing but a developed work market open at all times. Such a division of labour sounds impossible to achieve mainly because it never existed, but the realization is just a technical problem.

 

Of course, such an economy cannot be established soon because it will require a lot of development before people embrace it. But once people establish it, the burdens and benefits of a living will be justly distributed among the people, forming a just society. In addition, no economy can be more productive than the one where each job gets the best available worker. Private companies will lose the productivity battle with public companies, sending capitalism down in history. This economy presents an enormous socio-economic improvement opportunity to build good socialism. The new division of labour is explained in detail in my article Developed Marked of Work will Create Socialism.

 

The new socialism will teach workers to become satisfied with their lives. It will be accomplished by calling each worker very responsible for the productivity they offer to get the jobs they want. It will teach workers to set their needs following their abilities to satisfy them. This is the chief prerequisite for overcoming destructiveness in society because workers who consistently meet their needs are satisfied and not destructive. Then society will develop a new culture that will create a productive orientation of people.  

 

Democratic anarchy and open competition among workers will completely eliminate social privileges, the nest of all societal problems. Nobody will be socially privileged in any way anymore. The elite will disappear together with the vast alienation they built. Removing privileges will eliminate the central nest of narcissism and sadomasochism in the community. Then, no improper authorities and obedient people will be able to exist. Eliminating privileges by establishing equal human rights is crucial for the development of society. Then a promising future for humankind may begin. 

 

An open market of work will increase competition among people. I’ve already mentioned that competitions destroy love. Does this mean that my proposal is against love? No way! Competitions cannot be removed in any other way than by people’s understanding through their own experience that competitions are unnecessary and inappropriate for achieving a decent life. Freedom of experience is the only way to find the truth.

 

The idea assumes that open competition for all workplaces will allow everyone to try them, demystifying the importance of jobs and balancing the interests in all of them. Also, open competition in all workplaces will be exhausting, diminishing the competitive interest of workers. As a result, people will give up on the competition, give up on the need to compare themselves with other people, and instead find value in themselves. Then they will readily accept equality among people, enabling them to find genuine values in their lives.

 

There is a vibrant inner world in people where all the love, hate, joy and misery of humanity are located. In a just society, where people understand that they are equal to all others no matter what accomplishments they achieve, exploiting the outer world will barely be able to bring noticeable benefits to people. Then, people will start searching for values in their inner world. When such orientation is accepted, hate and misery will be eliminated because they do not exist in the inner world of individuals who are relieved from the need to compare themselves with others. In contrast, love and joy will significantly develop because nothing else exists in the inner world of individuals who are relieved from the need to compare themselves with others.

 

The most critical point of an individual’s creation is themselves. Searching the inner world will let people know themselves and develop themselves as productive beings. The more people get to know themselves, the more freedom, peace, joy, wisdom, and love they can achieve.

 

Equality is a sufficient condition for the formation of a good society and the creation of love. Equality is also the only solution to all of the societal problems today and fundamental for the unconditional establishment of love. Love is a product of the equal rights of people.

 

When people accept equal human rights, they will rely on their power to satisfy their needs while respecting others. That would establish the conscience of productive people. Then under-developed people would no longer exist. Then no one would admire a president, singer or football player more than any other person; not one idol would exist anymore. Then neither powerful nor powerless people would exist, and improper authorities and humble followers would not exist. Then narcissism, sadism and masochism would no longer exist. This will overcome the enormous alienation we live in today and allow the building of love beyond the wildest dreams today, creating a bright future for humankind.

 

 

Conclusion

 

So far, scientists and philosophers have found conscience as the only tool for solving numerous social problems, reaching a good society and creating love among people. However, it never worked because consciences is not a category capable of accomplishing such goals. Calling for conscience may affect some people but never all. One unconscious person may reverse a conscious effort of society. Power to the people, not consciousness, will change the world and make it a flourishing place.

 

Equal human rights will free people from the power of authorities. People released from the pressure of authorities will demystify the alienated values imposed on them throughout history and discover natural ways of living. It will enlighten people, lowering their interest in comparing themselves with others, making them productive and finding the values in their inner world full of love. Then society will start spreading love in its best and most beautiful form. Love is the final result of the new socialism based on equal human rights. Once people start loving each other, they will create an entirely new world beyond the wildest dreams of the alienated society of today.

 

Developed people do not depend on anybody because they can achieve what they need on their own; they love other people unconditionally just because they are. They find great joy in building themselves as productive people and find even greater joy in love.

 

 

Writen     22.06.2009

Updated  12.11.2022

Alienation

Alienation

Man naturally seeks more power to overcome his weakness in nature and achieve greater conveniences. Higher power is obtained by greater knowledge. But, gaining knowledge is neither easy nor a quick process. On the way to make greater conveniences, a man often gives subjective determinations to unknown phenomena in nature that suit him well. If such determinations do not come into direct conflict with nature, a man readily accepts them as real and realizes conveniences from it the same way as he really overcomes his powerless in nature. In this manner, an alienated knowledge from objective reality is created. This is the basis of my theory of alienation.


Authorities often deliberately create an alienated knowledge to achieve supremacy in society. Dominion is one of the highest forms of alienation because, in the subjective consciousness of man, power gives an impression of superiority in nature. Once the man thinks he has more potential than he objectively deserves, he realizes the illusion of great conveniences.


