About my failure to be recognized as a scientist
For the last 22 years, I have worked hard to create a system that would change the world and make it a beautiful place, but science does not recognize me. Why not? Well, the best answer I got came from one of the best thinkers in the world today. After we had exchanged a few e-mails about my work, he acknowledged, “You could well be right, but I simply don’t see it.” I did not want to bother him more by asking why, because I knew the answer. I have turned the social principles he was used to upside down. He is not young, and an entirely new way of thinking is not easy for him. And finally, he does not have time for me; he is wholly occupied with his work, which I respect strongly.
I have contacted hundreds of experts in the social sciences and told them I have invented a system that would provide a wonderful future for humankind. They did not respond to me. I believe most of them did not even read me. They are all very busy with their work, and besides that, they do not expect anybody to produce such a significant result, especially not an anonymous one like me. Those who found the time to read something of mine can see that my ideas have good intentions. However, they are afraid of supporting my work because they don’t have a clear vision of what the new system will bring. Without investing significant effort, they can't accept that view. The greater effort requires more trust in my work, but they don’t have it.
There is also another problem. My work says that whatever social scientists have studied in their lives would not be worth much in the future. They certainly do not like it. Besides that, they mainly cannot think independently of authority because they rely entirely on accepted knowledge from them. They do not question the correctness of the authorities’ statements in the first place because they respect them, and secondly, because without them, they might be lost entirely.
When my ideas challenge existing social knowledge, scientists will fear losing their social status. In today’s world, few fears are worse than that. Therefore, once my ideas become known to the world, I expect intense criticism rather than support from scientists. I look forward to the first attacks because they will show I am successful. Scientists cannot defeat my ideas. Besides, the new system offers them a much better life, so once the dialogue starts, the changes will come soon.
If some scientists still like my ideas, another problem arises: Scientists are not independent in the same way as other people in our so-called “free” society. They have positions, decent incomes, and they do not want to risk their good lives for the system that looks like communism. No one openly threatens them, but they know the environment is unhealthy. Authorities have introduced corruption and fear throughout the existing system. That's why I receive much more support from an average reader than from scientists. Social scientists are responsible for the world we live in today because they are supposed to solve our problems. But most of them lack the ability or the real intention to do so.
I have also engaged with various forms of media, including the movie industry. Mainstream media are proclaimed to be independent and objective. But they are privately owned and cannot operate independently of their owners. The owners have very different interests from mine. No wonder they do not want to publish my work.
Are state or non-profit media free? In fact, they are not. Please reread the previous paragraphs and find out why. I am especially disappointed with low-edition journals that publicly search for outside-the-box ideas. The result is the same everywhere. In the media, one can see numerous reports of violence, destruction, wars, terrorism, and crime, but one cannot see a story that presents a system that can solve all of these problems. (Recently, I’ve managed to achieve some success. You may see it here)
Also, one can watch movies with thousands of people killed, but cannot see my movie Good Communism – Heaven, which shows a society where people love each other and live in perfect harmony. The problem is that the movie promotes good communism, and that is not what you are allowed to see in your “free” society. We live in profound perversion, and the media teaches us to be more perverted everywhere. One may say that people who do not have freedom are not satisfied people; destructive people like to watch brutal movies.
But why don’t people have a chance to see my film, which presents a beautiful future reality based on pure science? Such a movie could open people’s eyes and help change the world. That is indeed not the interest of influential people. Once the system I have proposed starts to work, no one will want to watch brutal movies anymore. Scientists will analyze them solely to understand how sick our society is today.
Yes, I have also sent a large number of letters to movie directors, producers, screenwriters, and stars and none of them showed any interest. So, why is nobody interested in such an original scenario? The answer is straightforward; we do not live in freedom; we live in a very controlled world.
Recently, I’ve been participating in utopian competitions, and my work hasn't been recognized there. All utopias so far have been wrong. Even if that were the case with my utopia, which it will not, it still should have been awarded because it presents an entirely original system that offers a beautiful future to humankind.
Human history has recognized, let’s say, five socio-economic systems so far, and I have invented a new one, completely different from all of them. My utopia is based on all of the positive principles that history has established for utopias. It gives the answer to all social problems of society that no ideology before in the history of mankind was able to provide. It will make a paradise on earth. So why wasn't my work recognized? Some scientists were among the competition selectors, but they didn't give any reason for not choosing my work. It’s easier for them to ignore me and be silent, but it is not ethical, and they know it.
The rejection of my work is a real shame, whatever the reason. Practically, aside from two reviews from professors at Belgrade University, I have not achieved any scientific success with my work. But anyway, I am positive I am right, and therefore giving up is not an option. Right now, I average 100 visitors daily. That means I am progressing slowly, but I am progressing.