Category: English

Do you love

Do you love?

 

Equal Human Rights will Make People Love Unconditionally

 

Erich Fromm wrote a scientific book about love, “The Art of Loving.” He defined love as the rational orientation of people based on freedom and mutual respect. His contribution to understanding love is significant, which made his book very popular. However, Erich Fromm’s attempt to teach people love failed to spread love worldwide because he based love on people’s consciousness. The problem is that people’s conscience is a category with no power to establish freedom, rationality and mutual respect, and nothing else exists. As a result, people have not discovered how to love unconditionally. This paper intends to present that love directly depends on equal human rights. Equal human rights will give people the power to demystify indulging values of the outer world and to accept the inner world where all love of people is located. This paper teaches people to find love in themselves and develop it unconditionally.

 

***

 

People have the ability to love by their nature. Love is the most significant achievement people have and may develop in their life. Love is a state of mind based on caring for others, bringing the joy of living. Love is the condition of the soul that enriches the person who loves and the whole world. People who love carry a feeling of inner peace, stability, lightness and joy; that is how loving people can be identified. In a natural society, love exists on its own and develops spontaneously.

 

People decline love when they alienate themselves from their inherited ability to love. It starts by comparing themselves with other people. Instead of searching for the causes of a good life in themselves, people find the superficial explanation of life benefits, comparing their life with the lives of others. Then they quickly come to the subjective conclusion that power over people brings satisfaction and a good life. This conclusion is false. The need for dominance generates conflict among people causing social problems. Power over people has nothing to do with a good life and even less with love. People cannot fight with others and love them at the same time. Conflict among people alienates them from the chance to accomplish a good life. This article will present that the escape from all social problems lies in equal human rights. It is also a condition for maintaining and developing love. The purpose of this article is to explain it.

 

 

Narcissism 

 

The lack of equal human rights creates narcissism. Narcissism is a subjective state of mind primarily developed by the privileged statuses of people, which gives people an impression of superiority. One can generalize that the more privileged people are, the more narcissistic they are. For example, spoiled children, excellent students, and influential people are generally more privileged, which likely means more narcissistic. But narcissism can also grow in the subjective minds of everyone as a reaction to an inferior position in society, which is nothing but the lack of equal human rights.

 

The differences among narcissistic people are often only in nuances because every person can build an illusion of power or privileges in a world of their thoughts. Practically all people possess some narcissistic character traits because our alienated culture teaches people to be narcissistic. The less narcissistic people are, the healthier they are for themselves and society. The more narcissistic people are, the less they love.

 

Some people call narcissism self-love because successful narcissistic people may look lovely and charming. They adore their images, character, deeds and success in society. They enjoy their abilities, their thoughts, their beauty, their characteristics, their family, their nation, and everything that is connected with them.

 

Does narcissism contain love in itself? Rather not, but the problem is, in fact, semantic. If one can say, “I love chocolate,” where the term “love” actually means “enjoy,” then one can stretch the meaning of love to narcissism but in a very inferior form. Narcissism and love are separate categories, as their names suggest. People possess both characteristics; however, people who love more are less narcissistic and vice versa. In the following pages, people with more developed narcissistic characteristics are called narcissistic people; even though they can love, their abilities to love are less developed.

 

Narcissistic people are very ambitious. They want to climb the social scale by becoming an authority; their goal in life is success either by achieving power, earning money, winning a contest, or whatever they find appealing. They prefer to compete and, even more so, to win! The ego of the narcissist is very passionate, giving them enormous energy, which provides excellent opportunities to win but less chance to love. People who love base their mutual relations less on competition and more on cooperation.

 

Narcissistic people are subjective and tend to give their successes greater importance than they deserve. The narcissistic culture has raised superficial forms of value such as power, wealth, fame, beauty, strength, speed, etc. These values have become the most valuable goals in today’s society. They are objectively not so beneficial to people, but the alienated society has put them on a pedestal. Alienated values cannot bring genuine advantages to individuals. On the contrary, those values usually bring the opposite. These values damage the long-term possibility of creating social prosperity.

 

If narcissistic people are successful, as famous singers, actors or politicians might be, they are delighted, and their ego shines. This is mainly because such happiness finds the illusion of overcoming their powerlessness in nature, and therefore, the narcissistic pleasure may be pretty intense. As such, it can easily deceive people into thinking they are on the right track. Narcissistic happiness is primarily based on illusions because narcissism alienates people from objective reality.

 

The problem is, by developing their narcissistic character, narcissistic people value themselves significantly more than others. As a result, such people lose respect towards others, reducing the chance to reach the natural advantages in relationships with others and diminishing the opportunity to love.

 

Since narcissistic people overestimate themselves, they can easily confront objective reality. They hardly tolerate competition that may threaten their vision. Sooner or later, life shows narcissistic people they are not as strong, bright, or beautiful as they would like, bringing them stress and frustration. Any happiness people exercise undeservedly through illusions comes back as a painful payment. Narcissistic people often try to escape their tension by indulging in the abuse of substances; thus, they can be recognized.

 

Dissatisfied narcissistic people may quickly clash with other people. It can be said that virtually all conflicts in society are based on the damaged narcissistic character of people. By their subjective vision, narcissistic people can identify threats to their alienated needs as threats to their existence. It induces the fight for the survival of their illusions. The more narcissistic vision is threatened, the more they hate and the more brutal conflict they produce. All the cruelty of this world comes from endangered narcissism. An injured narcissism causes a destructive orientation in narcissistic people. Such people can fall into depression, which can develop into the need for self-destruction that can be extended to the need to destroy the world.

 

Genuine people have reasonable expectations, which they may fulfill, reaching stability. If the world does not match the needs of genuine people, they do not hate; they feel saddened. Sadness is a much healthier emotion, and unlike hatred, it allows people to find a way out of an unsatisfactory situation. Love always benefits those who love, while narcissism can hardly achieve that. Narcissism will rather induce evil in narcissistic people spreading it to the world around them. Narcissistic people produce trouble in their surroundings. People must eliminate narcissism to achieve a prosperous future for humankind. This will be possible by implementing equal human rights.

 

Love of authorities

 

Genuine authorities impact society through their positive example and help others when asked for it. They never impose their knowledge or values on others. Unfortunately, such authorities are rare today.

 

In alienated societies, authorities have built privileged power over people by forcing people to accept their subjective knowledge. Such authorities are inadequate because they cannot improve the community. Throughout the history of humankind, inadequate authorities have created a vast amount of false knowledge that society has adopted. Such knowledge is alienated from objective reality and therefore prevents society from natural development.

 

Authorities and people may build a stable mutual relationship, which might look like love. Authorities need obedient people to establish their power. Obedient people need authorities because it is more convenient for them to depend on the authorities than to be left alone in a frightening world. But the relationship between authority and followers is only an illusion of love. If we extend the meaning of love, such love is at least undeveloped. It should be rather labelled as a perverted concept of love.

 

A relationship based on the servility of obedient people and the control of authority always presents some degree of a sadomasochistic relationship, which is unproductive. A sadist is a person who finds pleasure in dominating people, which can be developed into extreme brutality. On the other hand, a masochist finds pleasure in submission to authorities until complete obedience. Sadomasochism should be considered a very unhealthy relationship. More about it may be found in my article Equal Human Rights will Eliminate Sadomasochism.

 

Today’s society is not enough aware that all the evil in the world origins in a lack of equal human rights. Authorities build privileges and exploit people through the unfair distribution of social wealth. Unsatisfied followers of authorities are potential time bombs that wait for a reason to release their stress anywhere in real life.

 

In a society without equal human rights, narcissistic authorities deceive obedient people and, on the way to achieving greater power, use them to subdue other people or nations. Obedient people, dissatisfied with the life authorities cause, accept leaders’ demands uncritically, becoming blind henchmen. That easily creates some form of group narcissism which only may look like love, while building militant foundations for conflicts and wars. A humble masochist, under authority’s guidance, may become a heartless weapon in the leaders’ hands. Militant people do not love. People who love do not support wars. This article claims that the escape lies in equal human rights, which will eliminate social problems, including sadomasochism.

 

 

Falling in love

 

Probably the first association that people have with the word love is falling in love. Falling in love is the most famous expression of love today and perhaps the most described and sung term of all time. People often mystify falling in love with magical romantic feelings that rise under no control. I would say that the main characteristic of people who fall in love is fear and hope. Juvenile uncertainty and optimism toward life bring a high possibility of falling in love.

 

Young people usually think they need to find an appropriate person to fall in love with, and magically romantic love will happen. First, I would like to emphasize that there is nothing magic in falling in love. It is entirely commercial behaviour that gives an illusion of a magical performance. People know how much their attractiveness is worth in the alienated value market because everyday life teaches them that. An appropriate person for love is a product of in-depth preparation and random events. There is almost nothing wrong with it because a person should choose a partner who suits them more. Rational behaviour in the choosing of partners is more than welcome. But the people who quickly fall in love are pretty subjective, which means they are not reasonable enough. They are quite foolish in selecting partners.

 

When an appropriate person for falling in love appears in the sight of a subjective person, high energy of happiness is released that attracts. Suppose it finds an appropriate response from the other side. In that case, a miracle of “love” appears, which indulges the release of all the brakes, and all the doubts about the acceptability of the partner disappear. The person then feels “the chemistry,” and the world becomes beautiful. This miraculous phenomenon described in countless songs is just a sweet illusion resulting from the liberation of considerable insecurity. There is almost no love there. People who are confident in themselves can hardly fall in love, but they are capable of loving.

 

Falling in love brings such great happiness that it can be compared to escaping death. People fall in love because they feel dead in authoritarian societies that take freedom from them. In the act of falling in love, people release themselves from the pressure authorities have imposed on them throughout their lives. Falling in love compensates for all the powerlessness people have felt in society and builds an illusion of power. It brings euphoria, and people wrongfully assign it to the “loved” person. This is why falling in love is an illusion.

 

Falling in love is very superficial, and a person who falls in love often quickly satiates with the loved one. If the emotions towards the loved person end, they are never loved because love lasts. Love develops practically the whole life. Love is an active learning in practice that brings pleasure. The person who loves does not stop getting to know their partner. By learning more about their partner, a person learns how to improve their partner’s life. That brings the joy of love.