To establish power over people, the authorities create ideologies in which they define values in society and rules of joint action. Ideologies can have their justification when the created rules prevent chaos in society. That is how all religions and all political systems have been created. The negative side of ideologies stems from the fact that they always support the interests of its creators and provide them with power in society. Thus they alienate the creators of ideologies and people of their own nature. The alienation of society from its own nature cannot bring a good result to society. In fact, the all evil of this world comes from the alienation of society from its nature.


Good results can come from the equal rights of people only. Equal rights among people will form objective values in society. It will remove the alienation and establish a good society. I have developed an ideology based on equal human rights, but the authorities prevent the formation of equal human rights because they, by definition, take the power of the authorities. Equal rights among people have been oppressed through the whole history of mankind, and that is the only reason a good society has never been established.  


Instead, we have continuous struggles between authorities who are striving to establish power in society. On this planet Earth, there was never enough space for all the people who wanted control over others. That is the reason why envy, hatred, conflicts and wars appear among the alienated people in which the entire nations suffer.


The Rothschild family


The Rothschild banking family has recognized long ago that direct power over people may be very inconvenient and came to the conclusion that it could be much more efficient, lasting, and safer to rule by using the money. The banking family Rothschild has developed the ideology of capitalism. Mayer Amschel Rothschild had allegedly said in 1790: “Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation and I care not who makes the laws.” The Rothschild family makes strategic decisions for society by using the money they have earned by banking and other businesses throughout the generations. They do not bare responsibilities to society for doing that. That is the primary source of alienation in the western world today.


The Rothschilds continued this tradition by imposing alienated rules to social life and by preventing the natural way of living that could disalienate the world in which we live. Alienation is mostly built up through the political system, through a system of education and through propaganda by the media. The Rothschild family has control over all of these systems by the people they help, finance or employ.


In the article Has Antichrist come? I wrote about the conspiracy the Rothschild family raised against the whole world. Here I enclose the YouTube video Zeitgeist – The Movie: Federal Reserve, which also presents the basis of the conspiracy theory quite convincingly. The Rothschild family has secretly succeeded in mastering the western world more than any emperor in the history of mankind. That means the power that should belong to the people today is alienated from the people regardless of what form of democracy is established.


The Rothschild family started financing kings in the 18th century, and in this way, entire kingdoms owed money to them. There is no better job than lending money to the states because then all the citizens pay the debt back through the state taxes with an interest of course. During the Napoleonic wars, Rothschild allegedly manipulated the stock market in England and took the wealth of the people for a bargain. They also managed to establish control over The Bank of England. At that time, the Rothschilds were convincingly the wealthiest people in the world. Today they are nowhere on the list of millionaires. How is this possible? Simply, they hide their wealth and power.


The Rothschild family is probably the first family that organized its operations all over the world. They could not take care of all the businesses themselves, so they employed expert agents to lead their companies. These agents receive a share in the ownership of companies and become their partners. The Rothschild family probably hired the Rockefeller and Morgan families in the nineteenth century in the United States. If the owners of the world’s largest corporations such as Rockefeller, Morgan, and Warburg were independent of the Rothschild family, then they would, according to the competitive nature of entrepreneurs in capitalism, fight with each other but they do not.


They are one body, and the head is most certainly the Rothschild family because they conquered the business world a century before their partners appeared in it. Through the 18th, 19th and 20th century, the Rothschild family has created an entire hierarchical structure of partners, and they do it today as well. Some call this structure Masons and its hierarchical top Illuminati. During nearly three centuries the Rothschild family and their partners could have bought half of the world, while nobody can know it.


In 1913, the Rothschilds gained control of the American Federal Reserve Bank with the help of corrupt politicians. This is the central bank in the U.S., and it is privately owned. The bank lends money to the U.S. government and the U.S. people return it with interest through taxes. But not only that, the U.S. spends more money than the Rothschilds, and their partners have at their disposal, so that the American Federal Reserve Bank prints money out of thin air, lends it to the U.S. Government, and then collects it back with interest. This is a masterpiece of deception which has been operating since 1913.


The Rothschilds have imposed a restrictive monetary policy to practically the entire western world. This policy prevents the governments to issue money to cover their own budget deficit. The justification was found in the fact that printing money creates inflation in which money loses value and money has fundamental importance in the capitalist world. States which perform a restrictive monetary policy must cover a budget deficit with money borrowed from banks and in that way the Rothschilds again collect profits.


Countries mostly borrow money from the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. These are supranational institutions in which the American Federal Reserve Bank has a significant role, influence and interest. That’s how the Rothschilds impose their will over the International Monetary Fund and World Bank. Taking into account that many countries are dependent on the help from these banks, the Rothschilds easily impose their will to them. In that way, the Rothschilds rule and exploit almost the whole world. Of course, the state must repay the debts with interest, which usually means that all these countries increasingly borrow money and the Rothschilds become increasingly rich.


The Rothschilds of course also control commercial banks, which give loans to individuals and companies in the Western world. Most of the people buy houses and cars with credits, companies borrow working capital from banks, and the Rothschilds realize tremendous profits. With the vast amount of money, they purchase valued companies all over the world.


