Category: English

2005.06.25

Let’s finish with the social evil

So you are a student, and a bully harasses you at school? Or your boss abuses you at work? One cannot find a person who would not agree that these are very occasional incidents today. To protect yourself from harassments you need to report it to authorities. The culture we have inherited gives authorities more power than other people have. The system we live in provides authorities with the rights to know what is good or bad for you, better than you would. That is wrong.

 

Also, the authorities more often like their power much more than you, so that they might be easily corrupted. Besides that, even the courts can hardly protect you from sophisticated abuse. Yes, you may move to another school or company if they are available, but another bully or boss may abuse you there, too. If somebody calls you names or your neighbour produces noise at night, or you name it, you do not have adequate protection from such harassment in everyday life anywhere.

 

Well, the system of evaluation I have invented will protect you from all of the evil mentioned above and from much more. This is actually anarchy because the people will not follow any written rules while evaluating other people. This will give people much more effective protection than laws or authorities. Everyone will stop doing what other people do not like and try their best to do what people do like. This is what will make a good society.

 

But you may be concerned, for example, what if somebody does not like the fact your singing is better than his. Would he evaluate you negatively just because he is jealous of your skill? Firstly, I would like to say that every person would have a limited right for assessing negatively let’s say three people monthly. That would have to make you a worse person to him than his lousy boss is, and a salesperson that sold him spoiled food, or the politician who lied to him, which is hard to believe. An average person would never evaluate you negatively just because you sing better than him.

 

Nevertheless, in an alienated perverted society we live in today, some misevaluation may happen, but an individual evaluation would not have the power to produce significant harm to anybody. On the other hand, if you are an exposed person and do things many people would not like you to do, you would get a large number of negative evaluations from the people, and that would hurt you and force you to change your behaviour.

 

Finally, the new system will make all peoples’ good skills equally appreciated so that if you sing better than somebody else, it will not bother him much because he would have a chance to be better than you in something else and to find his satisfaction there. Last but not least, the system of evaluation will teach people to solve possible conflicts through agreements. That would make all sides in conflicts satisfied without arbitrages of authorities. Bravery and excellent skills in serving the people will be appreciated strongly and evaluated positively.

 

Actually, I cannot see any problem with the system of evaluation besides that of the resistance of a small narcissus inside you people that does not like other people evaluating you. But the assessment is precisely what will finally give each person equal rights and power in society. The lack of it was the primary cause that prevented establishing a good society in the whole history of humankind.

 

People hurt other people only when they feel superior and do not harm people who might equally hurt them back. The system of evaluation will make people respect each other, and that will prevent bad relationships happening in society. However, if you are still concerned about the evaluation rights of people, we may try it without any awards and punishments involved. Let’s just see how many good and bad evaluations each person would get and that will make a significant improvement to society. We may try it tomorrow, and a much better future will start tomorrow. The system of evaluation will one day stop all evil.

Homosexuality

Homosexuality

 

Homosexuals most likely build their orientation on narcissism, which develops a close emotional bond between the members of the same sex.

 

Everyone who has thought about homosexual relationships for a long time develops a desire to investigate sex with same-sex members. Given that homosexual orientation was until recently prohibited or shameful, homosexuals have hidden their sexual desire. In such an environment, homosexuals were indeed unhappy people. The enormous stress under forbidden desires and long-term suffering resulting from the inability to achieve homosexual relations established the homosexual orientation. After that, the first homosexual experience brings incredible happiness and strengthens the homosexual orientation. I am convinced that if homosexuality were not forbidden, homosexuals would be less passionately homosexually oriented. Any forbidden love between a man and a woman may confirm this claim. If their relationship is undesirable or prohibited by their families, such a relationship raises passion. Restricting love is counterproductive. The same applies to homosexuals.

 

Members of the same sex who live together should have equal rights as married people except the right to name their relationship as “marriage” because it is not natural. Language should be rich enough to distinguish between natural and unnatural human relations. Homosexual sensitively opposes it fiercely because they have suffered deeply while hiding their sexual orientation, and it is essential to them that their homosexual relationship is accepted by society as natural. It would be better for them to accept their relationship as at least controversial because it would increase the possibility of returning to a natural state. A natural state can achieve genuine joy in life.

 

I think that homosexuality is undeveloped love, just as falling in love. Developed love is not even necessarily sexual. When people learn to love, they will lower their narcissism, which will return them to their nature, significantly reducing or even ending homosexuality. In a disalenated society, people will find that marriage between a man and a woman is a good solution.

 

***

 

Homosexuality is a wrong human orientation resulting from an unhealthy society. Society is insane because it is alienated, neurotic and destructive. Homosexuality cannot be removed until society is healed. In the healthy society, I have defined in my book “Humanism,” homosexuality would be reduced if not removed.  

 

My philosophy states that thoughts determine a person. I rather reject the genetic theory of the nature of a person’s character and orientation. Life creates a person. At birth, a person is an empty box. They do not know whether they are people or frogs. They have developed instincts for survival and individual characteristics, but nothing determines their character, interests or orientation. All that they know is created in the interaction within their environment. This interaction begins with the parents. The relationship between parent and child is the most important one for the development of every individual and then also for the development of society. Children see their future through the lives of their parents. Today, parents live in an alienated society which makes them dissatisfied with their lives. Such people could hardly find love in themselves. Lack of love creates trauma in the development of children. These children do not see a promising future for themselves. That is when the significant problems of today’s society begin. On the contrary, if the parents are happy and love each other, the children build faith in their future.  

 

I’ve concluded that only an equal relationship between parents can build love. If the father is the authority of the family and the mother is not, they are not equal, and the relationship between them cannot be defined as love. In my book “Humanism,” I have presented that some level of sadomasochism always exists in such relationships. Such a relationship is not good and cannot leave a good mark on the development of children. Suppose a father is an authority and a mother is only a person who serves in the house, which is an existing phenomenon even today. In that case, the children usually appreciate the father more than the mother. It may cause the son to love more men than women. I think it is the primary origin of male homosexuality. In support of this hypothesis is that throughout history, homosexuality rates have been higher among men than among women. In my opinion, that is because patriarchy was the dominant relationship in families. If the son in such a family does not develop homosexual tendencies, he would probably not build a love for women either because the family in which he has grown has not taught him to appreciate and love women. Daughters from such marriages would most likely seek more love from authoritative men because they could hardly enjoy others. They would probably spend their lives seeking love from a man who might be unable to give it.  

 

The situation is significantly different if the father is an adverse authority, an authority that the child fears or despises. The son in such a family would instead build a love for his mother, which would cause in him a better attitude towards women. The daughter may also establish a better relationship with women than men, which can direct her toward a homosexual relationship with women. Of course, human biological characteristics, character, a degree of narcissism, stress, and culture also play a significant role in sexual orientation. Still, I believe the crucial role comes from the families where the child grows up.  

 

Similar results will occur if the mother has the dominant role in the family. The son would admire his mother, which would, with great certainty, direct him towards a heterosexual relationship. Such a son can be passive in relationships with women and expect women to make decisions. Depending on the father’s passivity and other factors, her daughter may develop homosexual relationships with other women. If such relationships do not evolve, it might be difficult for her to establish and maintain a relationship with men. 

 

In conclusion, I want to emphasize that the same rights relations between men and women are the only reasonable solution for the development of the family and society. Husbands and wives must respect each other as human beings, regardless of their differences in intelligence, strength, or other skills they possess. There must be mutual respect between parents and children also. Parents must have the highest authority over their children, but they must also respect them. Parents need to build their respect through their good example and by using rewards and punishments. In addition to the full equality of parents, it may still be good if the father is somewhat higher in authority over daughters, and the mother slightly higher over sons, because it will reduce or remove the inclination of a child to develop homosexual tendencies.  

 

***

 

This observation regarding homosexuality is based on my philosophy. When I crystallized the conclusion, I decided to check out what science has discovered in the field of homosexuality. According to the references I found on the Internet, the study about the homosexuality of psychologists Bell, Weinberg and Hammersmith, published in 1981, seems very important. They have examined more than a thousand homosexuals and heterosexuals over three years of data collection. They then analyzed data for five years and spent two years verifying conclusions. After ten years of work, they concluded that family does not affect the sexual orientation of children. This study has contributed to the notion that homosexuality is part of the genetic code and should be accepted.  