 

Many people can’t wait to fall in love. If they knew better, they would avoid the state of being in love. Falling in love is sweet, but it harms the people who fall in love because the happiness that uncontrollably rises challenges people’s capability to see objectively the situation in which they are. People alienated from their productive orientation can hardly love. Love is a consequence of the productive orientation of people based on equal human rights. Productive people have difficulty falling in love, but they can love. Love is stable and grows with time. Once people accept equal human rights, they will build productive relationships in society, teaching people how to love, and they will love.

 

 

Love of children

 

Love is a natural phenomenon that develops from childhood. Loving parents take care of their children, showing them what love is. Unfortunately, today’s society has become alienated from its nature and does not know love enough to be able to pass it on to children. An authoritarian society, by alienated demands, suppresses the ability of parents to love their children. In capitalism, parents don’t have time to give their children the love they need because they must work to survive. Capitalism seems interested in disintegrating families to get more dependent workers and consumers. It is a political problem that should be solved by reducing working hours.

 

Furthermore, in an alienated society, parents are often occupied with their ambitions, so they do not have enough time for their children. They usually hide their ambitions behind their sacrifices for the family’s welfare, overestimating the value of their ambitions and underestimating their children’s lives. Children who do not receive enough love are emotionally handicapped and less able to love. Such children can easily become long-term problems for themselves, their parents and society. Children can discover how to love later in life, but in an alienated society, this rarely happens.

 

Instead of love, parents often pressure their children to submit to their will in the name of “higher interests.” Alienated parents cannot see the needs of their children objectively. Parental pressure alienates children from their nature, reducing their chances to live well. Children who oppose adults can easily be right because they are closer to their nature. Therefore, the resistance of children should be respected, which is nothing more than the promotion of equal human rights. Once accepted by society, equal human rights will teach parents to discover love and give it to their children. Only then can a bright future for humanity begin.

 

Love needs equal human rights

 

People need the freedom to liberate themselves from the influences of alienation authorities have imposed throughout history. Free people will discover through practice the genuine way of living. This is the so-called process of disalienation. It will be achieved by recognizing that a good society must be based on equal human rights.

 

But just a moment, haven’t people today already had equal rights after the development and acceptance of equal human, civil, legal, constitutional, and other human rights all over the world? Of course, they have not! It is only formal equality and propaganda by immoral authorities. The presidents of countries may send people to war, and people cannot do it to them. Bosses may abuse or fire workers, and workers cannot do it to them. Teachers may force students to accept knowledge, and students cannot do it to them. Where are the equal rights there? People probably think it is entirely normal because they have always lived in such a society, but this is not normal!

 

***

 

Equal human rights will solve social problems by developing democracy. It will be achieved by giving people equal legislative, judiciary and executive powers in society. Everyone should get equal rights to evaluate others for whatever they do. Each positive evaluation should bring a small award to the assessed person, and each negative evaluation should result in a small punishment. Such a policy would make everyone work hard to please others and avoid hurting anybody. This will significantly contribute to creating a good society. The equal evaluating power among people presents a new form of democracy, and the freedom of evaluation presents a new form of anarchy. Therefore, such a policy can be called democratic anarchy. Democratic anarchy alone should be capable of building a much better society than we have today.

 

Let the evaluations have an equivalent value of one dollar. Each reward a person receives from somebody will bring them one dollar, and each penalty will take away from them one dollar. In that manner, all people will become equal authorities with little direct power in society. It is essential to emphasize that the number of assessments will be limited so that people will evaluate only the best and worse individuals. However, democratic anarchy will still have enough power to direct each member of society to respect other people. As a result, people will become valuable to others, creating significant advantages for the community and diminishing or abolishing disadvantages.

 

Here is one example: the US President might get 100,000,000 bad evaluations from the American people for bad policies, lies, and criminal aggression on countries. This would cost him 100,000,000 dollars in only one month. Presidents who fail to meet people’s needs will quickly resign from their positions. Only the most skilful and brave individuals would dare lead countries. They will not be authorities anymore but sincere servants of the people.

 

Technically, democratic anarchy will create similar phenomena as love among people because it will bring caring for others as love does. But it will still not be love. Once the implementation of democratic anarchy starts, most people will probably not feel satisfaction in giving, which is the basis of love. Initially, the pleasure may come from the egotistic need to receive good evaluations from people and avoid bad ones. However, it will be beneficial because people will create advantages and avoid disadvantages for all of society.

 

Democratic anarchy will remove social privileges. It must be stressed that the privileged status of individuals causes enormous problems for society. Democratic anarchy will teach people that no matter what their successes are, they must not forget that they are equal community members. This will liberate people from narcissism and enable the development of love. Democratic anarchy is presented in more detail in my article Democratic Anarchy is the Future of Democracy.

 

***

 

Equal human rights need to be introduced in production processes as well, which will significantly improve the economy. First, society needs to introduce full employment of workers through shorter work hours. Then people need to accept a permanent open competition of workers for every public work post at any time. Every public job post will be filled by the worker who offers higher productivity, more responsibility, and demands a lower wage. It is nothing but a developed work market open at all times. Such a division of labour sounds impossible to achieve mainly because it never existed, but the realization is just a technical problem.

 

Of course, such an economy cannot be established soon because it will require a lot of development before people embrace it. But once people establish it, the burdens and benefits of a living will be justly distributed among the people, forming a just society. In addition, no economy can be more productive than the one where each job gets the best available worker. Private companies will lose the productivity battle with public companies, sending capitalism down in history. This economy presents an enormous socio-economic improvement opportunity to build good socialism. The new division of labour is explained in detail in my article Developed Marked of Work will Create Socialism.

 

The new socialism will teach workers to become satisfied with their lives. It will be accomplished by calling each worker very responsible for the productivity they offer to get the jobs they want. It will teach workers to set their needs following their abilities to satisfy them. This is the chief prerequisite for overcoming destructiveness in society because workers who consistently meet their needs are satisfied and not destructive. Then society will develop a new culture that will create a productive orientation of people.  

 

Democratic anarchy and open competition among workers will completely eliminate social privileges, the nest of all societal problems. Nobody will be socially privileged in any way anymore. The elite will disappear together with the vast alienation they built. Removing privileges will eliminate the central nest of narcissism and sadomasochism in the community. Then, no improper authorities and obedient people will be able to exist. Eliminating privileges by establishing equal human rights is crucial for the development of society. Then a promising future for humankind may begin. 

 

An open market of work will increase competition among people. I’ve already mentioned that competitions destroy love. Does this mean that my proposal is against love? No way! Competitions cannot be removed in any other way than by people’s understanding through their own experience that competitions are unnecessary and inappropriate for achieving a decent life. Freedom of experience is the only way to find the truth.

 

The idea assumes that open competition for all workplaces will allow everyone to try them, demystifying the importance of jobs and balancing the interests in all of them. Also, open competition in all workplaces will be exhausting, diminishing the competitive interest of workers. As a result, people will give up on the competition, give up on the need to compare themselves with other people, and instead find value in themselves. Then they will readily accept equality among people, enabling them to find genuine values in their lives.

 

There is a vibrant inner world in people where all the love, hate, joy and misery of humanity are located. In a just society, where people understand that they are equal to all others no matter what accomplishments they achieve, exploiting the outer world will barely be able to bring noticeable benefits to people. Then, people will start searching for values in their inner world. When such orientation is accepted, hate and misery will be eliminated because they do not exist in the inner world of individuals who are relieved from the need to compare themselves with others. In contrast, love and joy will significantly develop because nothing else exists in the inner world of individuals who are relieved from the need to compare themselves with others.

 

The most critical point of an individual’s creation is themselves. Searching the inner world will let people know themselves and develop themselves as productive beings. The more people get to know themselves, the more freedom, peace, joy, wisdom, and love they can achieve.

 

Equality is a sufficient condition for the formation of a good society and the creation of love. Equality is also the only solution to all of the societal problems today and fundamental for the unconditional establishment of love. Love is a product of the equal rights of people.

 

When people accept equal human rights, they will rely on their power to satisfy their needs while respecting others. That would establish the conscience of productive people. Then under-developed people would no longer exist. Then no one would admire a president, singer or football player more than any other person; not one idol would exist anymore. Then neither powerful nor powerless people would exist, and improper authorities and humble followers would not exist. Then narcissism, sadism and masochism would no longer exist. This will overcome the enormous alienation we live in today and allow the building of love beyond the wildest dreams today, creating a bright future for humankind.

 

 

Conclusion

 

So far, scientists and philosophers have found conscience as the only tool for solving numerous social problems, reaching a good society and creating love among people. However, it never worked because consciences is not a category capable of accomplishing such goals. Calling for conscience may affect some people but never all. One unconscious person may reverse a conscious effort of society. Power to the people, not consciousness, will change the world and make it a flourishing place.

 

Equal human rights will free people from the power of authorities. People released from the pressure of authorities will demystify the alienated values imposed on them throughout history and discover natural ways of living. It will enlighten people, lowering their interest in comparing themselves with others, making them productive and finding the values in their inner world full of love. Then society will start spreading love in its best and most beautiful form. Love is the final result of the new socialism based on equal human rights. Once people start loving each other, they will create an entirely new world beyond the wildest dreams of the alienated society of today.

 

Developed people do not depend on anybody because they can achieve what they need on their own; they love other people unconditionally just because they are. They find great joy in building themselves as productive people and find even greater joy in love.

 

 

Writen     22.06.2009

Updated  12.11.2022

Alienation

Alienation

Man naturally seeks more power to overcome his weakness in nature and achieve greater conveniences. Higher power is obtained by greater knowledge. But, gaining knowledge is neither easy nor a quick process. On the way to make greater conveniences, a man often gives subjective determinations to unknown phenomena in nature that suit him well. If such determinations do not come into direct conflict with nature, a man readily accepts them as real and realizes conveniences from it the same way as he really overcomes his powerless in nature. In this manner, an alienated knowledge from objective reality is created. This is the basis of my theory of alienation.


Authorities often deliberately create an alienated knowledge to achieve supremacy in society. Dominion is one of the highest forms of alienation because, in the subjective consciousness of man, power gives an impression of superiority in nature. Once the man thinks he has more potential than he objectively deserves, he realizes the illusion of great conveniences.


