Alienation
A person naturally seeks more power to overcome their inherent weaknesses and achieve greater conveniences. Greater knowledge yields greater power. But gaining knowledge is neither easy nor quick. On the path to creating greater conveniences, a person often makes subjective judgments about unknown phenomena in nature that suit them well. If such determinations do not directly conflict with nature, a person readily accepts them as real. They recognize its usefulness in the same way they overcome their powerlessness in nature. In this way, they create knowledge alienated from objective reality. This is the basis of my theory of alienation.
Authorities often deliberately create an alienating knowledge to achieve supremacy in society. Dominion is one of the highest forms of alienation because, in a person's subjective consciousness, power creates an impression of superiority over nature. Once a person thinks they have more power than they objectively deserve, they realize the illusion of great advantages.
To establish power over people, authorities create ideologies that define societal values and rules for collective action. Ideologies can be justified when the rules they create prevent chaos in society. That is how all religions and all political systems have been created. The negative side of ideologies stems from the fact that they always support the interests of their creators and provide them with power in society. Thus, they alienate the creators of ideologies and people from their own nature. Society's alienation from its own nature cannot lead to positive outcomes. In fact, all evil in this world comes from society's alienation from its nature.
Good results can come only from equal rights for all people. Equal rights among people will form objective values in society. It will remove the alienation and establish a good society. I have developed an ideology based on equal human rights, but authorities prevent its formation because, by definition, they hold power. Equal rights among people have been oppressed throughout human history, and that is why a good society has never been established.
Instead, we have continuous struggles between authorities who are striving to establish power in society. On this planet Earth, there has never been enough space for all the people who want control over others. That is why envy, hatred, conflict, and war appear among alienated people, and entire nations suffer.
The Rothschild family
The Rothschild banking family recognized long ago that direct power over people could be inconvenient and concluded that it would be more efficient, lasting, and safer to rule by using money. The Rothschild banking family has developed the ideology of capitalism. Mayer Amschel Rothschild had allegedly said in 1790: “Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes the laws.” The Rothschild family makes strategic decisions for society by using money they have earned through banking and other businesses over generations. They do not bear responsibilities to society for doing that. That is the primary source of alienation in the Western world today.
The Rothschilds continued this tradition by imposing alienating rules to social life and by preventing the natural way of living that could disalienate the world in which we live. Alienation is mainly built up through the political system, education, and media propaganda. The Rothschild family controls all of these systems through the people they help, finance, or employ.
In the article Has Antichrist come? I wrote about the conspiracy that the Rothschild family raised against the whole world. Here I enclose the YouTube video Zeitgeist – The Movie: Federal Reserve, which convincingly presents the basis of the conspiracy theory. The Rothschild family has secretly succeeded in mastering the Western world more than any emperor in history. This means the power that should belong to the people today is alienated from them, regardless of the form of democracy established.
The Rothschild family began financing kings in the 18th century, and as a result, entire kingdoms owed them money. No job is better than lending money to states because citizens pay back the debt through state taxes, with interest, of course. During the Napoleonic Wars, the Rothschilds allegedly manipulated the English stock market and took the people's wealth for a bargain. They also managed to establish control over the Bank of England. At that time, the Rothschilds were convincingly the wealthiest people in the world. Today, they are nowhere on the list of millionaires. How is this possible? They hide their wealth and power.
The Rothschild family was probably the first family to organize operations worldwide. They couldn't manage all the businesses themselves, so they hired expert agents to lead their companies. These agents received a share of company ownership and became partners. The Rothschild family probably hired the Rockefeller and Morgan families in the United States in the nineteenth century. If the owners of the world’s largest corporations, such as Rockefeller, Morgan, and Warburg, were independent of the Rothschild family, they would, given the competitive nature of entrepreneurs in capitalism, fight each other. However, they do not.
They are one body, with the Rothschild family as the head, as they conquered the business world a century before their partners entered it. Through the 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries, the Rothschild family created an entire hierarchical structure of partners, and they continue to do so today. Some call this structure Masons, and its hierarchical top is the Illuminati. For nearly three centuries, the Rothschild family and their partners could have bought half the world without anyone knowing.
In 1913, the Rothschilds gained control of the American Federal Reserve Bank with the help of corrupt politicians. This is the U.S. central bank, and it is privately owned. The bank lends money to the U.S. government, and the U.S. people return it with interest through taxes. But not only that, the U.S. spends more money than the Rothschilds and their partners have at their disposal, so that the American Federal Reserve Bank prints money out of thin air, lends it to the U.S. Government, and then collects it back with interest. This masterpiece of deception has been operating since 1913.