 

Does this mean that my contemplation was wrong? No, it does not! Recent studies by two Taiwanese psychiatrists, For-Wey Lung and Bih-Ching Shu, published in Comprehensive Psychiatry in 2007, examined parents’ role in forming homosexuals. They have questioned members of the military in Taiwan. Using a statistical model-based study, they concluded that the influence of parents and increased neuroticism could explain homosexuality in 62% of cases. In short, according to them, the relationship between father and son has the most critical role in becoming male homosexuals. They argue that paternal affection and introverted and neurotic characteristics are the leading causes of male homosexuals. 

 

Added on April 4, 2019. Dr. Neil and Briar Whitehead from New Zealand are the authors of the book My Genes Made Me Do It (2016). They made conclusions based on a 20-year study undertaken with more than 10,000 scientific papers and publications on homosexuality. They concluded that homosexuality is overwhelmingly environmental and nothing about our genes compels homosexuality. Genetic homosexuality has been a convenient myth promoted by gay activism for decades. The research based on 33,000 pairs of twins in Australia shows that when one of the siblings is gay, there is only an 11% chance the other sibling is gay too. If homosexuality occurs by genetics, identical twins will always be identical for same-sex attraction. The research proves that homosexuals are not born that way.

 

The research also states that no people become homosexual because of upbringing either. According to it, parents do not influence making a son or daughter homosexual. This contradicts my opinion. The study did not consider that we live in a society that does not know how to love. But later, the study states that an increasing number of young people in dysfunctional families identify themselves as homosexual and transsexual. In my opinion, this is a direct result of the lack of love. Once we learn to love, the number of homosexuals will decrease. My article “Do you love?” teaches it.

 

***

 

I have not read these studies because that is not of my primary interests. But I use their conclusions to emphasize the incompetence of western social scientists. Why are they incompetent? Today’s scientists are recruited from excellent students who have developed the ability to repeat knowledge. Such people are used to accepting knowledge uncritically; otherwise, they would not be able to replicate it and would not be excellent students. People who get used to uncritically accepting knowledge have less ability to detect substances because they are used to receiving it from authorities. I had the opportunity to talk to many professors of social sciences and often became disturbed by their lack of logical reasoning.

 

I concluded homosexuality almost incidentally. Lung and Shu, and Neil Whitehead confirmed by their studies that I was right. My conclusion should logically be the first idea that leads to the origin of homosexuality. Why was such research not provided before Lung, Shu and Neil Whitehead? What have the sociological and psychological scientists been working on in the field of homosexuality so far? Social sciences not only do not contribute to the development of society but also prevent it. And this is no accident. Why?

 

We live in a capitalist society in a continual economic and moral crisis. It is afraid for its survival and therefore hinders the natural development of values that can present the immorality of capitalism. Capitalism promotes perverted values to be perceived as normal. That is also why media propaganda supports homosexuality. But that is not enough; they need support from the sciences to be more convincing. Capitalists can always find people who, consciously or not, follow the interests of corporations and fund those people to develop suiting theories.

 

That is why the American Psychological Association has instructed for years that changing homosexual orientation is to harm. In contrast, the west has generally capitulated to the idea that homosexuality is innate and unchangeable. The study from Neil Whitehead states that half the homosexual population moves towards heterosexuality in the natural course of life; it’s just that very few people ever hear about it.

 

I believe that Bell, Weinberg, and Hammersmith were honoured by getting such an extensive study and a large sum of money, and they were sure that they honestly did their job (as much as they could). This is not about corruption but instead about something much worse. It is a conspiracy that covers practically all the activities of the developed world to the detriment of society. Scientists who actually may contribute to the development of social science are ignored and do not get research grants, and have no access to the media. Supporting studies such as this one from Bell, Weinberg, and Hammersmith have wrongfully directed social studies and were very successful.

 

As a result, the social sciences today are useless and damage society. Generations of scientists who have been wrongly directed cannot recognize the correct path today. Lung and Shu have managed to make their study because the Taiwan government that funded them is far from the influence of the west, while Neil Whitehead works for the New Zeeland government. The truth may be found only far away from the west. However, besides the fact that they were published in the west by some miracle, these studies are not supported there.

 

I am very disappointed with today’s social sciences. However, who will accept my idea if sciences cannot? So I have to vigorously attack today’s social sciences to attract attention to my work. I’ve already done so in the article My Clash With Sciences and plan to oppose them further in my next article.

 

My article, Do you love? teaches people how to love unconditionally and eliminate homosexuality. It has been offered to numerous psychological magazines. All the answers I received can be summarized as follows: “Your article, “Do you love?” is interesting, but unfortunately, its form does not fit into the conception of our journal.” Unfortunately, I do not have time for a formal study of the sciences I am writing about, so the critical message that the article carries and this one you are reading now will not be accessible to the general public soon. That’s a shame.
 

 

20.11.2012

 

References:

” Homosexuality: the importance of mothers and fathers” by Neil Whitehead and Lower Hutt, New Zealand

Studies of identical twins show homosexuality is acquired, not genetic.

 

2005.06.13

Let’s remove immorality

Man is immoral when he does not have the freedom to be moral. When the system he lives in does not allow him to use his power productively. Powerlessness in society is immoral itself and indeed spreads immorality. In today’s closed, not free, alienated society, almost all the people take some power from other people. That is the reason nearly all people are powerless in the community so that it is no surprise in what immorality we live in. Immorality is malign cancer for every society.

 

The system I have proposed gives unlimited possibilities to man to express his productive power in society and to find satisfaction from it. On the other hand, the system does not provide freedom to inconvenient or destructive behaviour in society. In the new order, everyone will have the power to evaluate any other person in the community. This evaluation will represent such a value so that everyone will avoid doing anything inconvenient to another person or to society, and everyone will try hard to produce the most significant possible benefits to another man and to society. What goes around comes around, and therefore the society will become good. The people will, through self-practice, get to know where natural values are. That will definitely stop all kinds of immorality.

2005.06.01

Let’s remove alienation

Subjectivity creates alienation. A man hardly accepts his powerlessness in nature, and therefore he easily gives to unknown or superior phenomena in nature determinations that suit him best. Such determinations often give the man an illusion of power and release him from unpleasant tensions, but such determinations are alienated from their objective essences and thus alienate the man from his nature. Nobody is immune to this process so that every man builds some sort of alienation. In purpose to achieve more power, alienated people tend to impose their alienated visions, values, needs to other people. This is an origin for the unlimited alienation we live in today.


It starts with upbringing. Parents teach children what they think is good and bad. Parents who live more naturally are mostly satisfied with their lives. They take care of their children and allow free development of children which is a precondition for the prosperity of children. Such parents are really rare today.


Today, parents are pretty much alienated from their own nature, so that they can hardly satisfy their needs and therefore cannot be satisfied with their lives. They often do not have time for their children so that they leave it to society to take care of them. The shortage of love does huge damage to the development of children. If alienated parents find the time for children that is mostly to force their children to accomplish everything they were not able to. They force children to accept even more alienated values and needs than they have accepted. Such parents produce outrageous demands for their children which oppresses them strongly. That does considerable damages to their mental development. The misfortune of today’s society starts here.


Then education comes as an institutionalized demand for imposing settled alienated knowledge. This is an abuse of a student’s mind. More successful students in schools are mainly those ones who have more advanced intelligence and who often feel less of their nature so that they may accept alienated knowledge more efficiently. After finishing schools, these students have a better chance to take leading roles in society. They are intellectually capable of making improvements in alienated fields but this, as a general rule, has little to do with the social growth. On the contrary, taking into account that these kinds of people have more difficulties to feel and comprehend natural issues, they prevent the natural development of society and spread accepted alienation.


The oppression continues in adulthood where you, dear reader, carry and develop all the alienation coming from your ancestors. The alienation makes you powerless. In today’s closed alienated society you almost do not have a chance to live a natural life. All in all, you’re just another brick in the wall (Pink Floyd).


Walls are everywhere around you, and what is worse, they are in your heads too. Authorities have taught you to fight just for the better positions in the walls all your lives. But there is not a better position in the wall; you just think there is because firstly, you cannot try it. You are not free and do not allow anybody you control anyhow to be free either. You are good people to authorities because they abundantly use you, but you can hardly be good for yourself nor to society. Here are the origins for all of the social problems today. That is what prevents you and other people from using natural potentials and abilities. That is what stops you and other people of having a good, sane, satisfied and joyful lives.