To establish power over people, the authorities create ideologies in which they define values in society and rules of joint action. Ideologies can have their justification when the created rules prevent chaos in society. That is how all religions and all political systems have been created. The negative side of ideologies stems from the fact that they always support the interests of its creators and provide them with power in society. Thus they alienate the creators of ideologies and people of their own nature. The alienation of society from its own nature cannot bring a good result to society. In fact, the all evil of this world comes from the alienation of society from its nature.


Good results can come from the equal rights of people only. Equal rights among people will form objective values in society. It will remove the alienation and establish a good society. I have developed an ideology based on equal human rights, but the authorities prevent the formation of equal human rights because they, by definition, take the power of the authorities. Equal rights among people have been oppressed through the whole history of mankind, and that is the only reason a good society has never been established.  


Instead, we have continuous struggles between authorities who are striving to establish power in society. On this planet Earth, there was never enough space for all the people who wanted control over others. That is the reason why envy, hatred, conflicts and wars appear among the alienated people in which the entire nations suffer.


The Rothschild family


The Rothschild banking family has recognized long ago that direct power over people may be very inconvenient and came to the conclusion that it could be much more efficient, lasting, and safer to rule by using the money. The banking family Rothschild has developed the ideology of capitalism. Mayer Amschel Rothschild had allegedly said in 1790: “Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation and I care not who makes the laws.” The Rothschild family makes strategic decisions for society by using the money they have earned by banking and other businesses throughout the generations. They do not bare responsibilities to society for doing that. That is the primary source of alienation in the western world today.


The Rothschilds continued this tradition by imposing alienated rules to social life and by preventing the natural way of living that could disalienate the world in which we live. Alienation is mostly built up through the political system, through a system of education and through propaganda by the media. The Rothschild family has control over all of these systems by the people they help, finance or employ.


In the article Has Antichrist come? I wrote about the conspiracy the Rothschild family raised against the whole world. Here I enclose the YouTube video Zeitgeist – The Movie: Federal Reserve, which also presents the basis of the conspiracy theory quite convincingly. The Rothschild family has secretly succeeded in mastering the western world more than any emperor in the history of mankind. That means the power that should belong to the people today is alienated from the people regardless of what form of democracy is established.


The Rothschild family started financing kings in the 18th century, and in this way, entire kingdoms owed money to them. There is no better job than lending money to the states because then all the citizens pay the debt back through the state taxes with an interest of course. During the Napoleonic wars, Rothschild allegedly manipulated the stock market in England and took the wealth of the people for a bargain. They also managed to establish control over The Bank of England. At that time, the Rothschilds were convincingly the wealthiest people in the world. Today they are nowhere on the list of millionaires. How is this possible? Simply, they hide their wealth and power.


The Rothschild family is probably the first family that organized its operations all over the world. They could not take care of all the businesses themselves, so they employed expert agents to lead their companies. These agents receive a share in the ownership of companies and become their partners. The Rothschild family probably hired the Rockefeller and Morgan families in the nineteenth century in the United States. If the owners of the world’s largest corporations such as Rockefeller, Morgan, and Warburg were independent of the Rothschild family, then they would, according to the competitive nature of entrepreneurs in capitalism, fight with each other but they do not.


They are one body, and the head is most certainly the Rothschild family because they conquered the business world a century before their partners appeared in it. Through the 18th, 19th and 20th century, the Rothschild family has created an entire hierarchical structure of partners, and they do it today as well. Some call this structure Masons and its hierarchical top Illuminati. During nearly three centuries the Rothschild family and their partners could have bought half of the world, while nobody can know it.


In 1913, the Rothschilds gained control of the American Federal Reserve Bank with the help of corrupt politicians. This is the central bank in the U.S., and it is privately owned. The bank lends money to the U.S. government and the U.S. people return it with interest through taxes. But not only that, the U.S. spends more money than the Rothschilds, and their partners have at their disposal, so that the American Federal Reserve Bank prints money out of thin air, lends it to the U.S. Government, and then collects it back with interest. This is a masterpiece of deception which has been operating since 1913.


The Rothschilds have imposed a restrictive monetary policy to practically the entire western world. This policy prevents the governments to issue money to cover their own budget deficit. The justification was found in the fact that printing money creates inflation in which money loses value and money has fundamental importance in the capitalist world. States which perform a restrictive monetary policy must cover a budget deficit with money borrowed from banks and in that way the Rothschilds again collect profits.


Countries mostly borrow money from the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. These are supranational institutions in which the American Federal Reserve Bank has a significant role, influence and interest. That’s how the Rothschilds impose their will over the International Monetary Fund and World Bank. Taking into account that many countries are dependent on the help from these banks, the Rothschilds easily impose their will to them. In that way, the Rothschilds rule and exploit almost the whole world. Of course, the state must repay the debts with interest, which usually means that all these countries increasingly borrow money and the Rothschilds become increasingly rich.


The Rothschilds of course also control commercial banks, which give loans to individuals and companies in the Western world. Most of the people buy houses and cars with credits, companies borrow working capital from banks, and the Rothschilds realize tremendous profits. With the vast amount of money, they purchase valued companies all over the world.


But that is not all; by controlling the money in the world, the Rothschilds have become masters of the economic crisis in the world. They encourage investments of people with low interest rates. When a private business expands, they raise the interest rate and reduce the amount of money in circulation. This reduces the purchasing power of people and thus deliberately creates an economic crisis. Then companies bankrupt massively, and the Rothschilds cheaply buy those they need. Rothschilds also profit on the increased number of unemployed workers who accept poorly paid jobs to be able to feed their families, and thus bring them more profits.


Alienation of policy


Under pressure from international financial institutions, various organizations and media propaganda, most of the presidents of countries around the world obediently follow the interests of the Rothschild family. If some head of state opposes the Rothschild family and decides to defend the independence of the country, then the Rothschild agents can create a civil war in his country. They made the civil war in Yugoslavia. I wrote more about this in the article in My debt to Yugoslavia. The Rothschild agents try to put every country in the world under control, including Russia and China. All the problems in these countries were undoubtedly assisted by the American and British secret services, backed by the Rothschild family.


In an extreme case of disobedience, presidents of countries lose their lives. As an example, the President of the U.S., John Kennedy, lost his life. The reason for it could be his executive order no. 11110 which closed the system of the Federal Reserve, and ordered the U.S. Government to restore the constitutional mandate over the control of money. Although Kennedy nowhere mentioned the name of the Rothschilds here, you can hear his speech that calls for a fight against the conspiracy. Shortly after that, John Kennedy was assassinated. An investigation of the murder was very doubtful according to Michael Parenti in the article The JFK Assassination: Defending the Gangster State.


The disobedient President of Romania Nicolae Ceausescu, Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic, the President of Iraq Saddam Hussein and before them many others were also killed. Of course, these or similar cases make governments in the world very obedient. The Rothschild family controls parliaments in the world as well. Please see a very interesting video Israeli lobby in America that shows how the American Israel Public Affairs Committee affects the creation of the US policy. By the control of governments and parliaments, the Rothschild family controls the formation of laws in the world and they, of course, correspond to the family Rothschild business and are entirely alienated from the needs of people.


The Rothschilds have built an entire hierarchical structure of agents that realize their interests. The senior agents founded the Bilderberg group, which meets once a year to coordinate policies that will be conducted in the western world. The group directs the programs of work to the heads in politics, banking, business, the military and media. These meetings are closed to the public. One should not be particularly bright to understand that such a policy has nothing to do with democracy. It is wholly alienated from the people. These meetings are no longer secret, and that means that the Rothschilds create an elite that allows them to rule the world.

President Obama attended the meeting of the Bilderberg Group, where he coordinated his program with the needs of the rulers of the world. If he did not do it, he would not get support from his own Democratic Party, without which he would not have had the chance to become the president. After President Bush, Rothschilds wanted a more humane president to tranquillize dissatisfied American people. To this purpose, they agreed to give small concessions to the people, but the policy will not change significantly.


Obama promised in the election campaign to end the military intervention in Iraq in the first place because there is no need for the war anymore because disobedient Saddam Hussein was removed. Now the Rothschilds need peace to exploit Iraqi oil. They will make it through the corruption of the government, through contracts and loans for the reconstruction of the ruined country.


Obama also announced the extension of military intervention in Afghanistan on the grounds that such action is necessary to prevent acts of terrorism in the world. I think the reason for the aggression lies in the fact that Afghanistan does not agree to be a colony of anyone and as such cannot be exploited. On account of supporting the aggression against Afghanistan, President Obama likely won some concessions in health care insurance for the US people. That is called a democracy today.


Alienation of economy

 

The market economy is based on profits, and therefore it values profits above people. This is an alienation that develops inequality in society and brings injustice in the process of production, the division of labour and distribution of incomes. In case of good enterprise business, the employees generally cannot participate in the division of profits, but in case of a bad enterprises business, workers face lower incomes for sure or a loss of work, and there is nothing they can do. Relations between employers and workers are also not moral because employers are the buyers of work and workers are salespeople of their own work. Thus, the workers become commodities, and that is unacceptable. Given that a man himself in the market economy is not accepted as a value, manufacturers lead shameless exploitation of workers to achieve higher profits.


Alienation of sciences

 

Alienation is thoroughly carried out by education. Throughout history, the authorities of sciences have attempted to define the authenticity of nature by writing an indefinite number of books. But often they were not successful in it so that they alienated their sciences from objective reality. Natural sciences are still satisfactory because their development makes profits. Social sciences are completely suppressed in their development because the change of the social system does not suit authorities. Social sciences should be the carriers of social improvement, but they are so alienated from their sense that they do not even try to find a solution that could improve society. They are useless. If someone tomorrow abolishes sociology, political science, and philosophy as sciences, no damage will have happened. Indeed that would bring benefits to society because people would no longer rely on useless authorities in the field of social sciences. They would start to think with their heads.


Authorities generally do not need smart people, but obedient followers. They use education to conquer thoughts of students and therefore turn them into tools in their own hands. Authorities keep useless sciences because they support the system in which authorities exercise privileges. It does not matter what ideology is behind it. All the authorities want power and do not allow people to free themselves from it. The evaluation of students’ knowledge by the teachers supports the authoritarian system in which authorities have power over people. As a result, education today is alienated from the natural needs of the society. It is very bureaucratic, too long, and unnecessarily complicated.