But that is not all; by controlling the money in the world, the Rothschilds have become masters of the economic crisis in the world. They encourage investments of people with low interest rates. When a private business expands, they raise the interest rate and reduce the amount of money in circulation. This reduces the purchasing power of people and thus deliberately creates an economic crisis. Then companies bankrupt massively, and the Rothschilds cheaply buy those they need. Rothschilds also profit on the increased number of unemployed workers who accept poorly paid jobs to be able to feed their families, and thus bring them more profits.


Alienation of policy


Under pressure from international financial institutions, various organizations and media propaganda, most of the presidents of countries around the world obediently follow the interests of the Rothschild family. If some head of state opposes the Rothschild family and decides to defend the independence of the country, then the Rothschild agents can create a civil war in his country. They made the civil war in Yugoslavia. I wrote more about this in the article in My debt to Yugoslavia. The Rothschild agents try to put every country in the world under control, including Russia and China. All the problems in these countries were undoubtedly assisted by the American and British secret services, backed by the Rothschild family.


In an extreme case of disobedience, presidents of countries lose their lives. As an example, the President of the U.S., John Kennedy, lost his life. The reason for it could be his executive order no. 11110 which closed the system of the Federal Reserve, and ordered the U.S. Government to restore the constitutional mandate over the control of money. Although Kennedy nowhere mentioned the name of the Rothschilds here, you can hear his speech that calls for a fight against the conspiracy. Shortly after that, John Kennedy was assassinated. An investigation of the murder was very doubtful according to Michael Parenti in the article The JFK Assassination: Defending the Gangster State.


The disobedient President of Romania Nicolae Ceausescu, Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic, the President of Iraq Saddam Hussein and before them many others were also killed. Of course, these or similar cases make governments in the world very obedient. The Rothschild family controls parliaments in the world as well. Please see a very interesting video Israeli lobby in America that shows how the American Israel Public Affairs Committee affects the creation of the US policy. By the control of governments and parliaments, the Rothschild family controls the formation of laws in the world and they, of course, correspond to the family Rothschild business and are entirely alienated from the needs of people.


The Rothschilds have built an entire hierarchical structure of agents that realize their interests. The senior agents founded the Bilderberg group, which meets once a year to coordinate policies that will be conducted in the western world. The group directs the programs of work to the heads in politics, banking, business, the military and media. These meetings are closed to the public. One should not be particularly bright to understand that such a policy has nothing to do with democracy. It is wholly alienated from the people. These meetings are no longer secret, and that means that the Rothschilds create an elite that allows them to rule the world.

President Obama attended the meeting of the Bilderberg Group, where he coordinated his program with the needs of the rulers of the world. If he did not do it, he would not get support from his own Democratic Party, without which he would not have had the chance to become the president. After President Bush, Rothschilds wanted a more humane president to tranquillize dissatisfied American people. To this purpose, they agreed to give small concessions to the people, but the policy will not change significantly.


Obama promised in the election campaign to end the military intervention in Iraq in the first place because there is no need for the war anymore because disobedient Saddam Hussein was removed. Now the Rothschilds need peace to exploit Iraqi oil. They will make it through the corruption of the government, through contracts and loans for the reconstruction of the ruined country.


Obama also announced the extension of military intervention in Afghanistan on the grounds that such action is necessary to prevent acts of terrorism in the world. I think the reason for the aggression lies in the fact that Afghanistan does not agree to be a colony of anyone and as such cannot be exploited. On account of supporting the aggression against Afghanistan, President Obama likely won some concessions in health care insurance for the US people. That is called a democracy today.


Alienation of economy

 

The market economy is based on profits, and therefore it values profits above people. This is an alienation that develops inequality in society and brings injustice in the process of production, the division of labour and distribution of incomes. In case of good enterprise business, the employees generally cannot participate in the division of profits, but in case of a bad enterprises business, workers face lower incomes for sure or a loss of work, and there is nothing they can do. Relations between employers and workers are also not moral because employers are the buyers of work and workers are salespeople of their own work. Thus, the workers become commodities, and that is unacceptable. Given that a man himself in the market economy is not accepted as a value, manufacturers lead shameless exploitation of workers to achieve higher profits.


Alienation of sciences

 

Alienation is thoroughly carried out by education. Throughout history, the authorities of sciences have attempted to define the authenticity of nature by writing an indefinite number of books. But often they were not successful in it so that they alienated their sciences from objective reality. Natural sciences are still satisfactory because their development makes profits. Social sciences are completely suppressed in their development because the change of the social system does not suit authorities. Social sciences should be the carriers of social improvement, but they are so alienated from their sense that they do not even try to find a solution that could improve society. They are useless. If someone tomorrow abolishes sociology, political science, and philosophy as sciences, no damage will have happened. Indeed that would bring benefits to society because people would no longer rely on useless authorities in the field of social sciences. They would start to think with their heads.


Authorities generally do not need smart people, but obedient followers. They use education to conquer thoughts of students and therefore turn them into tools in their own hands. Authorities keep useless sciences because they support the system in which authorities exercise privileges. It does not matter what ideology is behind it. All the authorities want power and do not allow people to free themselves from it. The evaluation of students’ knowledge by the teachers supports the authoritarian system in which authorities have power over people. As a result, education today is alienated from the natural needs of the society. It is very bureaucratic, too long, and unnecessarily complicated.