The system I have proposed will tear down the walls. It will rid you people of authoritative pressure and give you the freedom to follow your own interests, while at the same time the system will be forcing you to respect other people. Such an experience will demystify the values imposed by authorities and will teach you to live following your objective nature, which will, in turn, free you from all types of alienation characteristics of present-day society. Furthermore, the system will teach you to set your needs following the possibilities of satisfying them. This is the chief prerequisite for overcoming destructiveness in society because when you permanently satisfy your needs, you are not going to be destructive anymore. The proposed system will give you the power to be good people. It promises a natural, harmonious and highly prosperous development of society.


2005.05.29

Let’s remove fear


We don’t need fear anymore to achieve existential survival; however, we have it a lot. In today’s abundant production this is an artificial fear that gives power to privileged people. Frightened people are unable to think alone. Every fear blocks an ability to judge, so that afraid people seek shelter from authorities. It is a vicious circle of poverty in which we live. In the system I have proposed, everyone will receive a minimum income that assures an economic existence without matter if one works or not. The height of the salaries will be determined by direct democracy.


So then why would people work if they receive an income without work? Well, the answer is simple; those who work will earn higher salaries than those who do not work. Also, the system will give people a choice to choose the work they love to do, and they will do it primarily because of having a good time. One may say: “Yes, but almost no worker loves his job permanently his whole life.” That is true, but the new system allows people to change their work easily and find new, interesting ones. One may add: “Yes, but the worst problem today lies in the fact that we work all day practically, and even though we have an excellent job, as time passes, it would start becoming more like a difficult burden than a pleasure.”


Well, the new system has a simple answer to this problem. It will allow the demystification of today’s system of values. That means, a reduction in consumption of goods will be achieved and that will require the modification of production. Then, the reorganization of work will significantly reduce needed work hours. Once the new system improves society and society improves the system back, probably two-four hours daily will be enough to satisfy all of the peoples’ production needs. Besides that, the work will be a pleasure and will produce much better production than any fear can. Then the people will have much more time to spend in developing their productive orientations and in socializing with other people.


Another major fear in today’s society is the fear of losing a privileged status. If you are a president, movie star, or have any other exempt status in society, you have achieved alienated advantages that bring happiness but also a fear of losing such a condition. A privileged status brings a pretty much non-existent benefit objectively, and entirely unnecessary fear. In the new system, the people will have different jobs and statuses in society, but they will not rate their jobs nor ranks more or less than jobs or statuses of other people. Therefore, loss of any job or status in the new society will not be a significant inconvenience to anybody, so that neither will fear losing it be. In the new system, the people will respect other people for who they are and not for what kind of statuses they possess. That would enable everyone to have a healthy good life.


The system of mutual evaluation I have proposed will give everyone the ultimate power that no one can overpass. People will respect each other much. No one will be afraid of any other human being anymore without matter of what weaknesses they have. What about other fears: abstract and concrete, rational and irrational, conscious and unconscious, big and small? Authorities create or maintain most fears to make people obedient to them practically all their lives. Well, such fears in the new society where people love each other, where continuously help each other will hardly exist.


Can you imagine a life without fear? That would be a beautiful life.


2005.05.21

Let’s prevent corruption

When I start a discussion about my system with people most often I receive complains that Paradise on Earth is not possible because individuals are weak and like to corrupt or to be corrupted. Corruption makes immoral, destructive relations in society which prevents society from being good. Corruption is a poison of every society.


But when is a man weak? He is weak when he cannot satisfy his needs. He cannot meet his needs in a closed and alienated society where privileges rule such as the one we live in today. Privileges give a man power over people, and that corrupts. Privileges are the nests for corruption. In the world of privileges, one cannot get what he needs unless he is servile to privileged people or corrupts them. That is wrong.


In the system I have proposed power over people will not exist, there will be not privileged people either so that corruption will disappear as well. Everyone who does not satisfy one’s needs at his workplace will get negative evaluations from a not satisfied person. These evaluations will be as influent as it would be necessary for the system to work fine. Therefore, everyone will try hard to please other people as much as they can without corruption.


Furthermore, the new system offers open work competition for every work post in public companies. No one’s public work post will be privileged anymore. If a person at his workplace does not satisfy somebody’s needs, he or she may be replaced with a not satisfied person who offers better productivity. No one would be able to get benefits from a privileged status in society. No one will have control over other people, neither over assets that belong to the society. Why would corruption exist when no one could achieve a privileged status and power in society? Besides that, in such a community no one will be weak, and corruption will not have any reason to exist.


The work competition is probably the most challenging part of the system I have proposed, but it is far from impossible to accomplish. It will bring better productivity than capitalism can so that it will send capitalism down in history. It will make work become a value in itself, and people will enjoy working. The work market will make all jobs equally demanded. Life in such a system will bring disalienation; it will show where real values are. Such a system will undoubtedly stop corruption. The benefits of the new system will bring to society are practically unlimited. You may find more about it in my book The Humanism. The system is entirely new so that it might not be easy to implement, but there is no other good way. We have to go this way if we want to build a beautiful future of humankind.


Jacob Rothschild Guilty

Jacob Rothschild is Guilty for the Conspiracy Against Humankind

It is well documented that the Rothschild family was by far the wealthiest and most powerful family in the world 200 years ago. They realized that power over people is not popular, and decided to rule the world secretly. It is documented that they hide their wealth and power, which indicates that they are most likely still the wealthiest and most powerful family in the world. People should have equal rights but do not because the Rothschilds built their power by taking rights that belong to other people. Thus, the Rothschild family has become the evil that oppresses the world and a significant obstacle to the progress of society.


***


My interest in conspiracies arose when I found out that they exist in the case of the destruction of my homeland Yugoslavia. World media presented the dissolution of Yugoslavia as an internal conflict amongst the Yugoslav people; this depiction was just a facade. The essence of the breakup of Yugoslavia was rooted in the colonization of the country. In 1990, the western republics, Slovenia and Croatia, elected parties that supported capitalism. Previously ruling communists won the Serbian election. As a result, Serbia impeded on the pro-Western reforms in Yugoslavia. I realized that the Western politicians and media supported the pro-Western republics and accused the Serbs of all of the problems Yugoslavia entered. This bias was the result of a conspiracy that aimed to alienate people and weaken them politically and economically, which is precisely what happened. The conspirators got power over the whole territory of former Yugoslavia and cheaply took resources that were built by all the people of Yugoslavia.  

People realize that injustice happens around the world. Many media accuse the corporations that rule the world and produce wrong, but they do not blame the people who govern these corporations. In that way, the media accept that nothing can be done against these rulers. Conspirators like such media because they spread general apathy in society. I have recognized that the allegations against corporations are useless and that it is necessary to find people who benefit from the ruling of the corporations to be able to stop them.

Around the year 2000, I wondered, who might have such high power that they could destroy Yugoslavia? Through investigation, I came to the conclusion that all roads lead to the Rothschild family, although they are very unexposed. The Rothschild family secretly governs the Western world, and so no one could hold them responsible for it. No one could remove them from power. Is that not the goal of conspiracy? At that time, I noticed that many religious people believed that doomsday is approaching and speculated on the identity of the Antichrist. They suspected George Soros, Prince Charles, and even the Pope. I tried to take advantage of the interest of Christians and suggested in the article Has the Antichrist Come?, written in 2003, that Jacob Rothschild could be the Antichrist.

By the nineteenth century, the Rothschild family had already become the wealthiest family in the world. Lord Byron presented the family in his poem “Don Juan,” canto 12/5, written in the year 1823.

 

 

Who hold the balance of the World? Who reign
O’er congress, whether royalist or liberal?
Who rouse the shirtless patriots of Spain?
(That make old Europe’s journals “squeak and gibber” all)
Who keep the World, both old and new, in pain
Or pleasure? Who make politics run glibber all?
The shade of Buonaparte’s noble daring?–
Jew Rothschild, and his fellow-Christian, Baring.