 

Students are forced to accept useless alienated knowledge on which today’s alienated society has been built on if they want to be successful students. The more time students spend in school, the more they accumulate alienated knowledge, and the less they can understand the objective laws in society and accept the changing of the social system. Authorities know that, and thus they reassure the alienated order they imposed. Then, authorities recruit the best students, so-called excellences, to implement the policies they were imposed on society. These “excellences” are programmed in a way they cannot accept anything more than cosmetic changes of acquired knowledge.


Now you may conclude how wrong is the statement that the existing system of education is essential for human development. It is adopted by virtually all the people around the world. The primary function of the system of education is to make people prove that they are obedient followers of authorities and as such, they become eligible to work in an alienated society. The effect of today’s education is, in fact, harmful to human development because it alienates students from their own nature and turns them into living machines.


People who believe authorities and obediently follow them cannot achieve a good life firstly because authorities generally represent their own interests and secondly because by blindly following the authorities they neglect their own senses and abilities to find the correct path. They alienate themselves from their own nature, from themselves. As a result, the social sciences are so unsuccessful today that they cannot recognize my work; the only good solution for humankind and the education is so ineffective today that it prevents people from recognizing my work, the only good solution for humankind.


The Rothschild family likes useless sciences because they distance people away from real problems, and therefore the Rothschilds strongly support the development of such sciences. With the help of the authorities they kept under control, they control the education system as well. Misinformed people may think that control over education is harmless, but in reality, it creates a severe effect in the formation of the future of humankind.


Alienation of media

 

The agents of the Rothschild family do not regret the money they spent to take control over media because by control of media they control public opinion, and after that, they can do virtually whatever want. The Rothschild family started with control of newspapers and then television. You may have noticed how quickly the big television station, CNN, was made for example, and that from the start it had substantial financial resources available and has propagated throughout the world the values that the wealthy people advocates. Such TV stations run “excellences” that are well trained on how to represent the interests of big capitalists while trying at the same time not to confront the needs of the people. The only people who have access to media are corrupted by the system and do not have any intention to change anything there.


When you think that you have decided on which candidate you will vote in elections, the representatives of the wealthy people have already decided it for you. Everything you know about the candidates has come to you through the media they control. It is not even particularly relevant to the wealthy people what candidate you are going to vote for because all the candidates will implement their will anyway. It is important to them though to convince you that you have the “freedom” to make your own decisions in your life and to make you happy while following their will. They prepare you for your “good” decisions practically from birth, and they do it so cleverly that you cannot even notice.


Through everyday propaganda, media convince people that money is the biggest if not the only value. Money is a medium of purchase that regulates the market of goods and services, and therefore objectively it is a value, but in today’s alienated society this value is much exaggerated. If you think a little bit, you would see that air is undoubtedly more valuable than money, because without air there would not be us. But no one or almost no one considers air as a value mostly because it cannot be privatized and nobody can make money on it.


Man to man should be the most significant value, but money gives power over the people, which deny the importance of man. Love and friendship are indeed natural values, but money as a value brings out greed that destroys love and friendship. Overestimating the value of money brings alienation in every pore of society and social relations. People who accept money as the highest value under the pressure of propaganda are great enemies to themselves because they act against their own nature and against the nature of the society in which they live.


Events that are not convenient to the Rothschild family, such as, for example, my philosophy do not have access to the western media, and therefore neither to the people. The media in the world of the west are very uniform and selective in a presentation of events around the world, which indicates that they are under the control of a narrow circle of people. It comes to mind for example that the Serbs were accused of ten years of ethnic cleansing in the former Yugoslavia in virtually all the Western media. At the same time, Turkey committed ethnic cleansing of Kurds that have passed almost unnoticed by the media. As a result, Serbia was bombed due to “public pressure,” and Turkey did not suffer any sanctions. What was the essential difference? Serbia refused to obey to dictates from the western world and Turkey is cooperative like most of the countries around the world.


Since the Internet appeared, the Rothschilds have been trying to have the most considerable influence in this field as well. Their agents purchase influential websites and quickly form new ones in an attempt to take control of the Internet information distribution. Recently I was particularly attracted to the websites change.com, changemakers.com, GOOD.is, etc. All these websites are calling for positive changes in society and are allegedly particularly interested in helping disempowered people on the bottom of the “pyramid.” But it is just a mask. Behind all these web sites lies a powerful organization of private sponsors who have their own private interests.


Changemakers.com has even published some of my articles and accepted two projects of mine in the contests of new ideas: Humanistic enterprises and Democratic anarchy (They have been deleted in the meantime). But they ignore my work. The Rothschilds ignore my ideas, and everyone else’s that propose the real change to the world, and they drown them in a sea of other ideas. Not one idea in the competition at changemakers.com can compare with mine, but “excellences” of the alienated system of education cannot see it. The Rothschilds count on the inability of people that they have raised for generations.


Also, the Rothschild could have bought half of the world in the last three centuries and thus can directly control half of humankind. The managers of their companies and organizations may not know that they are agents of the Rothschilds, but they know very well that they are privileged and do not want to do anything that might upset their employers. Thus, the Rothschilds prevent the acceptance of new ideas that can improve society. The websites that advocate changes in society together with most of the left media which are sponsored by companies or organizations would most likely stop changes from happening.


The Rothschilds like the “resistance” provided by the “excellences” they have raised. Naomi Klein, for example, wrote the book “No Logo.” In this book, she calls upon people to boycott goods from brands such as Nike, for example, because this emerging multinational corporation thrives enormously at the expense of cheap labour in developing countries. The Rothschilds are very likely the owners of Nike and should not support such writing. So why is her work supported by media and publishers? Because the chance of success of her idea is practically nonexistent. The Rothschilds adore helpless critique and help it. Such ideas give the illusion of freedom of public expression, which directs the society in a struggle that cannot succeed.


There are many “excellences” that advocate human rights, women’s rights, gay rights, the rights of the poor, who are also supported by the agents of the Rothschild family because all these people cannot achieve success in improving this world. They are useful to the Rothschilds because they fill in the public space so much that work which way improve society cannot break through.


***

If there is a possibility that my work may come closer to the public, then the real power of the Rothschild family arrives on the scene. Two years ago, Google opened a competition inviting good ideas that can change the world. I participated with my project along with more than 150,000 other projects. The winner has been proclaimed after two years, and my work was not among them. Why? Google does not want to accept my ideas because they present the end of capitalism, the very system on which Google has been established. But my project does not threaten Google or its owners in any way. My project will one day inevitably wholly change the world and make it a beautiful place to live. Not accepting such work is immoral. Why is it so important for Google to defend capitalism? I think that the decision about the competition was made above Google. The Rothschilds have significant influences in all companies including Google even if they are not the principal shareholders. The Rothschilds together with their agents defend capitalism at any cost.

 

The Rothschild family creates the culture of the whole world as well. If you pay attention, you can notice that all countries in the world overtake a unique fashion, music, film and television program. Thus countries become cultural colonies of the Rothschilds. You can recognize that by the same shows on television like “Who Wants To Be A Millionaire” or “American Idol” airing all around the world. Unique culture creates a unique orientation of people and thus facilitates the work for great manipulators. This culture aims to capture the thoughts of people and not to give them the freedom to think about what is good for them. It will give them “answers” to all their questions and offer them everything they “need.”

 

Today’s culture propagates illusions, immorality, superficiality, kitsch, gossip, violence, cruelty, greed, shallowness, artificiality, and the situation is getting worse every day because the media cannot offer anything better. Today’s society is profoundly alienated from its nature and therefore requires perverted values on its own. It cannot recognize correct values because people have been living without freedom for generations and were systematically prevented from learning how to get rid of those who govern.

 

***

The Rothschild conspiracy prevents the development of civilization and degenerates human beings. It is the way to total alienation, to the eruption of dissatisfaction and destruction. The Rothschilds aim to dominate the whole world, and they cannot be satisfied until that goal is achieved. But this goal cannot be completed because not all people can be obedient followers, obedient consumers of ideas, images, tastes, and sounds. This is because people need freedom. People will sooner or later strongly oppose the Rothschilds because by their nature they cannot live in a cage even if it is made of gold.

 

Capitalism is profoundly immoral, and therefore there is no hope for it. Also, capitalism is developed to the point where it can no longer achieve enough improvement in society; it is no longer a rational enough system and as such presents obstacle for the development of civilization. In the article End of Capitalism, I have presented why it is time for capitalism to go down in history. I have also introduced the basis of the new system Humanism that will replace it. This system will overcome alienation as well.

 

In today’s world, the meaning of the word alienation is very underdeveloped. The purpose of this word in the English-speaking world is so suppressed that there is not a word that defines the condition that prevails alienation. The expression which would put society in the opposite position of alienation is non-existent. I use this meaning in my language a lot so that I had to translate it as a “disalienation“ in the English language even though you cannot find it in the English dictionary.

 

The process of disalienation

 

There is only one exit from the alienation of today’s society, and that is the establishment of equal rights among the people. There exist only one equal right among people, or they are not equal. Partially equal rights or almost equal rights do not exist because then we are talking about unequal rights. Even slightly uneven rights create privileges with very negative consequences that sooner or later cause problems in society. I have written more about that in the article Privileges are evil. I have defined society with equal rights of people. I think my philosophy is the only right way for humanity. I presented it in my book Humanism – A Philosophic-Ethical-Political-Economic Study of the Development of the Society, which is available free of charge.

 

Disalienation of policy

 

Even the poorest countries of the world can create an independent economic policy. Such states can accumulate financial resources no matter how small they are and economically compete with powerful countries around the world. Good social policy is primarily based on the democratic will of citizens. Citizens can directly decide that the majority of financial capital, which they possess together, invests in the economic development, while for the purpose of the living standards they could leave a minimal amount of money that is sufficient for survival. This means that these people would give up from any luxury in the period that they consider necessary to develop their economy. In this way, they would lose the dependence they have on private financial centers of power. That would release them from exploitation, from external pressures of any kind, and would make them the masters of their prosperity. It is also a way to a disalienation of society.