 

Students are forced to accept useless alienated knowledge on which today’s alienated society has been built on if they want to be successful students. The more time students spend in school, the more they accumulate alienated knowledge, and the less they can understand the objective laws in society and accept the changing of the social system. Authorities know that, and thus they reassure the alienated order they imposed. Then, authorities recruit the best students, so-called excellences, to implement the policies they were imposed on society. These “excellences” are programmed in a way they cannot accept anything more than cosmetic changes of acquired knowledge.


Now you may conclude how wrong is the statement that the existing system of education is essential for human development. It is adopted by virtually all the people around the world. The primary function of the system of education is to make people prove that they are obedient followers of authorities and as such, they become eligible to work in an alienated society. The effect of today’s education is, in fact, harmful to human development because it alienates students from their own nature and turns them into living machines.


People who believe authorities and obediently follow them cannot achieve a good life firstly because authorities generally represent their own interests and secondly because by blindly following the authorities they neglect their own senses and abilities to find the correct path. They alienate themselves from their own nature, from themselves. As a result, the social sciences are so unsuccessful today that they cannot recognize my work; the only good solution for humankind and the education is so ineffective today that it prevents people from recognizing my work, the only good solution for humankind.


The Rothschild family likes useless sciences because they distance people away from real problems, and therefore the Rothschilds strongly support the development of such sciences. With the help of the authorities they kept under control, they control the education system as well. Misinformed people may think that control over education is harmless, but in reality, it creates a severe effect in the formation of the future of humankind.


Alienation of media

 

The agents of the Rothschild family do not regret the money they spent to take control over media because by control of media they control public opinion, and after that, they can do virtually whatever want. The Rothschild family started with control of newspapers and then television. You may have noticed how quickly the big television station, CNN, was made for example, and that from the start it had substantial financial resources available and has propagated throughout the world the values that the wealthy people advocates. Such TV stations run “excellences” that are well trained on how to represent the interests of big capitalists while trying at the same time not to confront the needs of the people. The only people who have access to media are corrupted by the system and do not have any intention to change anything there.


When you think that you have decided on which candidate you will vote in elections, the representatives of the wealthy people have already decided it for you. Everything you know about the candidates has come to you through the media they control. It is not even particularly relevant to the wealthy people what candidate you are going to vote for because all the candidates will implement their will anyway. It is important to them though to convince you that you have the “freedom” to make your own decisions in your life and to make you happy while following their will. They prepare you for your “good” decisions practically from birth, and they do it so cleverly that you cannot even notice.


Through everyday propaganda, media convince people that money is the biggest if not the only value. Money is a medium of purchase that regulates the market of goods and services, and therefore objectively it is a value, but in today’s alienated society this value is much exaggerated. If you think a little bit, you would see that air is undoubtedly more valuable than money, because without air there would not be us. But no one or almost no one considers air as a value mostly because it cannot be privatized and nobody can make money on it.


Man to man should be the most significant value, but money gives power over the people, which deny the importance of man. Love and friendship are indeed natural values, but money as a value brings out greed that destroys love and friendship. Overestimating the value of money brings alienation in every pore of society and social relations. People who accept money as the highest value under the pressure of propaganda are great enemies to themselves because they act against their own nature and against the nature of the society in which they live.


Events that are not convenient to the Rothschild family, such as, for example, my philosophy do not have access to the western media, and therefore neither to the people. The media in the world of the west are very uniform and selective in a presentation of events around the world, which indicates that they are under the control of a narrow circle of people. It comes to mind for example that the Serbs were accused of ten years of ethnic cleansing in the former Yugoslavia in virtually all the Western media. At the same time, Turkey committed ethnic cleansing of Kurds that have passed almost unnoticed by the media. As a result, Serbia was bombed due to “public pressure,” and Turkey did not suffer any sanctions. What was the essential difference? Serbia refused to obey to dictates from the western world and Turkey is cooperative like most of the countries around the world.


Since the Internet appeared, the Rothschilds have been trying to have the most considerable influence in this field as well. Their agents purchase influential websites and quickly form new ones in an attempt to take control of the Internet information distribution. Recently I was particularly attracted to the websites change.com, changemakers.com, GOOD.is, etc. All these websites are calling for positive changes in society and are allegedly particularly interested in helping disempowered people on the bottom of the “pyramid.” But it is just a mask. Behind all these web sites lies a powerful organization of private sponsors who have their own private interests.


Changemakers.com has even published some of my articles and accepted two projects of mine in the contests of new ideas: Humanistic enterprises and Democratic anarchy (They have been deleted in the meantime). But they ignore my work. The Rothschilds ignore my ideas, and everyone else’s that propose the real change to the world, and they drown them in a sea of other ideas. Not one idea in the competition at changemakers.com can compare with mine, but “excellences” of the alienated system of education cannot see it. The Rothschilds count on the inability of people that they have raised for generations.


Also, the Rothschild could have bought half of the world in the last three centuries and thus can directly control half of humankind. The managers of their companies and organizations may not know that they are agents of the Rothschilds, but they know very well that they are privileged and do not want to do anything that might upset their employers. Thus, the Rothschilds prevent the acceptance of new ideas that can improve society. The websites that advocate changes in society together with most of the left media which are sponsored by companies or organizations would most likely stop changes from happening.