 

 

Then began the Industrial Revolution and the blossoming of colonialism where the Rothschilds certainly became even richer; but then withdrew from the public. Why did they do this? After conquering the Western world, as expected, they wanted to capture the whole world. Taking into account that rulers were often unpopular, and for this they could have even paid with their heads, the Rothschilds have decided to conquer the world secretly. And they have succeeded. Today, they are not placed on the list of the wealthiest people in the world. One could get the impression that they lost wealth in the last two hundred years, but there is no supporting evidence. On the contrary, I believe that the Rothschilds have never been wealthier or more powerful than today.

 

How can the Rothschilds increase their wealth and influence in the world while decreasing their visibility? The Rothschilds, as the wealthiest people in the world, have cleverly made contracts with poor agents who then represent them in the ownership of companies. As a reward, these people usually receive about 15% ownership as a gift, to incentivize their work, while the rest belongs to the Rothschilds. These people were immediately able to buy mansions, yachts and planes. They are very grateful for it, loyal to the Rothschilds, and do their best not to disappoint them. Such contracts are mutually very beneficial.

 

An example: After the arrest of Mikhail Khodorkovsky for tax evasion in the oil company “Yukos” in Russia, the Russian government threatened to seize his stocks. Then the control over Mikhail Khodorkovsky’s shares of “Yukos” was transferred to Lord Jacob Rothschild. The source is the article from “The Washington Times,” November 2, 2003: “Arrested oil tycoon passed shares to banker.” The article was republished on the web page Action Report Online. This article is significant because it indicates that Jacob Rothschild was most likely a real majority owner of the company “Yukos.” Khodorkovsky simply did not have the money nor the knowledge to step alone in such a big business and made the wealth he was ascribed. In this case, greed had forced Jacob Rothschild to make a mistake as he showed a high possibility that he hid his wealth behind Khodorkovsky. It should be added that the value of these shares, according to Forbes, exceeds the entire wealth of the whole Rothschild family.

 

Can we assume that the Rothschild model of hiding their wealth behind Khodorkovsky was applied to the other families throughout history? Of course we can. The Rothschilds were the wealthiest people in the world long before the wealthy families Rockefeller, Morgan, Buffet, and others appeared. The Rothschilds have most likely sponsored the rise of these families in a similar fashion to Khodorkovsky. The Banking Monopoly states: “During WWI, JP Morgan was thought to be the richest man in the US, but after his death, it was discovered that he was only a lieutenant of the Rothschild’s. Once Morgan’s will was made public, it was discovered that he owned only 19% of JP Morgan companies “. David Icke writes in Children of the Matrix that the Rockefellers and Morgans were just “gofers” for the European Rothschilds. Political Vel Craft argues: “Warren Buffett Is Rothschild’s Front Man In The United States.” None of these articles provides evidence that the Rothschilds contracted Rockefeller, Morgan, Buffet, and others to represent them in the ownership and management of the world’s biggest companies because the contracts that regulate their relationship are secret and as such are inaccessible to the public.

 

But the articles provide beyond a reasonable doubt that something like that is more than possible. In this way, the Rothschild family most likely controls the largest banks, the most profitable companies and the most influential media. They are united in a single hierarchical organization that has absolute financial power, which brings them political power and controls all power centers in the Western world. In such a manner, the Rothschilds most likely manage the Western world, although they are not in politics, nor on the lists of the world’s wealthiest.

If there were two centers of such power, then they would have fought for dominance and through their strife we would know who they are, but there is no such thing. The absence of such conflicts tells me with complete certainty that the Rothschild family has monopoly power in the Western world. Therefore, we can hold the Rothschilds accountable for almost everything in the western world. This article will do that to a large extent.

Jacob Rothschild hides his power so much that he does not hesitate to use any means to present himself as a humble philanthropist. An insinuation: A photo of Jacob Rothschild taken by mistake in his home, Waddesdon Manor in England, with the “richest” man in the world, Warren Buffett, and California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, has recognized Jacob Rothschild as a very influential man. That is most likely why Jacob Rothschild decided to present Warren Buffett as a great philanthropist and himself as a man surrounded by such people. I think that Jacob Rothschild was behind Warren Buffett’s statement that he intends to donate 85% of his wealth to charity. Of course, in this case, this wealth belongs to Jacob Rothschild. The source: Reuters.  

In 2012, David Rockefeller decided to sell 37% of his Wealth Advisory and Asset Management Group to Jacob Rothschild for an undisclosed sum. Source: Financial Services. It’s no surprise they cooperate well, but this is not the problem here. When people buy something, they usually need to pay taxes. According to the law, there are some exceptions and buying corporations is one of them. In this particular case even issuing a bill is not necessary. Why is the law so convenient for those who purchase corporations? 

 

The Rothschilds have such massive financial power that they could easily redeem all the worth of the stock exchange. Also, they offer investments to independent companies that the companies could hardly refuse. If the owners of the companies accept the terms of the investment, they may even retain control of their companies. It is critical for the Rothschilds that they are cooperative. If these companies oppose the Rothschilds, they run into problems. A considerable campaign comes to mind that was supposed to split Microsoft in two because of the allegedly unacceptable monopoly that the company had in the world. The majority owner Bill Gates started playing bridge with Warren Buffet on which occasion Buffet probably explained to Gates the importance of “cooperativeness” in the Western world. I believe that Bill Gates accepted and since then there was no pressure to split Microsoft anymore. 

 

The same happens with entire countries. Saudi Arabia has been cooperative with the Rothschilds, and therefore nobody touches it. The Rothschilds do not care what oil company exploits oil in the world as long as it belongs to them. If it does not, then the people who control the oil lose their power or even their lives like Muammar Gaddafi and Saddam Hussein. I do not claim that the Rothschilds have organized the killing of those people. No, their deaths were a side product of the Rothschild’s need to control oil in the world. I do not claim either that the Rothschilds wanted to steal the oil. It will still technically belong to Iraq and Libya. But the Rothschilds will bring to power obedient people contrary to Muammar Gaddafi and Saddam Hussein. Thus, the Rothschilds will establish control over these countries and then of course over their oil. No one else has such power. The Rothschilds are able to achieve this goal because they are invisible and cannot be held accountable. 

One of the most important agents of the Rothschild family is George Soros. By portraying himself as a “great benefactor,” at the end of the millennium, he helped the reforms in Eastern Europe and donated one billion dollars to these countries through his organization “Open Society.” The name he gave his organization is at least shamelessly hypocritical because he is one of the prominent members of the most closed society. He is a pirate who wounded many countries and their people as a result of his greed. William Engdahl wrote about it in his article: The Secret Financial Network Behind “Wizard” George Soros. The article also presents Soros’ connection with the Rothschilds.

 

Can the people who do not believe in conspiracies explain why Soros has donated one billion dollars? Here is my explanation. It was not a gift but a big scam by which the agents of the Rothschild family’s secret organization took the properties of Eastern European countries. I have no evidence. But if you think that the pirate Soros donated one billion dollars to the countries of Eastern Europe to let independent people get rich, then the Rothschild’s conspiracy has successfully formed the way you think. By giving donations to Eastern Europe, Soros promoted capitalism as an ideal system financed parties and media, and corrupted politicians. That allowed other agents of the Rothschild’s to step in an organized manner and buy the state ownership in these countries. That is how an investment of one billion dollars returned trillions. This is the only proper way to interpret Soros’ philanthropy. It was organized crime. Some local people in these countries got rich as well, but they are agents who run the Rothschild companies and generally work for commissions.

 

The governments of East European countries received assistance from representatives of the West, binding them to follow the policy of Western countries. If some government of the East European countries opposes the policies imposed from the West then that country experiences rebellion against the government. The President of Ukraine, Viktor Yanukovich was dismissed by violent revolution because he tried to build a closer relationship with Russia. This was a very sophisticated operation that funded the revolution in Ukraine, which has misguided the world about occurrences in Ukraine by controlled media, which has forced the leaders of the world to support a violent change of government in Ukraine. Who could have an interest and the power to achieve it? Only the Rothschilds.

 

Russia opposes the aggressive policy of the West, and therefore the West increasingly attacks it. I believe that this is the beginning of the third major aggression against Russia after Napoleon and Hitler. I do not think it would be an armed war between America and Russia because both sides know they cannot win. The battles will be performed by economic and political exhaustion and will last until one of the parties gives up. The Russians defeated Napoleon and Hitler, and I believe they might defeat Rothschild as well, primarily because they are moral contrary to the corrupt West and therefore stronger. It would take years, if not decades, of exhausting struggle, during which the countries will stagnate, and people will suffer.