 

People can directly decide what percentage of their salaries they want to give for taxes. To be clear, individuals will not pay taxes in the amount they want, but they will participate in the formation of the total amount of the tax money, and then the tax money would be collected from people according to their incomes. Furthermore, people will decide how much money from the taxes they want to allocate for: the defence of the state, public security, education, health, housing, recreation, infrastructure, etc. Following the living experience, people will learn how much money they need to spend on taxes and what is the best way to spend it. In that manner, the people will for the first time create the macroeconomic policy of the society directly, and that will constitute the basis for the de-alienation of society. Such a strategy will certainly follow people’s needs in the most efficient way, and therefore it will significantly develop society.

Today, leaders of countries allocate most of the tax money for armies. When people start deciding on the allocation of tax money, the armies will no longer exist and waging wars would be impossible. Once people get the power to directly decide in society, they will be so pleased that they would not let authorities take it away from them anymore.

 

Democratic anarchy

 

The new system also provides a highly efficient method of bearing the responsibility of all people for their deeds. One part of the responsibilities will be based on democratic anarchy. It is a system in which each person gets an equal right to evaluate any other person. A positive evaluation should bring a reward of let’s say one dollar to the assessed person, and a negative rating will carry a fine of let’s say one dollar. Let each person receive the right to allocate three positive and three negative evaluations to other people monthly. In such a simple way, each person will get real power in society and therefore will be respected. This measure will direct people to produce the highest possible conveniences to other people and to diminish or abolish the creation of disadvantages.

 

The system of democratic anarchy will especially affect authorities. The higher the position of power in society, the greater the responsibility they would have to bear to society. For example, the President of the United States can get 100 million bad evaluations from U.S. citizens for bad politics, lies, and criminal aggression against other countries. This will cost him 100 million U.S. dollars in a single month. Non-privileged presidents would not dare perform bad policies anymore. And if it happens somehow, they would run away from their positions very fast. Only the most skilful and brave individuals would dare lead countries. They will not be authorities anymore, but our servants. I wrote more about it in the article: The Future of Democracy.

 

Disalienation of economy

 

Equal human rights mean every person must have the right to work. Unemployment will be eliminated by shortening working hours proportionally to the rate of unemployment. This would increase the demand for workers on the free market so that employers would have to pay them more. It will remove the exploitation of workers. I wrote more about this in the article: Let’s remove unemployment.

 

The system I have proposed offers more market than capitalism can afford. The market for public work posts will be primarily developed. Which means it will open competition of workers for every public job post, including work posts of politicians and the president of the corporations. A worker who offers a higher profit, more goods produced, better, cleaner and cheaper production at any time for any job in public companies, will get the job. I have developed a system that will efficiently valorize the productivity of job offers, harmonize work remuneration and define worker’s labour responsibilities. The new division of work is elaborated in detail in my book Humanism. For more on this, please read my article The Future of the Economy.

 

No economy can be more productive than the one where the best available worker gets each job. Such an economy will easily become significantly more productive than the capitalist one so that capitalism will be forced to go down in history together with the vast alienation it has built. Private companies will join the public companies, and the owners will be adequately compensated. In such a society, authorities would not be able to expand the alienation of society from its very nature.

 

Disalienation of Education

 

The only thing that is hard for a man to learn is to respect people. This most critical social need simply disappears quickly and easily in any society without matter what kind of education is established. The system of democratic anarchy that I have proposed gives equal power to every man in the community. That power is based on the same right of every person to evaluate any other person. Any positive evaluation would bring a small prize to an evaluated person, and any negative assessment would carry a small penalty. Such a simple measure will make people respect each other. It will build a sound and sane society regardless of the education system.

 

People specialize in their knowledge. To acquire specialized knowledge schools are necessary as a means of educating people. In the future, schools will no longer be a place where the authorities bureaucratically determine the curriculum of the learning program, but the learning program will be formed by the interests of students. Schools will no longer be institutions that guarantee the knowledge of students as it is accepted today, but the places where education is accessible. I have proposed a system that will require a great responsibility of workers at their workplaces, far more significant than is the case today. In this system, workers will not dare to compete for jobs they do not have enough knowledge for.

 

Everything else that a man should learn in his life is a product of his interest. When a person has the interest to acquire some knowledge he has no difficulty to do that if the knowledge is accessible. Students will be able to attend whichever classes they want whenever they need in life. I wrote more about this in the article: My clash with sciences.

 

Disalienation of families

 

In the animal world, parents teach young animals the basics of needed knowledge. Human society has moved in a very wrong direction because schools have taken rights to teach children the required knowledge. It is wrong firstly because the school curriculum is alienated from the needs of children. And it is even more wrong because directing children through life should be the task of parents, not schools. Parental love, which manifests itself also through the education of children, is one of the primary conditions of the prosperity of the children and society as a whole.

 

For parents to be able to teach children the basics of required knowledge, in the first place, it is necessary that parents have free time that they can dedicate to children. Today parents work all day and practically do not see the kids during the day. From this derives a large number of problems. Shortly after the acceptance of the system that I have proposed, working hours would most likely be significantly shorter so that parents would have far more time to devote to their children.

 

Another condition of establishing a proper education in society is that parents carry love towards their children. In today’s alienated society, love is rare because the alienated society develops narcissism; an inferior and often somewhat perverted form of love. The lack of love is unusual in the animal world, but in human society it is a prevalent phenomenon because of the enormous alienation in which people live. The lack of love is damage to the development of people and human culture. That is the reason the society in which we live in is terrible. The new system I have proposed will teach people to love, and that will fundamentally change the community in which we live. I wrote more about it in the article Do you love?

 

The disalienation of society

 

The disalienation of society will be realized when all people get equal rights. It will be achieved when all people get equal rights to work at any workplace, when all people get equal legislative, judicial and executive powers in the society through the equal right of evaluation, and when all people get the same right to participate in making decisions of common interest. All these rights are entirely opposite to the rights authorities have established to rule society, and therefore cannot be quickly adopted. But there is no other good way. When people accept equal rights, society will get rid of alienation, and then, this world will be improved beyond the wildest dreams today.

 

July 25, 2010

2008.03.30

The most potent tool of justice ever

The most potent tool of justice ever is the system of evaluations among the people invented by me. Each man will have the equal right to take or give one dollar, or one cent, or something like that, from a few people monthly as an award or punishment for their behaviour. How can such a small power in the hands of individuals, even if it unites, be the most potent tool of justice ever? The answer lies in time. There is a saying: “Silent water moves hills.” The permanent power of evaluation will make people respect each other. A human being will become a value. That will make a miracle no other tool of justice has ever been able to make. That will create a good society

2008.03.08

Equal Human Rights will Build a Good Society Unconditionally

Many people think that the escape from an entirely wrong history of humankind will come from some high level of knowledge that people cannot understand. The output should be based on the work of great thinkers such are Jesus, Buddha, Mohammad, Kant, Hegel, Marx, etc. However, by following these people, we are not on the right path. The lack of the ability to have thus far created a good society confirms that.

 

But why would we not try to find a common denominator for all positively oriented philosophies and develop it? That might produce a good result. I think that all contemporary philosophers agree that people have to have equal rights. The development and acceptance of equal human, civil, legal, constitutional, and other rights all over the world confirm that the relationship between people is evolving toward equal rights.

 

But do we, the people, as the result of this effort, have equal rights today? No, we do not! Equal rights are established on a formal level, while the reality presents that rights are not equal among people. The president of your country may send you to war, and you cannot do it to them. Your boss may abuse or fire you, and you cannot do it to them. Your teacher may force you to accept knowledge, and you cannot do it to them. Where are the equal human rights here?

 

Authorities impose their will on the people, and people have to follow their will. Such a relationship creates on one side, privileged people, and on the other side, deprived ones. This creates a major social problem. I wrote more about this in the article Privileges are evil. Privileges are the biggest mistake humanity has ever made. I saw it firsthand, so it was not hard for me to research ideas of equal human rights for 25 years. That means one does not need to search for an escape from today’s social problems in a profound philosophy. The exit is located on a very shallow level of philosophy.

 

Equal human rights primarily include the right of all people to participate equally in the decision-making processes on all issues of common interest in society. Today, that right is partly implemented through the process of democracy, but democracy is not efficient enough in following the needs of people. Besides, democracy cannot support the needs of individuals, so they often remain unsatisfied. By being aware of this, I have created a simple idea that will successfully represent the needs of every individual and society as a whole. This will be achieved by mutual evaluation among people, which I call democratic anarchy.

 

Each person will get an equal right to evaluate, let’s say, three people positively, and three people negatively every month. Each positive evaluation will bring a small award to the assessed person, and each negative assessment will result in a small punishment. This will direct every person in society to respect the needs of every person, to create the highest possible conveniences to the community, and to reduce or abolish the creation of any forms of inconvenience. Thus, equal rights among people will create a good society. I wrote more about it in the article Democratic Anarchy is the Future of Democracy.

 

Equal rights among people require that every person has the right to work. This is, in theory, a highly developed right, but in practice, unemployment is still normalized. Shortening working hours proportionally to the unemployment rate will eliminate unemployment. It will increase the demand for workers and their salaries. Workers will be able to purchase more, the economy will grow, and society will prosper. I wrote more about it in the article Full employment is a turning point of capitalism.

 

Human rights should be developed further by forming equal access of every person to every public workplace at any time through a new division of labour. The best available worker will get every job. Only this should be called socialism. Socialism will be more productive than capitalism so the latter will go down in history. More about this can be found in my article The Future of Economics. People will accept socialism in the distant future as a final act of the abolition of privileges and unequal rights in society.

 

All social evil starts with unequal rights among people, and all social evil will be entirely removed when equal rights among people are established. Then, the president would not dare to call for war, managers will not hire or fire workers, and teachers will no longer teach the material that does not interest students. The consistent acceptance of equal rights among people will solve all social problems. And there is no other realistic way to achieve a good society. Everything I wrote in my philosophy is the result of the development of this idea.

Everlasting life

Everlasting life?