The Rothschilds like the “resistance” provided by the “excellences” they have raised. Naomi Klein, for example, wrote the book “No Logo.” In this book, she calls upon people to boycott goods from brands such as Nike, for example, because this emerging multinational corporation thrives enormously at the expense of cheap labour in developing countries. The Rothschilds are very likely the owners of Nike and should not support such writing. So why is her work supported by media and publishers? Because the chance of success of her idea is practically nonexistent. The Rothschilds adore helpless critique and help it. Such ideas give the illusion of freedom of public expression, which directs the society in a struggle that cannot succeed.


There are many “excellences” that advocate human rights, women’s rights, gay rights, the rights of the poor, who are also supported by the agents of the Rothschild family because all these people cannot achieve success in improving this world. They are useful to the Rothschilds because they fill in the public space so much that work which way improve society cannot break through.


***

If there is a possibility that my work may come closer to the public, then the real power of the Rothschild family arrives on the scene. Two years ago, Google opened a competition inviting good ideas that can change the world. I participated with my project along with more than 150,000 other projects. The winner has been proclaimed after two years, and my work was not among them. Why? Google does not want to accept my ideas because they present the end of capitalism, the very system on which Google has been established. But my project does not threaten Google or its owners in any way. My project will one day inevitably wholly change the world and make it a beautiful place to live. Not accepting such work is immoral. Why is it so important for Google to defend capitalism? I think that the decision about the competition was made above Google. The Rothschilds have significant influences in all companies including Google even if they are not the principal shareholders. The Rothschilds together with their agents defend capitalism at any cost.

 

The Rothschild family creates the culture of the whole world as well. If you pay attention, you can notice that all countries in the world overtake a unique fashion, music, film and television program. Thus countries become cultural colonies of the Rothschilds. You can recognize that by the same shows on television like “Who Wants To Be A Millionaire” or “American Idol” airing all around the world. Unique culture creates a unique orientation of people and thus facilitates the work for great manipulators. This culture aims to capture the thoughts of people and not to give them the freedom to think about what is good for them. It will give them “answers” to all their questions and offer them everything they “need.”

 

Today’s culture propagates illusions, immorality, superficiality, kitsch, gossip, violence, cruelty, greed, shallowness, artificiality, and the situation is getting worse every day because the media cannot offer anything better. Today’s society is profoundly alienated from its nature and therefore requires perverted values on its own. It cannot recognize correct values because people have been living without freedom for generations and were systematically prevented from learning how to get rid of those who govern.

 

***

The Rothschild conspiracy prevents the development of civilization and degenerates human beings. It is the way to total alienation, to the eruption of dissatisfaction and destruction. The Rothschilds aim to dominate the whole world, and they cannot be satisfied until that goal is achieved. But this goal cannot be completed because not all people can be obedient followers, obedient consumers of ideas, images, tastes, and sounds. This is because people need freedom. People will sooner or later strongly oppose the Rothschilds because by their nature they cannot live in a cage even if it is made of gold.

 

Capitalism is profoundly immoral, and therefore there is no hope for it. Also, capitalism is developed to the point where it can no longer achieve enough improvement in society; it is no longer a rational enough system and as such presents obstacle for the development of civilization. In the article End of Capitalism, I have presented why it is time for capitalism to go down in history. I have also introduced the basis of the new system Humanism that will replace it. This system will overcome alienation as well.

 

In today’s world, the meaning of the word alienation is very underdeveloped. The purpose of this word in the English-speaking world is so suppressed that there is not a word that defines the condition that prevails alienation. The expression which would put society in the opposite position of alienation is non-existent. I use this meaning in my language a lot so that I had to translate it as a “disalienation“ in the English language even though you cannot find it in the English dictionary.

 

The process of disalienation

 

There is only one exit from the alienation of today’s society, and that is the establishment of equal rights among the people. There exist only one equal right among people, or they are not equal. Partially equal rights or almost equal rights do not exist because then we are talking about unequal rights. Even slightly uneven rights create privileges with very negative consequences that sooner or later cause problems in society. I have written more about that in the article Privileges are evil. I have defined society with equal rights of people. I think my philosophy is the only right way for humanity. I presented it in my book Humanism – A Philosophic-Ethical-Political-Economic Study of the Development of the Society, which is available free of charge.

 

Disalienation of policy

 

Even the poorest countries of the world can create an independent economic policy. Such states can accumulate financial resources no matter how small they are and economically compete with powerful countries around the world. Good social policy is primarily based on the democratic will of citizens. Citizens can directly decide that the majority of financial capital, which they possess together, invests in the economic development, while for the purpose of the living standards they could leave a minimal amount of money that is sufficient for survival. This means that these people would give up from any luxury in the period that they consider necessary to develop their economy. In this way, they would lose the dependence they have on private financial centers of power. That would release them from exploitation, from external pressures of any kind, and would make them the masters of their prosperity. It is also a way to a disalienation of society.

 

People can directly decide what percentage of their salaries they want to give for taxes. To be clear, individuals will not pay taxes in the amount they want, but they will participate in the formation of the total amount of the tax money, and then the tax money would be collected from people according to their incomes. Furthermore, people will decide how much money from the taxes they want to allocate for: the defence of the state, public security, education, health, housing, recreation, infrastructure, etc. Following the living experience, people will learn how much money they need to spend on taxes and what is the best way to spend it. In that manner, the people will for the first time create the macroeconomic policy of the society directly, and that will constitute the basis for the de-alienation of society. Such a strategy will certainly follow people’s needs in the most efficient way, and therefore it will significantly develop society.