The Rothschild family decides for whom people vote for in the US elections and in all the influenced countries around the world by investing large amounts of money to political parties that are most suitable to them and by promoting them through the media they control. In the end, it does not matter to them who will win because they finance, through their agents, all influential parties that follow their interests around the world. Thus they ensure that the policy that suits them would be accepted wherever liberal democracy exists. In the 2012 presidential elections in the US in, both the dominant parties have spent around a billion dollars. There were more candidates for the presidential position, but the Americans did not even know they exist. Where is the democracy? This is the hidden dictatorship of the Rothschild family.

 

It very rarely happens that things do not work out as the Rothschilds predict. But it does happen. On the way of conquering the world, the Rothschilds met resistance from the Serbs. Serbs resisted the Rothschild family in the attack on Yugoslavia for ten years. The Rothschilds lost patience and decided to break the opposition by way of military aggression of NATO pact on Yugoslavia in 1999. Only the Rothschilds can organize aggression against a sovereign country without consequences because no one can connect them to this aggression. Only Rothschild can mobilize all the western media to justify this aggression through lies which have backed the support of the world nations for aggression against Yugoslavia. Only Rothschild can benefit from it.

 

US President Bill Clinton, as the highest authority of NATO, was supposed to command the aggression against Yugoslavia. He knew that such a command would be criminal because it did not have permission from the UN. Therefore, Clinton persistently refused to issue such a command even though the Rothschilds pressured him for years. Then the Rothschild agents set up the Lewinsky case and blackmailed him with impeachment if he refused the aggression against Yugoslavia. Only the Rothschilds can blackmail the US President in such a manner. President Clinton, of course, preferred his position more than the lives of thousands of people and commanded the attack on Yugoslavia. Immediately after his approval, the Lewinsky case was forgotten entirely. Please see the chronology at CNN. Clinton got a 500 million dollar donation to build his library in Little Rock, Arkansas. May it be the reward for the attack on Yugoslavia? I wrote excessively about the war on Yugoslavia in the article My debt to Yugoslavia. I am deeply convinced that an investigation against US President Bill Clinton for the criminal aggression on Yugoslavia would lead to Jacob Rothschild. But who can sue President Clinton?

The successful aggression on Yugoslavia encouraged the Rothschilds to go further in conquering the world. Thus, in turn, came Iraq and Afghanistan, countries rich with minerals. These states were independent, and that is something the Rothschild family certainly wanted to change. To make this easier to accomplish they chose George W. Bush for the US President in 2000 because he was entirely on their side as opposed to President Clinton. For the aggression on Afghanistan and Iraq, they needed the support of the people. It was found in the terrorist attack in New York on 9/11/2001. I think the Rothschilds would wait way too long for such an opportunity so I believe they made it happen much sooner by the help from their Muslim allies which the terrorists did not know about. There is an open suspicion that Saudi Arabia was involved. President Bush immediately accused Afghanistan and Iraq of the terrorist attack even though he had no proof. He gave the ultimatum to Afghanistan and Iraq which they could not accept and ordered the aggression against these countries.

 

Practically only the Rothschilds can control the American government, only they could benefit from the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan, only they are able to launch the aggression, and only they could establish a puppet government there. Only they could have profited from these wars. To hide their responsibility if something went wrong, they cunningly sought reserve culprits for the wars. They could not find anyone else but the US government itself. Therefore they formed the conspiracy theory that claims the Bush administration carried out the attack on the twin towers in New York 9/11/2001 to obtain a pretext for attacks on Iraq and Afghanistan. This is nonsense. President Bush did not have the operational ability to derive a significant personal benefit from the aggression on Iraq and Afghanistan. I am sure President Bush did not know about that because he was surprised and reacted very awkwardly when he heard that the planes hit the World Trade Center.

 

But numerous experts who claim that the WTC building number 7 was demolished with explosives were found, and they accused the US government. This conspiracy theory is presented a lot in the media which would not be possible without the support of the Rothschild family that controls the media. I am an architect, and I know that the steel structure is weak when exposed o high temperatures and rapidly loses its loading weight capacity when it is exposed to fire, as opposed to concrete structures. Building number seven was burning on low floors almost all day collapsing under the heavy load of the building, which looks like a demolition. The same thing happened to the twin skyscrapers. They collapsed faster because they were strongly damaged by the hit of the planes.

 

With such conspiracies the Rothschilds deceive people. The accusation against the US government does not bother the Rothschilds at all, because it serves to carry the burden of all the evil that the Rothschilds commit. Some indication exists which presents the possibility that the Rothschilds bypassed the president, helped the terrorists in the United States achieve their goal, and obstructed the investigation to bring suspicion to the US government. Thus they remove any possible doubt from themselves. I wrote more about it in the article: My Investigation of 9/11.

 

The Rothschilds support false conspiracy theories because they invalidate the credibility of real conspiracies. Many people write about the evil Rothschilds even though often they do not have evidence. The Rothschilds have never sued any such writers because such trials would bring negative attention. Instead of it, they encourage all kinds of attacks on themselves because the more nonsense people write about them, the less credible their attacks are. Even more, Rothschilds often accuse themselves of the stupid conspiracies. For example: Before it’s News recently published: “Rothschild Takes Down Malaysian Airliner MH370 to gain rights to the Semiconductor Patent – Getting Rid of Those Who Stood In His Way!” What a stupidity! It is equally absurd as if they are accused of stealing food from a grocery store. The authors of such texts should be afraid the Rothschilds might sue them for slander. Of course, unless the Rothschild’s agents hired them to write such articles. Such articles can bring benefits to the Rothschilds because of its shallowness they devaluate the real accusations. Unconvincing conspiracy theories create the opposite effect so that people dismiss conspiracy theories as impossible in today’s “democratic society.” And that is a part of the Rothschild’s conspiracy as well. With such articles, the Rothschilds become innocent people who suffer unjust accusations in the eyes of the world. They are very crafty. Media under control of the Rothschilds deliberately indoctrinate people by imposing misinformation and shallow values, because misinformed and stupid people are obedient and cannot resist.

 

On the other hand, nobody investigates the real conspiracy. In the TV broadcast, Democracy Now on 3.2.2007, the U.S. General Wesley Clark said that immediately after 9/11, the Pentagon planned attacks on Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran. Is that not enough proof that there is a conspiracy? Clark is a real whistleblower because he unadvisedly betrayed the criminal action by the U.S. authorities. The U.S. Army General’s statement has not awakened any interest in the U.S. judiciary or the media. On the other hand I am not sure if whistleblowers Assange and Snowden have said anything that is not known, but still, they are persecuted by the American justice system. Why? Because the U.S. justice and the media are controlled by the Rothschild family. The media have a purpose of removing public interest from the real issues by imposing endless useless public discussions. Assange and Snowden are victims created precisely for that purpose. If what they have revealed did not fit big capital, you would not know that they exist.

 

To return to the US aggression on Iraq and Afghanistan; if you physically attack a man you will most likely end up in jail; if you attack Iraq and Afghanistan, kill hundreds of thousands of people to steal their resources, nothing will happen. It cannot be like this. Given that I am very well versed with the aggression against Yugoslavia, I recognized in the criminal aggression against Iraq and Afghanistan the handwriting of the Rothschild family. Have you ever asked yourself why the President of the US may be impeached for cheating on his wife but cannot be impeached for the criminal aggression against Iraq? I am deeply convinced that the investigation against US President George W Bush for the criminal aggression on Iraq would lead to Jacob Rothschild. But who can sue President George W Bush?

To decrease the dissatisfaction of the people in the United States due to wrong policies of George W. Bush, the Rothschild family, aided by their agent David Rockefeller, chose the young and intelligent Barack Obama for the US presidential position in 2008. I read somewhere that David Rockefeller, agent of the Rothschild family, first congratulated Barack Obama on his victory long before the election. Barack Obama as a humane man attracted the American left and tried to remove the problems that the conservative Bush administration built in America. But he was not strong enough to succeed in doing so. Just before the nomination for the presidency, Obama graduated Harvard law. People who complete university must be obedient followers of authority otherwise they would not be able to complete their studies. The Rothschilds knew that they could relatively easily manipulate young Obama and that is why they chose him. 