The Rothschilds have imposed a restrictive monetary policy on practically the entire Western world. This policy prevents governments from issuing money to cover their own budget deficit. The justification is that printing money creates inflation, causing money to lose value, and that money is fundamentally important in the capitalist world. States that pursue restrictive monetary policy must cover budget deficits by borrowing from banks, and in that way, the Rothschilds again collect profits.
Countries mostly borrow money from the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. These are supranational institutions in which the American Federal Reserve Bank has a significant role, influence and interest. That’s how the Rothschilds impose their will over the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. Because many countries depend on help from these banks, the Rothschilds can easily impose their will on them. In that way, the Rothschilds rule and exploit almost the whole world. Of course, states must repay debts with interest, which usually means these countries borrow more and the Rothschilds become richer.
The Rothschilds also control commercial banks, which lend to individuals and companies in the Western world. Most people buy houses and cars with credit, companies borrow working capital from banks, and the Rothschilds realize tremendous profits. With that money, they buy valuable companies worldwide.
But that is not all; by controlling money worldwide, the Rothschilds have become masters of the global economic crisis. They encourage investments of people with low interest rates. When a private business expands, it raises the interest rate and reduces the amount of money in circulation. This reduces people's purchasing power and thus deliberately creates an economic crisis. Then, companies go bankrupt en masse, and the Rothschilds buy the ones they need cheaply. The Rothschilds also profit from the increased number of unemployed workers who accept poorly paid jobs to feed their families, bringing them more profit.
Alienation of policy
Under pressure from international financial institutions, various organizations and media propaganda, most of the presidents of countries around the world obediently follow the interests of the Rothschild family. If a head of state opposes the Rothschild family and decides to defend the country’s independence, Rothschild agents can start a civil war in that country. They started the civil war in Yugoslavia. I wrote more about this in the article "My Debt to Yugoslavia." The Rothschild agents attempt to bring every country in the world under their control, including Russia and China. The American and British secret services, backed by the Rothschild family, undoubtedly helped cause all the problems in these countries.
In an extreme case of disobedience, the presidents of countries lose their lives. As an example, the President of the U.S., John Kennedy, lost his life. The reason could be his Executive Order 11110, which closed the system of the Federal Reserve and ordered the U.S. Government to restore the constitutional mandate over the control of money. Although Kennedy never mentioned the Rothschilds by name, his speech calls for fighting the conspiracy. Shortly after that, John Kennedy was assassinated. An investigation of the murder was very doubtful, according to Michael Parenti in the article The JFK Assassination: Defending the Gangster State.
The disobedient President of Romania, Nicolae Ceaușescu, Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic, the President of Iraq, Saddam Hussein and before them many others were also killed. Of course, these and similar cases make governments worldwide very obedient. The Rothschild family also controls parliaments worldwide. Please see a very interesting video on the Israeli lobby in America that shows how the American Israel Public Affairs Committee affects the creation of US policy. Through the control of governments and parliaments, the Rothschild family influences the formation of laws worldwide. They, of course, correspond to the Rothschild business and are entirely alienated from people's needs.
The Rothschilds have built an entire hierarchical structure of agents that realize their interests. The senior agents founded the Bilderberg group, which meets once a year to coordinate policies to be implemented in the Western world. The group directs the programs of work to the heads in politics, banking, business, the military and media. These meetings are closed to the public. One should not be particularly bright to understand that such a policy has nothing to do with democracy. It is wholly alienated from the people. These meetings are no longer secret, which means the Rothschilds create an elite that allows them to rule the world.
President Obama attended a Bilderberg Group meeting, where he coordinated his program with the needs of the world’s rulers. If he did not do so, he would not have received support from his own Democratic Party, without which he would not have had the chance to become president. After President Bush, the Rothschilds wanted a more humane president to tranquillize the dissatisfied American people. To this end, they agreed to make small concessions to the people, but the policy would not change significantly.
Obama promised in the election campaign to end the military intervention in Iraq in the first place because there is no need for the war anymore, since the disobedient Saddam Hussein was removed. Now the Rothschilds need peace to exploit Iraqi oil. They will navigate government corruption, as well as contracts and loans for rebuilding the ruined country.