Today, leaders of countries allocate most of the tax money for armies. When people start deciding on the allocation of tax money, the armies will no longer exist and waging wars would be impossible. Once people get the power to directly decide in society, they will be so pleased that they would not let authorities take it away from them anymore.

 

Democratic anarchy

 

The new system also provides a highly efficient method of bearing the responsibility of all people for their deeds. One part of the responsibilities will be based on democratic anarchy. It is a system in which each person gets an equal right to evaluate any other person. A positive evaluation should bring a reward of let’s say one dollar to the assessed person, and a negative rating will carry a fine of let’s say one dollar. Let each person receive the right to allocate three positive and three negative evaluations to other people monthly. In such a simple way, each person will get real power in society and therefore will be respected. This measure will direct people to produce the highest possible conveniences to other people and to diminish or abolish the creation of disadvantages.

 

The system of democratic anarchy will especially affect authorities. The higher the position of power in society, the greater the responsibility they would have to bear to society. For example, the President of the United States can get 100 million bad evaluations from U.S. citizens for bad politics, lies, and criminal aggression against other countries. This will cost him 100 million U.S. dollars in a single month. Non-privileged presidents would not dare perform bad policies anymore. And if it happens somehow, they would run away from their positions very fast. Only the most skilful and brave individuals would dare lead countries. They will not be authorities anymore, but our servants. I wrote more about it in the article: The Future of Democracy.

 

Disalienation of economy

 

Equal human rights mean every person must have the right to work. Unemployment will be eliminated by shortening working hours proportionally to the rate of unemployment. This would increase the demand for workers on the free market so that employers would have to pay them more. It will remove the exploitation of workers. I wrote more about this in the article: Let’s remove unemployment.

 

The system I have proposed offers more market than capitalism can afford. The market for public work posts will be primarily developed. Which means it will open competition of workers for every public job post, including work posts of politicians and the president of the corporations. A worker who offers a higher profit, more goods produced, better, cleaner and cheaper production at any time for any job in public companies, will get the job. I have developed a system that will efficiently valorize the productivity of job offers, harmonize work remuneration and define worker’s labour responsibilities. The new division of work is elaborated in detail in my book Humanism. For more on this, please read my article The Future of the Economy.

 

No economy can be more productive than the one where the best available worker gets each job. Such an economy will easily become significantly more productive than the capitalist one so that capitalism will be forced to go down in history together with the vast alienation it has built. Private companies will join the public companies, and the owners will be adequately compensated. In such a society, authorities would not be able to expand the alienation of society from its very nature.

 

Disalienation of Education

 

The only thing that is hard for a man to learn is to respect people. This most critical social need simply disappears quickly and easily in any society without matter what kind of education is established. The system of democratic anarchy that I have proposed gives equal power to every man in the community. That power is based on the same right of every person to evaluate any other person. Any positive evaluation would bring a small prize to an evaluated person, and any negative assessment would carry a small penalty. Such a simple measure will make people respect each other. It will build a sound and sane society regardless of the education system.

 

People specialize in their knowledge. To acquire specialized knowledge schools are necessary as a means of educating people. In the future, schools will no longer be a place where the authorities bureaucratically determine the curriculum of the learning program, but the learning program will be formed by the interests of students. Schools will no longer be institutions that guarantee the knowledge of students as it is accepted today, but the places where education is accessible. I have proposed a system that will require a great responsibility of workers at their workplaces, far more significant than is the case today. In this system, workers will not dare to compete for jobs they do not have enough knowledge for.

 

Everything else that a man should learn in his life is a product of his interest. When a person has the interest to acquire some knowledge he has no difficulty to do that if the knowledge is accessible. Students will be able to attend whichever classes they want whenever they need in life. I wrote more about this in the article: My clash with sciences.

 

Disalienation of families

 

In the animal world, parents teach young animals the basics of needed knowledge. Human society has moved in a very wrong direction because schools have taken rights to teach children the required knowledge. It is wrong firstly because the school curriculum is alienated from the needs of children. And it is even more wrong because directing children through life should be the task of parents, not schools. Parental love, which manifests itself also through the education of children, is one of the primary conditions of the prosperity of the children and society as a whole.

 

For parents to be able to teach children the basics of required knowledge, in the first place, it is necessary that parents have free time that they can dedicate to children. Today parents work all day and practically do not see the kids during the day. From this derives a large number of problems. Shortly after the acceptance of the system that I have proposed, working hours would most likely be significantly shorter so that parents would have far more time to devote to their children.

 

Another condition of establishing a proper education in society is that parents carry love towards their children. In today’s alienated society, love is rare because the alienated society develops narcissism; an inferior and often somewhat perverted form of love. The lack of love is unusual in the animal world, but in human society it is a prevalent phenomenon because of the enormous alienation in which people live. The lack of love is damage to the development of people and human culture. That is the reason the society in which we live in is terrible. The new system I have proposed will teach people to love, and that will fundamentally change the community in which we live. I wrote more about it in the article Do you love?