 

The Rothschilds turned an exemplary law student who believes that everyone is innocent until a court proves him guilty into a criminal and murderer. Obama signed an order for the predatory arrest of Osama Bin Laden that resulted in his cruel murder in 2011. He spat on his own diploma. Why did he do this? He felt pressure from the media and the U.S. government officials that surrounded him. They are all controlled by the Rothschilds because otherwise, they could not be in the position they hold. No one has convinced me that Osama Bin Laden had anything to do with the terrorist actions that are attributed to him. If you noticed, all the media’s gravest charges have been proved only by putting his picture on the television screen. It is possible that the death was the silencing of a man who was wrongly accused and who could tell an uncomfortable truth in court. 

 

America, pressured by the Rothschilds, kills people around the world with the excuse that in this way they fight terrorism, spread democracy and human rights. That is a lie; this is only about the discipline of disobedient countries. Obama sends drones that kill people in Afghanistan daily under the pretext that it prevents terrorism and spreads democracy. This is terrorism. Could you imagine Afghan drones flying over the United States and killing people because America is an undemocratic and terrorist state? The biggest crime of President Barack Obama was the aggression against Libya. I am deeply convinced that the investigation against US President Barack Obama for the criminal aggression on Libya, would lead to Jacob Rothschild. But who can sue President Barack Obama? 

On the way to conquering the world, the Rothschilds certainly want to conquer Russia. In the recent election campaign the newly elected President of the United States, Donald Trump promised the reconciliation with Russia. President Trump also announced the crackdown on lobbying by “the global elite,” which is synonymous with the Rothschilds. Why would he do this? They have the same interests. I think that nothing significant will be changed. So a choice of continuing conflict between Russia and America is more likely than cooperation.

 

Sometimes leaders of states lose their lives violently. Knowing what kind of power the Rothschild family possess, if I were in the position of public attorney, I would ask the Rothschild family if they know something about the unsolved murders of Presidents John Kennedy, Salvador Allende, Olof Palme, Nicolae Ceausescu, Slobodan Milosevic, and others. For this, of course, political will has to exist. If it appears, I believe that the Rothschilds would get scared of such an investigation and would stop creating the criminal policies of society. I believe that this would immediately reduce the problems in the world.

 

Other heads of “developed” Western countries are also either corrupted or incompetent because other people have no access to such positions. The Rothschilds founded the Bilderberg group. It is a private organization that openly recruits and ideologically directs leaders of the Western world. No wonder that the presidents of Great Britain, France, Italy, and Turkey have recently adopted rebels in Syria as legal representatives of the government. This is a crime. These rebels were secretly created and financed by the Rothschild family with the goal to take control over Syria. That is how the Rothschild family replaces the disobedient governments of independent countries. Thus gaining control of all the resources of this world that they do not have yet under control. And since they are entirely invisible, no one can stop them in that.

 

A few years ago I saw on a YouTube video, which cannot be found anymore, that the Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu said: Do not worry we control the U.S. government. An intelligent man cannot afford such an arrogant statement if the process of the enslavement of American society is not completed. However, Netanyahu did not tell the truth because Israel does not control the U.S. government, but rather the Rothschild family does. The Rothschilds control the US Congress as well through the AIPAC (The American Israel Public Affairs Committee). If any senator or representative of the people opposes the Rothschilds, they will not be politicians anymore because AIPAC has the power to dismiss disobedient politicians and they know it. The American laws have been created in a way that suits the rich for centuries. No wonder why those who purchase corporations are not required to pay taxes. America is a colony of the Rothschilds. This is indirectly confirmed by the National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter, Zbigniew Brzezinski. He said in 2012, “I do not think there is an implicit obligation for the United States to follow like a stupid mule whatever the Israelis do. I think that the United States has the right to have its own national security policy. ” This sentence shows all the weakness of the US administration to the power the Rothschilds possess.

 

The Rothschilds control the judicial departments of Western countries as well. They have established the International Court in Hague to judge the nations that oppose them. So that is why the Serbs were punished. In 2012, the judgments were made by which the Croatian generals Gotovina and Markač and Kosovar politician Hardinaj were declared innocent in the war in Yugoslavia while the Serbian general Tolimir received a life sentence of imprisonment. The civil war in Yugoslavia produced evil on all sides. General Tolimir is no more guilty than the other three people. The judgments are crimes of the corrupted court. Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic was killed in Hague by the drug against leprosy, which annulled the activity of medications for the heart. As the court had no evidence against him, the tension of the four-year stressful trial and most likely inadequate medical treatment for his ailing heart killed him in 2006. Vojislav Šešelj, president of the Serbian Radical Party, was in jail in the Hague tribunal for ten years without a verdict, then he was released without a sentence. That court is a crime itself and a shame on today’s society. Judges from all over the world judge at this court and that means that judges all over the world are corrupt and that there is no justice anywhere. James Bissett, former Canadian ambassador to Yugoslavia, claimed that George Soros, the agent of the Rothschild family, funded the International Court in Hague. This means that the Serbs were tried by the same man who attacked them. It says to me that the family Rothschild has an impact not only on governments around the world but also on the judiciary system. The family Rothschild should be charged for the evil they produce but this, of course, is not possible with a corrupt court. Besides, no one knows that they are responsible for it and therefore he creates the evil in the world uninterruptedly.

In short, power corrupts, and as long as there is power over people, there will be corruption. In my book, Humanism – A Philosophic-Ethical-Political-Economic Study of the Development of the Society,I have proposed the elimination of the power of man over a man. This is the only way to build a good future for humankind, but powerful and corrupted people do not accept such a system. Others are so influenced by the system of education and the media that they could not recognize the benefits of the system I have proposed.

 

The conspiracy has absorbed science as well. Sometime early in 2012, I watched a video from the conference of “The Institute for New Economic Thinking.” In this video, George Soros has called upon all economic schools, including Marxist, to contribute to finding a way out of the financial crisis. The call is not sincere because if it were, they would analyze the economic ideas I offered to them, but they had no such intention. They do not want to solve the financial crisis because it suits them better than the release from the economic crisis. What’s that all about? The plight of capitalism is not based on a lack of production, but on the lack of purchasing power of people. If the big businesses cared about bringing the economy out of the crisis, they need only to find a way for people to earn more.

 

For this reason I wrote the article Let’s Remove Unemployment where I offered shortening working hours proportionally to the unemployment rate. In this way, the ratio of jobs to workers would be equal. That would establish a fair market of work which would justly regulate the salaries of workers and profits of employers. In such an economy, the owners of companies would have to attract workers by increasing wages. The increased purchasing power of workers would increase the trade of goods and services, and that would bring businesses higher profits and would pull the economy out of the crisis.

 

But it would also reduce the economic dependence of workers on businesses. That would free workers from fear of their financial future. Workers would no longer be interested in fighting wars for the interests of big business around the world, for example. Big business is not interested in making money because it already has all the money; it has an interest in controlling the people, and its best bet is during a crisis. And that is the main reason the economic crises exist. All economic crises, including the U.S. Great Depression, are incurred through monetary and interest rate manipulation of the Rothschild family. Webster Griffin Tarpley wrote about that. Through economic crisis, the Rothschilds force independent entrepreneurs to bankruptcy and cheaply take their wealth. So Rothschild’s wider circle of people depend on their power. Then workers, through fear for their own future, silently accept unfairly low wages and their own powerlessness. And if they rebel against the injustice that is happening to them, they at best can abolish the government, but that can change nothing. The policy controlled by the big business remains the same.

 

The shortening of working hours proportionally to the unemployment rate should be the first idea to come to the mind of an independent thinker to reduce the suffering of workers and improve the economy and society. But such a view is nowhere to be seen. Why? Because it is forbidden by the conspiracy of the Rothschild family. Such an idea would start a transformation of society towards a better socio-economic system. That is why such an approach cannot be heard at universities or in media. None of the media, including those on the left, wanted to publish my article “Let’s Remove Unemployment.” Why? Because most of them are controlled by big business and the rest is influenced by imposed knowledge. The brainwashed people do not believe that such a simple measure can fix society and economy in the first place because they’ve never heard for it. An idea that does not have access to the public cannot be accepted by political parties either. So the cycle of powerlessness never ends.