According to John (14:6), Jesus Christ said: “I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.” This is probably a free interpretation of Jesus’ words that should probably read that his way, but not him, is the only way to God, the Father. The formal difference between these two claims is insignificant, but mostly it is tremendous. I think it is wrong to expect that only followers of Jesus Christ can reach God. What would happen in that case with either the followers of other religions or those who have never heard of Jesus Christ? Do they, therefore, have no access to God? No matter how God loves His Son Jesus Christ, it would be unfair, and God is just.


The path of love that Jesus Christ preached was well known before him. Jesus Christ had realized the importance of love because he lived in a very destructive time. According to the Bible, his greatest achievement was the sacrifice of his life to cleanse humanity of sin. With this, he demonstrated his love for people and the importance that love should have in people’s lives. But that sacrifice is not enough to prove his divine origin. In human history, many people have sacrificed their lives in the name of ideas they believed in.


Giordano Bruno, for example, was burned at the stake because he could not oppose his view of the universe. Jesus Christ, during his lifetime, did not show such a power that would clearly present that he is Son of God even though he made significant achievements. His sacrifice drew attention to his teaching. His teachings formed the Christian religion with which he had directed his followers, the Christians, to good. He became the most influential person of all time. Any man who under the influence of Jesus Christ accepted love together has accepted the way to God, the Father.


But how did Jesus Christ become the only way to God? It suited devoted believers well that Jesus Christ is the only way to God because such an attitude released them from fear of uncertainty and that relieves their lives significantly. Jesus Christ, being the only way to God, also suited great manipulators as well. They follow the teachings of Jesus Christ and then interpret his words as it suits them. It often happens that fraudsters, criminals, and murderers call upon Jesus Christ to present their criminal path as the proper, and become the most influential people in society. President George W. Bush is one of those people. Jesus Christ will never bless aggression; so all the people who are aggressive cannot be followers of Jesus Christ.


Love is the only right way, but under the influence of authorities not many people are able to recognize love. If you dear readers think that you know what love is, I have created a test that will answer whether you’re right. The test is in my article Do you Love?


Today, people often confuse love and narcissism, and it is very wrong. Love is good, and narcissism is bad. If you spend a lot of time admiring your beauty, power or wealth, then you are narcissistic. Such admiration brings you pleasure, but together with it, you book in your future at least the same amount of time spent in pain and suffering. It is a natural law that derives from the narcissistic character of people. Why is this so? A narcissistic man interprets all the success in his life as a form of overcoming his powerlessness in nature. Then he realizes the great fortune, but overcoming his helplessness in nature is mostly an illusion. The illusion of overcoming impotence in life sooner or later clashes with reality and then inevitably brings the pain. When a person admires himself, he is falling into a trap that leads to disaster.


People do not see it because they would otherwise have chosen a different path. The most successful people today usually suffer the most. They take medication and abuse alcohol to reduce the pain that haunts them. Pain makes them very destructive to themselves and to their environment. Then life turns into hell. This is precisely the situation we have today in society. With such an experience no one can get to God the Father.


A man who learns to love possesses a successful vaccine against narcissism and cannot fall into its fatal trap. If society as a whole learns how to love, it would no longer have problems. That is why Jesus Christ taught people to love. In the name of spreading love, He has invited people to do good, to avoid sin and to pray to God. At the time when Jesus Christ lived on Earth, building love was a matter of conscience. It was the only possible way of spreading the love. If people were conscious, they would be able to develop love by following Jesus, but humankind has shown that the conscience is not successful enough in creating love. That is why Jesus Christ was as successful as it was possible in the given circumstances.


***

Love can be built unconditionally. I have come to the conclusion that love can be developed only by equal rights among people. Equal human rights are an essential condition for the creation of love.

 

I have created the most significant improvement of society in the history of mankind by using the system of evaluation among the people. Each person will have an equal right to evaluate the activity of any other person. Each positive assessment will automatically bring a small prize to the positively assessed man, and every negative evaluation will result in a little punishment. Democratic anarchy will direct each member of society to create the highest possible advantages for the community and to diminish or abolish the creation of all forms of disadvantages. Technically, this is very much like love because love is based on indiscriminate concern for others and giving.

 

The system of evaluation that I have proposed has conceptual similarities with the Bible. The Bible has offered a solution that could form a good society through the golden rule: “Do onto others as you would have them do onto you!” But this sentence called upon the conscience of the people because at that time it could not count on anything else, and so the golden rule was quite helpless. So far people have not learned how to efficiently implement the golden rule. I’ve found it! The system of evaluation among the people will fully comply with the requirement of the golden rules. It will remove evil and build a paradise on earth.

 

With the establishment of equal rights, people will get equal power in society, and that will create equal respect among people. People will no longer feel superior to others and will not be afraid of other people. The system of evaluation will teach people that no matter what kind of success they achieve in their lives they cannot forget that they are equal members of society. It will liberate people from narcissism and enable the development of love. The productive orientation of people that the system of evaluation offers through freedom and equality will by the time, create unconditional love among people. With the help of technology, I have created a far more efficient way to introduce and spread love, than Jesus Christ could have accomplished.

 

When people accept my system, they would unconditionally establish heaven on earth where evil will be deleted entirely. You can briefly learn what it is about in my article Humanism extensively. All people will be able to love, and as such, they will all probably go to God the Father in another world, where they will achieve everlasting life.

 

Even though my work gives hope for a better future of mankind, I have not managed to motivate interest from people so far in it. To attract attention to my work I even asked: Am I Jesus Christ?, and even that did not bring success. Why is that? People are forced to accept the knowledge from parents, teachers, bosses, priests so that they did not learn how to recognize the truth on their own. Uncritically accepted knowledge is a set of information which cannot contribute to understanding. That is why people cannot understand my work.

 

Authorities do not like my work because it takes away their privileged power. That is the reason the bright future of humankind is stopped. To make any progress in society possible, people must be free from the yoke of authorities. Authorities should not be unconditionally followed, but they should be checked and respected if they deserve it. This also applies to me. I do not ask for anything else.

 

My theory is straightforward and relatively easy to check. One day the system I have proposed will be examined because there is no other good way. If the check-up of my work proves that I am right, does that mean that I am Jesus Christ? If I’m not Jesus Christ and my philosophy makes heaven on earth, then is the Christian religion pointless?

 

***

The survival of the Christian faith depends on whether Jesus Christ is resurrected three days after his death. His resurrection would confirm everlasting life, which is one of the fundamental postulates of the Christian religion. According to the Bible, all people who believe in Jesus Christ are assigned for everlasting life.

 

The Internet site Beyond Today in the article What happens after death?, unconditionally confirms this hypothesis. They believe that after the return of Jesus Christ, God would create an entirely new material world in which people will achieve everlasting life. They cited a question from sceptical people who think that our lives are too painful and difficult enough so that why would anyone want to live forever? They answer to such people that God will make everlasting life better and more beautiful than our wildest hopes are. We can believe it or not, but it will not help us find the truth.

 

In nature, the matter constantly moves and passes from one state to another. Nothing is indestructible in the material world, neither diamonds, nor stars, and so man cannot be indestructible either. God should completely stop the motion of matter to give eternity to matter. This means he would have to stop atoms and the whole universe. I would easily say that this is impossible if the Bible does not state that God is omnipotent. But if he did it somehow, that would stop light so that such a world would not be visible. The stopped motion would stop breathing. This means that the everlasting material life would cease the life that God had created. I do not believe that God will go that way. I’d say that for this reason, most Christians believe that everlasting life rests in the spiritual world.

 

Even though I applied for the position of Jesus Christ, unfortunately, I cannot say anything about another world, because I was not there, or I do not remember that I was there. This is undoubtedly a severe blow to any chance that I might be Jesus Christ. Or maybe it is not?

A profound website 2001 Translation Bible that again translates the original Bible written in the Greek language, claims in the article: Does the Bible promise everlasting life? they answer “the fact is; it doesn’t… at least, not in those exact words. Why not? Because the Greek word that other Bible translators render as “everlasting” (aionos) doesn’t mean that. It’s what we get the English word “eon” from, and it means a long time.” Due to the different meanings of related words in different languages, the translators of the Bible often freely interpreted the verses. Later in the article, they questioned: “Then, what will happen to the faithful?” The article offers this answer: “The Bible simply doesn’t tell us, but we can be confident that Jesus will never destroy those he loves.”

 

***

The differences in understanding the Bible are considerable so that it is possible to accept very different interpretations that affect the very basis of the religion. What is most apparent, God created a man giving him an optimal life. Neither shorter nor longer lives are desirable because God knows the best what an optimal life for people is. If people would like to have good lives, they must respect the laws of nature that God created.

 

I am confident that God intended equal rights to men in society and that is what was never formed. That is the reason the history of humanity was so sad and destructive. People who are forced to follow the authorities because the authorities have power or people who follow the authorities because they are afraid of making an independent step are on the wrong track. Such people readily accept alienated values from God, such as money, power, or fame. Such needs are alienated from the nature of people and therefore cannot be satisfied. People who accept such values cannot be satisfied with their lives. From that emerges the widespread poverty of life regardless of what these people have achieved in their lives. They live unnatural, unfulfilled lives, and that is the reason they fear death.

 

People need to adequately meet the nature of their lives that God has given them. They need to accept a productive way of living and love that the Bible talks about, and even more my web site www.sarovic.com. People who live natural lives generally easily satisfy their needs, and at the time of their late life, they do not need anything anymore. Their soul is calm, and then they become free people in the broadest sense. The lives they lived are enough rewards to them. Such people are not afraid of death because they know they have not missed anything in their life.

If everlasting life occurs after this, and if that life would be better than our wildest dreams as Christian authorities claim, then such a life would be welcomed. In this world, salvation brings each man to himself by his own productive way of living. Who makes good, good will return to him and vice versa.

 

August 24, 2010

 

Continues on: What God Wants?

Open Letter

I sent the following letter to Lord Jacob Rothschild on July 6, 2010. Now it is October 23, 2010, and since I have not received a response, I opened it to the public.


Dear Lord Jacob Rothschild,


I have created a new social system, which will replace capitalism and make this world a beautiful place to live in. It will solve each and every problem of capitalism while bringing benefits to all of the people, including you. The system is defined in my book “Humanism – A Philosophic-Ethical-Political-Economic Study of the Development of the Society.” For the last 10 years, I have been promoting the new system worldwide through my web site www.sarovic.com but could not reach success. That is because you are preventing the development of society. You may deny it, but it won’t help.