 

The disalienation of society

 

The disalienation of society will be realized when all people get equal rights. It will be achieved when all people get equal rights to work at any workplace, when all people get equal legislative, judicial and executive powers in the society through the equal right of evaluation, and when all people get the same right to participate in making decisions of common interest. All these rights are entirely opposite to the rights authorities have established to rule society, and therefore cannot be quickly adopted. But there is no other good way. When people accept equal rights, society will get rid of alienation, and then, this world will be improved beyond the wildest dreams today.

 

July 25, 2010

Everlasting life

Everlasting life?

According to John (14:6), Jesus Christ said: “I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.” This is probably a free interpretation of Jesus’ words that should probably read that his way, but not him, is the only way to God, the Father. The formal difference between these two claims is insignificant, but mostly it is tremendous. I think it is wrong to expect that only followers of Jesus Christ can reach God. What would happen in that case with either the followers of other religions or those who have never heard of Jesus Christ? Do they, therefore, have no access to God? No matter how God loves His Son Jesus Christ, it would be unfair, and God is just.


The path of love that Jesus Christ preached was well known before him. Jesus Christ had realized the importance of love because he lived in a very destructive time. According to the Bible, his greatest achievement was the sacrifice of his life to cleanse humanity of sin. With this, he demonstrated his love for people and the importance that love should have in people’s lives. But that sacrifice is not enough to prove his divine origin. In human history, many people have sacrificed their lives in the name of ideas they believed in.


Giordano Bruno, for example, was burned at the stake because he could not oppose his view of the universe. Jesus Christ, during his lifetime, did not show such a power that would clearly present that he is Son of God even though he made significant achievements. His sacrifice drew attention to his teaching. His teachings formed the Christian religion with which he had directed his followers, the Christians, to good. He became the most influential person of all time. Any man who under the influence of Jesus Christ accepted love together has accepted the way to God, the Father.


But how did Jesus Christ become the only way to God? It suited devoted believers well that Jesus Christ is the only way to God because such an attitude released them from fear of uncertainty and that relieves their lives significantly. Jesus Christ, being the only way to God, also suited great manipulators as well. They follow the teachings of Jesus Christ and then interpret his words as it suits them. It often happens that fraudsters, criminals, and murderers call upon Jesus Christ to present their criminal path as the proper, and become the most influential people in society. President George W. Bush is one of those people. Jesus Christ will never bless aggression; so all the people who are aggressive cannot be followers of Jesus Christ.


Love is the only right way, but under the influence of authorities not many people are able to recognize love. If you dear readers think that you know what love is, I have created a test that will answer whether you’re right. The test is in my article Do you Love?


Today, people often confuse love and narcissism, and it is very wrong. Love is good, and narcissism is bad. If you spend a lot of time admiring your beauty, power or wealth, then you are narcissistic. Such admiration brings you pleasure, but together with it, you book in your future at least the same amount of time spent in pain and suffering. It is a natural law that derives from the narcissistic character of people. Why is this so? A narcissistic man interprets all the success in his life as a form of overcoming his powerlessness in nature. Then he realizes the great fortune, but overcoming his helplessness in nature is mostly an illusion. The illusion of overcoming impotence in life sooner or later clashes with reality and then inevitably brings the pain. When a person admires himself, he is falling into a trap that leads to disaster.


People do not see it because they would otherwise have chosen a different path. The most successful people today usually suffer the most. They take medication and abuse alcohol to reduce the pain that haunts them. Pain makes them very destructive to themselves and to their environment. Then life turns into hell. This is precisely the situation we have today in society. With such an experience no one can get to God the Father.


A man who learns to love possesses a successful vaccine against narcissism and cannot fall into its fatal trap. If society as a whole learns how to love, it would no longer have problems. That is why Jesus Christ taught people to love. In the name of spreading love, He has invited people to do good, to avoid sin and to pray to God. At the time when Jesus Christ lived on Earth, building love was a matter of conscience. It was the only possible way of spreading the love. If people were conscious, they would be able to develop love by following Jesus, but humankind has shown that the conscience is not successful enough in creating love. That is why Jesus Christ was as successful as it was possible in the given circumstances.


***

Love can be built unconditionally. I have come to the conclusion that love can be developed only by equal rights among people. Equal human rights are an essential condition for the creation of love.

 

I have created the most significant improvement of society in the history of mankind by using the system of evaluation among the people. Each person will have an equal right to evaluate the activity of any other person. Each positive assessment will automatically bring a small prize to the positively assessed man, and every negative evaluation will result in a little punishment. Democratic anarchy will direct each member of society to create the highest possible advantages for the community and to diminish or abolish the creation of all forms of disadvantages. Technically, this is very much like love because love is based on indiscriminate concern for others and giving.

 

The system of evaluation that I have proposed has conceptual similarities with the Bible. The Bible has offered a solution that could form a good society through the golden rule: “Do onto others as you would have them do onto you!” But this sentence called upon the conscience of the people because at that time it could not count on anything else, and so the golden rule was quite helpless. So far people have not learned how to efficiently implement the golden rule. I’ve found it! The system of evaluation among the people will fully comply with the requirement of the golden rules. It will remove evil and build a paradise on earth.