Obama also announced the extension of military intervention in Afghanistan on the grounds that such action is necessary to prevent acts of terrorism in the world. I think the reason for the aggression lies in the fact that Afghanistan does not agree to be a colony of anyone, and as such cannot be exploited. In support of the aggression against Afghanistan, President Obama likely won some concessions in health care insurance for the US people. That is called a democracy today.
Alienation of the economy
The market economy is based on profits, and therefore, it values profits above people. This is an alienation that develops inequality in society and brings injustice in the process of production, the division of labour and the distribution of incomes. In a good enterprise, employees generally cannot participate in the division of profits. However, in a bad enterprise, workers face lower incomes or job losses, and they can do nothing. Relations between employers and workers are also immoral because employers buy work and workers sell their own labour. Thus, the workers become commodities, and that is unacceptable. Because a person in the market economy is not accepted as a value, manufacturers shamelessly exploit workers to achieve higher profits.
Alienation of sciences
Education thoroughly carries out alienation. Throughout history, the authorities of science have attempted to define the authenticity of nature by writing an indefinite number of books. But they often failed, so they alienated science from objective reality. The natural sciences remain satisfactory because their development brings profits. Social sciences are completely suppressed because changes in the social system do not suit the authorities. Social sciences should carry social improvement, but they are so alienated from their purpose that they do not even try to find solutions that could improve society. They are useless. If someone abolishes sociology, political science, and philosophy as sciences tomorrow, no damage will have happened. Indeed, that would benefit society because people would no longer rely on useless authorities in the social sciences. They would start thinking for themselves.
Authorities generally do not need smart people, but obedient followers. They use education to conquer students' thoughts and turn them into tools in their own hands. Authorities keep useless sciences because they support the system that lets authorities exercise privilege. It does not matter what ideology is behind it. All the authorities want power and do not allow people to free themselves from it. Teachers' evaluation of students’ knowledge supports an authoritarian system in which authorities hold power over people. As a result, education today is disconnected from society's natural needs. It is very bureaucratic, too long, and unnecessarily complicated.
Students are forced to accept useless, alienating knowledge on which today’s society has been built if they want to succeed. The more time students spend in school, the more alienated knowledge they accumulate, making it harder for them to understand society's objective laws and accept changes in the social system. Authorities know that, and thus they reassure the alienated order they imposed. Then, authorities recruit the best students, known as excellences, to implement the policies imposed on society. These “excellences” are programmed so they cannot accept anything more than cosmetic changes to acquired knowledge.
Now you may conclude how wrong the statement is that the current education system is essential for human development. Virtually everyone around the world adopts it. The primary function of the educational system is to ensure that people prove they are obedient followers of authorities, making them eligible to work in an alienated society. Today’s education harms human development because it alienates students from their own nature and turns them into living machines.
People who believe in authorities and obediently follow them cannot achieve a good life, firstly, because authorities generally represent their own interests. Second, by blindly following authorities, they neglect their own senses and abilities to find the right path. They alienate themselves from their own nature, from themselves. As a result, the social sciences are so unsuccessful today that they cannot recognize my work. The only reasonable solution for humankind and education is so ineffective that it prevents people from recognizing my work as the only good solution for humanity.
The Rothschild family likes useless sciences because they distance people from real problems, and therefore, the Rothschilds strongly support the development of such sciences. With the help of the authorities, they kept it under control and managed the education system as well. Misinformed people may think control over education is harmless, but in reality, it severely affects humankind's future.
Alienation of media
The Rothschild agents do not regret the money they spent to control the media because, by controlling it, they control public opinion. After that, they can do virtually whatever they want. The Rothschild family started by controlling newspapers and then television. You may have noticed how quickly the big television station CNN was created, for example, and that from the start it had substantial financial resources and has propagated the values wealthy people advocate throughout the world. Such TV stations run “excellences” that are well trained to represent the interests of big capitalists while simultaneously avoiding confrontation with the needs of the people. The only people with access to the media are corrupted by the system and have no intention of changing anything.
By the time you think you have decided which candidate to vote for, representatives of the wealthy have already decided it for you. Everything you know about the candidates has come to you through the media they control. It is not even particularly relevant to wealthy people which candidate you will vote for because all candidates will implement their will anyway. It is important to them, though, to convince you that you have the “freedom” to make your own decisions and that they will make you happy while following their will. They prepare you for your “good” decisions practically from birth, and they do it so cleverly that you cannot notice.