 

But why did Soros call the Marxists when he knew that they were the greatest enemies of capitalism? Then I realized that they are not afraid of Marxists. Probably half the professors of sociology in the Western world are Marxists. They openly teach Marxist philosophy in universities, which would not have been possible if Marxism could undermine capitalism in any way. I am deeply convinced that the Rothschilds consciously manipulate the Marxist-oriented professors by putting them on the wrong path. This way, they reduce the possibility of the appearance of an excellent left-social system that could defeat capitalism. I wrote about it in the article Marx still prevents the progress of society.

 

This conspiracy was established a long time ago. Apparently, Lenin returned to Russia from exile with suitcases full of money. The reason? Russian Czar Nicholas Romanov angered the Rothschilds with his support of the American government in conflict with the Bank of England. Besides, the Russian Czar allegedly repaid the debt to the international bankers and did not want to continue to borrow money from them. That was enough for the Rothschilds to finance the revolution. Marxism is planned for disobedient countries. In the West, the revolutions were prevented by the murder of the Marxist leaders. Rosa Luxembourg for example. A similar thing is happening to Syria right now. This is possible only because no one can imagine that the Rothschild family is behind all of it. They realize their interests through the financing of crimes because no one can connect the crimes with them.

 

The Rothschilds have imposed a system of education that makes people stupid. I am not exaggerating. Such education helps them to stay in power and rule over society. How did they do it? They have been supporting mistaken scientists for centuries who develop wrong or insufficiently right knowledge, and by the help from politics which they also control, they have imposed such knowledge to the system of education. Almost all social scientists may belong to such a group including Karl Marx. Sigmund Freud is a supported creator of the unsuccessful theory of psychoanalysis, which is mostly rejected. The philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche was supported in developing a wrong philosophy from the standpoint of creating a good society. Less well-known Bell, Weinberg, and Hammersmith are promoted in the development of the theory of homosexuality registered in the genetic code. I’ve shown that this theory is wrong in the article Homosexuality. These scientists have become authorities mostly with the help of the Rothschilds.

 

University students have been forced to accept the incorrect or not enough correct knowledge of such authorities if they want to pass exams. Intellectuals who have taken such knowledge became incompetent and could not find an escape from the problems of society. The best students of the wrong or insufficiently correct sciences became the most influential people in the community and then spread false knowledge. In this way, the Rothschilds have produced weak and useless sciences. I wrote more about it in the article My Clash with Sciences. Scientists who are deeply influenced with false knowledge cannot improve the world; nor understand or accept progressive ideas. That is the reason the world cannot move forward.

 

Conspiracy has affected food production as well. In my article Epilogue, I wrote that indications exist that the Rothschild family deliberately poisons food to produce food cheaply and make more profits. Thus also hire medical and pharmaceutical industries more, over which they have control too. Furthermore, health care and the pharmaceutical industry are not keen enough to treat people honestly, because healthy people are not spending money on medical treatment. There are indications that the Rothschilds deliberately poison people with food to reduce the Earth’s population. William Engdahl in his book Seeds of Destruction states that the expansion of genetically modified crops and food all over the world today, have reached that scope that can and must be proclaimed as “genocide, crimes against humanity.” Dr Peter Gøtzsche exposes big pharma as organized crime. The Canadian Cancer Society warns of a rapid increase in cancer cases and predicts that every other Canadian will become ill through their lives. Causes of cancer are hardly researched and discussed because every debate will accuse new manufacturing technologies and could accuse corporations that make money at the expense of people’s lives.

 

The conspiracy of the Rothschild family has reached every pore of today’s society. Only cooperative people, those who follow the interests of big business have access to the media and are in influential positions in society. They are obedient because they are corrupted by their positions in society and by the markedly high living standards that the system gives to them. People believe that these corrupted individuals deserve everything because of their hard work and skills, but this is not true. They are only pawns of the people who actually run society. But that is not all, the Rothschilds control their opposition as well. They corrupt fighters for justice who publicly confront the existing system but do nothing to change it. They took control over the “Occupy” movement. Also, they like to support indoctrinated fighters for justice who are unable to make progress. Noam Chomsky, for example, is an honest fighter for justice, but has his fight helped humankind? Has he offered a solution that might improve the situation around the world? He has not. And so the Rothschilds must love his contribution to the betterment of humankind. While people who might improve society, like me for example, do not have financial support, do not have access to universities, media, or politics, and cannot help. Every day you can see all kinds of published nonsense, but my philosophy that defines the bright future of humanity has no access anywhere. Everything is based on a deep conspiracy. People who believe media and follow fighters for “justice,” actually work in favour of their own powerlessness.

 

This article has been sent to hundreds of news publishers and was published only by Veterans Today. Why? A large number of editors do not believe in conspiracies, those who believe are afraid of the Rothschild family (unfortunately, influential RT is among them), and the rest are controlled by the Rothschilds. Even the media specialized in conspiracies did not want to publish it because their primary task is to write nonsense ordered by the Rothschild family.

The conspiracy is completely hidden, so the public does not know anything about it. It is possible that only Jacob Rothschild has access to the entire conspiracy. He has far more power than any emperor in the history of humankind, but nobody knows it. I believe that his wife thinks he is just a successful businessman. Even his son Nathaniel, until recently, did not know how influential his father was. When he learned that he would inherit his power, he suddenly transformed from an irresponsible adventurer to a very successful “independent” businessman. Of course, a narrow circle of his family was acquainted with the conspiracy, as well as several other family members, including, of course, David Rockefeller, who rules in the name of Rothschild over the United States. In the hierarchy below them, no one, I repeat, no one, I believe not even Soros, knows how powerful Jacob Rothschild really is. That is why the conspiracy remains undiscovered.

 

So then, how have I discovered how powerful Jacob Rothschild is? Around the turn of the millennium, I became convinced that the Rothschilds rule the Western world by studying various documents on the Internet. Many papers and the genealogy of the Rothschild family suggest that the London branch manages the whole family. A variety of statements, articles, and documents indicate that Jacob is the head of the London branch. That is how I realized that Jacob Rothschild is the secret ruler of the Western world. He suits the role perfectly as a quiet man mostly known for his love of arts and flowers. This image is, of course, built up so that no one would have thought that he could be the leader of a global conspiracy. I have no substantial evidence against Jacob Rothschild because it is impossible to collect it without the help of governments. State governments are corrupted, incompetent, or afraid of the power of corporations, so they have no intention to search for evidence and accuse Jacob Rothschild. By finishing my research, I concluded that there might be only a 0.1% chance that he is not at the head of the conspiracy hierarchy and a 0% chance that he is not among the top five. Jacob Rothschild is certainly guilty for the conspiracy against humankind.

 

The situation in the world is only getting worse, and so I have decided to act. It makes no sense to attack presidents, governments and corporations under media accusations of evil in the world because they are only highlighted puppets Jacob Rothschild has managed and protected. This article is not proof against the Rothschilds, but it provides sufficient information and explanations that, beyond a reasonable doubt, can and should invite public prosecutors to launch an investigation against the Rothschilds. But this requires political will, which corrupted governments do not have. Therefore, the sad situation in the world does not change. We must not allow evil to act freely. This article’s task is to inform people about what is happening in the world, and I expect the unsatisfied people to exert political pressure on their governments to launch an investigation against the Rothschilds. Or choose new governments that will show the courage to initiate such an investigation. Once the Rothschild family is accused of the crime, the crime will end. Then, the evil in the world will end as well.

 

Written 20.12.2012

Updated 29.11.2016

 

February 26, 2024. Today, Jacob Rothschild, the secret ruler of the Western world, died. From now on, his son, Nathaniel Rothschild, takes his secret position while pretending to be an ordinary citizen.

 

Recently, it came to my mind that the family may be successfully debunked by going after seemingly benign conspiracies, such as Chemtrails, Global Warming, or Flat Earth. Flat Earth is one of the most successful conspiracies ever, making people believe they are bright while the Rothschild family controls them by manipulating public information. People who spread seemingly benign conspiracies would more readily admit who pays them than those who commit crimes. Investigators just need to follow the money that drives the spread of conspiratorial ideas. The Western world is obviously controlled by one center, and according to me, nobody else but the Rothschilds has the power to make it happen.

 

Continues on Mayan prophecy is true.

See also Has Antichrist Come?