Capitalism is destined to fail, and you cannot save it. If you think that collecting resources from all over the world would give you the ultimate power to rule the world you might be very wrong. Your program is not good enough. The point is you reduce the freedom of people and by using their dissatisfaction produce crime, rebellion, and wars. I wrote about that as much as I could. The result of your work is evil for most of the people around the world. If you are not concerned about that you should be. Your name is increasingly connected to the problems of our world. Sooner or later people will find it more profitable to go after you and your partners than anything else, and indeed more useful than attacking buildings full of innocent people.


I try hard to write this letter as a friend. The system I have proposed is an inevitable future of humankind. In the new order, you will not be able to impose your will to the world secretly as you are used to. But if you consider accepting the new system, you may participate in its development and protect your interests in the best possible way. I really do not think you should be against the new system because by the time it will pool of all the companies around the world and you would be the most influential shareholder by far. In the new order, you would still be the richest man in the world. You would also be able to openly govern the world. The system I’ve proposed needs someone to do it, but this time that person will be directly responsible to the people.


If you refuse it, you might lose everything. You will not be able to prevent the development of society forever. The proposed system is not only the best solution for humankind; it is also the only good one so that people will accept it one day. Then they will organize well and be able to live without you, but you will not be able to live without them. Before that happens, you would probably fight back to protect your side, but you do not have a chance to win.


On the other hand, my side would have a hard time winning over yours. So why would we fight when the best solution for all must be made through negotiations? Why wouldn’t we instead join our powers and let the bright future of humankind come faster? Your involvement in creating a new system might also compensate for your responsibilities from the past and make you an honourable person in the world.


When the new system is accepted a new era will begin where social evil would not exist anymore. The new era will make this world a brilliant place to live beyond the wildest dreams today.


Best regards,

Aleksandar Šarović

2008.02.15

The problem with democracy

Voters today often find that their votes do not have an influence in creating the policy of society because politicians do not follow their will and they do not fulfill the promises they gave to voters. That is the reason, for example, that the participation at elections in the USA falls below 35% of the voters’ body. To increase the credibility of the lousy election system in the US, an election show is created that lasts for more than a year, and it is broadcasted every day on prime time on television. As a result of such propaganda the people support their favourites the same way fans support their idols in sports which in essence has nothing in common with democracy.


It is not even relevant to the creators of shows who wins; it is all about how to make voters happy if their candidate wins or sad if they lose the election, while the politics don’t change at all. That all is a vast manipulation, which many people are aware of. So why then are there no attempts to change something here?


Democracy by definition requires the power of decision making in the hands of the people. Of course, that confronts to the will of the influential people that much, so that scientists have not been able to create an academic consensus of how a developed democracy is supposed to look like. But politicians use the word democracy whenever it is suitable to them like their democracy is a perfectly defined solution. Of course, it is not.


I have defined a developed form of democracy in my book Humanism, where all people will really decide about all issues of their interests and in such a way define the best possible political orientation of society. So why then do people not take my ideas into consideration?


Firstly, that is because it requires intellectual effort which cannot be directly profitable. People who try searching for the satisfying solution soon realize that a redistribution of the real decision making power in society can be very hardly accepted due to a large number of different interests of people who have different powers inside society. Besides that, my ideas strongly decline from the knowledge and customs people are used to, so that my ideas are often emotionally unacceptable to them. No arguments help here. The inertia to changes in society is nothing else but a consequence of conspiracy of authorities through the entire history of humankind. Today accepted knowledge still has the intention to make people obedient followers of authorities.


After fifteen years of promoting the ideas of how to build a good society, I’ve not succeeded in making people interested. Paradoxically, this has been happening in the time of political, economic, and moral crisis around the world, when numerous people searched for an escape from unfortunate situations, and could not find it because no other idea besides mine existed to create a good society. Unfortunately, the acceptance of the way to a good society will require a lot of time.


2008.01.20

Jesus Christ said

Jesus Christ said: “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me”. In other words, people may come to God the Father only if they follow the will of Jesus Christ, defined in the Bible. The analysis of Jesus Christ’s words presents without any doubt that Jesus Christ has a goal to build a good man and good society.


Jesus Christ has directed many people to a good way through the Bible, but He did not succeed in leading the whole society to the right path because a good society was never established. The Bible should have presented the road to a good society a lot better. I did it. My book Humanism shows the only path that may solve all social problems. Does it mean the only way to God the Father for the whole society, leads through me?


If the Bible is right when it states that Jesus Christ will create heaven on earth in His next arrival, and if I am right when I say that heaven on earth is possible only through the way I proposed in my book “Humanism,” then I am Jesus Christ. This statement should be a strong enough reason for Christians to thoroughly investigate my work.


Wisdom

Wisdom

Wisdom is the knowledge necessary for a good life. It is the result of an objective understanding of life’s experiences. Wisdom teaches us where the real values in life are. A wise man respects nature and the laws that exist in it. He has a productive orientation, while continually improving himself and his environment, and therefore he lives well. A wise man is always responsible for nature. For example, a man who does not know to swim would not jump into deep water because his objectivity tells him that he will drown if he did so. This is wisdom, although we generally call wisdom the knowledge that is more difficult to understand. Ordinary people cannot see such wisdom. Only a wise man can.

 

We are proud of our intellectual development, production capabilities, and the successes we reach throughout our lives and believe that our good life mostly depends on it. This idea was imposed by the authorities and might not be true. Today people have a higher standard of living than that of kings in the Middle Ages. Therefore, they are supposed to be more satisfied with their lives than the kings in The Middle Ages were. Are they? I doubt it. The standard of living does not have much to do with the happiness of people.

 

So where is the problem? The problem is that our subjectivity sends us off course. We easily overestimate the successes we achieve and underestimate the objective reality. It is more comfortable and in the short term more convenient to accept the subjective way of thinking. Practically anything a person thinks may quickly become the truth in his subjective mind. Anything a person does may be easily justified in his subjective mind. Such a fact, even though if personal, could easily release people from fear and bring them great happiness. So why would someone waste their time in finding the objective truth when they can reach it faster through their subjective mind? The answer lies in the fact that subjective knowledge is alienated from its objective reality. Therefore, subjective knowledge easily comes into conflict with objective reality and then often causes a far more significant inconvenience than the initial happiness.

 

The most common subjectivity that alienates us from the objective reality is our need to have power over people. Such power brings the illusion of overcoming powerlessness in nature or attempts to compensate man’s weakness in life. It is initially very suitable and brings great happiness. This is the reason why most people try to achieve power over others. This is why parents rule over children, teachers rule over students, bosses rule over the employees, the Heads of States rule over the citizens. The rich rule over the poor people.

 

People have difficulty seeing wisdom when their power in society is questioned because this power brings an illusion of overcoming their powerlessness in nature. If happiness lies in power over the people, then the wealthiest and most famous people in the world should be the happiest people. Are they? The more a person builds their power in society the more they live in illusion and because of it more easily come into conflict with the objective laws of nature. The more he becomes disappointed, feel more pain, and become more destructive. If you enjoy making money in fact, you fight for your power in society. You strive for power that you cannot get enough of.

 

The result of it is the stress from which your body gets damaged. Or, if you are pleased with your physical appearance and you invest a lot of energy to preserve the beauty and youth, you are also fighting for your power in society. When you see the first wrinkle on your face, it brings the pain. The stress that comes from it slowly but inevitably kills your soul and then, of course, the body. Rich and famous people are often the most dissatisfied. They drink the most in attempt to try finding peace in their minds; they are depressed, they confront other people the most because they cannot find peace. They divorce the most; they live an unhealthy life and are quite destructive.

 

When a man rises above others, further rise is limited and therefore can hardly bring satisfaction. At high altitudes, one can easily fall, and that brings the pain. A man would never commit suicide if they cannot satisfy their natural needs such as hunger and thirst, but they would if they lose the illusion of power. Therefore, a wise man would never try to realize power over the people, just as the man who cannot swim will not jump into deep water.

 

Some people have asked me how they can learn wisdom in the short run. It is not possible to achieve, although there is nothing complicated in wisdom. Wisdom should tell them to forget their ego and to improve the world around them. That way they can keep their health and happiness. But the person who is obsessed with themselves can no longer enjoy enhancing their environment. Wise words will hardly encourage the man who has power in society to give up that power because it contradicts with the character he has built throughout his life in an alienated society. If he gave it up, that would hurt him. An intellectual understanding of wisdom is not enough; one needs to feel the right way. The man becomes wise by living a righteous life. Wisdom is the result of a healthy lifestyle.

 

***

Wisdom is challenging to achieve because it faces significant obstacles in everyday life. Authorities build their power by imposing subjective knowledge on people. Such knowledge is often wholly useless but successfully prevents free thought and diverts people from real problems. Authorities have always determined what way of life people are going to accept, what they are going to think and what they are going to do. Very little of that is the result of free choice. The man was never a real basis of any system or ideology. A man has always been only in the service of various ideologies and therefore cannot be satisfied.

 

When people accept alienated knowledge, it becomes a value for them. For example, rich people use the vast propaganda that imposes money as the most significant value. That’s why people are obsessed with money. It is just this obsession that gives power to rich people because they have money. Money cannot be the highest value. Once accepted, these wrong values in society become real and challenging to change. But the problem is far more significant. When people get used to following authorities, they lose the ability to make independent conclusions and therefore have a reduced ability to recognize the objective essence. They are alienated from their nature, from their feelings and from logic, and that prevents them from finding the truth within themselves.

 

Taking away the freedom of people begins with cultural heritage and is instituted by the education system. The education system imposes knowledge, and that is wrong even if that knowledge is objectively necessary. The only proper education is one that follows the students’ interests. Today, education not only does not follow the students’ interests but also imposes a massive amount of entirely unnecessary knowledge. The education system has the task to burden students with useless information that dumbs down the students and makes them powerless and obedient followers of authority. That is all opposite of wisdom. I wrote more about the problems of education in the article My Clash with Sciences. When a man starts to work, the fight for the job and the amount of work itself becomes an obstacle that prevents the man from dedicating enough time to himself to discover what wisdom and the good life is. When after a hard workday a man arrives home, media supplements this difficulty with alienated values, which prevent him from following his real needs. Media teaches us everything diametrically opposite to what wisdom and the good life is.