Through everyday propaganda, the media convince people that money is the biggest, if not the only, value. Money is a medium of exchange that regulates the market for goods and services. Therefore, objectively, it is a value, but in today’s alienated society, this value is much exaggerated. If you think about it, you'll see that air is undoubtedly more valuable than money, because without air, there would be no us. But no one, or almost no one, considers air a value, mainly because it cannot be privatized and nobody can make money from it.
Person-to-person relationships should be the most significant value, but money gives power over people, which undermines the importance of individuals. Love and friendship are indeed natural values, but money as a value brings out greed that destroys love and friendship. Overestimating the value of money brings alienation in every pore of society and social relations. People who accept money as the highest value under the pressure of propaganda are great enemies to themselves because they act against their own nature and against the nature of the society in which they live.
Events that are not convenient to the Rothschild family, such as my philosophy, do not reach the Western media, and therefore do not reach the people. Western media are uniform and selective in their presentation of global events, suggesting they are controlled by a narrow circle of people. It comes to mind, for example, that the Serbs were accused of ten years of ethnic cleansing in the former Yugoslavia in virtually all the Western media. At the same time, Turkey committed ethnic cleansing of Kurds that has passed almost unnoticed by the media. As a result, Serbia was bombed due to “public pressure,” and Turkey did not suffer any sanctions. What was the essential difference? Serbia refused to obey the dictates of the Western world, and Turkey was cooperative, like most countries around the world.
Since the Internet appeared, the Rothschilds have tried to gain the most considerable influence in this field as well. Their agents buy influential websites and quickly create new ones to try to control the distribution of information on the Internet. Recently, I was particularly attracted to the websites change.com, changemakers.com, and GOOD.is, among others. All these websites call for positive change in society and are allegedly particularly interested in helping disempowered people at the bottom of the “pyramid.” But it is just a mask. Behind all these websites lies a powerful organization of private sponsors with their own interests.
Changemakers.com has published some of my articles and accepted two of my projects in contests for new ideas: Humanistic enterprises and Democratic anarchy (they have since been deleted). But they ignore my work. The Rothschilds ignore my ideas and everyone else’s that propose fundamental change to the world, and they drown them in a sea of other ideas. Not one idea in the competition at changemakers.com can compare with mine, but the “excellences” of the alienated education system cannot see it. The Rothschilds count on the inability of people whom they have raised for generations.
Also, the Rothschilds could have bought half the world in the last three centuries and could thus directly control half of humankind. The managers of their companies and organizations may not realize they are agents of the Rothschilds. Still, they are well aware of their privilege and are reluctant to do anything that might upset their employers. Thus, the Rothschilds prevent the acceptance of new ideas that can improve society. Websites that advocate changes in society, along with most left-leaning media sponsored by companies or organizations, would most likely prevent changes from happening.
The Rothschilds like the “resistance” provided by the “excellences” they have raised. Naomi Klein, for example, wrote the book “No Logo.” In this book, she calls upon people to boycott goods from brands such as Nike because this emerging multinational corporation thrives enormously at the expense of cheap labour in developing countries. The Rothschilds are very likely Nike's owners and should not support such writing. So why do the media and publishers support her work? Because the chance of her idea succeeding is practically nonexistent. The Rothschilds adore helpless critique and help it. Such ideas create the illusion of freedom of public expression, leading society into a struggle that cannot succeed.
There are many “excellences” that advocate human rights, women’s rights, gay rights, and the rights of the poor who are also supported by the agents of the Rothschild family, because all these people cannot achieve success in improving this world. They help the Rothschilds because they fill public space so much that work to improve society cannot break through.
***
If my work becomes more public, the Rothschild family's real power will come into play. Two years ago, Google opened a competition inviting good ideas that can change the world. I entered the competition alongside more than 150,000 other projects. After two years, Google announced the winner, and my work wasn't among them. Why? Google does not want to accept my ideas because they present the end of capitalism, the very system on which Google has been established. But my project does not threaten Google or its owners in any way. My project will inevitably one day change the world and make it a beautiful place to live. Not accepting such work is immoral. Why is it so important for Google to defend capitalism? I think that the decision about the competition was made above Google. The Rothschilds have significant influence in all companies, including Google, even if they are not the principal shareholders. The Rothschilds, together with their agents, defend capitalism at any cost.