References:

The Truth Behind The Rothschild Family: World’s Only Trillionaires

2005.03.27

Let’s finish with capitalism

The new system I have proposed would offer much more market than capitalism can afford. In the first place, a permanently open labour market will be established. Each public work post will have to be given to the worker who envisages and offers the highest productivity at any time. Productivity could be measured by earned money, by quality and quantity of produced goods, or by productivity evaluation of workers by customers. A worker who offers more profits, manufactured goods, and better or cheaper production will get the job.


That is an idea. How to make such changes to bring the most possible advantages and the least possible disadvantages to society is just a technical question. I have defined a pretty good solution in my book Humanism, but that is what would probably be much more developed by the practice. Today a labour market almost does not exist. Once a developed labour market starts to work, it will bring higher productivity, disalienation, balance among people’s needs, harmony to the people, benefits to society beyond the wildest dreams today.


No economy can be more productive than the one where the best available worker gets each job. Such an economy will easily become significantly more productive than the capitalist one so that the latter will be forced to recede.


In a good society, a human being is a central value and not capital. When capitalism is done humanism will step in, and an unthinkably better future of humankind will start.


Mayan Prophecy

Mayan Prophecy is True

Before reading this article it would be a good idea to read Jacob Rothschild is guilty for the conspiracy against humankind. A good society will be much easier to establish when the Rothschild family is stopped. It’s not hard to do. People who face increasing problems of living, mainly protest and demonstrate on the streets of cities around the world. I must tell that the protests against governments are useless because governments are just predetermined, scapegoats. Nothing would be better if people replace a head of state or government. Protests against corporations and banks also cannot bring success, because they are only tools of power. People should demonstrate against the Rothschilds because they are to blame for all the problems. Once accused, they will retreat into defence, which will allow for a better tomorrow.


If you people, want to relieve the colonial chains you must stop Jacob Rothschild. Syrians, peace and justice cannot arrive in your country until you stop Jacob Rothschild. Iranians, if you want the West to let you live in peace, you must stop Jacob Rothschild. Serbs, if you want to cleanse your name, you must stop Jacob Rothschild. If your country is over-indebted and riddled with high and imposing taxes, Jacob Rothschild is as guilty for it because he corrupts politicians. Workers, if you want to ensure the right to work, you must stop Jacob Rothschild. He deliberately keeps the unemployment rate high to pay you less for your work. Folks, if you had any problem that has affected you, Jacob Rothschild is guilty of it. If you live in poverty, Jacob Rothschild is guilty because he seizes the money that should belong to you. If you, or your loved ones, have been a victim of crime, Jacob Rothschild is guilty because he has built a criminal society. If you’ve lost someone close in the war, Jacob Rothschild is guilty because he is the primary initiator of wars. If you are hungry anywhere in this world, Jacob Rothschild is guilty because he builds an immoral society. If your spouse has left you, Jacob Rothschild is accountable for it because he has created an unhealthy society. If you are not the most significant authority for your children, Jacob Rothschild is guilty because he breaks families. If you are sick, if you are high or drunk, Jacob Rothschild is guilty because he formed a sick society. If you are dissatisfied and unhappy, Jacob Rothschild is guilty because he does not allow the formation of a healthy community. Folks, even if you lack nothing, you would not be mistaken if you fight against Jacob Rothschild, because he builds a very uncertain future.

My voice is not strong enough, because I have not access to the media, so I ask kindly for your help. I made up this poster, which accuses Jacob Rothschild. Get it by clicking on the image above or on this link. Create a picket sign from it. When you decide to demonstrate against anyone, anywhere, bring that picket sign with you because Jacob Rothschild is undoubtedly directly or indirectly guilty for what ails you. You may also attach this poster on the rear windows of your car or print it on a T-shirt. Show to the world that you are tired of injustice and evil. You people have the power; you just need to use it. If a sufficient number of you people carry this poster, it will send a strong message to society that will stop the Rothschilds and open the gates for the creation of a much better future for mankind.


It would not be wrong, for instance, if you come and bring the posters to the front of Waddesdon Manor, Buckinghamshire, England, where Jacob Rothschild lives. Go there and accuse him of the evil that has befallen on you. Inform RT (Russian Television) about it. They will be happy to broadcast your demonstration worldwide. Russian TV is the biggest thing that the Russian government has made because it is probably the only influential television in the west independent of the Rothschild family.


I am convinced that Jacob Rothschild is a coward. He has lived far too comfortably that he could be brave. Once you people start demonstrating against him and accusing him of his crimes, he will be scared and will stop committing evil. This statement, of course, leads me to danger. In this regard, I declare: If by some chance I get struck by lightning while I am walking my dog Meda, or if I eat a green salad with polonium dressing, or something like that happens to me, I want you to know that I accuse Jacob Rothschild of that.


Under the influence of the Rothschild family, you people persistently choose a very complicated option that cannot solve any of the social problems of the world. My philosophy is, and it will resolve all the social issues of the world. Once you begin to examine my philosophy, the Rothschilds will not have any chances.


My philosophy is based on equal rights among people. Only equal rights among the people can build a bright future for humankind. To be more explicit, as long as privileges exist there cannot be equal rights among people, and society can not solve its problems. It cannot be good. There are only one “equal rights,” and I have defined them. Equal rights among the people will save this world from evil and build a paradise on earth. In this paradise evil will no longer exist, no one will fear for their future. All people will be happy and satisfied. The changes will be so significant that practically nothing will remain the same. The history before the implementation of my social system will be called barbarism and from the implementation will be called civilization.


My philosophy will realize the messianic prophecy. This means that I am messiah Aleksandar. According to the Mayan prophecy, the Messianic changes are expected to start today, 21.12.2012. That is why I published this article just today. Today, by this action against Jacob Rothschilds I have begun a movement of transformation in society. I do not know when the change will occur, but I know that it will happen because there is no other alternative for the realization of a good society.


21.12.2012


2005.03.24

Let’s decide alone about our taxes

Taxes have a purpose to serve the collective needs of people. People should determine such needs, but they have almost nowhere the influences on the creation of tax policy. For example, workers were never asked how much they would like to pay for taxes. What is even worse, they do not have an influence on how the tax money will be spent. Formally, this spending is provided by governments and parliaments. Yes, we choose our governments democratically following their proposals at elections. But we cannot rely much on it because they rarely keep their promises. For example, I have never heard any governments proposed tax increases at elections; however, the practice shows that taxes grow.

 

The Governments are supposed to use the tax money to follow the interests of the people, but they don’t. The control over the accumulated wealth through taxes gives the most significant power in the state, and the governments tend to spend the tax-collected money in the way they like. However, even governments do not have the most significant control over this money. In the western world, rich people have the most significant power. They have invented a very developed mechanism that gives them control over everything including the tax-collected money. The mechanism starts with friendly advice and lobbying of governments and representatives in parliaments and finishes with corruption and blackmailing. They are very successful in it, and that means the collective spending follows the interests of a few and not of the people. This is not fair. We all pay taxes, but only some have the power to use it. That must be changed.

 

In the new system, I have proposed, nobody will be able to take the power that belongs to the people. Each person will have the right to participate directly in creating the tax policy. Each person will do it by splitting their own gross income into a part intended for their personal spending and a part intended for taxes. All of the workers will break their salaries in such a way. The total sum of the money intended for taxes to the community will form the total amount of money for taxes. This amount will then be collected from workers according to their income heights. Maybe I was not clear enough: The individuals will not pay taxes in the amount that they want, they will participate in creating the total amount of tax money, and then this money will be taken from workers according to their income height.

 

In the same manner, the people can make the further allocation of the tax money for the various common expenses groups. It could be money for health care, education, building new objects or infrastructure, etc. Theoretically, the people can further decide on the distribution of the funds inside the groups as long as they have interests in it. Managers will perform the final disposition. They will make the best possible money distribution for people because they will pay their responsibilities for doing it to the people by receiving evaluations for their work from the people.

 

The new tax policy will significantly contribute to the development of society without a matter of what kind of decisions the people will make about taxes. Following the living experience, people will learn how much money needs to be allocated for taxes and what is the best way to spend it. They will obviously allocate more money in the fields of their most substantial interests. In such a simple way the public spending will most efficiently follow the interests of the people and the people will be most satisfied with it. Once the people get the power to decide about taxes and how the collected money would be spent, nobody will be able to take this power from them because they would not allow it.