 

Today’s control over people is very organized. Authorities take great care to prevent the development of ideas that can take away their power and privilege. Authorities are obstacles that prevent people from seeking the truth and achieving wisdom. A man has learned to follow the authorities and finds the meaning for his existence in imposed wrong values. He becomes a machine that lives, unable to be wise. That is why society cannot develop. That is why people are unsatisfied no matter what they have achieved in life.

 

***

A man who wants to become wise must not allow imposed knowledge to guide him. He has to follow his path. If a man wants to be wise he has to have time for himself. Time to analyze the world around him and his actions, time to discover where real values lie, to find out what is best for him. He has to relate critically to every form of imposed knowledge. The more and the earlier he begins; the more he is on the right way. It is not easy to achieve, but just in that way, one can develop the ability to find the real values of life. That builds objectivity. Objectivity is a sufficient condition for the development of wisdom.

 

I followed just this path. From since I can remember I developed my own way because it has been more valuable to me than anything the authorities have imposed. In the beginning, it was nothing significant. I did not accept the imposed knowledge in school, and as a result, I was a lousy student. It was not pleasant because society does not value people who deviate from the accepted norms of behaviour. But in this way, I kept my natural sense and logic, which aimed me on the right path. Money was not a great value to me, and I did not need power over people, so I have largely avoided the major pitfalls. That has eased to me the path to wisdom. I found that creative work gives me great pleasure and because of it I worked a lot.

 

Of course, as a part of the society in which I lived, I was prone to the influence of authorities as well. I was particularly attracted to competitions. Competition is probably natural for young people. As an architecture student, I managed to win the Yugoslav contest for the arrangement of the Republic Square in Zagreb, Croatia. It brought me fame, money and happiness. I thought at the time that I was on top of the world. On the other side, this success imposed the need for me to stay on top. It was stressful. In following attempts, I did not manage to repeat the victory, which brought me disappointment. Generally, I do not remember this period as a successful and happy period of my life, but I have learned from my own mistakes.

 

I worked hard to get to the core of the problems from which emerged the philosophy I have been working on for thirty years. It instructed me not to search for happiness by comparing myself and my power to other people. Such comparisons inspire a competitive spirit, which alienates people of their nature. Philosophy instructed me to search for my happiness within myself. Man must rely on his power whenever it is possible because that makes him more independent and enjoy life more. I think it is wisdom. Such satisfaction is easier to achieve than winning competitions, and as opposed to contests, it brings stable joy. I cannot say I am happy every day, but if you exclude the situation in the world, I have no problem that makes me unhappy. I am not stressed, and I do not feel depressed. Indeed I have my inner peace, and I am often happy just because I am. It is a big enough reward for me.

 

***

If an individual finds wisdom, it is not enough for the success of the society. The whole community should learn what is objectively good, to change and achieve a good life. A population can reach wisdom with more ease than an individual because objectivity could be more easily accomplished in the par among people than through an individual contemplation. A wise society will be built through equal rights among people. This is what has never before existed, and therefore society was never wise or good. Without equal rights, evil authorities and the obedience of people develop, which cannot bring a good solution. We must overcome the intrusive power of the authorities. The only right authorities are those that affect people only if asked to. All others are bullies. When people get equal power to follow and represent their own needs, no one authority will be violent. Most of the problems in today’s society will disappear. In the wild, the stronger animal often eats weaker one, while equally strong animals respect and do not attack one another. Something similar will happen to people when they establish equal rights among people.

 

The basis of wisdom lies in the fact that no matter what success a man realizes in his life, he must never for his own good and for the good of all who surround him, forget that it is equal to every other man. When a man loses his ability to exercise power over other people, he will stop looking for this power. Equal rights among the people will eliminate the illusion of man’s power, alienated values, and build the respect of every man towards every man. It will teach people wisdom much more than an individual could achieve through contemplation. Then a good society will be built.

 

When I discovered the importance of equal rights among the people, it became necessary to find a way to implement equal rights in society, and I succeeded in that. I created simple ideas that will gradually and unconditionally form a good community. The first idea is a reduction of work hours proportionally to the rate of unemployment. This measure will lead to full employment, which is the basis of people’s journeys toward equal rights. When unemployment ends, owners will have to pay workers more. Workers will achieve greater buying power, and so capitalism would be better off.

 

The second fundamental idea is the creation of a system of mutual evaluation. Each person will get equal power to evaluate positively or negatively let’s say, three people. With the help of such assessment, every person will try hard to produce fewer inconveniences and more conveniences to other people. This will build the most significant social wisdom: “Do not do unto others what you do not want others to do unto you.” People will become a value to each other and respect one another, regardless of what their positions in society are. People will learn what is objectively right and wrong by receiving evaluations from others. The development of such assessment shall be exercised wisely and good society.

 

I have promoted these simple ideas for twenty years. They can quickly solve the significant problems of today’s society; however, they do not have access to the public. What kind of world do we live in? People who stray to my web site mostly like my ideas, but expect them to be promoted by scientific authorities and the media. I offered my work to thousands of authorities usually in the form of short articles like this one, Humanism extensively. This article briefly defines an entirely new social system that will achieve the bright future of mankind.

 

***

The social scientists did not accept me. Why? Generally speaking, the science authorities have always been privileged. Their privileges have prevented them from devoting sufficient interest for equal rights among people regardless of which philosophy they develop. Any philosophy that is built on unequal rights in society is wrong or not correct enough. The more a man is educated, the more he had to accept the wrong or insufficiently right knowledge imposed by authorities. When social scientists get the opportunity to think independently, they already ink significantly through the alienated premises, through a heavy burden of alienated knowledge that prevents them from enlightenment. They can hardly understand objective reality, and be wise. Under the influence of wrong or insufficiently proper authorities, the social sciences are in the wrong or insufficiently adequate path. That is the reason sociology today does not have a solution to the problems of society and society cannot prosper.

 

I have to mention Professor Erik Olin Wright, elected President of the American Sociological Association. Under the influence of the philosopher Karl Marx he searches for “realistic utopia” which would, among other things, make all goods and services freely available to all people. However, following Marx, he does not propose anything new that might bring the goal even slightly closer. I contacted Professor Wright and informed him that I had developed a system that will one day achieve Marx’s communist utopia. He said that he had not enough time to study my work. But the problem is more profound. People who have invested significant effort in studying any ideology fall in love with their efforts and do not accept changes to the ideas they have adopted. Professor Wright has built his opinion where there is no room for brand new ideas that are inconsistent with the knowledge he has taken. Acceptance of such ideas would have been painful for him.

 

I offered my critique of Marxism to many magazines. Among others, to the journal “Science & Society.” The editor replied to me that Marxism is not a religion and he would gladly publish my criticism. By his support, I wrote the article The Failures of Marxism and the Right Path to Socialism and Communism, but the article was not published. Their acceptance of my ideas implies their recognition that a significant part of what they were doing is worthless. They are not ready for it.

 

I have contacted Professor Noam Chomsky as well. He is a great critic of U.S. policy. Unfortunately, his criticism cannot improve the society in which we live because he does not propose a solution that could bring change. I informed Professor Chomsky that I have created a new system that will create a good society. He replied: “You could well be right, but I simply don’t see it.” What Professor Chomsky makes great comparing to his colleagues is that he admitted he did not know.

 

I have offered my social system to politicians. They did not reply to my letters because my philosophy gives power to the people, which means that it reduces the power of politicians, and of course, they do not like it. Besides, in the system I have proposed, politicians would for the first time really become responsible to the people, and they love that even less.

 

The media, no matter how independent they are, cannot be independent of the owners. The owners do not admire the ideas of social justice, so they do not want to publish my work. Indeed their interest is entirely opposite. They not only do not want to support my ideas but they are doing everything in their power to deceive people in the wrong way. I cancelled cable television because I am sick of it. Now I only use the Internet.

 

The education system, the media, the government agencies and corporations control our thoughts, and therefore us, practically from birth. In the article Jacob Rothschild is Guilty for the Conspiracy Against Humankind. I accused Jacob Rothschild of organizing a conspiracy that prevents the development of society. He hides his power so that no one can blame him for the problems he creates in the world.

 

Finally, I want to stress out that my work does not let individuals have more power in society than other people. Individuals cannot achieve private profit from it, and that is the reason they are not interested enough in my ideas. That is why my views do not have support even though only they can lead society forward.

 

***

The system I have proposed will really take power from authorities and give it to people for the first time in human history. Man will become the center from which everything proceeds and to which everything returns. Each person will have equal rights of decision-making in society, and therefore the system will for the first time indeed follow the needs of the people. Each person will have free access to any work post at any time, and that will definitely abolish the privileges and all the disadvantages that come from them. The system will democratically establish a very efficient method of bearing the responsibility of individuals for their free actions, and that will contribute to the development of cooperation among people at all levels of human relationships. That will make a good society. That will teach people wisdom.

 

One day the world will accept my ideas because freedom and equal human rights are conditions without which it is not possible to achieve a good society. When people realize that man to man is the highest value, then they would more easily share the benefits they possess with others and would reach the wisdom and good life sooner. It will also teach people to love. Wisdom is to find a way to love. Love is the highest possible value after basic human needs are met. Love brings joy. People who do not feel love have nothing no matter what kind of success in life they have achieved. People think that they are able to love. I realized that behind their love often lies narcissism and the need to create power over people. This is mainly because our culture supports the development of alienated values and thus prevents the growth of love. You think you love? I have created a little test that can tell you if you love. The test is here: Do you love?

 

My philosophy on which I have worked on for 30 years gives me pleasure, although I still have not managed to present it to the world. From the beginning, I have envisioned that my work would not be accepted easily but to be honest, I did not predict it would be this hard. I will probably not be able to see the implementation of the results of my work. Sometimes I am sad about that, but there is nothing I can do to speed up the process. It now depends on you people. My work has given me a tremendous reward because it helped me to penetrate deeper into the laws of nature. I found wisdom. Whenever I develop some new thoughts in my philosophy, I feel better, and I love this world more. I also enjoy writing because I know that one day my work will bring a good life for all people.

 

 

December 17, 2010

Updated

February 28, 2013