The Rothschild family also shapes the culture of the whole world. If you pay attention, you can notice that countries have unique fashion, music, film, and television programs. Thus, countries become cultural colonies of the Rothschilds. You can recognize this by shows like “Who Wants to Be A Millionaire” or “American Idol” airing all around the world. A unique culture creates a unique orientation of people and thus facilitates the work of great manipulators. This culture aims to capture people’s thoughts rather than give them the freedom to determine what is good for them. It gives them “answers” to all their questions and offers them everything they “need.”
Today’s culture propagates illusions, immorality, superficiality, kitsch, gossip, violence, cruelty, greed, shallowness, artificiality, and the situation is getting worse every day because the media cannot offer anything better. Today’s society is profoundly alienated from its nature and therefore inherently adopts distorted values. It cannot recognize correct values because people have been living without freedom for generations and were systematically prevented from learning how to overthrow their rulers.
***
The Rothschild conspiracy prevents the development of civilization and degenerates human beings. It is the way to total alienation, to the eruption of dissatisfaction and destruction. The Rothschilds aim to dominate the whole world, and they cannot be satisfied until they achieve that goal. But this goal cannot be completed because not all people can be obedient followers, obedient consumers of ideas, images, tastes, and sounds. This is because people need freedom. People will sooner or later strongly oppose the Rothschilds because, by their nature, they cannot live in a cage even if it is made of gold.
Capitalism is profoundly immoral, and therefore, there is no hope for it. Also, capitalism has developed to the point where it can no longer achieve sufficient improvement in society; it is no longer a rational enough system and, as such, presents an obstacle to the development of civilization. In the article End of Capitalism, I explain why it is time for capitalism to end. I have also introduced the basis of the new system, Humanism, which will replace the current system. This system will also overcome alienation.
In today’s world, the meaning of the word alienation is underdeveloped. In the English-speaking world, this word is so suppressed that no word defines the condition of alienation. The expression which would put society in the opposite position of alienation is non-existent. I use this meaning a lot in my language, so I had to translate it as “disalienation” in English, even though you can't find it in the English dictionary.
The process of disalienation
There is only one exit from the alienation of today’s society, and that is the establishment of equal rights among the people. There exists only one equal right among people, or they are not equal. Partially equal rights or almost equal rights do not exist because, in that case, we are talking about unequal rights. Even slightly uneven rights create privileges with very negative consequences that eventually cause problems in society. I discuss this further in the article Privileges are evil. I define society as one with equal rights for all people. I think my philosophy is the only right way for humanity. I presented it in my book Humanism – A Philosophic-Ethical-Political-Economic Study of the Development of the Society, which is available free of charge.
Disalienation of policy
Even the poorest countries can create an independent economic policy. Such states can accumulate financial resources, however small, and compete economically with powerful countries worldwide. Good social policy is primarily based on the democratic will of citizens. Citizens can collectively decide to invest most of their financial capital in economic development while allocating only enough to improve living standards and sustain survival. This means these people would give up any luxury they consider unnecessary while they develop their economy. In this way, they would lose their dependence on private financial centers of power. That would free them from exploitation and external pressures, making them masters of their prosperity. It would also help disalienate society.
People can directly decide what percentage of their salaries they want to give to taxes. To be clear, individuals will not pay the amount they choose, but they will help determine the total tax amount, which will then be collected from people according to their incomes. Furthermore, people will decide how much of their taxes they want to allocate to national defence, public security, education, health, housing, recreation, infrastructure, etc. Through their lived experience, people will learn how much money they need to spend on taxes and the best way to spend it. In that way, people will, for the first time, directly create society's macroeconomic policy, which will form the basis for society's disalienation. Such a strategy will certainly follow people’s needs in the most efficient way and, therefore, significantly develop society.
Today, national leaders allocate most tax money to armies. When people start deciding how to allocate tax money, armies will no longer exist, and waging wars will become impossible. Once people gain the power to decide directly, they will be so pleased that they will not allow authorities to take it away from them again.
Democratic anarchy
The new system also provides a highly efficient way to hold everyone accountable for their actions. One part of the responsibilities will be based on democratic anarchy. It is a system in which each person has an equal right to evaluate any other person. A positive evaluation should bring a reward of, say, one dollar to the assessed person, and a negative rating should carry a fine of, say, one dollar. Let each person have the right to allocate three positive and three negative evaluations to other people each month. In this simple way, each person will gain real power in society and, therefore, will be respected. This measure will direct people to produce the greatest possible conveniences for others and to diminish or abolish the creation of disadvantages.