 

With the establishment of equal rights, people will get equal power in society, and that will create equal respect among people. People will no longer feel superior to others and will not be afraid of other people. The system of evaluation will teach people that no matter what kind of success they achieve in their lives they cannot forget that they are equal members of society. It will liberate people from narcissism and enable the development of love. The productive orientation of people that the system of evaluation offers through freedom and equality will by the time, create unconditional love among people. With the help of technology, I have created a far more efficient way to introduce and spread love, than Jesus Christ could have accomplished.

 

When people accept my system, they would unconditionally establish heaven on earth where evil will be deleted entirely. You can briefly learn what it is about in my article Humanism extensively. All people will be able to love, and as such, they will all probably go to God the Father in another world, where they will achieve everlasting life.

 

Even though my work gives hope for a better future of mankind, I have not managed to motivate interest from people so far in it. To attract attention to my work I even asked: Am I Jesus Christ?, and even that did not bring success. Why is that? People are forced to accept the knowledge from parents, teachers, bosses, priests so that they did not learn how to recognize the truth on their own. Uncritically accepted knowledge is a set of information which cannot contribute to understanding. That is why people cannot understand my work.

 

Authorities do not like my work because it takes away their privileged power. That is the reason the bright future of humankind is stopped. To make any progress in society possible, people must be free from the yoke of authorities. Authorities should not be unconditionally followed, but they should be checked and respected if they deserve it. This also applies to me. I do not ask for anything else.

 

My theory is straightforward and relatively easy to check. One day the system I have proposed will be examined because there is no other good way. If the check-up of my work proves that I am right, does that mean that I am Jesus Christ? If I’m not Jesus Christ and my philosophy makes heaven on earth, then is the Christian religion pointless?

 

***

The survival of the Christian faith depends on whether Jesus Christ is resurrected three days after his death. His resurrection would confirm everlasting life, which is one of the fundamental postulates of the Christian religion. According to the Bible, all people who believe in Jesus Christ are assigned for everlasting life.

 

The Internet site Beyond Today in the article What happens after death?, unconditionally confirms this hypothesis. They believe that after the return of Jesus Christ, God would create an entirely new material world in which people will achieve everlasting life. They cited a question from sceptical people who think that our lives are too painful and difficult enough so that why would anyone want to live forever? They answer to such people that God will make everlasting life better and more beautiful than our wildest hopes are. We can believe it or not, but it will not help us find the truth.

 

In nature, the matter constantly moves and passes from one state to another. Nothing is indestructible in the material world, neither diamonds, nor stars, and so man cannot be indestructible either. God should completely stop the motion of matter to give eternity to matter. This means he would have to stop atoms and the whole universe. I would easily say that this is impossible if the Bible does not state that God is omnipotent. But if he did it somehow, that would stop light so that such a world would not be visible. The stopped motion would stop breathing. This means that the everlasting material life would cease the life that God had created. I do not believe that God will go that way. I’d say that for this reason, most Christians believe that everlasting life rests in the spiritual world.

 

Even though I applied for the position of Jesus Christ, unfortunately, I cannot say anything about another world, because I was not there, or I do not remember that I was there. This is undoubtedly a severe blow to any chance that I might be Jesus Christ. Or maybe it is not?

A profound website 2001 Translation Bible that again translates the original Bible written in the Greek language, claims in the article: Does the Bible promise everlasting life? they answer “the fact is; it doesn’t… at least, not in those exact words. Why not? Because the Greek word that other Bible translators render as “everlasting” (aionos) doesn’t mean that. It’s what we get the English word “eon” from, and it means a long time.” Due to the different meanings of related words in different languages, the translators of the Bible often freely interpreted the verses. Later in the article, they questioned: “Then, what will happen to the faithful?” The article offers this answer: “The Bible simply doesn’t tell us, but we can be confident that Jesus will never destroy those he loves.”

 

***

The differences in understanding the Bible are considerable so that it is possible to accept very different interpretations that affect the very basis of the religion. What is most apparent, God created a man giving him an optimal life. Neither shorter nor longer lives are desirable because God knows the best what an optimal life for people is. If people would like to have good lives, they must respect the laws of nature that God created.

 

I am confident that God intended equal rights to men in society and that is what was never formed. That is the reason the history of humanity was so sad and destructive. People who are forced to follow the authorities because the authorities have power or people who follow the authorities because they are afraid of making an independent step are on the wrong track. Such people readily accept alienated values from God, such as money, power, or fame. Such needs are alienated from the nature of people and therefore cannot be satisfied. People who accept such values cannot be satisfied with their lives. From that emerges the widespread poverty of life regardless of what these people have achieved in their lives. They live unnatural, unfulfilled lives, and that is the reason they fear death.

 

People need to adequately meet the nature of their lives that God has given them. They need to accept a productive way of living and love that the Bible talks about, and even more my web site www.sarovic.com. People who live natural lives generally easily satisfy their needs, and at the time of their late life, they do not need anything anymore. Their soul is calm, and then they become free people in the broadest sense. The lives they lived are enough rewards to them. Such people are not afraid of death because they know they have not missed anything in their life.

If everlasting life occurs after this, and if that life would be better than our wildest dreams as Christian authorities claim, then such a life would be welcomed. In this world, salvation brings each man to himself by his own productive way of living. Who makes good, good will return to him and vice versa.

 

August 24, 2010

 

Continues on: What God Wants?