The system of democratic anarchy will especially affect authorities. The higher the position of power in society, the greater the responsibility they must bear. For example, the President of the United States can get 100 million negative evaluations from U.S. citizens for bad politics, lies, and criminal aggression against other countries. This will cost him 100 million U.S. dollars in a single month. Non-privileged presidents would no longer dare implement bad policies. And if it happens somehow, they would quickly run away from their positions. Only the most skilful and brave individuals would dare lead countries. They will no longer be authorities, but our servants. I wrote more about it in the article: The Future of Democracy.
Disalienation of the economy
Equal human rights mean every person must have the right to work. Unemployment will be eliminated by shortening working hours proportionally to the rate of unemployment. This would increase the demand for workers in the free market, so employers would have to pay them more. It will remove the exploitation of workers. I wrote more about this in the article: Let’s remove unemployment.
The system I have proposed offers more market than capitalism can afford. The market for public work posts will develop primarily. This means it will open competition among workers for every public job post, including those of politicians and the corporation's president. A worker who offers a higher profit, more goods produced, better, cleaner and cheaper production at any time for any job in public companies will get the job. I have developed a system that will efficiently valorize the productivity of job offers, harmonize work remuneration and define workers’ labour responsibilities. I elaborate the new division of work in detail in my book Humanism. For more, please read my article The Future of the Economy.
No economy can be more productive than one where the best available worker gets each job. Such an economy will easily become far more productive than a capitalist one, so capitalism will be forced to fade in history, along with the vast alienation it has built. Private companies will join the public companies, and the owners will be adequately compensated. In such a society, authorities would not be able to expand society's alienation from its very nature.
Disalienation of Education
The only thing that is hard for a person to learn is to respect people. This most critical social need disappears quickly and easily in any society, regardless of the type of education established. The democratic anarchy system I propose gives every person in the community equal power. That power is based on the same right of every person to evaluate any other person. Any positive evaluation would bring a small prize to the evaluated person, and any negative assessment would carry a minor penalty. Such a simple measure will make people respect each other. It will build a sound and sane society regardless of the education system.
People specialize in their knowledge. To acquire specialized knowledge, schools are essential. In the future, schools will no longer be places where authorities bureaucratically determine the curriculum; instead, students' interests will shape it. Schools will no longer be institutions that guarantee students the knowledge accepted today, but places where education is accessible. I have proposed a system that will require workers to take on greater responsibility at their workplaces, far more significant than is the case today. In this system, workers will not dare to compete for jobs for which they lack sufficient knowledge.
Everything else that a person should learn in his life is a product of his interest. When a person is interested in acquiring knowledge, he has no difficulty doing so if the knowledge is accessible. Students can attend any classes they want, whenever they need to. I wrote more about this in the article, "My clash with sciences."
Disalienation of families
In the animal world, parents teach young animals the basic knowledge they need. Human society has moved in the wrong direction because schools have taken away parents' right to teach children what they need to know. It is wrong, first, because the school curriculum is disconnected from children's needs. And it is even worse because directing children through life should be the task of parents, not schools. Parental love, which also shapes children's education, is one of the primary conditions for the prosperity of children and society as a whole.
To teach children the basic knowledge they need, parents must have free time to dedicate to them. Today, parents work all day and practically do not see the kids. This creates many problems. Shortly after the system I proposed is accepted, working hours would most likely be significantly shorter, giving parents far more time to devote to their children.
Another condition for establishing proper education in society is that parents love their children. In today’s alienated society, love is rare because the alienated society develops narcissism, an inferior and often somewhat perverted form of love. A lack of love is unusual in the animal world, but in human society, it is prevalent because of the enormous alienation people experience. A lack of love damages people's development and human culture. That is the reason the society in which we live is terrible. The new system I have proposed will teach people to love, fundamentally changing the community in which we live. I wrote more about it in the article Do You Love?
The disalienation of society
The disalienation of society will be realized when all people get equal rights. It will be achieved when all people have equal rights to work at any workplace, when they have equal legislative, judicial, and executive powers in society through equal rights of evaluation, and when they have the same right to participate in making decisions of common interest. These rights are entirely opposite to the rights authorities have established to rule society, and therefore cannot be adopted quickly. But there is no other reasonable way. When people accept equal rights, society will eliminate alienation, and this world will be improved beyond the wildest dreams of today.
July 25, 2010